Ground-based testing of the new European Common Radar System (ECRS) Mk2 radar on a Eurofighter Typhoon test and evaluation aircraft has been completed, according to the Royal Air Force.

This development sets the stage for the upcoming flight trials.

The testing was carried out at BAE Systems’ flight testing facility in Warton, Lancashire, with support from Leonardo UK, which developed the radar at its Edinburgh and Luton sites.

The process included electromagnetic testing in an anechoic chamber.

Group Captain D’Aubyn, Typhoon Programme Director at the RAF, commented, “Embodiment of this prototype new radar into the test aircraft is a positive step on the continuous evolution of Typhoon’s control of the air capabilities, maintaining its sovereign Freedom of Action and preserving its technological advantage.”

The ECRS Mk2 radar, procured by the UK Ministry of Defence’s agency Defence Equipment and Support, is intended to support RAF operations in challenging environments. The radar aims to enhance pilots’ capabilities by providing high-powered jamming to suppress enemy air defences and engaging targets from a distance.

The ECRS Mk2 radar is a significant upgrade from the earlier Captor-M radar systems.

In a statement last year, DE&S said:

“ECRS Mk 2 radar will further transform the Eurofighter Typhoon’s control of the air, bringing a world-leading electronic warfare capability which will allow the aircraft to simultaneously detect, identify and track multiple targets in the air and on the ground.

It will support operations in the most challenging situations, equipping pilots with the ability to suppress enemy air defences using high-powered jamming and engage targets whilst beyond the reach of threats. This will cement Typhoon aircraft as the backbone of combat air capability defending UK at home and abroad for decades to come. The radar will now undergo integration work and ground-based testing in preparation for first flights on-board the Eurofighter Typhoon next year.”

Will anyone else use it?

The radar will be integrated into at least 40 aircraft, with potential for up to 160 aircraft depending on decisions by the UK and Germany.

United Kingdom

  • 40 radars are on order for the modernisation of the Tranche 3 aircraft.
  • Potential order for Tranche 2 aircraft could include up to 67 additional radars.

Germany

  • The German Air Force is discussing a shift from the Mk1 variant to the Mk2 for the 15 (up to 30) Eurofighter ECR, which might involve new or existing aircraft.
  • Discussions are also underway to shift from the Mk1 variant to the Mk2 for the Tranche 4 “Quadriga.”

Italy

  • The Italian Air Force is considering ordering 24 radars for a potential Tranche 4.
Avatar photo
Lisa has a degree in Media & Communication from Glasgow Caledonian University and works with industry news, sifting through press releases in addition to moderating website comments.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

54 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Spyinthesky
Spyinthesky (@guest_836532)
1 month ago

That’s interesting I thought the Germans were intent on going their own way with upgrades.

Jim
Jim (@guest_836539)
1 month ago
Reply to  Spyinthesky

Last thing Typhoon needs is a third AESA radar. Hopefully the German’s see sense. Looking forward to getting these into our aircraft. I really hope they put them into tranche 2 as well so we don’t end up with a fleet inside a fleet again.

Steve
Steve (@guest_836824)
1 month ago
Reply to  Jim

Agreed, either they are needed and therefore should be on all or they arent and so why order.

I know money is too tight to mention but still. I’m hoping this government follows through on their promise to investage and follow up on covid fraud, there is billions of extra money for the treasury to be recovered

Last edited 1 month ago by Steve
Paul.P
Paul.P (@guest_836540)
1 month ago
Reply to  Spyinthesky

Yes, interesting. Haven’t the Germans also signed up for Brimstone? Another example of UK – Germany co-operation on defence following the strategic decision to get back into the Boxer program.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke (@guest_836555)
1 month ago
Reply to  Paul.P

Germany have a pinched defence budget and are trying to do more.

Why would you waste that on developing another version (with all the attendant risks) of what already exists and works?

Paul.P
Paul.P (@guest_836571)
1 month ago

Quite. When they can afford it countries like to develop sovereign capabilities. Bit of austerity works wonders.

Steve
Steve (@guest_836825)
1 month ago

Maybe there is an issue with this version that they arent willing to accept, but the MOD doesn’t have the funds to fix.

