NATO fighter jets intercepted two Russian military aircraft that failed to comply with international air traffic regulations, posing a security concern, according to NATO Air Command.

The incident, which occurred off the coast of Latvia, marks the third such violation in February.

The French Air Policing detachment currently stationed in Lithuania scrambled Rafale fighter jets to intercept the aircraft, ensuring the security of NATO airspace. NATO Air Command confirmed the event in a public statement:

“Two 🇷🇺 aircraft not adhering to international flight regulations are intercepted by 🇫🇷 Rafale off the coast of 🇱🇻. The 🇫🇷 Air Policing detachment based in 🇱🇹 scrambled to ensure the continued safety and security of NATO airspace.”

This latest airspace violation follows two previous incidents earlier in the month. On 7 February, a Russian aircraft violated Finnish airspace, and just four days later, a Su-24MR aircraft intruded into Poland’s territorial waters. These repeated incursions have heightened concerns among NATO member states, reinforcing the alliance’s commitment to maintaining airspace integrity in the region.

NATO’s Baltic Air Policing mission continues to serve as a frontline defence mechanism against such intrusions, ensuring rapid response to potential security threats. The alliance has reiterated its readiness to intercept and deter any further airspace violations, particularly amid ongoing tensions between Russia and NATO members.

In the previous year, NATO air forces across Europe scrambled well over 300 times to intercept Russian military aircraft approaching Alliance airspace, with most intercepts occurring over the Baltic Sea.

NATO has standing air-policing missions that calls for Allied jets to scramble when there are signs of Russian military planes approaching Allied airspace in unpredictable ways.

According to the Alliance:

“Along NATO’s eastern flank, Russian military aircraft have a history of not transmitting a transponder code indicating their position and altitude, not filing a flight plan, or did communicating with air traffic controllers. The vast majority of aerial encounters between NATO and Russian jets were safe and professional. Breaches of NATO airspace by Russian military aircraft remained rare and generally of short duration. 

In the wake of Russia’s war in Ukraine, NATO has substantially reinforced its air defences on its eastern flank, including with more fighter jets, surveillance flights and ground-based air defences. After repeated Russian strikes on Ukrainian infrastructure very close to NATO territory, Allies deployed extra fighter jets to Romania. In October, after subsea pipelines ruptured in the Baltic Sea, NATO sent additional capabilities to the region.”

“Russia’s war against Ukraine has created the most dangerous security situation in Europe in decades,” said acting NATO Spokesperson Dylan White.

“NATO fighter jets are on duty around the clock, ready to scramble in case of suspicious or unannounced flights near the airspace of our Allies. Air policing is an important way in which NATO provides security for our Allies,” he added.

George Allison
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison

9 COMMENTS

  1. Very much coming to the opinion that the very first thing we should see from the defence review and the hoped for spending hike is more Eurofighter Typhoons and E7’s. A few months ago I would have said more F35’s but I can’t see how we can invest billions in increasing the F35 fleet now give the uncertainty over its future, our ability to operate it and Trump offering it to Russian allies.

    • Rumours are circulating that the SDR publication could be pushed back to June or later……

      You have to think there would be a few ‘no brainers’ right away if Rachel from Accounts loosens the purse strings. I agree the two extra E-7s are an obvious choice as we have already bought and paid for five AESA radars.

      I would also love to see Type 32 come to fruition – the RN is desperately short of hulls.

      As for the Army? More Challenger 3s would be nice just for starters…….

      Any uplift in defence spending is to be truly welcomed but I hope it’s not too little too late….

      • Main effort for the Army would be an increase back to 100,000 (actually an increase to fully equip an armoured division plus follow on force and rapid intervention (ie 16AA)) with modern fires, ISTAR, logistics etc

        Following that a tracked IFV to accompany C3.

        Then C3 increase.

      • T32 is still nothing more than a BJ utterance, More CH3’s ain’t ever going to happen , An uplift in spending should have started in 2014.

    • Cancel the Albions being scrapped/sold. We’ll need them to get troops & equipment to & from theater. Insane to scrap the capability with no replacement in sight.
      More Typhoons needed indeed asap. Speeding up Hawk replacement & the Tempest program too. We could do worse than to develop our own stealthy STVOL fighter if F35 becomes blocked by Trump treachery. Even a revamp of the Harrier would deliver basic carrier strike//task force air defence.

      A revival of sanity in the USA is urgently needed. We’ve so manydefence systems etc we’re inimately joined with & dependat upon.
      Trumpism is stomping all over my all ready delicate MH.

      • Albions need money spent and Crews recruited, More Typhoons would be good but It takes so many tears to train aircrew and we don’t have enough of either, Hawk has no replacement yet, neither have the Red Arrows, Not a snowballs chance in hell of developing a F35B replacement, your Harrier Re Vamp is pie in the sky, Sanity in the USA has been noticeably missing since the Boston Tea Party.

        America might just be heading towards another Civil War.

  2. I’d consider 20 of the dedicated EK variant, enough to keep a full squadron operational. Regain a long lost defence suppression capability. With f35 and uk weapons integration looking shaky it would help keep our vulnerable typhoons in the fight until tempest arrives.

    • That was meant to be a reply to Jim… oh for something websites have had for decades now, an edit function. Fitted for but not with in true uk defence fashion…

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here