The UK and the EU are at a stand-off over vaccines as the EU demands the diversion of vaccines produced in the UK to make up for shortfalls in the European Union.
German MEP Peter Liese, a member of the European Parliament’s health committee, said that the UK had “better think twice”, telling Euronews:
💥German MEP Peter Liese, who sits on the Health Committee, tells me
European Union citizens will not be treated as second class
If AstraZeneca don’t change course, it will face consequences and so will UK “better think twice” – including blocking Pfizer exports pic.twitter.com/xaBLrisOH5
— Darren McCaffrey (@darrenmccaffrey) January 27, 2021
The demand from the EU follows a war of words between the two sides, including threats of lawsuits.
On Wednesday, the EU said that Astra “had pulled out of the scheduled call, in what would be an unprecedented snub of 27 governments”.
The drug maker denied that account.
According to Bloomberg:
“EU countries are desperate to speed up vaccinations after a sluggish start that’s left the bloc lagging far behind the U.S. and the U.K. The EU has administered just 2.2 doses per 100 people, versus 7.5 doses in the U.S., 11 doses in the U.K. and almost 45 doses in Israel. Astra’s vaccine isn’t due to be authorized for use in the bloc until Friday at the earliest.”
The public fight has epitomised the bloc’s failure to put its mass vaccination campaign on the right track added the US news outlet here.
Don’t listen to those EU idiots! So glad Britain isn’t part of the EU anymore.
I agree! It is the EU that wants to jump the queue!
The old blame someone else for your incompetence game that politicians for all nations and strips love to play.
If Astra can’t fulfill the EU order (signed 3 months after ours) why does that mean they should take it from the UK’s?
They can blame the company producing vaccines if they wish but how is threatening another customer justified?
Covering for their own incompetence no doubt!
Fail to sign a contract until 3 months after the UK and yet the UK is to blame.
Sadly, the EU is a victim of its own leaden bureaucracy by acting too slowly in ordering the vaccines early. Typically, the UK is open to jibes and threats, when they should be getting on with fighting COVID-19.
This current debacle is clear evidence that Brussels is incapable of acting in a quick and coordinated fashion when it really matters. This huge conglomerate of states is so bound up by procedure, that it’s strangulating any hope of quickly streamlining processes such as this issue. Who knows how the EU will tackle Climate Change, the next global crisis, in a timely manner, when they have obviously failed to ensure vaccines were approved and ordered in sufficient quantities to fight a pandemic.
The EU politicians should be held to account for why they held up signing the contract for 3 months. It was political as usual. The French did not want to order it and lobbied the EU to hold off on signing it for a French vaccine. The UK along with everyone else signed up to anyone reputable early that was developing a vaccine so they could deliver millions of doses as soon as it was approved. The UK has likely ordered double what it needs from multiple suppliers to guarentee supply. Once everyone has received the vaccine I’m sure the surplus will be distributed back to less developed countries or we could sell them to the EU for £38bn or whatever the divorce package was.
Absolutely guys, typically snail slow EU bureaucracy, they fiddled (held meeting after meeting) while Rome burnt and somehow it’s someone else’s fault, the drug company and the UK, huge surprise there then!
A great example of how our independent Country can act quickly, for the benefit of its citizens and how the poor people of the EU have been very badly let down, in the worst way possible.
The usual pro EU suspects on here are being suspiciously quiet …. The digital tumbleweed rolls by while we wait for a robust defence of the EU’s arrogant position, looking forward to it.
We’re all ears…
When I worked for a large company the time spent in meetings was disproportionate to the time you actually spent on the product. My usual contribution was about 1% to the furtherance of the issues, but one had to attend, it was mandatory. Brussels (EU) is full of meeting attendees and possibly each and everyone contributing about the same as I did? Okay, issues are addressed but at a snail’s pace, and that becomes the daily modus Operandi resulting in everyone swimming in molasses.
BB85 you are right. The EU was betting big on the French manufactured Sanofi vaccine. Unfortunately the French appear to be less than good at biomedical engineering and vaccine therapies. The Sanofi vaccine failed at clinical trial and had to be scrapped.
Now the company are going to try to gesr up to manufacture Pfizer vaccines which is going to take many months to come to fruition.
The EU did not care its net far enough and was betting solely on an EU only solution. Which thus far hasn’t worked very well for them.
I am sure AZ will produce tens of billions of doses in due course and the EU will get what they want however they can’t reasonably faff about for ages and then expect their share to be ready and waiting.
It is in our interests to see the whole world vaccinated but the priority is to get rid of the nasty variants.
If we can help any country we should but not at our own expense and we should certainly not respond to bullying.
AstraZeneca are on record to say they would try their best to fulfill orders but from a research perspective the AstraZeneca vaccine is pretty much UK intellectual property researched using a majority of uk taxpayers funding.
They bet big on the failed Sanofi vaccine and lost.
Astra are on record stating only low rate initial production has begun inside the EU with about 31 million doses because the EU delayed by months and months to license the vaccine. No company will go into full scale production for a drug costing about £12 an ampoule (for 5 doses) without a license in the country, region or federated superstate in question.
This is simply an issue of the EUs manufacture but they dont want to hear the truth instead they blame the UK and Astra for their failings. Why? Because their citizens are rightly angry and frustrated. But bear in mind. No country. No country in the EU has suffered as much as the UK has with covid.
Of course we dont know what the contracts actually say so jumping to conclusions seems potentially foolish as it may well be Astra-zenica arent behaving well – and large companies are hardly known for being reputable!
Although the suspicion that the EU is desperately trying to cover it’s complete failure does rather seem overwhelming.
It is certainly ironic that one of the principal reasons for Brexit (for me – cutting out layers of admin and decision making being brought more accountable to UK people) has been demonstrated quite so quickly. Hence the EU doubling down to try and ensure it doesnt work out that way.
It’s politics as usual really, blame someone else, whilst trying to create the conditions to force a compromise in your favour and eventually everyone settles and you get your way to some extent. The EU habitually works in this way but it’s another reason why I wanted to leave as it isn’t really our culture.
All in all, not a good time to be a EUophile – reporting of this is pretty awkward over on the Guardian! Even the BBC seems embarassed and trying to cover the EU’s arse!
AstraZeneca has been acting perfectly properly. Even Robert Peston, arch remainer, can see the EU is at it.
Covid vaccine: What is the dispute between the EU and AstraZeneca? | ITV News
Unless you have seen the contract, you literally have no idea if that is true.
It is touching that some have such faith in global multinationals though. Or such bias against the EU, and as the rest of my comnent makes clear, I’ve no appreciation for it.
Astra Zeneca are tied with a non-disclosure clause, while the EU seems to be free to shout and stamp their feet like big babies and make all sort of threats. I’ll go with the company’s story of problems in the EU supply chain due to their late signing of a deal over the rantings and threats from the EU. AstraZeneca’s side of the story is being confirmed as more information starts to be known.
Thank goodness we left the EU.
It’s funny that the EU have covered the Astra vaccine contract in a non disclosure cause? Why? Because they dont want transparency for their populace.
OH please you taken the sting out of your Post by mentioning that posturiing
stuttering vain glorious Peston
I agree he is an eejit, and that was why I mentioned it. Because even he is saying the EU is in the wrong.
The problem here is the EU placed a lot of its eggs on the French Sanofi Pasteur’s vaccine which was meant to go into production last month at the starting rate of 100 million doses a month, but which then pushed back that date to Oct 2021. which is why the EU rejected 500 million doses of the Pfizer vaccine which were offered to it. I quote from last Dec and the Brussels Times:
Vaccines: EU turned down offer of 500 million extra doses
“”The European Union was offered an extra 500 million doses of the vaccine now making it’s way across Europe, but turned the offer down, Der Spiegel reports. The offer came from BioNTech, the German partner of the American pharmaceuticals giant Pfizer. The EU had already signed a contract for 200 million doses, with an option of 100 million more. According to the magazine, citing sources familiar with the negotiations, the objection came mainly from France. The French company Sanofi had been given a contract for 300 million doses of its own vaccine, which has yet to obtain approval. The French government objected to the offer from BioNTech because it would bring the total bought from the company to 800 million doses.”