Steve
Steve (@guest_836826)
1 month ago
Reply to  Steve

It’s the fundamental issue with military expenditure, known weaknesses and issues are kept secret until a war happens and people die due to it and their is a public outcry causing a transparent investigation.

Who know if it’s the case here or not, or if being more honest would have any effect on procurement.

Last edited 1 month ago by Steve
Robert Blay
Robert Blay (@guest_836829)
1 month ago
Reply to  Steve

Mk 1 is essentially the export version of the radar. Mk2 has that all singing all dancing electronic attack modes, plus other classified capability.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke (@guest_836837)
1 month ago
Reply to  Steve

There isn’t an issue.

Everyone in the know thinks it is an amazing bit of kit.

Steve
Steve (@guest_836840)
1 month ago

Who are these people?

It will only be a handful of people that might know how well it operates in a environment where jammed etc are being deployed. Certainly pilots etc won’t know until a war happens.

Those few people will be subject to heavy contractual clauses keeping them quiet.

John M
John M (@guest_836611)
1 month ago
Reply to  Spyinthesky

Latest edition of Air Forces Monthly suggesting current plan for only 24 RAF Tranche 3 jets to receive new radar?

Ben
Ben (@guest_836615)
1 month ago
Reply to  John M

As far as I’m aware it’s the 40 Tranche 3 jets that are getting them. But when you divide the total cost of development, trials, procurement, and integration, between the 40 jets it works out to something in the ballpark of £50 million per aircraft which is pretty insane. Obviously a lot of the work has derisked the radar tech for Tempest/GCAP which you can’t really put a price on but it’s still a lot of money for what is ultimately a relatively limited roll out.

Baker
Baker (@guest_836724)
1 month ago
Reply to  Ben

£50 Million each ? Bloody hell and people reckon the F35 is expensive.🙁

ChariotRider
ChariotRider (@guest_836754)
1 month ago
Reply to  Baker

Development costs spread over a very small number of production units. Europe’s age old problem

If we order a few more and the Germans and Italians order some as well then the cost per unit should come down. If not, then sack the MoD contract negotiators…

F35 is expensive, given the big numbers being procured, but it delivers a huge step forward in capability, or it will when LM get their weapons integration program sorted out.

Typhoon and F35 are arguably the two most important combat air programs in NATO at the moment.

Cheers CR

Baker
Baker (@guest_836765)
1 month ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

Oh absolutely on all counts.👌

Lee j furs an
Lee j furs an (@guest_836813)
1 month ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

Big numbers…… God help us then…. 11.000 aircraft took parts in overlord and that was acer the big battles… We make ourselves a joke..

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke (@guest_836844)
1 month ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

“ If not, then sack the MoD contract negotiators…”

Nothing wrong with the contact the issue is the number ordered is tiny.

It is the same issue as SAMPSON.

The project had a ~£2Bn budget. The R&D costs increased therefore the £££ left to buy units decreased which pushed up the per unit costs.

If another 100 units are purchased the per unit costs go to £14m which looks more sensible?

ChariotRider
ChariotRider (@guest_840723)
21 days ago

Hi SB, Yeh, recent decisions around SAMPSON, reduced numbers procured and a hiatus in upgrades in the early years of its deployed life represent a missed opportunity IMO. The Government have failed to build on the considerable effort and investment of the 80’s and early 90’s that produced a couple of experimental radars could be considered stepping stones to SAMPSON. I know SAMPSON is getting some upgrades but I worry that there is note much in the pipeline… The technology could have been adapted and built on for so many different radar applications, perhaps being used for land based system,… Read more »

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke (@guest_836839)
1 month ago
Reply to  Baker

F35 is actually not very expensive at all for what it is.

I agree that £50m sounds an awful lot.

There is a fundamental rework of a lot of systems as well.

The unit costs are IRL 1/5 – 1/10th of that once R&D and certification are removed from the equation.

However, Radar2 + T2 upgrades also involve bringing T2 fully to T3 standards – always best to avoid a fleet within a fleet.

