Defence Vehicle Dynamics (DVD) 2024 brought together the British Army’s latest armoured platforms—Ajax, Boxer, and Challenger 3 Main Battle Tank—demonstrating the modernisation of the UK’s land forces.

Held at the UTAC vehicle test facility in Millbrook, Bedfordshire, the event showcased the Army’s commitment to enhancing its land capabilities, ensuring the UK is equipped to face the evolving challenges of 21st-century warfare.

Major General Lizzie Faithfull-Davies, Director Land Equipment at Defence Equipment & Support (DE&S), highlighted the importance of the event, saying, “The role of DVD has always been crucial to defence procurement, encouraging collaboration between industry, our customers in the Army, and ourselves in DE&S as we collectively build a more modern and lethal Army.”

She added that having the core of the modernised Armoured Brigade Combat Teams in one place felt like a significant turning point in the delivery of the Army’s modernisation agenda.

The two-day event was an opportunity for stakeholders from the Ministry of Defence (MOD) and industry to engage in discussions, briefings, and demonstrations of the latest military technologies. These discussions focused on resilience, innovation, and enhancing capability to maintain the Army’s competitive edge. For many attendees, it was the first chance to see these state-of-the-art vehicles up close, each developed in collaboration with industry to equip the Army for current and future threats.

Colonel Jamie Hayward, Programme Director for Ajax, spoke of the vehicle’s importance in the Army’s modernisation plan: “Ajax is at the forefront of the Army’s Modernisation agenda. Alongside Boxer and Challenger 3, we’ll provide digitally enabled capability that allows the Army to face current threats.”

He highlighted Ajax’s six variants, which will help the UK maintain its role within NATO and address future challenges.

The Boxer armoured vehicle was also a key feature at DVD 2024, with Programme Director Colonel Iain Fake describing it as a “gamechanger” for the British Army. “The key selling point is its mobility,” he said, noting Boxer’s ability to self-deploy over 1,000 kilometres. Available in four configurations—including infantry carrier, command-and-control variant, specialist carrier, and ambulance—the Boxer offers unprecedented flexibility and operational reach for Army units.

The most anticipated platform at the event was the Challenger 3 Main Battle Tank, billed as the most lethal tank ever operated by the British Army.

Colonel Will Waugh, Programme Director for Challenger 3, described it as a “world-class main battle tank” and a “step-change in terms of lethality and survivability” compared to its predecessor. Waugh noted that alongside Ajax and Boxer, Challenger 3 will form the backbone of the Army’s future Brigade Combat Teams, a critical component of the UK’s warfighting capability and its contribution to NATO deterrence.

The modernised fleet of Ajax, Boxer, and Challenger 3 ensures that the British Army can operate across diverse terrains and weather conditions, using next-generation sensors to provide real-time reconnaissance and rapid response to threats.

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

33 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Lord Baddlesmere
Lord Baddlesmere (@guest_858835)
4 hours ago

Ajax will not obviously be able to make the most of its digital capability as GD have totally failed on MORPHEUS so Ajax advantages such as we are told they are – Omniscient, omnipresent real god like ISTAR capability will be lost. On top of all its other problems this doesn’t bode well for the most expensive vehicle of its type does it?

maurice10
maurice10 (@guest_858837)
3 hours ago

Good to see the three new vehicles together for the first time. In some recent pictures Ajax appeared to be fitted with additional armour? Will this be fitted as standard or like CH2 have to capability of adding armour as and when? I was impressed to note that a package had already been designed so early in the life of the machine. I’ve yet to see a similar upgrade on boxer, so this may also follow. Additional armour is already designed for CH3 as I’ve seen some pictures but I would imagine this is very similar to CH2 as the… Read more »

pete
pete (@guest_858851)
3 hours ago
Reply to  maurice10

Additional armour requires a crane to remove it for track maintenance and increases wear and tear on on transmission and running gear. Only used when required.

Tullzter
Tullzter (@guest_858838)
3 hours ago

How many ordered?

Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_858879)
1 hour ago
Reply to  Tullzter

148 CR3s, 589 Ajax (all variants), 623 Boxer (but many more are required).

Martin
Martin (@guest_858840)
3 hours ago

That list of Boxer type does not state an IFV/ICV, am i missing some thing or has that type not even been ordered yet let alone trialed?. I ask as Warrior is on its last legs and doe not have long to its full out of service date.
No over watch, or SP Mortar or AD Boxer yet, and still no ordered for RCH155. The Army showing off kit thats not even finished trials, or been built in numbers to issue to users.

Tim
Tim (@guest_858856)
3 hours ago
Reply to  Martin

I believe the boxer is replacing warrior and it’s only having a 50cal on it which is nuts I’m hoping they will see sense and realise it needs a canon ideally the 40mm that’s going on Ajax or if we have to order more Ajax and have them replace warrior I like the look of the mortar boxer that is something we need in our military

Martin
Martin (@guest_858867)
2 hours ago
Reply to  Tim

who bright idea is a Boxer with 50 cal? that will next to use less, Ajax as an IFV is good option just not sure it can carry an infantry section. As always we will something crap thats cost loads to fix we always do. Wheeled IFV bad idea.

Andrew D
Andrew D (@guest_858912)
4 minutes ago
Reply to  Martin

Not really a fan of Boxer ,do think track would be better than wheels and to go from warrior to boxer isn’t really given the Army a better deal .Sorry to say it but best IFV for our troops should of been CV90 but to late now.

Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_858891)
54 minutes ago
Reply to  Tim

Ajax is a recce vehicle, so it is not replacing Warrior, which is an infantry vehicle. Totally different. Boxer is replacing Warrior, but then you know that. It is clearly a political/monetary decision. Anyone in the Infantry, and probably the wider army too will be very disappointed to lose the chance of having a stabilised 40mm cannon per section in the AI. The army staff was supposed to propose enhanced lethality options for Boxer back in 2021 but it all went quiet. Mounted mortar is no new thing. We have mounted 81mm mortar in adapted FV 432 for as long… Read more »

Dern
Dern (@guest_858871)
1 hour ago
Reply to  Martin

Currently there are no plans to purchase a cannon armed Boxer variant. Boxer is going to the armoured infantry brigades with an RWS that takes either 50mm or (contrary to what Tim has said) 30mm GMG.

Ajax can’t replace warrior, it’s turret ring is too big, so there’s no room for dismounts in the back (even if you redesigned the interior to get rid of the electronics in that have been installed).

As ever the question is where would the money come from. WCSP was cancelled because we couldn’t fund it, so Boxer has to step into the role.

Martin
Martin (@guest_858880)
1 hour ago
Reply to  Dern

cost over what is really needed as always. Boxer has already been fitted with a full turret for other nations, so its easy enough to do. just not sure two diffirent ammo types and sizes is wise for Ajax/Boxer not a smart idea.

David Lee
David Lee (@guest_858906)
24 minutes ago
Reply to  Dern

More importantly do ajax and boxer variants have a BV

Paul.P
Paul.P (@guest_858881)
1 hour ago
Reply to  Martin

Can’t find links but I think tranche 1 Boxer provides for some Boxers to carry 80mm dismount mortars and that the next tranche will contain some 120mm turreted mortars, some of which have a direct fire capability. Could AD and Overwatch be done with Jackals? RCH155 is in development in Germany I think. My understanding is that IFV effect will be delivered a different way, using combinations of Ajax and Boxer variants.

Last edited 1 hour ago by Paul.P
Martin
Martin (@guest_858899)
39 minutes ago
Reply to  Paul.P

A lot of what ifs and may be’s just like the Army top brass bluffers

Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_858886)
1 hour ago
Reply to  Martin

Martin, you raise a very, very old point that has been debated to death on these pages. MoD very clearly announced in March 2021 that WCSP was cancelled, and that Warrior (as is) would stay in service until being replaced from the middle of this decade by Boxer. Several of the Boxer specialist carriers (about 50 as I recall) have been earmarked to carry a mortar. RCH-155 has not been ordered yet as MoD has declared that more development work is required. I have no problem with the army showing off kit that is not yet in service. Why is… Read more »

Martin
Martin (@guest_858897)
40 minutes ago
Reply to  Graham Moore

show kit it has not got to work yet, has not got operational, and most are not even built its like look what we are getting some day to distract from the shit show that the Army is. Always the same it never changes forget the now live in the future, bluff smoke and mirrors with no set in stone in service dates as they keep changing no set in stone on how many we will buy and wishy washy about what types we might get.
You should work in the MOD Pr dept where every story is fantasy.