Regards the AZ issue, here is a transcript of an interview from AstraZeneca’s CEO Pascal Soriot. If you have the time, it is well worth a read:
https://www.repubblica.it/cronaca/2021/01/26/news/interview_pascal_soriot_ceo_astrazeneca_coronavirus_covid_vaccines-284349628/
I hear the French have given up on it.
Yes, that has a lot to do with it.
Essentially the EU experts wanted to do what the UK were doing.
This didn’t suit Macron’s highly nationalistic agenda so he put a lot of pressure to take French product options.
The French options didn’t materialize and now a late sign with Astra.
Contrast that to the UK government, that underwrote the cost of developing the Oxford Astra vaccine. The UK government also bought the manufacturing options at risk, if there was no vaccine or nobody wanted the production slots the UK would have to pay for them, before there was a product. This allowed Astra to tool up the production line and stand it ready, The UK governemnt then crystallized the options to a contract as soon as trials results looked reasonable.
So I don’t see the EU’s contractual argument or moral argument.
I only see a playground bully.
I couldn’t agree more with what you have said. This is just the beginning and as I have said all along the EU have made no secret about a proxy war with the UK and that includes Scotland by the way and only goes to show how terrified the German French alliance are of of a seismic shift in the balance of power from Europe to the UK. YOU START A TRADE WAR and the consequences are the global economy will not want to do buisness with you. How many bullied European nations have had enough? Greece, Italy and maybe even the Irish who are torn between its nemesis the UK or the European project. As Churchill said more jaw jaw less war war. We are going through a global pandemic and the UK made sure that a percentage of the vaccines that it has ordered go to those countries that need assistance so the EU is not only trying to take from the Uk.
The really odd thing is that they are having a go at AZ from before they licensed the AZ vaccine! That is what makes it kind of obvious that AZ are being used as a scapegoat.
The EU’s real current problem is the production of all of the other vaccines that they have licensed is also ‘slow’ to ramp up.
Similar theme emerging?
Anyone familiar with industrial chemistry will know the formidable difficulties that there are with taking lab scale to batch and then to process scale. You can make a lot of educated guesses but unfortunately you have to try it and refine things incrementally.
I suspect that what is actually slowing things down is batches of vaccine that are failing tests and are, **quite rightly**, being disposed of. You cannot take any chances with this kind of thing.
The Commission’s raid on the Belgian plant really does smack of desperation and bullying. I wonder is they sent Inspector Clouseau in for expert help?
The one thing that I can tell you having worked on the edges of Pharma, in my chemistry days, is that the guys at AZ will be 100% laser focused on doing the job 100% correctly with zero short cuts.
Are the EU then going to raid all the other Pharma companies and is Biden going to start kicking doors in? Don’t think so. Is France going to kick in the doors of the Pasteur Institute and enquire if they ditched their research wrongly? Or is the EU commission going to grow up, stick its hands up, admit their mistake and then try and plan as best they can around where they actually are and if throwing more money at the problem might speed things up. Pink flying pigs.
There are pretty strange messages coming out of the EU “we got the vaccine cheaper than the UK” – maybe you need to pay more speed things up. UK approach was “what does it cost to do this as fast as safly possible” as the UK government recognised that paying a few £Bn more was a drop in the ocean compared to more week/months of lockdown.
I was a Europhile, I voted to remain in. But this rubbish along with the games played in the BEXIT negotiations has changed my mind. The EU has a terrible rotten bullying culture.
Supportive Bloke. Excellent post. Totally agree
The Sanofi vaccine utterly failed in clinical trials that is why it has been withdrawn. Injecting it offers no better protection then a placebo.
Wasnt aware they turned down the offer of 500 million pfizer jabs. That will have been on cost grounds. It costs £13 a shot and the EU vaccine programme wasnt going to pay the going rate. They wanted to prove they were driving down costs and giving value for money to their citizens. Which is just nuts. £13 a shot vs someone’s life.
Pfizer are making minimal profit off their vaccine. It is a complex very expensive manufacturing process to build a messenger RNA vaccine wrapped in lipids is going to be expensive.
The UK wisely signed a reasonable contract with pfizer to hedge its bets and provide a broad portfolio of potential vaccines. Unlike the EU that bet on Sanofi as the only vaccine in town and this bet has failed. Too late to now cast your net further afield and hope for a miracle or tens of millions of doses of vaccine to arrive when the EU has only just licensed the drug… today!
Yep I don’t believe Pfizer are making much from this vaccine. But then when you are talking about whole population health of the EU even a pound on the vaccine will equal a billion pounds of cost to EU healthcare systems, that’s a lot of knee replacements or childhood vaccs and Imms programmes.
Its a sad fact that when you start talking about pounds and pence in a health system and how and when you spend them it always ends in someone living and someone dying! These are choices made every day in every year In every organisation that makes up our health systems. In health It’s a fact you face at the beginning of your career when you choose who your seeing to first and how to divide your time between the 16 patients that need you, through to running a department and deciding who sees the Dr when and what patients get nurses time or moved to resuscitate, finally at the end of your career your deciding what teams and organisations get what budgets, which business cases to fund and which risks you hold and which you don’t. The decisions that save lives are always balanced against decisions that mean lives will not be saved.
Unfortunately the brutal truth is that £13 pounds does not save a life, it only does in very small number of cases in that person who was going to catch the disease and was due to be one of the unlucky 1%. so you are actually throwing probably at least 1000 vaccines into a 1000 arms to save 1 life ( so it’s maybe 100 hours of GP/Registered Nurse time , the same for admin, cost of the building and 1000 vaccine doses, so a good £16000 per life), but Maybe we will also prevent 10 ITU admissions each of which will burn that whole £16, 000 in 2 weeks, so for a western nation the economy of health on spending that £16000 to save a life works as it also prevents possibly hundreds of thousands of pound of ITU costs, time and treatment and not overwhelm the acute care system, which will kill many people ( if there is not an ED resus bay or ITU bed and the skilled staff when you need it you die). Vaccination programmes are never really about the individual, it’s all about how much your are willing to invest to prevent the likely harm of not paying for the vaccination Programme. Finally you also balanced against could you make more impact spending the money elsewhere (16k would pay for around 30 hip/knee replacements, that will give years more life to 30 individuals who would succumb to slow death from immobility and chronic pain and cost a few more hundreds of thousands of pounds in social care costs).
Personally I would fund every health programme we could, as it all saves more money in the end as well as improving lives( the less you treat and intervene up stream the more you pay Down stream and that’s leads to a cycle of Exponentially increased health and social care costs and lost quality of life years ). But as Mrs May clearly put it there is no magic money tree and we cut our cloth and decide what we pay for, knowing we are damming many to save even more.
I have to laugh I read this story on an Irish paper last week:
Brussels block Dublin from buying Oxford vaccine as EU population aren’t ‘guinea pigs’
Ireland has been barred from ordering doses of the Oxford coronavirus vaccine in an apparent EU bid to pay the UK back for Brexit. The vaccine has been given the go ahead in the UK in order to vaccinate as many people as possible with the NHS under increasing pressure. The jab has yet to be given the green light by the EU and there may be delays due to Brexit.
The European Commission said that coronavirus vaccines cannot be delivered before they get regulatory approval. Today, Micheal Martin told the Dail that an early consignment of the Oxford jab would not be forthcoming. Although the Taoiseach said the latest COVID-19 vaccine will arrive in Ireland before mid-February. He said: “We have a much more comprehensive and detailed plan in terms of ramping up then the volume for the next phase, particularly after the authorisation of the AstraZeneca vaccine, which should be on the 29 January with from the EMA and then delivery for their timeline for mid-February.
“That would be followed then by the Janssen vaccine, sometimes a month after that in terms of authorisation a little bit later on we’ll be getting more supplies of Pfizer/BioNtech and Moderna.”
