Ukraine war: Australian-made cardboard drones used to attack Russian airfield show how innovation is key to modern warfare
Innovative design choices can have a massive impact in the theatre of war, so it is important to understand the principles behind their development.
Recent use of low-cost cardboard drones by Ukraine, supplied by Australia, to attack targets in Russia is a good example of how this can work.
This article is the opinion of the author and not necessarily that of the UK Defence Journal. If you would like to submit your own article on this topic or any other, please see our submission guidelines.
Australia has been supplying Ukraine with 100 of the drones per month from March this year as part of an aid package deal worth an estimated £15.7 million, following an agreement struck in July 2021, according to the Australian Army Defence Innovation Hub.
Emerging technologies tend to override current technologies, and in turn, this generates competitive counter-technologies. This circular relationship driven by innovation is often critical in warfare as it can provide key technological advances.
Drone technology was originally developed for military use. It was then seen to offer opportunities in the civilian sphere for logistics, delivery and disaster relief. This then in turn has offered new innovations that can translate to military applications.
Conflicts in the future will be particularly shaped by drones, which will have implications for international relations, security and defence.
The Australian firm Sypaq, an engineering and solutions company founded in 1992, created the Corvo Precision Payload Delivery System (PPDS) for use in military, law enforcement, border security and emergency services, as well as food security, asset inspection and search and rescue.
Ukrainian forces reportedly used the PDDS cardboard drones in an attack on an airfield in Kursk Oblast in western Russia on August 27. The attack damaged a Mig-29 and four Su-30 fighter jets, two Pantsir anti-aircraft missile launchers, gun systems, and an S-300 air surface-to-air missile defence system.
Design principles
The design principles behind the success of the drones revolve around several factors including the production cost, airframe material, weight, payload, range, deployment and ease of use. Other considerations include the reliability of the operating software and the ability to fly the drone in various weather conditions.
Generally, small drones offer high-resolution imagery for reconnaissance in a rapidly changing theatre of war. The Corvo drone has a high-resolution camera that provides images covering a large area, transmitting footage back to its user in real time.
The importance of real-time mapping is critical in modern agile armed forces’ command and control as this can direct ground forces, heavy weapons and artillery.
In some cases, the design of small drones is concentrated on adapting the payloads to carry different types of munitions, as seen in the attack in Kursk.
The cardboard drones can carry 5kg of weight, have a wingspan of two metres and a range of 120km at a reported cost of US$3,500 (£2,750). Waxed cardboard is an ideal material as it offers weather resistance, flat-pack transportation (measuring 510mm by 760mm) and, importantly, a lightweight airframe, which enables a longer flight range and a high cruise speed of 60km/h.
Fixed-wing drones also offer longer ranges than rotor-based drones as the wings generate the lift and the airframe has less drag, so they are more energy efficient. They can also fly at higher altitudes. The drones can be launched from a simple catapult or by hand and so can be rapidly deployed.
Low-tech material, hi-tech thinking
Radar involves the transmission of electromagnetic waves, and these are reflected off any object back to a receiving antenna. Cardboard is generally harder to detect by radar – but its components, such as the battery, can be detected.
But the Corvo drone is likely to have a small signature. Radar-absorbing materials are needed to have full stealth properties. These polymers have various absorbing qualities to avoid radar detection.
Another design principle is the swarming capability of the drone. Swarms of drones can overpower air defence systems through sheer volume and or can be used as decoys in counterintelligence operations.
Swarms are highly reliant on the development of artificial intelligence, which is still an embryonic research area. But a recent drone race at ETH University in Zurich, in which AI-piloted drone beat drones controlled by world-champion drone racers, highlighted this potential.
All of these design principles and innovations have and are continuing to transform warfare and theatre operations. It is likely that small drones at low cost are likely to have further mission success in the future.