Martin
Martin (@guest_858902)
32 minutes ago
Reply to  Graham Moore

so if its old news do we just not bother with it and pretend all is good? easy if your not the men who have man this new lack luster kit.

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_858850)
3 hours ago

Without a tracked or wheeled IFV the British army has a huge great big warrior sized hole, simply put losing the armoured infantry battalions from the heavy combined arms brigades is not really acceptable. Boxer is not a replacement for warrior, yes it’s a great vehicle for mechanised infantry, it’s not a vehicle for the armoured infantry…if they cannot order a new IFV they need to do a life extension on the warriors…then order a few less boxers at the end.

Martin
Martin (@guest_858869)
2 hours ago
Reply to  Jonathan

why no tracked ifv? what clown thought that was a good idea, we will have to buy one wheeled APC with a 50cal does not cut it.

David Lloyd
David Lloyd (@guest_858885)
1 hour ago
Reply to  Martin

Boris the buffoon scrapped the Warrior upgrade after a mere £450m had been spent on it

Martin
Martin (@guest_858901)
34 minutes ago
Reply to  David Lloyd

Were there not issues with Warrior armour and hulls conditions and that a lot things in the new turret did not work? been better to have fixed it that get a wheeled under gunned Boxer and its limits to it being wheeled. Is the Army rum by weak yes men with no balls? as its seems it is.

Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_858895)
43 minutes ago
Reply to  Martin

The clown would have been the SofS for Defence in early 2021.

Martin
Martin (@guest_858900)
37 minutes ago
Reply to  Graham Moore

And top brass that went along with it, weak men

PaulW
PaulW (@guest_858863)
2 hours ago

Can you really call 148 tanks as showing off? Then, when HMG halve that number to save money; as they usually do. God help us.

Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_858898)
39 minutes ago
Reply to  PaulW

Given that we bought 386 CR2s for the post-Cold War army, I would say that the halving activity for its successor has already happened!

Martin
Martin (@guest_858903)
30 minutes ago
Reply to  Graham Moore

then why can we not find 148 hulls then? or it that a miss story we should be able to convert about 250/300 C2 to C3 if we wanted to including those in service yet we can not even do half that with out struggling.

David Lee
David Lee (@guest_858908)
21 minutes ago
Reply to  Graham Moore

When I joined the army in 1978 we had 900 chieftains in service

PaulW
PaulW (@guest_858911)
5 minutes ago
Reply to  Graham Moore

I was following a previous pattern from Tornado IDS, which goes something like:
232 GR1s were upgraded to …
150 GR4s, which were reduced to …
80 GR4s, which were withdrawn without replacement.
Following this rule we should expect about 75 CR3s to last about 5 to 10 years. 😂
P.S. I think one extra Typhoon squadron was added to counter the Tornado withdrawal; which doesn’t count as replacement in my book.

Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_858878)
1 hour ago

Colonel Fake (is he giving us fake news!) says that Boxer’s mobility is a game-changer.

Good, because its firepower isn’t, and CGS is trying to double, then triple the army’s lethality.

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_858909)
14 minutes ago
Reply to  Graham Moore

indeed I’m not sure what they plan to do when engaged by enemy IFVs or they need to provide direct fire support to their dismounts.

Dave c
Dave c (@guest_858913)
31 seconds ago

Lol we can’t even beat Latvia.

Peter S
Peter S (@guest_858914)
4 seconds ago

Why can Ares only carry 4 dismounts when the similar length Austrian version of ASCOD can carry 8?
One solution to the lack of an IFV is to recognize that combining APC carrying capability with a turreted cannon imposes serious design challenges. Separating the functions into MPF and troop carrying allows a wider choice of weapon. In operation, you might have 1 in 3 vehicles providing fire support, with 2 in the APC role.