The AstraZeneca vaccine is set to be approved for use by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) before the end of January.
Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo told broadcaster VRT News last month: “In the UK, they have started vaccination earlier, that’s correct.
“But they have used their population as guinea pigs over there, and they have opted not to do these extra tests.”
Irish diplomat, Ray Bassett, told Express.co.uk: “Our Minister for Health, Stephen Donnelly, has just been rebuffed publicly when he suggested that Ireland should bring in some supplies of the AstraZeneca/Oxford COVID vaccine in anticipation of its approval by the European Medicines Agency.
“The Irish Government was sharply told by the Commission that this would not be permitted.
Morning Farouk, very interesting. It just shows you how far the EU has gone in centralising power and pulling it away from the member States.
They have been sleepwalking into this for years, perhaps some will finally wake up and smell the coffee……
So they are threatening a trade war unless they get deliveries of a vaccine that they are not currently allowing to be delivered? Kafka could not have made this one up!
Astra z claimed today that the contract numbers are targets not promises. I would say if your not happy here is cash back many other countries are begging for it ( only not for profit vaccine)
AZ will have known that if they came up with a decent vaccine they would have been inundated with orders. A failure to deliver to target might void the contract allowing the EU to go elsewhere which is fine. Boris’s strategy of keeping well out of it is sensible. Going to Scotland was inspired.
Lots of dead cats being dumped on desks in Brussels this week.
Deflect, Deflect , Deflect seems to be the default EU position.
AZ should take a lesson from the EU and start playing dirty. A redacted copy of the contract should be found by a jouno on a park bench then the “best efforts ” clause will be there for all to see.
All countries in the EU know what EU contracts are like and they will know the type of terms drug companies will sign up to. No one will be fooled. The odd thing here is the EU is raging against the company which will sooner or later come to the rescue of it’s citizens. It is just a case of ramping up the production.
Has rather teutonic overtones for me, they should learn to modulate their language. What they going to do? Send their bombers over??
He certainly seems to be a grade one plonker. But then, we have been sending UKIP plonkers to Brussels for years, to insult and turn their backs (liberally) on the EU. I think we need to get over the idea that the UK is home-ground for idiots….other countries have a plentiful supply as well!
Very true. One need look no further than this German MEP or a certain former US president…….
Its always possible of course in that he was instructed to cause a kerfuffle to show German/EU outrage at being shortchanged for public consumption/perception, for one it puts pressure on a UK/Swedish company and makes the UK look bad in European voters eyes. If thats the case I would not be surprised as I’m sure mischief making is on the agenda of some within the EU establisment.
Anything is possible….but it doesn’t make it so! I’ll leave the conspiracy theories to the lost tribes of America. Anyway, Merkel isn’t that cheap!
What bombers? Thought Germans only had 4 fly able planes due to cuts? Can’t invade Europe with soldiers using brooms as guns! They will use economic might.
funny that no ones talking about Germany bypassing Eu and buying own vaccine
With all due seriousness our Astra manufacturing sites should be guarded with immediate effect by our armed forces. There is a risk of spoiling action by a foreign power envious at our country actually having vaccine manufactured and supplied to the UK.
I was thinking about this too; these vaccines need to have round the clock protection because if it’s not a foreign power, it will be some loony conspiracy theorist wanting to burn the stockpile of ‘5G-containing’ vaccines.
What is astonishing is that they never seem to learn. That threatening and browbeating the UK gets Europe precisely nowhere; but they still try it on century upon century. They never learn.
Imagine if Scotland were in the EU? (and this is before it has to pay in to the EU as opposed to receiving it from England)
I guess if push came to shove we would make supplies available to Ireland. Indeed if we have over production from Wrexham than I’m sure we will make it available to poorer countries. We are not needlessly hoarding it.
And still we wait for the usual pro EU contingent to fight their case, the silence is absolutely deafening!
Could it be that it’s ‘finally’ dawning on them that leaving was the right move afterall?
A little slow to catch up with the rest of us perhaps, but finally, welcome to common sense!
I’m french and it’s totally BS.
It’s not the fault of the UK if the EU is in this situation.
But hey… That’s come from a German, really need to say more ?
Well Hermes, it’s time to get on the Frexit bandwagon, you can even join our Commonwealth, we even have a Queen you can put on your new Francs, just don’t lop her head off on her state visits!??
Certainly not for the moment.
The UK out of the EU is a good thing, not the France.
One of the main problem of the EU was the UK, now we have a chance to do something good, if that fail, it’s another debate.
Even if I would prefer a small western EU.
Interesting. You have a chance with the UK out to do something? Like what? Create a new federated superstate controlled by France and Germany? Kind of like an invasion of other countries sovereignty but without a bullet being fired.
Many think the EU was created in it’s current format to drive forward German dominance over Europe after failing in 2 world wars.
I think the EU will fall apart before a true federated superstate becomes a reality.
The fulcrum of that failure could well be the covid crises.
I see Marine Le Pen is neck and neck with Macron mow in the polls. So who knows maybe Frexit is a possibility.
I’m probably one of your pro EU contingent and have made a balanced posting below which promotes some kind of compromise in which the UK is NOT weakened. Whilst its clear the EU have screwed up and need to take responsibility for that, its really not driving a coach and horses through the EU argument. Even if the UK can complete its vaccination plan, it won’t make that much difference if not just the EU but the rest of the world is not moving ahead quickly with theirs. We all want to travel, we all want to trade. It requires an international effort which goes beyond country borders. It is after all a humanitarian threat.
Julian that is what is surprising about this. The UK hasn’t been underhanded. It has merely moved quickly and got on with what is needed. We have ordered what is required from many sources and are now injecting people with those that have successful and have been quick to get ahead of the game. AZ will increase production no doubt but it is neither AZ nor the UK’s fault that the EU has been indecisive and are behind.
Wrong. The vaccination programme isnt solely about econokica. It’s about saving lives and reducing the terrible burden this disease has had on the British people. A much greater toll then theEU is currently experiencing proportionately.
Well bear in mind it was wee Nicola and her bunch of goons who kicked this off by publishing the vaccine delivery schedule.
Deliberate ploy to stir trouble me thinks
We have to get upto 20-30 million vaccines administered to all those 50+ and high clinical risk before we would have spare vaccines from our orders to even think of donating abroad.
Simply speaking the UK has the highest death toll in Europe and thus we have paid for the right (monetarily and ethically/ morally in human lives) for the right to retain uk manufactured, funded, researched vaccine.
Sad to say but this is part and parcel of the EU and why so many people were pretty fed up with them. We need good relations with Europe, no matter what, but they do seem to shit on their own doorstep and then blame UK. They ordered the vaccine late, didnt like to be seen incapable of sorting out “there own people” and made such a bloody fuss about how great they are doing. Now its gone pear shaped, and they are going back to default setting, blame UK. EU politics is a dirty mess, all pretending to be one super state but all realy just concerned about re-election for themselves back to whatever gravy train they are riding.
I am a European, we all are, geography ensures that, but isnt it sad to see this continued anti-UK rhetoric when they get it wrong. One thing this will remind us, is, no matter what platitudes and soothing words they speak, deep down they now really hate the fact we are no longer part of their empire, and hate the fact they have a limited control over us. This should have been an opportunity for politicians to work together, to show that no matter how many bumps in the road various EU countries border crossing seem to have invented, the smooth flow of goods is quite bloody easy……especialy if its a vaccine that we may be requried to send to them. EU politics…..sigh…very messy.
SPOT ON!!!! Sick to death of their behaviour.
Very little about it on the BBC. What a surprise.
I’m seeing a huge amount of press coverage: BBC, Sky, LBC, CNN as well as the print press
I’m sure that it will run & run. Hopefully, something sensible will be said about the crisis we are in at some stage. So strange how hatred becomes a unifying force and diverts us away from the real issue!