Paul Cureton, Senior Lecturer in Design (People, Places, Products), Lancaster University. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
This is brilliant. I’m trying to figure out why the cost is over 5,000 AUD. The datalink, maybe? Presumably as quantities rise, the price will fall. On one of the videos the Minister calls them IKEA drones. Great idea. Give them an unpronoucable name and sell civvy versions in IKEA!
😂 brilliant 3kg payload so 2 glass of bbq lighter fluid and ignitor with delay instant naplam drone, perfect to attack trunk, supply dumps and aircraft all for budget price.
Deserves a Blue Peter badge. Just add sticky-backed plastic.
A bog-standard claymore type mine weighs in at just under 1.6 kg. Face towards enemy with a simple blasting cap detonator actuated remotely via data link or by the camera from 50m altitude is going to put 700 x 3.2 mm steel balls down on a target with the balls travelling at 1200m/s.
Something like a modern Hailstorm mine will put 930 tungsten balls onto the target at 80m with 5 balls per m sq traveling at 2300 m/s. It will penertrate 4mm of steel. Its known as Directed Fragmentation Charge (DFC) Multi-Purpose Infantry Munition (MPIM) by NATO
My best guess is this was the type of warhead used on the recent airfield attack. That is going to shred anything in its path. It will shred the wings and upper fuselage area.
I can see these type of drones are a real threat to our infrastructure especially wind turbines it would be difficult to have any meaningful defence against these. You only need to damage the integrity of the turbine blade and the wind will do the rest. Sounds like small number of this type of drone, maybe 30 or so with the right ordinance, flight profile and hand launched from a inconspicuous vessel could take out an entire wind farm.
stick some old cluster submunitions on and use it as a dive bomber
Jon
A little late, but I suspect that military grade electronics, avionics & guidance on a drone that needs no post launch operator involvement is going to cost. While it looks like a “toy”, it was designed primarily as a military / law enforcement drone. It’s not a repurposed “toy” or off the shelf professional civilian drone. I believe it was originally envisioned as a logistics drone, dropping off things like ammo to forward or isolated units. Ukraine is very good at adapting things, but I also understand the information flow has been both ways. The manufacturer has been actively modifying based on the feedback.
The sneaky Australians. The U.K. spends billions on watch keeper and Australia pulls out the arts and craft box. 😭😂
😂
😂
The UK has been doing this sort of thing too- QinetiQs KINDRED program apparently resulted in several fast prototyped drones: https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/uk-3d-printed-suicide-drone-ukraine-russia
Fantastic to see ‘low budget’ technology, being used on the battlefield. Unfortunately, armed conflict brings out the best in design and tech, and has always been the case.
Brilliant stuff 🇦🇺. Now, unfortunately, wait for it to be copied!
well as this is the first time we are seeing hitec weapon’s on a battlefield in europe, as sad as it is. as we see drones have changed the battlefield dynamites, what works the best and what does not. so there is nowhere to hide. as drones will find you. but this plane is so outstanding and made of paper.
There’s a Youtube channel that I follow called Flite Test. They make RC planes using this same material which is paper (cardboard) back expanded foam. They have made some truly massive model planes out of this stuff that use battery powered motors. Ranging from A10s, to a 20ft wingspan B17 and a huge Star Destroyer. Being from the good ol’ US of A. They have also used these aircraft to shoot BBs and drop bombs.
Its hard not to see where a nefarious group of people might use some of these designs for no good.
The below link to Youtube, shows a video of them fitting an airsoft gun to their model A10 and then using it to shoot up a model tank.
(360) A-10 Warthog VS Tank – Epic Airsoft Battle – YouTube
Looking at the size of the A10, it’s not dissimilar to the Russian Lancet drone, just saying…..
Geez foam board takes me back to art college in the 80s where we discovered and used it to make all manner of 3D stuff with that, didn’t quite see this result mind. Great material.
I wonder how well it performs in a stiff breeze
I’ll never look at a Cornflakes packet the same way ever again!