Five uncrewed boats remotely piloted from 500 miles away surrounded HMS Tyne during a three-day demonstration off the Scottish coast, marking what the Royal Navy called a milestone in its move toward a Hybrid Navy of crewed and uncrewed platforms.

The exercise, conducted by the Navy’s Disruptive Capabilities and Technology Office (DCTO) and the Fleet Experimentation Squadron (FXS), simulated the escort of a warship using a flotilla of 7.2-metre autonomous Rattler vessels.

The uncrewed boats were controlled from Patrick Blackett, moored in Portsmouth, while operating in Scottish waters in coordination with HMS Tyne, HMS Stirling Castle, HMS Biter and a Merlin helicopter.

Live data, video and sensor feeds were transmitted to controllers aboard Patrick Blackett, allowing the Rattlers to perform escort and surveillance tasks in real time. The Royal Navy said the demonstration was the culmination of months of trials, showing how uncrewed surface vessels could work alongside traditional ships in future operations.

The project was developed in collaboration with a consortium of small and medium-sized companies. Military personnel were directly involved in the design and testing process to ensure the boats met operational requirements, according to the Navy. Built on rigid inflatable boat hulls, the Rattlers are fitted with autonomy systems and modular payloads that can be tailored for missions such as reconnaissance, surveillance and payload delivery.

Each boat is controlled by a two-person team using a portable “plug and play” laptop system. The vessels can operate independently or as a swarm, following pre-programmed mission profiles or, in time, functioning autonomously without direct human control.

Commander Michael Hutchinson, who leads the Fleet Experimentation Squadron and commands Patrick Blackett, said in the press release that “this is a really important moment for the Royal Navy as we progress towards a Hybrid Navy of crewed and uncrewed platforms.”

He added that the uncrewed surface vessels had been “built and developed at pace, in a ground-breaking way, alongside a coalition of fantastic local companies.” Hutchinson described the project as “the most exciting of my career,” adding that the platforms would operate both in support of existing warships and as a capability in their own right.

“In recent years we have seen the effect that autonomy and uncrewed systems can have at sea, on land and in the air, especially in Ukraine,” he said. “In the maritime domain the effect has been remarkable, with simple, cheap, one-way effectors used to defeat complex and capable warships and deny them freedom of manoeuvre at sea.”

He noted that uncrewed surface vessels are also being used for reconnaissance, patrol and survey operations, making it “critical that the Navy develop these systems and train people with the skills to operate them.”

Brigadier Jaimie Roylance, the Royal Navy’s Chief Technology Officer, said in the press release that “this is an important moment in the history of the Royal Navy.” He called it “the first time we have been able to field a capable, mission-ready, deployable uncrewed system at sea” and the “first major success for the DCTO.”

Roylance praised the work of the FXS, Coastal Forces Squadron, Royal Marines and Army personnel, saying their efforts to develop the systems and training “have been astonishing and completed in record time.” He added that while more development lies ahead, “the wider consortium of SMEs we are working with are up to the task.”

George Allison
George Allison is the founder and editor of the UK Defence Journal. He holds a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and specialises in naval and cyber security topics. George has appeared on national radio and television to provide commentary on defence and security issues. Twitter: @geoallison

34 COMMENTS

  1. Jamming?
    I wonder whether they’d buy new RHIBS for this or just use ships existing RHIBS and call it an increase?

      • I’m not sure what you call those inflatable things but they are most definitely not RHIBs.. I suppose you could cut them up and use them to cover silage.. but I would not even give them the boat title..disposable inflatable raft maybe 🤔

  2. I’m not sure why you would have a escort set of drones controlling hundreds of miles away.. I would imagine the best solution would be a container based control room you can bolt to any deck of a ship being escorted..

            • Surely that’s why they’re doing exercises like this; find out what’s lacking when it comes to defending against drones – air or sea-based – and work to improve it through whatever means.

              If it were up to me I’d take some of the Ukrainian USV designs like SeaBaby, build them here and have them as assets for our navy; a combination of offensive weapons platforms for hitting enemy ships and defensive ones to engage enemy USVs.

              • I have no problem with the exercise. In fact it’s very sensible. I’m just making the point that an awful lot has changed. I repeat….drones “could” take out a larger ship.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here