The Ministry of Defence (MoD) still cannot say exactly how much it has spent on resettling Afghans through the Afghanistan Response Route (ARR), according to a new report from the National Audit Office (NAO).

The scheme was launched in April 2024 in direct response to a February 2022 data breach, which revealed the personal information of thousands linked to the UK mission in Afghanistan. Those affected were at risk of Taliban reprisals yet were not eligible for other resettlement programmes.

The NAO notes that while the MoD has put the total cost of the ARR at around £850 million, “it has not provided sufficient evidence to give confidence regarding the completeness and accuracy of its estimates.” That figure also excludes compensation payments and all legal costs beyond the £2.5 million already expected.

The MoD admits it cannot calculate precisely how much it has spent to date on the ARR. Expenditure was not separately tracked but instead folded into overall Afghan resettlement costs. Officials have argued this was necessary to maintain secrecy while a High Court super-injunction was in force preventing disclosure of both the breach and the scheme itself.

By July 2025, the MoD estimated it had already spent £400 million, with the remainder to be incurred over the coming years. Across all Afghan resettlement routes, departmental spending between 2021–22 and 2024–25 totalled £563 million, with overall costs forecast to exceed £2 billion by 2029. A further £1.5 billion is expected to be spent between now and March 2029.

Who is eligible

The February 2022 breach compromised the details of 18,700 principal applicants to the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP) and its predecessor scheme. Of these, 1,531 people, along with an estimated 5,824 relatives, were offered places under the ARR specifically because of the data loss.

By the end of July 2025, the MoD assessed that 7,355 individuals would be resettled through the ARR as a direct consequence of the breach. Wider eligibility, however, has pushed the projected number much higher. As the report notes, “The MoD estimates that these applications could result in a total of up to 27,278 people being resettled in the UK (under both the ARR and ARAP schemes).”

According to Home Office immigration statistics published in August, 3,383 had arrived by June 2025. The NAO observed that “many of those invited to the UK under the ARR have not yet arrived,” pointing to delays caused by third-country exit visas, security checks and visa processing.

By the numbers

  • 7,355 people – expected to be resettled in the UK through the Afghanistan Response Route (ARR) as a direct result of the 2022 MoD data breach.
  • 27,278 people – the total projected number of Afghans to be resettled when combining ARR with the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP). This includes people whose data was exposed but who were already eligible under existing schemes.
  • £850 million – MoD’s current estimate of the historic and future costs of the ARR alone, not including legal fees or compensation.
  • £2 billion+ – forecast total cost to the MoD of all Afghan resettlement schemes between 2021 and 2029.

Scheme closure

The ARR was closed to new applicants in July 2025, but reviews of rejected cases continue, including applications from Afghan special forces units known as the “Triples.” If approved, these could add to the already significant totals.

The NAO stresses that its report is not an evaluation of how the MoD managed the scheme, nor an examination of the super-injunction, but a factual briefing to support parliamentary scrutiny. “The report does not seek to evaluate the MoD’s management of or spending on the ARR scheme, nor does it assess the evidence which led to the super-injunction being issued, maintained and then lifted,” it notes.

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) will now take up the issue. Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP, Chair of the PAC, said in a statement:

“The NAO briefing published today has provided some much-needed clarity on the Afghanistan Response Route, which was launched following a data breach in 2022. The result was the disclosure of unauthorised personal information on many thousands of individuals, leading to over 7,000 people becoming eligible for resettlement as a direct result of the breach.

After the High Court super-injunction was lifted earlier this year, confusion still remains over the reported £850 million historic and future costs relating to the breach, with the MoD unable to provide sufficient assurance over their numbers. This figure does not include all legal costs or compensation claims, which currently remain unknown.

The PAC will be examining these issues in our inquiry next week and I will be following developments closely as the NAO conducts further work to provide transparency on the figures in their upcoming report on Afghan resettlement schemes, with many of those needing relocation yet to arrive in the UK.”

For the MoD, the task ahead is twofold: resettling thousands whose safety was compromised by its own data loss, and answering questions over its opaque accounting for one of the most costly resettlement undertakings in modern defence history.

Read the report here.

George Allison
George Allison is the founder and editor of the UK Defence Journal. He holds a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and specialises in naval and cyber security topics. George has appeared on national radio and television to provide commentary on defence and security issues. Twitter: @geoallison

32 COMMENTS

    • Keeping quiet about the fact that
      – a classified list was outputted into excel
      – someone was stupid enough to email any part of it
      – someone was incompetent enough to think they had emailed part of the list whilst sending the whole thing
      – keep quiet about keeping quiet
      – keep quiet about keeping quiet about keeping quiet etc

      Above all else to confirm that the courts have taken over protecting officials which is the function of the Official Secrets Act to protect the officials and not the secrets.

      • After 911, certain “Leaders” minds seemed to frazzle and It hasn’t got any better since,
        RIP to the many thousands who died on all sides.
        History showed the futility of this stupidity plainly enough.

