The Ministry of Defence has confirmed that Project Brakestop, a new UK cruise missile programme designed for rapid production and scale, has entered live firing trials, as senior defence officials set out a shift toward faster, more flexible weapons procurement.

Giving evidence to the Defence Committee, Lieutenant General Anna-Lee Reilly revealed that the first firing of Brakestop had taken place this week, just 12 months after the programme was launched. She described the project as a deliberate move away from slow, bespoke acquisition cycles toward a model built around speed, simplicity and industrial scale.

Explaining the approach, Reilly told MPs that, “Brakestop is a cruise missile with five incredibly simple requirements: range, cost, payload, production quantity, can you ramp up, and being transportable in an ISO container.”

She contrasted the programme with long-established precision weapons such as Storm Shadow, noting that high-end capabilities inevitably take years to deliver. “If you take an exquisite capability like a Storm Shadow missile, you know it will take a long time to procure,” she said.

Brakestop, by contrast, is being delivered through the Ministry of Defence’s Kindred procurement framework, which Reilly described as enabling a rapid buy-test-scale cycle. “The idea is that you buy, you try and you scale. We have the ability to trial in the UK and then take it out to Ukraine. That has been within 12 months, with 27 companies,” she said, adding, “The first firing of Brakestop was yesterday.”

The programme is intended to complement, rather than replace, existing high-end weapons. Reilly told the committee that the Army’s future structure would rely on a mix of “the exquisite capabilities and then the more disposable capabilities off the back end of it,” with Brakestop sitting firmly in the latter category.

Pressed on concerns that the UK would struggle to sustain losses in a peer-on-peer conflict similar to Ukraine, Reilly framed Brakestop within a broader effort to harden defence supply chains. “From my perspective, sitting where I do, this is about supply chains,” she said, quoting a senior US defence official who warned that “our supply chains are at war. We just don’t know it yet.”

She said the lessons from Ukraine were already shaping procurement priorities. “That is what you see with the strategy on munitions, what you saw in the strategic defence review, and what you will see in the defence investment plan. It is about being ready as quickly as possible and being able to respond.”

National Armaments Director Rupert Pearce supported that assessment, telling MPs that the challenge was twofold. “We have to be readier, and we have to be undertaking a transformation over the top of that as well, in a very small number of years.”

In recent written parliamentary answers, Defence Minister Luke Pollard confirmed that no final decision has yet been taken on the number of Brakestop one-way effectors to be purchased. He said figures would depend on the outcome of ongoing flight trials, industrial capacity and final system costs. Pollard also confirmed that multiple prototype contracts have already been placed and that builds are at an advanced stage.

Lisa West
Lisa has a degree in Media & Communication from Glasgow Caledonian University and works with industry news, sifting through press releases in addition to moderating website comments.

13 COMMENTS

  1. There were 27 entries into the competition…without a doubt a number of these were utterly impractical, or from companies with an office above a shop…

    Been narrowed down to 3 potential options reportedly…we don’t know who these are..

    There are 2 that we know of for sure that were entered;
    MBDA Crossbow
    MGI Tigershark

    And there are 2 that seem to fit the bill, but have not had confirmation that they were entered;
    Rotron Defendor
    FlyBy Mayhem

    I think its reasonable to assume the first 2 are the ones that reached the final round, based on their attendance and interviews at the recent DSEi event. And its likely that one of MBDA or MGI’s entry did the first test flight on Monday. As to the third it could be one of the 2 directly above…or something else. Its all very cagey…

    love to know the names of the other proposals though…I suspect there were no credible ballistic missiles entered though, all were cruise missile types.

    • Don’t know if MBDA has given any flight timeline but MGI stated a while back they expect first flight by the end of the year, so if my money is on anyone it would be them, especially as they are from Motorsport where quick prototyping and quick development is the norm, not something traditional missile companies are familiar with for the most part, plus this is an upscaled version of a design they were already promoting. Sounds very impressive to me, especially the flexibility, light weight and 3D printing of some parts.

      This is the second significant uk tech company I have recently come across springing from an F1 background and this is a World leading sector we really must exploit to the fullest I reckon.

    • Let’s hope the third one isn’t a spin off business from Baroness Mone… though I guess it might be quite stealthy by nature.

  2. At least it sounds like the message about quantity being a quality in itself has hit home… or did it just bounce off when the real cost for the required numbers hits home.

  3. Hopefully we pass a batch to Ukraine to do some final testing against Russian supplied targets before full production ramps up.

  4. “Quick, load the one way effectors into the two way enablers”

    ffs, you just know someone gets paid to rename these things !

  5. I do think there has been a lot of discussion with Ukraine and in particular Fire Point who designed and build the Flamingo cruise missile. As the Flamingo is a pretty basic yet effective cruise missile, that is having is manufacturing scaled up. Flamingo, meets the requirements stated above.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here