Sorry DM but its the headlining story on the BBC online news. People on left say the BBC is bias and people on the right say its bias ,so they must be doing something right in being impartial, especially compared to other nation news.
i’m glad you’ve said that since the BBC can never win. The right wing claim it is bias to the left and the left wing claim it is bias to the right. The reality is that the BBC are centrist. It’s a mark of politics in this country that people don’t see that. The Centre has been poorly represented in recent years because of deselections from both Tory and Labour parties though Sir Kier is attempting now to recover that ground. with labour.
As a Centrist myself I totally agree with you julian, in this online world that panders to the extreme left or extreme right the centrist are left out, and in my opinion so is some common sense left out too.
And I’m sorry too Dave12, but you don’t get my meaning. I was expecting this response as I left it hanging deliberately to see a response!
One I said “very little” not “nothing” and two where does it quote the headline on this website? It is the spin on how the story is delivered. I too have read that report at 0500 this morning on my night shift.
“UK will ‘face consequences and better think twice” where is that?
As for folk defending the BBC, pull the other one.
I invite you to read “The Noble Liar”
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Noble-Liar-Distorts-Promote-Liberal/dp/1785903497
Now I’m getting back to military matters, which some on this journal ignore and only surface when political spats surface. And true to form, he’s here already.
And to add some balance, which even we supposed right wing sorts are actually capable of, though you’d never believe it given some here talking of “hate” which is utter cobblers and the usual spin, the latest BBC report has an analysis by Nick Triggle that I admit does at least seem fair. OK.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-55838272
Fair enough DM I would say some people come on here to learn (like myself )more on military knowledge through the comment section with researchers like yourself, and former service people but yes a lot of us are guilty of the political spats when it comes to military story, given though this story is very political.
No worries mate, not arguing with your good self at all. I’m also guilty of getting involved in “political spats”, and I actually try to avoid it and keep failing as I will wade in with the best of them if such is already underway.
I’d support an instant ban from the site for anyone who indulges in it if it meant we could actually keep the UKDJ for purely military related posts.
Well DM…..if this article wasn’t designed to encourage political debate, what was its objective? Given the political views of many on this site, this article was like the proverbial red rag to the bull! Fortunately the posts have been fairly ‘moderate’ (in UKDJ terms) so far. You have got the Brexit that you wanted…you can feel free to put away the ‘sword of justice’ less you start tilting at windmills! ?
Politics and military goes hand in hand. What’s that song? don’t want you singing to yourself all day about church and marriage though 😉
?
Indeed Daniele, the BBC have glossed over it, certainly not a single word of Macrons push for the failed French vaccine and subsequent delay in ordering alternative vaccines ….
Of course John, it is the spin on the reporting that I did not adequately explain in my first post that so frustrates. The same ball park that Covid is all Boris / HMG fault when in fact it is people’s behaviour that is causing this spread, despite HMG;s mistakes early on with PPE and Test and Trace. Vaccination programme going well? Where is the praise? The positivity? The hope? The moral booster?
Laura Kuenssberg was only interested in hanging the PM the other day on the 100,000 deaths total, and media just love a negative report to slam the government.
I just watched the lunchtime version of Al-Jazeera and lo and behold did you know that the whole of S America is in a real bad way re the virus
I thought it was only the UK that had it
Well it does seem that way at times when i watch the so called world news
Absolutely Daniele, spot on……
I’ve taken both parents and one in law to my local vaccination center and I was totally awed at the organisation, the care and professionalism of all involved, it makes you proud to be British, outstanding in every way….
Millions vaccinated already = fantastic news for us all!
But, the left just swipe and snear (actually seeming pissed off its going so well) and the BBC act as cheerleaders for them…..
Piss poor…
But to be fair vaccinations are one of the few things we HAVE got right and most ‘leftists’ I know don’t disagree with this. It’s the rest of the Covid response that the government has lagged behind most other countries in. I can give you examples but I think you already know…
Just had the vaccine this afternoon, John and I concur totally with your views. A very slick operation, set up in the local shopping mall. Totally professional but, at the same time, kind and chatty – everyone just pleased they are helping. Whilst Boris and his govt have faced justifiable criticism over their handing of the crisis so far, they can truly claim much kudos for a massive success with the vaccination programme.
The bbc ? every time I hear that acronym I can’t stop laughing ?. Soon man soon the end is nigh for these shitehoose fake charlatan masters of spin and propaganda .
The Good news is the new Andrew Neil ???????fronted news channel will be here soon.We might actually get to hear some balanced reporting ??
Andrew Neil you say Artist, top bloke….
This Week was one of the few BBC programms I religious watched, the mix of Neil, Portillo and thoughtful Labour guest was a superb mix, no wonder the BBC axed it!
It had to make way for Drag Race Canada or some other comparable lazy arse, Woke bull crap programming…..
Yes it was the only programme I watched every week on that shower of ? without fail fair and balanced. The Marxist loving looney left just don’t get it this is why record numbers are cancelling the licence fee and I believe the beeb are facing a 160 million black hole. ??? it’s over for them in their present form.
GB news and the R Murdoch news Chanel both coming to a screen near you soon .
???????????
I’m sorry, you’re looking forward to a channel run by Rupert Murdoch? Oh dear…
Not so much Murdochs Chanel but the other GB news with Andrew Neil ?? Wey hey man ???
Bitter fools. They expect to be 3 months late to the party yet to sit at the top of the table.
If the EU wasn’t a mess of red tape & ego’s maybe they’d be able to get organised.
The reason we have the Biotech vaccine is that we approved it for use and pre-ordered in advance. Not out of any favour from the EU the self righteous p*icks. Same reason we have the first 100 million AstraZeneca vaccines on contract – we got organised for a change!
It is business plain & simple. AstraZeneca aren’t going to risk a second round of legal action from the UK government in order to avoid legal action from the EU when the wording of their contract is dubious at best.
Suggestion is if there is enough headroom in production to meet the UK rollout targets then additional capacity can be used to back fill European shortfalls… What happened to superior European manufacturing? (That bit is a joke… I’m fully aware it is simply down to UK labs having more time to prepare based on forward orders etc).
I don’t see what all the fuss is about. Some countries like Australia forward ordered from multiple companies many months ago (including a local manufacturing deal for the Oxford vaccine), as well as putting up R&D money. All well before approvals or even stage 3 trials. In a pandemic, it really is the quick or the dead. The fact that the EU sat on its hands for months is their problem.
Exactly, we booked production capacity with AZ before a viable vaccine was even found. Risk/Reward. That allowed the quick start as the production lines were up and running at the work go… UK plants have had their own capacity issues… 3 months ago.
The process is well run in now so gathering a head of steam. The EU have tossed about mostly thanks to France’s protectionism as usual and now want to be at the front of the queue.
Someone above said ‘playground bully tactics’. that exactly what it is.
Rfn it’s all true what you say. But to add.
AstraZeneca vaccine was majority funded by UK taxpayers. We ordered in block contract.
The EU meanwhile delayed and pontificate in extremes betting on the failed Sanofi vaccine to come to their aide.
Then demand millions of doses of AZ vaccine to be released whilst only today licensing the drug for use within the EU.
Then due to costs they turned down the offer to mass manufacture 500 million doses of pfizer vaccine. Just scandalous behaviour and incompetence of the highest order.
I think the compromise may be: AZ prioritises UK until the 4 high category groups are vaccinated (or maybe the top 6.) This brings us to mid Feb/mid March timescale if current rates are maintained. Then divert some supplies to EU. Why? Well, simply because even though we’ve seen the worst of the EU in its competence, nationalism and slopey shoulders, the fact is we’re not going to be safe until we’re all vaccinated and a vaccinated EU allows us to more quickly open our economy and get life back to normal. Also, it reduces the threat of mutants developing in the EU which harms everybody.
An escalated polemic and vaccine/trade war won’t really help anybody
By that time there will be lots of plants making the Astra vaccine at scale.
I agree arguing now for short term gain is not productive.
