Airbus and the Republic of Singapore Air Force (RSAF) have announced the successful conclusion of their joint automatic air-to-air refuelling (A3R) flight test campaign, featuring the Airbus A330 Multi Role Tanker Transport (MRTT) and F-15 fighter.
The completion marks a significant step ahead of the anticipated certification in the first half of 2024.
During a three-week testing period in August, the RSAF’s A330 MRTT accomplished over 500 automated wet and dry contacts with the air force’s full range of receiver aircraft. This included the F-15SG aircraft, a tailored version of the US-manufactured F-15E Strike Eagle air-to-ground fighter jet.
Jean-Brice Dumont, Head of Military Air Systems at Airbus Defence and Space, remarked, “The A330 MRTT has made the future of air-to-air refuelling a reality as a result of the joint efforts of Airbus and the Republic of Singapore Air Force.”
The flight assessments involving F-15SG took place in Singapore. They spanned the entire operational AAR spectrum in varied weather scenarios, supervised by INTA (National Institute for Aerospace Technology), the Spanish certifying body.
The testing phase wasn’t confined to daylight conditions. Additional test flights during the night involved not only F-15s but also the RSAF’s A330 MRTT and F-16s, aiding in data gathering to advance and actualise the automated system’s night capabilities.
I bet the USAF really wishes it went for the MT330 over the KC46, it’s quite astounding how Boeing could really f**k up something so simple.
It’s also quite telling how the US harps on about NATO compatibility and not replicating capabilities. A European developed capability built in America that meats all the requirements and wins the competition then gets canned for a dodgy US contractor who just so happened to start hiring Airforce brass that were in charge of the competition.
And no one went to jail
Welcome to how big business works!
How many KC-46 is US buying?
179 in total are planned, it may be more if the USAF drops the KC-Y tanker program or they may end up buying MRTT 330 as well, the last of their KC10 just left service and the KC135 tanker fleet is currently being held together with spit and bubble gum. I think they needed our AWACS planes for spare parts from them.
Boeing really left the USAF in a bad place and it’s suffering a loss on the project itself.
Its sad that an engineer lead company like Boeing with so many accomplishments could be screwed up by a handful of greedy execs from a failed aerospace company.
It’s got to be one of the biggest vandalism’s in US corporate history.
128
64 have been delivered.
10 additional for Japan and Israel.
After all of the problems, the USAF is well satisfied with the KC-46 and its revolutionary boom system.
Next USAF tanker will be clean sheet.
Not really revolutionary boom system. An evolutionary boom is a better description.
Until it works as well as the old boom it’s not really that useful.
Yes. The boom was fly by wire for the KC-10 all those decades back. Its a new design but old concepts
the separate refuelling baskets are revolutionary as they can now be ‘steered’ with open and shut flaps
Boeing doesnt make any part of the booms or baskets , it was the UK sub contractor Cobham who were the experts in this field since it began.
The visual system too was outsourced to a business specialising in the field , but Boeings mistake was to specify an older out of date hardware/software and when that had problems had to move to newer tech which was workable but took time and money
Overall, the real concern is how weak engineering is getting in USA. They have not so many talented home made engineers now. Especially outside of finance or software. The pay structure and over valuation of incomes in what is important to define someone leads to this kind of aberration: USA that was at the forefront of mecanical engineering and chemistry is a shadow of the legend it once has been. Even developpers of their plateform are in Europe now. I am not surprised. Complacency in education for way too long, benefit of a big market with easy money has made them incapable of making good planes. What was the last innovation of Boeing? The last unflawed plane from Northrop (B2 bomber, only 20, B52 still flying) or Lockeed (F35 still not operational 25 years after it’s first flight, F22 unable to communicate with other planes). All this comes down to attraction for easy money, value given to stupidity, lasyness and internal fights with woke, sex, guns, drugs and fat. The overall picture is decay. Look 1 or 2 movies of the 50’s, what these men were made off. They were the right stuff. Not what we see today. USA will rise again, be good and smart. Now, they are not so serious.
A large part of American post ww2 success was based on mass migration of British and European engineers plus the massive stimulus from WW2 vets going to college with government subsidy. That’s been lost and the benefits of Americas economic success are not reaching their own people on the ground. Their social problems are astounding. That being said if you look at what space X is doing no one on the planet can come close to that.
No other county in the world is going to let an African guy build rockets the size of Saturn 5 and practice blowing them up a few miles away from a beach resort.
I would never right the US off, they are still the main place talented people want to go to at-least from outside Europe but there is no getting away from it, the countries industrial base has been hollowed out. The “tech” sector that’s replaced it is not really tech it’s internet coding primarily made in India and repackaged as a US product.
Agreed, Space X and Tesla are real success, you are right. I am excessive as always. Though I can’t help but feal… something is broken. Young engineers are not driven by senior one. The automatic refueling is in the making in Boeing for 10 years now. What’s wrong… Take shipbuilding: no successfull hull since 1980´s. They have to get designs from Europe (France and Italy). Hypersonic: nothing to brag about. Now, with Vmax, France is at same stage or ahead with a budget a fraction of US’s. Take tanks: new tank is a revamp of Abraham from 1980´s as well. No mistake, that machine was good but let say the approach is not selling dreams about the future of ground warfare. Intellectual strategy is working properly in USA. We copy many of their concepts which are excellent. But the best strategy lead nowhere if you cannot produce the right equipment.
The US Coast Guard large ‘cutter ‘is a light frigate hull.
Successful is a relative term. The hulls/superstructure for the LCS and the Zumwalt class ( really a cruiser size) were fine , its other components which let them down. Part of that was concurrency the discredited development process
Seem to have good kit F15s ,F16s AAR capability .Sometimes makes me wonder how these nations can afford this top line platforms. Saying that the Singapore airfroce back in the day had probably the best version of Hawker Hunter they really did give it extra teeth .Anyone into jets check it out guys 😉
When they say ‘automatic’, do they mean pilot hands-off on the aircraft being refuelled? I still can’t do AAR on DCS World flight sim. Haha. Auto mode would be epic.
The pilot still flies naturally, its the boom end thats automated.
Its best described as semi automated as the boom extends on its own/retracts and the pilot flies *into the nozzle* There is also the automated control to keep the boom in position against the airflow/turbulence moving them around
I can only wonder what the remaining Victor Tanker and Vulcan crews of Operation Corporate think of this fantastic new technology? The sheer amount of connections they had to make, not just for the Vulcans on the Black Buck missions, but also for the reconnaissance of the South Georgia area, refuelling Nimrods, Hercules, attrition replacement GR3’s that flew all the way from Ascension to Hermes, topping up every aircraft going to and from the UK and Ascension. Their workload was incredible.
Thats wasnt boom refuelling , but trailing basket – which was much easier from the operator point of view. All that work was done by the receiver pilot and who had a flexible connection, the boom isnt flexible so needs constant ‘flying’ , hence the aerodynamic surfaces
That took took some doing and show the professional flying skills of the RN and RAF pilots 🇬🇧