The UK has reiterated its unwavering support for Ukraine in its ongoing conflict with Russia, according to a speech delivered by Mungo Woodifield, the UK Spokesperson to the UN, at the United Nations Security Council on 25 July 2024.

Woodifield began his remarks by recalling the onset of the invasion on 24 February 2022, describing it as an “illegal and unprovoked” act by Russia.

He stated that Ukraine has been exercising its right to self-defence under the UN Charter since that day. “Ukraine has defended its sovereign land and it has rejected Russia’s vision for a world where states can change borders by force. It has stood up for the principles at the very heart of the UN Charter. The UK’s commitment to support Ukraine is ironclad,” Woodifield said.

Drawing attention to the human toll of the conflict, Woodifield highlighted the devastating impact on both Ukrainian and Russian populations. He cited recent attacks, including a missile strike on a children’s hospital in Kyiv, as examples of the ongoing humanitarian crisis.

“Just a few weeks ago, we met after a Russian missile reduced a children’s hospital in Kyiv to rubble… over 34 thousand civilians confirmed killed and injured since the invasion began, and which have left over 14.6 million Ukrainians in need of humanitarian assistance,” he noted.

The conflict has also inflicted severe losses on Russian forces, with nearly 70,000 soldiers killed or wounded in the last 60 days alone.

Woodifield criticised Russia’s efforts to sustain its military campaign through external support, specifically pointing to the procurement of drones from Iran and weapons from the DPRK.

“It is absurd, but frankly no longer surprising, that Russia criticises legitimate Western support for Ukraine’s self-defence while it procures weapons from the DPRK in flagrant violation of Security Council resolutions that it supported,” he said, urging all third parties to cease material support for Russia’s aggression.

Reaffirming the UK’s commitment, Woodifield mentioned the recent NATO Summit where the UK, along with 22 other countries and the EU, signed the Ukraine Compact, which underscores a long-term pledge to support Ukraine.

“The UK has committed to sustain current levels of military support to Ukraine for as long as it takes. And we will continue to support Ukraine’s fight against Russian aggression until a just and lasting peace is secured, in line with the UN Charter,” he affirmed.

In his concluding remarks, Woodifield stated that any negotiations and decisions regarding Ukraine’s future must be determined by Ukraine itself. “Ukraine is a sovereign country making sovereign decisions about the defence of its sovereign land and the sooner Russia understands this, the better,” he concluded.

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

36 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

John Clark
John Clark (@guest_838487)
30 days ago

As laudable as this support is, the base is cracking.

Trump the return (this time it’s personal) is a feature film we all know is being released this coming November….

Sadly, Trump will highly likely force Ukraine into a settlement of some sort and there’s not a thing the UK could do about it.

Michael Hannah
Michael Hannah (@guest_838489)
30 days ago
Reply to  John Clark

Biden dropping out and the likely contender in Kamala Harris has completely changed the playing field. Trump is panicing. If she can keep it on policy and character, she may just pull it off.

Jacko
Jacko (@guest_838501)
30 days ago
Reply to  Michael Hannah

The polls are shifting towards Harris and one slogan I’ve seen is brilliant ’Dont vote for the old guy’👍

Mark B
Mark B (@guest_838804)
29 days ago
Reply to  Jacko

The Republicans have got a younger lady waiting in the wings as well.

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_838534)
30 days ago
Reply to  Michael Hannah

Fingers crossed..although the assassination attempt has done him a lot of favours with getting out his base. It’s now a God given mission apparently and far from moderating his base it seems to have inflamed it. I honestly worry if he losses, what will happen, because he is never going to agree he lost and a lot of heavily armed Americans will agree with him, I can see a reality significant possibility of some very nasty political violence in the U.S. at the end of the year.

Michael Hannah
Michael Hannah (@guest_838570)
29 days ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Regrettably, I believe you are right.

Lonpfrb
Lonpfrb (@guest_838574)
29 days ago
Reply to  Jonathan

While his base were always going to vote for him the Independents and Republican Never-Trump (25%) have seen him forced to conclude that political violence is not acceptable, which doesn’t align with his enthusiasm for Insurrection (Jan-6 etc.) so his position looks increasingly deluded even for those not paying much attention. He knows that he can’t have another Debate as his stream of untruth will not be tolerated even if moderators fail as CNN did.