Absolutely Julian…’vaccine nationalism’ will not help any country…we are in a race against covid 19 not each other! Astra-Zenica appear to have overestimated their ability to fulfil the contracts that it has signed. This is for AZ to sort out and they need to be working with all countries concerned to a achieve a short-term compromise….this may mean shipping some UK supplies to EU countries. The longer term answer is to expand production facilities …. we are in the early days of a global fight against this virus….international cooperation is paramount.
I am rather saddened to see this issue appearing as an article on UKDJ….but we all know why…don’t we?
It’s typically piss poor planning by the EU Politburo Herodotus and it’s everyone else’s fault!
It drags EU central planning into the harsh cold light of a January day and shows how utterly incompetent it is, when it really matters most and lives are at stake.
As for shipping UK supplies to the EU, I don’t have any issues there, so long as it’s after everyone over 50 in the UK has had two doses. That might sound harsh, but I will guarantee that Boris would be politically crucified from all sides if he diverted UK orders before that point.
Might I suggest the EU plead their case with Joe Biden for US supplies, it certainly wouldn’t be first time that Uncle Sam has had to bail them out!
Perhaps ask Uncle Joe for Sputnik 5, it seems to work after all and they need to act fast!
I do have to give you credit for trying to fly the blue flag here, you raised it above the trench line and got it shot full of holes, but you took a stab at it anyway, good for you.
Praise indeed from you John! I am in group 5 and can expect to receive my first shot before the summer? I am quite prepared to wait longer if it means protecting the most vulnerable in Europe I think that many people would do the same. We need to be working together on this and the comments by Mr Liese are, at best, unhelpful. As for having my ‘blue flag’ shot full of holes, I await that event and don’t mind as long as there are 28 holes?
Agree the UK cannot donate any vaccine until all over 50s and all key workers are vaccinated. So sometime in late May I would think under current vaccination plans. Later if the EU stops the flow of the pfizer jab. If I was CEO of AZ I would return the EUs contract as unfilled and tell the EU to source vaccine elsewhere. The AZ vaccine is currently the only vaccine safe for a world wide roll out. Unless the Russian Sputnik is also reported to be similar???
Astra approached the EU weeks and weeks ago. Offered full rate production but the EU declined because their medicines agency didnt trust the CDC, MHRA or any other country’s regulator to have made the right decision. The EMA then went about a hugely lengthy time consuming peer review of all documentation that took many months. Only to conclude that the British and Americans were right.
AZ vaccine is safe and effective.
Why did they pontificate? Why did they turn down offer of full rate production that has meant they are only getting 31 million doses instead of 100 million now (due to delayed full batch production rates at its 2 plants in Holland and Belgium)
Why did they turn down the offer of 500 million pfizer jabs?
It was all because of France and Macron promising the French Sanofi vaccine which was an utter failure in clinical trials and has now been withdrawn.
I see the middle ground you are aiming for Julian, but it just won’t fly.
You make a well reasoned argument, but as I suggested to Herodotus below, such a move would be utterly politically unacceptable, no UK government of any colour would ever sanction it.
Simply put, UK lives would be sacrificed to save EU lives, it’s an unsettling and harsh fact.
The UK government ‘must’ stick to the plan and ensure everyone over 50 gets both doses before we can think of diverting our order.
The NHS has done an incredibly good job on the vaccination programme so far and we must not allow any outside influence to de-rail things.
my post states that minimum number of UK categories need to be vaccinated first before any goodwill diversions to EU, but a 75 year old in the EU should take precedence over a fit 40 year old in the UK based on the tightly coupled supply chains/manufacturing and investment decisions already actioned. I think if we got this right, it could be an excellent PR activity so soon after the trade deal. Anybody who believes that UK should not export/share under any circumstances fails to recognise that the benefits of full vaccination won’t be realised in the UK if our EU neighbours are not close behind us at least.
The right thing would be for the EU to accept it has screwed up (and accept the political fall-out), for AZ to come clean re contracts and for a compromise to be reached. If we’re falling out like this less than a month after the signing of the trade deal, really, what future do we have with our new relationship? Oh and by the way, what would Biden say – the dynamics have changed now.
F**K that pal!
The only time any UK produced vaccines should be diverted away from the UK program is when production exceeds that which is required to maintain the pace of vaccinating every man, woman and child in this country, before next winter.
They can have everything over and above that, but until then, no.
Agree
It might sound a tad churlish, but re the new relationship, I do believe they immediately started threatening and Sabre rattling, not conjusive to relationship building.
What would Biden say, hmm, good question, I suggest they ask and sharpish!
Or, like I said, there’s always Sputnik 5 to try..
Funnily the Russians are more then happy to supply vaccine to whoever wants it. They are selling hundreds of millions of doses to India.
Sputnik is in essence a near carbon copy of Oxford vaccine.
The uk government have to get down to tier 5 vaccination priority group before any vaccine can be freed up from our contracted supply.
If EU citizens due of covid that is not our fault. It is the EUs fault for utter incompetence.
Looks like your position has mellowed since you’ve worked down the thread. Perhaps you do believe in global social responsibility after all!
Like litmus paper!
Hi John
You just wrote
“Simply put, UK lives would be sacrificed to save EU lives”
Isnt that what the UK has done for the last 3/4 hundred years
And they still hate us
Agree. We bleed and die. They hate us for it. The cycle has to stop. Time Europe dealt with it’s own utter mess.
The number 1 priority of any government is to protect its citizens. Therefore giving any UK manufactured vaccine to the EU that is from our contracted supplies is a dereliction and failure of the primary duty of the government.
It is tantamount to stating EU citizens lives are more valuable then UK citizens. Let’s be Frank some uk citizens will die of covid for a lack of a vaccine they would have got but for any donation to the EU.
that Policy leads to the chances of further mutations developing which resist the vaccines. In that case it would make no difference that UK had achieved 100% vaccination. This is a global issue which is only solved by the world working together, I developed this point elsewhere on the thread so won’t repeat it
No Julian.
We continue vaccinating at full steam because British citizens are dying to the tune of 103,000 so far. That is not something the EU , or you, want to hear but that is the truth. No vaccines can be sent abroad when the UK has the highest death rate in Europe.
That is morally, ethically indefensible. Once France and Germany surpass our death rates then on humanitarian grounds there is an argument for mutual aide.
Until that time. I’m sorry the EU can do one. It’s their mess, they can lie in it.
Vaccination Nationalism……oh dear!
Is it vaccination nationalism to simply state the truth. On the grounds of death rates and disease burden the uk vaccination programme is likely to save more lives then the distributed EU programme.
Plus is it wrong to want our own populace to be protected from this terrible disease.
Until you have worked as a clinician in the frontline of the NHS as I do every day. You cannot possibly know the horrific nature of this disease.
So not nationalism just simple statistical facts. Once the EU has a death rate that is proportionately higher then ours then they can be given vaccine from our contracted stock.
No, it is petty nationalism!
No it is not. It is statistical fact. You can call it pretty nationalism all you like but until the EU has proportionately the same death and hospitalization rates as the UK there is no justification to mutual aide.
The EU has shown its card this morning by blocking exports of vaccines until their orders are fulfilled.
That’s the first example of petty nationalism or supra nationalism in the EU case.
The EU has declared a war with the UK by proxy in that they are trying to force third a party ie multi nationals destroy the UK. The stupidity of all of this is the EU will destroy its self. There isn’t a right thinking multi national who would want to do business with a trading bloc who changes the rules whenever they feel like it. When will the EU realise the world does not revolve around them. To use its citizens lives to get what they want when they want it is almost a Stalinism trait.
A couple of points:
1) The Continetals were never very good at queueing.
2) Sounds like the UK Gov is at last starting to wake up and smell the roses as far as developing National Strategic Resources and Capabilties like I have been banging on about on this forum..
e.g.
“Oxford vaccine was going to be developed by Merck, a German company, until HMG stepped in and said it must be done with a UK headquartered company, hence AstraZeneca deal.”