Andrew D
Andrew D (@guest_836622)
1 month ago
Reply to  John M

No surprise 🙄

John Clark
John Clark (@guest_836630)
1 month ago
Reply to  Spyinthesky

I think they were originally going with the less sophisticated mk1, basically a port of the Captor M with the new front end.

I believe Radar 2 is effectively a brand new Radar.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke (@guest_836653)
1 month ago
Reply to  John Clark

Radar2 is a totally new system.

Totally different performance level.

Coll
Coll (@guest_836569)
1 month ago

I’m assuming Germany has 58 Eurofighters on order? give or take due to the initial order of Eurofighters of 38 in 2020, and 20 additional in June 2024.

Last edited 1 month ago by Coll
Peter
Peter (@guest_836586)
1 month ago

I think we all need to know how good this radar is at detecting supersonic cricket balls?
Maybe a cricket ball going 3k mph at 200 miles?

That’s the real threat.

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_836591)
1 month ago

One would hope that the seeming new focus on making what we have more lethal will mean the tranche 2 typhoons get this as well….it’s one of those things that could make a difference within the 2027-2030 timeframe.

DeeBee
DeeBee (@guest_836614)
1 month ago

Whilst More countries are increasing the amount of Typhoon aircraft, we are reducing our air force by 30 , airframes, the insanity continues!!

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_836621)
1 month ago
Reply to  DeeBee

I’m hoping that the defence review will reverse this to be honest…the mood music is strength as much as possible and not cut….keeping the tranche 1 aircraft is an easy immediate win at no cost…..I would suspect a lot of stuff due to be sunsetted will find a reprieve until a direct replacement is in place.

DeeBee
DeeBee (@guest_836623)
1 month ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Let’s hope so, I’ve read that the trance 1 aircraft can be upgraded to tranche 3/4 level for relatively little money.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke (@guest_836657)
1 month ago
Reply to  DeeBee

That isn’t really true.

There are very significant differences.

It can be done BAE said it could be done. Question is would a fixed price contract make sense – I suspect it would come in close to the price of a new one.

Baker
Baker (@guest_836721)
1 month ago
Reply to  DeeBee

T1’s are virtually all grounded and non serviceable as far as I understand.

ChariotRider
ChariotRider (@guest_836755)
1 month ago
Reply to  DeeBee

I think they have already started to strip them for spares, if not then they soon will be…

Cheers CR

Andrew D
Andrew D (@guest_836631)
1 month ago
Reply to  Jonathan

I put on another post the other week about cuts, I think what the Tory party had in the pipe line to be cut ✂will still go ahead with this Labour government sadly but do pray I’ll be wrong 🙏

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke (@guest_836654)
1 month ago
Reply to  Jonathan

I don’t think most of the Typhoon T1s have been serviceable for years TBH.

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_836681)
1 month ago

Hi supportive, I think there is a fair few left…IX bomber squadron is equipped with T1 as are the Falklands flight…so I would imagine they have 12-16 serviceable…it does mean once they are gone they will need to equip both IX and the Falklands flight with tranche 2 and 3s…not sure how they will do that with only 106 jets that are already equipping 6 frontline squadrons, the OCU, 12 squadron and the test and evaluation squadron….the reality is when the tranche 1s go out of service the RAF will probably loss a squadron.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke (@guest_836683)
1 month ago
Reply to  Jonathan

I think they have been quietly put through ‘reduce to produce’ so whilst Falklands have them I’m not 100% sure any other squadrons really have any working frames.

It is really crazy TBH as numbers of frames pilots and maintainers are critically low.

The result if 20 years of underfunding and salami slicing of perfectly effective kit for short term book balancing.

John Clark
John Clark (@guest_836691)
1 month ago
Reply to  Jonathan

The obvious solution is the 15 tranche 2 aircraft that Spain has surplus to requirements.

I would buy them, retire the tranche1 machines and upgrade the whole fleet to an advanced common standard with radar 2.

Quentin D63
Quentin D63 (@guest_836706)
1 month ago
Reply to  John Clark

And hopefully at bargain price. Wonder why Spain wouldn’t be considering upgrading them herself? Germany, Italy and Spain all ordering new batches of Typhoon too. The UK must be weighing up some options if there’s rumblings with Tempest. Hope it’s not all going to 🗑. The Tempest kind of looks like a twin engined F35A that been to the gym!