Frank62
Frank62 (@guest_838649)
29 days ago
Reply to  Lonpfrb

Trump was perfectly happy with political violence when he was whipping up fervour to imprison H Clinton, launch an attack on congress, lynch Mike Pence, fiddle the election result, slander every law agency investigating & prosecuting him, persecute & purge opposition etc. He’s stupid enough to risk civil war. Trumpism is a cult of personality, not that there’s much personality there. He only seems to like democracy when he wins. I hope American democracy survives.

Last edited 29 days ago by Frank62
Lonpfrb
Lonpfrb (@guest_838674)
29 days ago
Reply to  Frank62

Because of the global impact that an American fascist dictatorship would have, it’s a global concern to call out the maga fascists daily on social media. The deeply ironic Truth Social platform owned by #45 is where he likes to stream rage posts of alternative truth (lies) but for more electoral value the platforms used by independents and undecided are the key. While they may be filled with FSB kompromat bots, there’s still room to engage with US Voters who are the Jury in the matter DJT vs the United States of America, come November. The evidence is clear. He’s… Read more »

Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_838621)
29 days ago
Reply to  Jonathan

I recently saw the excellent movie ‘Civil War’ set in a future USA. Something like it might happen!

grizzler
grizzler (@guest_838543)
30 days ago
Reply to  Michael Hannah

Harris is a joke.
Yes,Trump may now not have an easy ride, but it’s by no means
guaranteed he would lose to Harris.
He didn’t lose to Clinton and Harris has a similar feel about her.
I really hope they remember how they believed ‘anyone can beat Trump’ when they chose Clinton and choose someone else instead of Harris.

Last edited 30 days ago by grizzler
Michael Hannah
Michael Hannah (@guest_838565)
29 days ago
Reply to  grizzler

Harris is a joke? Interesting, did she suggest injecting herself with disinfectant, or nucking a Hurricane.?
I never said Harris was a “ sure” thing, I did say the playing field has changed somewhat.

Lonpfrb
Lonpfrb (@guest_838572)
29 days ago
Reply to  grizzler

It’s a straight fight between the Prosecutor and the Convict on the 250 year American Democracy, or fascist Dictatorship Project 2025. She’s experienced dealing with fraudsters and sex offenders, so has his measure being both.

Send him to the Big House, not the White House.

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_838585)
29 days ago
Reply to  Lonpfrb

I try to be balanced, but I agree, Trump is potentially a serious risk to US democracy..Especially if he gets in as president, with a republican senate, congress and supreme court…with the grip he has on the Republican Party ( I’m not even sure you can call it the Republican Party anymore to be honest) you many even see him try and do something as drastic as try and remove the two term check..Democracies have fallen before.

Last edited 29 days ago by Jonathan
Baker
Baker (@guest_838679)
29 days ago
Reply to  grizzler

“Harris is a joke”
And Trump isn’t ? 😂

Mark B
Mark B (@guest_838802)
29 days ago
Reply to  Michael Hannah

Never comment on the politics of other countries is my policy.

I have no such worries about talking about people on TV shows bragging that they are brillaint at running businesses. Telling everyone they are idiots and then firing them – doesn’t sound to me like a brilliant way to run a business or lead people. Also if you are running loads of successful businesses how come you have time (or the need) to do a TV show. Sounds more like an actor or possibly the pied piper.

I would be worried I was being sold some old tat.😀

Last edited 29 days ago by Mark B
Jim
Jim (@guest_838601)
29 days ago
Reply to  John Clark

How would Trump force Ukraine into a settlement exactly? Do tell, threat to arm Russia?

US military aid being largely sent before January and vast majority of the fiscal aid is not from the USA.

John Clark
John Clark (@guest_838909)
28 days ago
Reply to  Jim

By simply withdrawing (probably steadily reducing) support. Ukraine would be forced to sue for peace.It would likely mean a new president, but they would end up at the negotiating table.

The US provides the lions share of support, and the reality is that European support is becoming progressively more Luke warm…

I’m glad the new UK Government has nailed its colours to the cross, the US elections in November will however be absolutely pivitol to Ukrains future.

Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_838616)
29 days ago
Reply to  John Clark

Why would Ukraine allow itself to cave in to US pressure to accept a ‘peace plan’ that will undoubtedly favour Russia?