Can someone remind me why we still call the EU our friends and partners. This is nothing short of a mafia style power and resource grab. I think any pretense that remainers have that the EU is a benign entity are blow literally out of the water now. The EU only have themselves to blame for their vaccine mess up. They should do the decent thing that Boris did and say they take responsibility for the mess they have created. I have great respect for what Boris has done. He had to deal with Brexit, covid-19 and now an overly nationalistic and aggressive EU. I am so glad I voted leave in the referendum and this has only re-confirmed why I voted the way I did. The irony is that Scotland wants to re-join the EU…getting rid of one parliament where they have a major say (and many previous Scottish PMs) to one where they are a tiny voice overruled all the time by the French and Germans….you couldn’t make it up…
It’s stuff like this that makes my Brexit doubts evaporate. there is no question that the EU is STILL out to punish us for daring to leave! Also, despite accusations of left wing bias against the BBC, having watched their reporting on this yesterday I am now fully convinced they are in the hands of a left wing/anti-Brexit clique. They punted the EU grievance line 100% without giving any coverage or right of rebuttal to the Astra Zeneca side. It was outrageous. i hasten to had that the left and anti-Brexiteers are entitled to their views but surely the BBC is supposed to beneutral and objective. this needs fixing!
..despite accusations of left wing bias against the BBC I had given them the benefit of the doubt but…
George please can we have an Edit facility.
There is an edit button, sort of “settings” type icon at the bottom right corner of any post I write that says “manage content”” when cursored over & when clicked says “Edit” & clicked again, allows the writer to edit; at least it does from my PC.
Ah! Thank you geoff. Channel 4 news at 7pm will make you tear your hair out!
Hi Daniele! We get the BBC World News channel from DSTV. What made me cross was the fact they had 3 or 4 people making the case for the EU but NOT ONE for Astra. Even if they had allowed an AZ spokesperson to say Good Afternoon it would have been an improvement! 🙂
Rain on and off here but mild. Cheers my friend.
Geoff, BBC world news plays to a totally different audience…not to Brits or even descendants. You may as well watch any international news channel
its very good
C4 news is probably the best available on terrestrial TV. Always liked Jon Snow….a good egg!
geoff, when we were in the EU there was a disappointing trend that EU decisions were increasingly going against us. Up until about 2009 I think it was we were doing quite well and Germany was the outlier but after that we were increasingly at odds with the Brussels establishment.
At the end of the day I think most of us who voted Brexit did so with a heavy heart because we are fans of Europe, have friends and family there and believe in mutual cooperation amongst friends. It was all about trajectory and all the sign posts were miserable reading. The writing was on the cards for a Europe of sovereign and friendly nations working in unison for greater effect. This debacle just proves the point…. sadly.
The right think the BBC is left wing bias, the left think it’s right wing bias. So maybe they are impartial after all. ?
It’s not about trying to punish us from leaving. It is simple scapegoating. They have really messed up big time on the vaccine issue. Most EU citizens are now seeing this. So the EU tries to blame anyone they can. Just so happens the UK is this easy pariah state they can blame for all their incompetence.
The Crux of the problem is delays in licensing, delays in ordering and putting all their hopes in the Sanofi vaccine which was an utter failure.
The BBC are very biased. However it’s not LW or RW, it’s extreme liberal pseudo-libertarian. They’ve got a clear agenda to mould every generation to their narrow viewpoint, witnessed by excluding voices they don’t like & championing ad-nauseum those few they admire, beyond all sanity.
Their Brexit coverage was the last straw for me, but also recent years of watching “points of view” or whatever it’s called today, where each compliant is outlined then every time dismissed basically because the BBC think they’re always right & can’t do any wrong based on the reputation it had 30-40 years ago. For the few things they still do ok or well today, there’s endless dross I wouldn’t wish on even a sewer.
Similarly the EU have been showing its true colours & this hissy fit does nothing to re-establish a sensible adult post-Brexit relationship.
I also am frustrated by the EU’s very combative language, but I think there is something of a flip side here too.
Apparently AZ listed the UK factories as the primary supply points for the vaccine batches going to the EU, rather than the Belgian one that is underperforming. It is therefore not unreasonable for the EU to be wondering why the UK factories’ production is not leaving the country, or at least not heading for the EU.
The EU is also claiming (I don’t know if this is true), that the AZ factories in the UK were developed and built out with EU money specifically for improving infrastructure for delivering the vaccine. Those 3 months advantage in owrking out the kinks in supply that we had could well have been funded by EU money. Again, if this is true (the EU would have to be outright lying if it isn’t), then their stance does not seem as unreasonable as at first glance.
Yes, the EU has not handled vaccinations well (this is a great axample of the bad side of EU membership) and are now clearly scrabbling to show that they’re fighting their citizens’ corner. But if the two points above are true, then they have a fair argument- regardless of the best efforts clause. If they’ve paid for capacity improvements to factories that they understand from contract will be delivering them vaccines, and then are told that actually all those vaccines are going elsewhere they have a right to be annoyed.
yes it is unreasonable to expect that as the first 100 million doses were booked by the UK prior to a vaccine even being available… We put the capital up front and took the risk.
If the EU want to approach it from a contracts perspective they have very little leg to stand on.
The EU funded improvements to the EU supply chain of the BioTech vaccine not AZ which the UK is benefiting from… BECAUSE WE ORDERED IT EARLY.
I agree with you, if what you’re saying is the case. Although I’ve no doubt that we are also under a “best efforts” clause.
But the FT report I read said specifically that the EU are claiming they put up capital early to AZ to prepare their facilities in the UK (which was apparently listed in their contract as the primary production location) for higher output. It may even have been before we signed on the dotted line for our vaccines, if it was money for infrastructure and capacity improvements (that we have been enjoying the benefits of while the EU finalises their approval of the drug) rather than the vaccine doses.
If that is the case, then they absolutely have a leg to stand on. As I hope I made clear, I don’t know if this is true, but the EU are certainly claiming it is. We won’t know for sure until the contract is made public, as well as any contracts relating to earlier funding payments that the EU may or may not have made to AZ.
(I’ll start by saying I’m not writing this while worked up at all… Just I have an interest in such matters so here we go…)
Even if that is true, capital investment for product improvements & supply chain efficiencies does not translate to ownership of production capacity. Not in contract law or any other basis (unless on a sole supply contract).
It’s entirely down to AZ to determine the best way to fulfil its various contractual obligations & the EU can apply political pressure to have their will obeyed, but political pressure is the limit of their power as there is zero legal basis.
The EU’s contract with CureVac states “the delivery dates set out in this APA are the contractor’s current best estimates only and subject to change”, adding “the parties acknowledge that there is a risk that … the timeline for scaling up the production of the product may be delayed”
I would be extremely surprised if the AZ contract does not include a similar clause – especially considering the AZ CEO has explicitly said that it does. Copies of the contract will clear that up as you say.
From a business perspective what would you do, upset every customer in order to placate a single one? Or try your best to ride out the storm with the dissatisfied customer but deliver on time to the rest of them?
From an AZ business perspective the EU are unhappy, so leave them unhappy and do your best to recover the situation – once something is late 1 day – it is always late with whatever OTD metric you measure it by… Will that be damaging from a customer relations perspective – maybe – will that be legally damaging when your contract has a ‘best effort’ clause in… Not at all…
I’ve been privy to this dance dozens of times myself between supplier and customer with what I assume to be similarly worded supply contracts involved… The louder the EU shout publicly about it the more likely they are to get their way, through pressure – but the fact remains it is up to AZ to decide how to deliver on their contracts with very little if any legal argument to support it. It is simply the Italians getting fiery.
Even if the UK contract has a similar ‘best effort’ clause in it – that does not automatically mean AZ has to bend to the EU’s will.
EU could argue it is not in the ‘spirit’ of the agreement however the UK plants and UK supplies faced the exact same issues months ago.
We’ve weathered our teething problems and now hit full efficient production cycles – It’s the EU’s turn – 3 months late – to weather theirs.
I’m not taking any offence- I really appreciate your input as a voice of experience.
