The Leonardo helicopter operation in Yeovil was cited in Parliament as an example of how environmental, social and governance requirements risk undermining Britain’s defence industry if they are not matched by firm government procurement decisions.
During a Westminster Hall debate on the impact of ESG rules on defence, MPs from across the House pointed to Leonardo as a company that has actively invested in communities, skills and environmental initiatives, while warning that such commitments depend on predictable defence contracts.
Adam Dance, Liberal Democrat MP for Yeovil, told MPs that Leonardo had demonstrated a willingness to engage with environmental and social responsibilities alongside its defence work, but said this needed to be backed by government action.
“Defence firms such as Leonardo in Yeovil are happy to invest in environmental and social products,” he said. “Leonardo has invested heavily in Yeovil College and entertainment venues and is building its own solar farm, but if defence firms are to meet those obligations, the Government need to award contracts such as the new medium-lift helicopter. If not, we will lose the benefits for our community forever.”
Jack Rankin, the Conservative MP who secured the debate, agreed and said Leonardo’s presence in Yeovil illustrated the wider contradiction facing the defence sector. Companies are encouraged to meet ESG expectations, he argued, while investment rules and procurement delays simultaneously restrict their ability to plan and grow. “The hon. Gentleman makes a powerful point about Leonardo, which builds helicopters in his constituency,” Rankin said, adding that the issue was not unique to one company but reflected a systemic problem affecting British defence manufacturers.
Other MPs reinforced the point, highlighting Leonardo’s role as a major employer and skills provider across the South West. Edward Morello, Liberal Democrat MP for West Dorset, said the company’s links with schools and higher education were critical to sustaining high-skilled employment in the region. “Leonardo in Yeovil employs vast numbers of people in my West Dorset constituency,” he said. “Those links with local schools and higher education institutions are vital to creating a pathway for people in the south-west, especially in rural communities, who might not have another avenue into high-skilled labour.”
Rankin argued that ESG frameworks often imply defence investment is unethical, despite the reliance of national security on firms such as Leonardo. He warned that excluding defence from finance and procurement risks hollowing out industrial capacity, even as governments pledge to increase defence spending.
“There is nothing less ethical than sending British sons and daughters into battle under-equipped,” he said, adding that Parliament itself sends conflicting signals when defence is praised rhetorically but constrained in practice.












Wastelands = job creation project, nothing more.
Firstly? Accept all politicians are liars who would tell people black is white when in fact it is red.
No politician since Thatcher has had to guts to stand up for the UK.
I agree, sadly.
Unfortunately, there is a huge amount of remedial work and finances required to get our armed forces back up to strength.
New helicopters are just one more thing on the list to buy.
Everybody, everyone and everything is being sidelined in this goverments drive to the bottom.
“actively invested in communities, skills and environmental initiatives”.
That after all is the main driver for selecting a medium support helicopter!
If someone re started the Sopwith Company and sold it as a Green enterprise that will employ thousands of people in a sustainable factory, building an environmently sustainable fighter that will be far cheaper to own and operate, while supporting the local economy, the RAF would order 200 Sopwith Camels…
Only ‘half’ joking ….
The way we’re going John, we’ll probaly end up with a “camel”. The old saying … A camel is an animal invented by a committee, or words to that effect. I take your point. It doesn’t take a brain surgeon to work out what an MLH has to do. It takes a commitment.
This government? The last government did nothing but can kick and now we are suffering in declining frigate numbers, SSN that are tied up awaiting dry dock time. A strategic. Deterrent being undermined because boats which should have been replaced are requiring lengthy refits to squeeze a few more years out of them meanwhile the other SSBN are having to pick up the slack with absurdly long patrols . The list goes on. The medium lift helicopter being the latest in a very long list. The only thing I can accuse the current government is badly underestimating how much they need to inject and for how long to arrest the downward decline.
The previous government starting with Cameron were great at accounting games that made it look like we were spending 2% when in actual fact we were spending far less.
Yes. This government. You are sounding rather like Starmer and Reeves. Everything is someone else’s fault, even though they have been in power for 19 months. Back to reality then… The cuts and cancellations, particularly in the RN started under Blair/Brown and were dire. Please don’t believe me. Check them for yourself. Add to this the billions wasted in two pointless wars and it puts things in perspective
Did the Tories makje cuts? Yes, they did. Bear in mind though that even though S and R are still wittering on about the £26 billion black hole when they came to power the incoming Cameron administration were left with a shortfall of £106 billion at 2010 prices and our gold had been sold off at a discount by Brown. Again, don’t believe me. Check it out.
Every warship currently under construction was ordered by the Tory government, bar one, KG6. Fact.
Any business man will tell you that an approximate budget both capital and revenue can be organised in weeks at the outside, a prelim snapshot probably in days, so they are to blame for the dithering,. Where is the D.I.P. promised for last September and contiually delayed?
Finally, unlike some, I do not make political broadcasts. Could the Tories ahve done better? Of course they could. Do I trust Healey, Reeves and Starmer? No I don’t ,nor do most of the country.
You are entitled to your opinion but I have no particular political leanings other than anti Nationalist and very much Anti reform.
I call it, how I see it, sorry if that offends you.
The simple fact is whether you like it or not Frigates and Submarines take years to build and should have been ordered years earlier . The frigate fleet is uncomfortably small and it will get smaller.
Cameron and Osborne came up with a brilliant little wheeze where previous to their occupancy the budget for the strategic defence came out of a separate pot of money. They decided to lump it all together resulting in a 1% plus cut in the conventional defence budget.
19 months is hardly sufficient time to start correcting the mistakes of the past and imho this government is badly underestimating how much it will take both in one off capital injections and rate of increase to the annual MoD budget.
Very well said Geoffrey.
I’ve had some interesting “debates” here before with those with collective amnesia of anything pre 2010 Tory.
Tories delayed the Carriers is one that crops up a lot, until I show the 2009 headlines of the DS at that time delaying at a cost of over 1 billion.
On the Tories, they were bloody useless mate. Most SSN, Escorts and Fast Jet Sqns went in the Labour years 97 to 2010. But then the Tories came in vowing to fix defence and cut more, as well as a huge chunk out of the Army which Labour had not done due to the ongoing sandbox wars.
Both are gone for me I’m afraid, though, to rephrase that, the Tories are gone, as I’ve never voted Labour in my life.
Also, love the picture of the 149, weapon systems ‘a plenty’, what a joke…
Meanwhile the Army Wildcat, in service for years is lucky to get a door gun.
Does anyone actually buy this crap???
I’ve heard they avoided putting weapons on wildcat so that Apache upgrade wouldn’t be cancelled.
I can believe it Hugo….
If they managed to strap passengers to the stub wings of the Apache, they could scrap the Army Wildcat altogether, but then what would the senior officers use as a Taxi service??
I was watching a Wildcat for about 3 hours yesterday, In and out, up and down and much of It just on the ground, engines running. Think It was running errands for a Tide.
(Please note, no Tide was showing on all the usual tracking sites but I saw one from my lofty perch, lurking off the coast, in the mist and rain.)
(please also note, It was normal rain not Purple rain)
👀
Yes, most of the public and politicians. How many MPs in the Commons even care?