John Clark
John Clark (@guest_838913)
28 days ago
Reply to  Graham Moore

Alas Graham, they simply wouldn’t have a choice. If Trump wins, he will force an end to the war, of that I have no doubt. Russia won’t stop, Putin will keep the steamroller running at any cost, if it takes a million lives, then so be it, any cost. Anything less would be seen as weakness, it’s just not in Russian mentality. Consider their 80’s Afgan nightmare (that was a playground fight in comparison to the Ukrainian horrors) it took an enlightened change of leadership to end it. The only chance of Russa blinking first, would be a Kremlin coup,… Read more »

Last edited 28 days ago by John Clark
Paul T
Paul T (@guest_838978)
28 days ago
Reply to  John Clark

Again replacing Putin by whatever means would not signal a change of direction in this War.The limited criticism he has faced at home has been directed at the complete shambles that this War has been conducted.Most voices want the Russian Military to take the Gloves off and fight the War properly.Any dissenting voices come from people who are either in Jail,in Exile or are Dead.

John Clark
John Clark (@guest_839170)
28 days ago
Reply to  Paul T

As I suggested, it would require the elimination of the entire Kremlin head shed.

Only the Russan military could do this.

Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_839220)
27 days ago
Reply to  John Clark

I am still not seeing it. If Trump wins he may well wish to end the war in Ukraine and has boasted repeatedly that he could end the war in 24hrs. Not sure why he wishes to end this war particularly, other than getting his mate Putin, out of a bad position…and providing a rationale for the US to cease providing expensive support to Ukraine. But how does he force Russia and Ukraine to peace talks and how does he ensure they are (in his mind) successful? He has zero track record at ending armed conflicts. I have always thought… Read more »

Andrew D
Andrew D (@guest_838815)
29 days ago
Reply to  John Clark

That’s how I’d see John

Paul T
Paul T (@guest_838905)
28 days ago
Reply to  John Clark

The only way this War will end will have to involve some sort of negotiated settlement, regardless of who is POTUS.

davyro
davyro (@guest_838515)
30 days ago

Why?

OldSchool
OldSchool (@guest_838603)
29 days ago

Personally hoping Harris will be POTUS. One thing I did think Trump was right on tho is to put a blowtorch on NATO ( esp the EU countries) to pony up the money for defence. Hoping Harris will continue on that vein. As for the UK getting closer to the EU in defence policy I’d be asking for some quid pro quo ( as in what are going to give us) before handing over a penny.

Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_838617)
29 days ago
Reply to  OldSchool

Did you mean the EU countries? – some of which are not in NATO.

Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_838620)
29 days ago

Great to hear a Government spokesman talk, again, about ironclad support to Ukraine. When can we hear a believable comment from HMG about the ironclad commitment to the Defence of the Realm and our role in helping to defend the Continent..or more importantly the deeds to back the words up.

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_838772)
29 days ago
Reply to  Graham Moore

Let’s hope early next year after the defence review is published…

Frank62
Frank62 (@guest_838646)
29 days ago

We must support UKR, all of Europe, not just sufficient to survive but bleeding heavily risking defeat, but enough to win & drive Russia out of all her territory. With or without USA support if Trump gets in & cuts off all aid.

Michael Hannah
Michael Hannah (@guest_838654)
29 days ago

We should list them as a partner for Tempest and watch the Russians go Ballastic.

Paul.P
Paul.P (@guest_838661)
29 days ago

Mungo Woodifield is an influential UK diplomat. He has given significant UN speeches on the dangers of misinformation and on the UK’s commitment to our double lock position on Gibraltar.

sh
sh (@guest_839106)
28 days ago
Reply to  Paul.P

Excellent then perhaps he can start on misinformation by looking at the photos of the supposed hit and most certainly not believing a word the Ukrainians say

Paul.P
Paul.P (@guest_838664)
29 days ago

Neither Trump nor Harris will exercise as much control of world destiny as we might think. The most significant and hopeful recent world events have been the death of Iranian president, hardline Ebrahim Raisi and the election of moderate reformer Masoud Pezeshkian as his sucessor.
Also significant I think is the disenchantment of the Chinese population in respect of China’s property economy and the dispiriting effect on Russian population of high losses in Ukraine. We need to hold our nerve. Come November I think the prospects for peace will be brighter

sh
sh (@guest_839103)
28 days ago

a Russian missile reduced a children’s hospital in Kyiv to rubble…

No it didn’t. Whatever it was hit an annex a few hundred yards away being used by the Ukrainian military and TWO people were killed.

Still, we should never expect the truth out of the UN or its reps or the UK political establishment