Everything that you say maks sense, but if that contract names UK production sites as primarily supplying that EU contract, and they aren’t, then surely that is an issue for the EU? That’s what they’re claiming, alongside their claim that they provided capital to get those plants running at expanded capacity. It’s the two together that I feel would be compelling, if true.
That’s my big question, and as you say it’ll be interesting to see what the contract says- it seems that everyone wants it published so hopefully that’ll happen soon. Even then, that may be covered under your point about AZ having the discretion to execute their supply contracts as they see fit, the international contracts that I’ve worked on prevouslyare not of the same type as these so I bow to your greater knowledge on that.
https://www.ft.com/content/d814b2dc-a803-4680-b8c4-ffa2a4c370ad
It is the case. Those are the facts.
No it is not true. AZ vaccine was not funded by the EU. Majority funding was done at risk by the UK taxpayer and government.
Yes the EU has funded vaccines like Sanofi (failed) pfizer (too expensive according to the EU for mass vaccination and thus 500 million doses rejected).
AZ was not a mass receiver of EU funding.
Compared to HMG which invested hundreds of millions in the Oxford vaccine and now which must be really annoying for the EU. They now need a British dedigned and manufactured vaccine.
The Oxford vaccine to be clear will be the vaccine the majority of the world receives, possibly alongside the similar Sputnik vaccine.
Oh the irony. The EU must be seething and spitting at the teeth on this issue.
Sorry, I think you misunderstand me; my understanding of the EU claim is that a) their contract names the UK facilities as supply points for their order of doses and b) they put up capital to expand those facilities for greater production- not funding the vaccien development as such.
If both a and b are true, then I can understand at least some frustration from the EU.
Of course, if the EU are overstating their position then that’s a different story. I am only cautioning that there are two sides to the story, not which one is true.
This could be sorted out quite easily, get the various Countries military HQs and Command staff to sort it out. No bias, no bullshit, just Allies, friends and colleagues with no political spin to froth. However I have just seen the old SNP “great leader” jumping on the EU bandwagon, desperatly trying to score a few points if and when they get Indy and try to rejoin the EU! She is so shallow and obvious, she would fit right in sat in Brussels sewer.
Blimey airborne I thought you were a Nicola Sturgeon fan? She is a two faced weasel. I loved seeing how hot under the collar she got when BoJo went to “her Scotland” I think this needs to happen very regularly. A uk minister goes there every week to check on progress of vaccination and public services during this time of national crises. Then step back and watch the SNP lose it.
My opinion granted but would be hugely childish fun for the rest of the UK.
Why, as far as I understand the Oxford development was paid for by the UK. If the EU needs help ask, don’t demand or threaten. As to this date 28/01/2021 the EU has not approved the AZ vaccine for use. So explain to me why a company should develop infrastructre for something they do not know if it will be approved or not. Even if it is approved and made in the UK and shipped to the EU what about border control, will that be lifted. If so then border control on other things can be lifted. As the EU once said you can not cherry pick!
I think the issue is political, the UK did its own thing and in an emergancy showed it is flexible, this flexibility is the weakness of the EU. We tested, approved and implemented I think before any country in the world. That is why we have about 1 in 10 people to date vaccinated.
The EU waited for French and German companies and for the cheaper solution to get up and running, that failed, the UK took an expensive vaccine £15 per dose and the new AZ cheaper £3 per dose and everything inbetween. The EU waited for the £3 per dose to be approved, which will be maybe tomorrow. They also want it now, the UK had to develop production lines
I also remember the British media ripping the UK government a new hole when it pulled out of the EU system for the vaccine. Not once have I seen a sorry we got that wrong. Boris and government jumped very quick to get things done in this area. He does not always get it right, but this time, when it counts did.
So to my friends in Europe, we the UK will help, a big flag of the Union and made in the UK on the side of the bottle flown in on RAF aircraft, with a sticker of UK Aid to the EU. Hows that.
Superb!
Uncle Nigel is touting the following concept:
As we are likely to have at enough doses to vaccinate our population 5x times over, why not do a deal with the EU now that gives them some of our surplus vaccine in exchange for no more silly-buggers at the borders, and to do a deal on financial services (that was left out).
For once the UK has the upper hand with the EU, but should we use it?
Defno give AUS, NZ CAN some AZ.
Because uk citizens are dying in their thousands. 104,000 to date. The UK is the worst affected country in Europe. That is a fact. We have a more virulent strain. “The Kent variant” that is 75% more contagious and 30% more fatal.
Those facts mean we should NOT IN ANYWAY EVEN BE CONSIDERING ANY DONATIONS OF UK CONTRACTED VACCINES TO THE EU.
Sorry the capitals came on by mistake but I’m fine with that.
The EU has not even approved the AZ vaccine. It placed an order with the EU 3 months AFTER the UK. It was reported that France pressured Brussels not to back the UK vaccine but to wait and buy the vaccine the French pharma company Sanofi and the Pasteur Institute were developing. ( The Pasteur Institute incidentally announced on Monday 25th Jan, that they were abandoning further research, while Sanofi announced their most promising prospect would not be ready before the end of this year, at best. Source France24 news channel )
The EU’s demand AZ meet its contractual commitments is just one more EU LIE. AZ NEVER made such a commitment. AZ’s CEO Pascal Soriot, said (26th Jan) quote, “we said we are going to make our best effort. The reason why we said that is because Europe at the time wanted to be supplied more or less at the same time as the UK, even though the contract was signed three months later. So we said “ok, we’re going to do our best, we’re going to try, but we cannot commit contractually because we are three months behind UK.” He explained that during the 3 months the EU turned its back on AZ, it was setting up the manufacturing process the UK had paid for and had these 3 months to fix all the “teething issues and glitches”
But here’s something else. On March4th, Germany banned the export of all CV19 related material. In addition to PPE and ventilators, they banned the export of testing reagents and kits. The exports of the absolutely critical reagent, guanidinium thiocyanate, made by Alzchem in Bavaria and by Qiagen, in Hilden,Germany, were banned. Also banned were Magna Pure virus test kits, made by Roche in Mannheim and Munich. While the UK could not perform the tests required in the Phase One Containment stage, German vets were offering CV19 tests for PETS !!! France, Poland and the Czech Republic then followed with export their own bans, even to other EU countries.
Now the EU imbeciles are demanding that the UK suffers after their incompetent, underhand scheming and hypocracy has backfired.
This is not about the AZ vaccine. The EU plan is to take over the UK allocation of the Pfizer vaccine manufactured in Belgium. Hence the mud slinging on AZ effectiveness for 65+. The eurocrats will save themselves from public humiliation by being able to go back and say they have secured their original number of doses of vaccine and have an even better one at the same time. The really don’t care about the UK or AZ it’s just the leverage they are using to put in place a export ban of vaccines and supplies. The root cause of this cluster was France not agreeing to pre-order vaccines unless they were from Sanofi.
I think surplus UK stocks of the AZ vaccine should firstly be offered to the ROI since we have a land border with them and it is in GB’s own interests to do so. Additionally, the EU were very keen to do everything to maintain free movement between the North and South and so uphold the Good Friday agreement during the Brexit negotiations and it would seem logical that having the entire island at the same level of vaccination would be vital to this. I doubt the EU would be particularly popular in Ireland if the Commission stepped in to forbid this. That, of course, would be their own dilemma and a sudden backdown on a frictionless border would be an interesting thing to examine.
Nice! Playing the game…
I assume any lorries leaving the U.K. with the vaccine can expect a protracted checking process on the other side of the channel to protect the integrity of the single market.
Indeed given the importance of having the correct paperwork if anything is wrong I look forward to the goods being returned to the U.K. or held at the dockside until all those boxes are ticked!
Of course if continental lorries arrive to collect the vaccine from the U.K. someone better tell them not to bring sandwiches.
Very funny. Or at least it would be if it wasnt true.
The quote is from an MEP – a complete nonentity then.