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_836742)
1 month ago
Reply to  John Clark

Actually that’s would be a very very very good idea.

John Clark
John Clark (@guest_836835)
1 month ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Afternoon Jonathan. Well if we have to build some mass, look at the secondhand market as an interim measure.

I’m sure we could whistle up a few more Tranche 2 jets from our partners too.

Andrew D
Andrew D (@guest_836624)
1 month ago
Reply to  DeeBee

Absolutely madness 😞

Finney
Finney (@guest_836700)
1 month ago

While it would be nice to have more of these radars, I think overall airframe numbers are more important, I’d rather have another 12-24 new Eurofighters, with the old version. I imagine one plane with the mk2 could lead a flight of aircraft with the older model and then share the data with the other aircraft and take the lead on EW.

Lonpfrb
Lonpfrb (@guest_836703)
1 month ago
Reply to  Finney

USAF seem to be happy to run F18 Growlers for SEAD / EW within a larger fleet, so if the number of aircraft are our priority, why not. Assuming tranche 2 and 3 have a lot in common for sustainment.

Last edited 1 month ago by Lonpfrb
simon alexander
simon alexander (@guest_836733)
1 month ago
Reply to  Lonpfrb

would not UK use F35b on first night of attack to take out air defenses? is it because we are waiting for F35b block 4 upgrade and need capability now.

Jon
Jon (@guest_836741)
1 month ago

Exactly. Without Spear EW and without a standoff like Storm Shadow, how are they supposed to attack air defences?

When people trot out the line that we can’t increase spending immediately, we have to gear up for it, my very long laundry list response includes the acceleration of the upgrades to the current Typhoons and 24 new ones.

ChariotRider
ChariotRider (@guest_836758)
1 month ago
Reply to  Jon

Hi Jon, I would agree with you but when I was in the MoD (as a techie) the Treasure would take back any unspent funds and then cut the next years budget inline with the under spend. It always led to s scramble to spend at the end of the financial year. If that system is still in place then a big lump sum increase in one year would simply end up going back to the Treasury, thanks to Treasure rules which are designed to stop you spending money by putting lots of hoops in your way. The system is… Read more »

Meirion X
Meirion X (@guest_836859)
1 month ago

The IDF make good use of the F-35s, without waiting for B4?

simon alex
simon alex (@guest_836865)
1 month ago
Reply to  Meirion X

Israel has flown into Syria etc with Russian air defence and been successful. Wonder if Russia using their best versions with their allies.

simon alex
simon alex (@guest_836866)
1 month ago
Reply to  simon alex

Of s400

Lonpfrb
Lonpfrb (@guest_836870)
1 month ago

I’m not party to any of the data, but imagine that the capabilities of the current F35B on squadron strength are sufficient for the first SEAD missions that F117 did on the Gulf Wars, for example.
HARM AGM-88 have been supplied to UAF for use on Su-27 and so able to do basic SEAD missions. I’ve heard that the full capabilities of HARM require better integration so imagine that Typhoon can do that. According to WiKi there’s even a G variant that fits F-35.
Based on S-30,0 S-400 & Buk performance in Ukraine, they’re toast..

OldSchool
OldSchool (@guest_836710)
1 month ago

Ideally tranche 2 would get new radar but given fiscal problems……..

So maybe it is feasible ( useful) to run mixed groups of T2 &T3? With the T3’s with their better radars ‘spotting’ for the T2’s via data links or such? A system of systems seems the way to go these days.

Graham
Graham (@guest_836892)
1 month ago

Wonder if the Saudi’s would be interested in upgrading their Typhoon tranche 2/3 jets.

Aaron L
Aaron L (@guest_837517)
1 month ago

I’m still holding out hope that we’re going to piggy back on the T4 order, no idea where the money would come from but that’s besides the point.

Paul T
Paul T (@guest_837742)
30 days ago

Interesting to note that Italy is keen to order 24 more Typhoons, but is prepared to sacrifice the latest Radar spec for a much quicker delivery.