        What a mess this country has become.

  1. So the MoD budget now has:
    2 billion for Afghans.
    150 odd million every year for 99 years for the Chagos nonsense. That alone is more than many equipment programs get PA.
    3 billion plus a year for Ukraine.
    Pensions.
    The billions allocated for the DNE.
    The SIA.
    What have I missed?
    Is it any wonder conventional defence is falling apart?
    And when will ANY journalist be brave enough, or be allowed to, put this to Kier Starmer or D S Healey?
    HMG hide behind so much % all the time when the measure must be in what is spent on maintaining the conventional capabilities of the forces.

    • Totally agree.

      As far as I can see conventional is still being cut.

      Unfortunately the T26 and T31 exports likely don’t allow UK to order more any time soon.

      Probably hoping for more Typhoon orders to pull the same trick there.

      Here is an idea why don’t you write an article and ask George if he would publish it? I think you would be surprised how much offline info you would get.

      The UK’s jokerish approach to defence spending is terrifying when everyone else has got the message.

      • Perhaps a better idea would be to get Jonathan, Daniele, Rodders(RR Derby) and yourself around a pot of tea – you’d take defence apart and probably get publishing rights with the tome you produce. Deep and Dern could add detail and Robert Blay could contribute on Air, REME Sir giving background on the costs of maintaining equipment.

      • The 40 Typhoons Turkey is ordering will keep the Warton facility busy for quite some time. A perfect excuse for the MOD not to order more for the RAF. Expect any new buys before Tempest to be F35. They will have to order more A variant if the OSD for Typhoon is accurate.

        • Indeed, the Alpha pivot is an excuse for RAF to, for the third time, try and emasculate carrier aviation.

          RAF are, unwittingly, making a very strong case for F35B to be FAA and the BRAVO budget to be moved across to FAA.

          At least that way the RAF ditty about pilot leaving who go to sea to much will stop getting airtime. And we won’t have to hear about conflicting priorities and taskings….

      • I can only agree with DB.
        As Halfwit says “I know a lot of shit” Whether that qualifies me to write an article I am uncertain. I am after all a nobody. But, I’m happy to contribute to any group effort or movement with actual ex or current military in it whose words would carry greater weight than my words ever will.

    • Sorry Daniele, but you’ve forgotten potholes and rural broadband as part of out “future defence expenditure”….

      • Morning Geoff.
        Sadly, I hadn’t. As I believe those are in the extra % beyond the core 2.5 rising to 3% when Starmer, Reeves, and the other clowns can be bothered. So I did not mention them.
        My list as I understand it is stuff all moved into core 2.5% funding.

    • As you know a lot of shit about a lot of shit, how much damage would you say our “Camp Bastion” campain did to the Army ?

      • You mean the Afghan, Helmand operation as a whole?
        Peer on peer kit wise, lots, as much was put to one side to concentrate on COIN.
        I supported SF and Intell going in there and wiping out terrorists. I did not support the occupation that came after. The west trying to impose its values on a country whose pastime is tribal warfare was never going to work.

  2. What a short sighted decision this is? Are we importing Taliban onto our shores from which our children and grandchildren will have to bear any burden?

  3. If you get drawn into unwinnable wars, this is the inevitable outcome.

    We cannot abandon those who helped us and still call ourselves honourable and dependable. We are duty bound to help these people. That we were there in the first place is the problem – not that we must now mop up our mess.

  4. 30k working age adults coming to join a country desperate with working age adults that has more job roles open than people to fill them, doesn’t seem so bad to me.

    • With unemployment rising and vacancies down there is no reason to come here for jobs. A lot of Poles are actually leaving.

          • Not to mention xenophobia is at all time high on this country right now (at least in my life time) discouraging skilled people wanting to come and work here and encouraging the ones here to want to take their labour else where to somewhere they are more welcome

      • Business confidence is at a 20 year high. Inwards investment is going up. I suspect that will reverse itself over the next couple of years. We however still have major need for manual labour, to get back to where we were when you went to the supermarket and stuff was actually always there.

  5. So as I’m reading this across multiple sources it appears a good chunk of these individuals would have been denied resettlement but because of an MOD data breach they were resettled with some suggestions that limited checks were performed given the obvious panic?

    I know Wallace tried to shift blame in a newspaper article onto the US for the poor communication, lack of warning and terrible withdrawal plan. All valid I’m sure but they have should have no bearing on the MODs ability to keep data secure.

    We should be concerned that a 2 year presidential campaign where the eventual winner was banging on about getting out of Afghanistan and the fairly lengthy and well publicized US negotiations with the Taliban managed to completely blindsided us. There were enough signs of the inevitable that maybe someone should have picked up a phone and asked the cousins “sup?”.

    I’d guess the injunction has made any potential for holding individuals to account for their massive failings disappear, that was handy for the government of the day.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here