If this does escalate to the point of the EU (unjustifiably) retaliating against the U.K. by stoping Pfizer exporting its contracted U.K. doses from its Belgian factory it would be rather wonderful if it backfired on the EU and a year or two later Pfizer decides that the EU is an unreliable place to have a big manufacturing site and moves some or all of the production to the U.K.! Latest news is that the EU is looking at export restrictions on all vaccine manufacturers if there is a shortfall on EU supplies, not just Pfizer, so potentially many other companies where the EU is looking to interfere with their global businesses.
I was a staunch Remainer during and for quite a while after the referendum but this whole episode, and the EU’s incompetence regarding vaccine procurement leading up to it, is definitely swaying me in the other direction now (not that it matters any more; water under the bridge now).
The EU just don’t look like an ally
Its not an EU UK issue is it. Its supplier client. It serves no purpose for it descend into anything other than a contract dispute.
Provided the contracts don’t clash or overlap then the truth will out. Its an emotive subject and best off not been politicised.
Well those that did suck up to the EU should remember EU ex president Donald Tusk ” There is s special place in hell for brexiters ”
This vaccine row is a demonstration of this. Merkel : ” Britain will be seen as a competitor post brexit ” The EU is at a political and trade war with the UK which is crystal clear! Instigated by Germany and France . The Germany media being most hostile to the UK
We have certainly missed a bullet here!
So, the incompetent (unelected) ruling class of Europe, with the ingrained arrogance of those who feel they rule by right, not by consent, have decided that my life should be put at higher risk by removing my bought and paid for vaccine and it should be sent to Europe because they can’t organize a Bierfest in Bavaria. I consider that an act of war, personally.
I trust my dear friends in the remain camp will now see that we are well and truly shot of these illegitimate sons and daughters.
Still look on the bright side, if The EU does stand up it’s own Armed Forces under it’s own control. The war would be over before they got out of the committee stage.
This comment lightened up my day
You’re welcome.
True they would take 3 months to decide on a strategy. By which time we would have destroyed every airbase, radar site, bridge, military base in Europe.
Please Britain don’t bow down to Merkel and her socialist elitist wankers!
The UK secured its vaccine doses within a block contract structure months before the EU.
The EU/ Astra contract only stipulates Astra will strive to do it’s best.
The facts are that the Astra vaccine until today had not even been given its emergency licensing. Some 6-7 weeks after the UK and 4-5 weeks after the USA.
Why? Because the EMA (European medicines agency) did not trust the companies manufacturing the vaccine and wanted to do their own peer reviews. The MHRA knew in June last year that once the UK left the EU that the EU EMA would not be agile or flexible enough to administer a timely mass vaccination programme. Hence advice to SAGE to go it alone. Which has worked well for vaccine supply so far.
The EUs Astra vaccine supply issues were due to only low level initial production as no company will go into mass production until a drug is licensed. Which happened today from the EU side.
Summary the EU is a victim of it’s own beurocratic incompetence. As the UK has the highest death toll in Europe it would be utterly scandalous for the UK to give any of its UK manufactured vaccine batches to the EU.
Are we saying EU nationals lives are more precious then our own countrymen and women?
No.
Meanwhile vaccine manufactured in Europe eg Pfizer was authorised and licensed for use in UK, yet again significantly before the EU, and our supply is covered by batch contract. Therefore if batches are not released to the UK then pfizer but more accurately the EU are in breach of contractual law and should be sued.
Things could get very very messy if the EU withholds vaccine batches earmarked to the uk from pfizer and have no right or claim to uk manufactured batches.
I’m better think twice?
No we thought first, Prost!!
If we had still been in the Eu we would be sat waiting for vaccines too.
Hope the SNP will manage to see reality for a change too.
Just to add to the EUs woes. The MHRA has just licensed the Novomax vaccine which is 89% effective against severe CV19 disease.
Great news.
Especially as 60 million doses on order and its manufactured in the UK. Stockton on Tees.
Oh dear more trouble and pressure building up on the EU.
Wonder how they are going to say they are entitled to those vaccines too?
Well, that’s just about every post commented on, time for a tea-break eh ding-dong. By the way, who do you think is going to win the FA Cup this year?
Covid’s first 19.
Yep well. Someone has to highlight the truth.
FA cup. Dont care as I dont follow football. The game was ruined by big money and the premiere league years ago.
Why dont you go put your headphones back on and go back to wearing a blindfold because clearly the facts and truth are not allowed to enter your brain.
I will continue to post if I so choose because we live in a free and democratic country mate. Much to EUs annoyance.
I’m not surprised that you don’t follow football…where would you find the time. Too busy sending thinly disguised hate messages.
I am always amused by fanatics, of whatever persuasion, that insist that they know the facts and the truth. Try a basic course in philosophy….you will quickly discover that you know bugger all, and least of all the Truth (absolutely shimmering arrogance).
I know a good deal more then you do on this issue.
There is no hate coming from my side just yours.
It is a common thread for the truelly arrogant such as yourself, to accuse others (anyone with a different opinion to themselves, because they have a philosophy qualification and must be right at all times) of hate and arrogance to hide your own ignorance on this issue.
I’m hoping this website edits or bans your hate filled posts herodutus because they are uncalled for. I reiterate I am entitled in a democratic country to share facts and express and opinion based upon my analysis of the facts.
If you dont like that. Go elsewhere.
I would give the EU vaccinations from the UK allocation in the spirit of friendship. With the condition that the EU proves that it is not a protectionist block and cares about the international community. It could do this by proportionally matching the UK’s COVAX donation of over £500 million. The EU is about 10 times the size of the UK. An extra £5 billion should help the developing world’s vaccination problems.
Well maybe not quite 10 times the size ? but the point still stands.
Over on the Guardian theyre strongly suggesting the EU will block Pfizer deliveries to UK. I suspect its inevitable. Personally if I’d like the UK to order more AZ doses in that case – with priority for UK citz’s of course and prior to any doses going to the EU. Since they don’t believe in first come first serve (LOL) this shouln’t trouble them……
Well exactly, they block our supplies from Pfizer we block Astra supplies from our side.
They really are starting to show how pathetic they are at negotiations, very glad the UK has stood up to them over the last couple of years.
Me too, but on purely humanitarian grounds I would not want any hinderence in getting the vaccine to everyone who needs it, regardless of their government/trading bloc. Once we’ve got the most vulnerable covered(2 jabs, but sad for the 11% it’s not effective on!) lets help others as much as we can.
If others play silly whatsits, it doesn’t mean we have to sink to their purile level.
Disagree Frank. We need to get the top 5 or 6 tiers vaccinated to reduce the burden of this horrific disease.
So 25-30 million doses administered before we can even consider any uk contracted vaccine being donated abroad.
If we are donating abroad the vaccines should go to Brazil, Mexico and India as they are the worst affected countries proportionately after the UK and USA. USA does not need our support at this time as they have Moderna jab in large scale production. If however we are requested then yes USA too before the EU.
And then what do we do when the EU blocks the ingredients for the AZ vaccine? The AZ vaccine supply chains extend to EU. Just because the vaccine is manufactured in the UK doesn’t mean we are totally independent.
It’s one bloke, a no-mark on a health committee, whining via social media. It’s hardly an official announcement from the EU itself. That woman in charge may have said similar today, but in effect she’s telling AZ to choose which contract to breach.
No doubt our friends in Russia are doing their best to whip this up too.
Keep Calm and Carry On Jabbing.
I’ve put a freedom of request into the Gov for how many people have suffered adverse reactions from Pfizer and Astra Zeneca effort as in those who were unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required care from doctor or health care professional after receiving it.
I look forward to the official stats although something tells me there is going to be a delay in me getting this info if indeed they ever give it out at all…? hmmmmmmmmm
The reason the EU are acting like Children in this vaccine war. Is Simple: “The EU have not realised yet, that the UK are no longer members of their union”
the damage to astra zenica by the eu has been done ..and now Germany s Bayer corp will get all the profit .even though zenica was given at no profit to the company ….well done Germany ….its like corperate war …..it seems they never give up .being dominant over Europe