A report by the Defence Committee concludes that the UK Armed Forces have key capability and stockpile shortages and are losing personnel faster than they can recruit. Let’s take a look at the issues facing the Royal Air Force.
Read the full report by clicking here.
Both Generals Lord Houghton and Sir Nick Carter questioned the RAF’s ability to engage in peer-to-peer warfighting. General Lord Houghton suggested that the RAF had “good kit” in relation to its platforms and weapons but not enough of them—and a pilot shortage problem.
The Defence Committee said:
“He went to note that the RAF was rarely asked to carry out a short-notice operation (other than QRA) on its own, meaning that whilst it worked well in alliances on standing tasks, it would face difficulties in a warfighting situation because the RAF “can force packet—that is run from CAOC—in a way that is impressive, but is far more ugly with ground combat”.”
Professor Justin Bronk was in agreement with this assessment, telling the Committee that:
“The big thing on munitions is also that they are not the right kind of munitions. We have a reasonable number of munitions for permissive or semi-permissive environments—for, essentially, very precisely blowing up technicals, killing snipers on rooftops and things. … [On fighting the Russians] we would have to beat them on the ground, but, ultimately, our armies will never be resourced or the size required to beat them land for land. Our strategy is predicated, as is the entire western military instrument, on air superiority. Put bluntly, we have a Russia problem if we cannot establish air superiority over where we have to fight.“
The Human Security Centre again produced a list of outstanding or near-future capability, resource and readiness shortfalls which the RAF faces:
- A shortfall in combat aircraft numbers. The retirement of 30 Tranche 1 Typhoon aircraft in 2025 (with the majority of their airframe lives remaining) will leave only 107 Typhoons in service. 48 F-35B aircraft should be delivered by the end of 2025,115 but these will be jointly operated by the Royal Navy and will have a commitment to carrier operations.
- There is also a shortfall in fixed-wing transport aircraft numbers and capabilities caused by the retirement of the C-130J Hercules116 with plans to procure greater numbers of the A400M judged by the National Audit Office to be unaffordable.
- Delays in the procurement of 14 new model Chinook helicopters with extended ranges have occurred due to budget shortfalls. The new Chinooks are intended to replace older model Chinooks but the new model’s increased range could help cover some tasks previously assigned to the C-130J fleet and in supporting the Persistent Engagement strategy.
- There has been a lack of a dedicated Suppression of Enemy Air Defence/Destruction of Enemy Air Defence (SEAD/DEAD) capability since the RAF retired the Air-Launched Anti-Radiation Missile (ALARM) in 2013. The planned introduction by the UK of the SPEAR 3 missile with a multi-mode seeker and a range of around 80 miles could—particularly if used in conjunction with the F-35B’s electronic warfare system—provide a new SEAD/DEAD capability.
- Failures in the pilot training system have led to shortfalls in pilot numbers.
- There are insufficient numbers of Maritime Patrol Aircraft and Wedgetail AEW1 airborne early warning and control aircraft.
- There is a lack of air-to-air refuelling capacity for the Poseidon MRA1, Wedgetail AEW1, RC-135W Rivet Joint and C-17 Globemaster aircraft as they all lack an in-flight refuelling probe to make them compatible with the RAF Voyager tanker fleet.117
- The RAF does not have kinetic ground-based air defence systems or an anti-ballistic missile capability.118
Professor Justin Bronk also raised the issue of F-35 fleet size, describing the F-35 force as “triple or quadruple-hatted in terms of how many parts of UK defence are counting on it for how many mission outputs in the case of a war [and] … there are not very many of them.”
Professor Bronk also addressed other issues raised by the Human Security Centre including the pilot shortage—which he attributed to a lack of RAF engineers and supply of spares to sustain the fleet and keep them flying; the lack of SEAD/DEAD capability (which, despite the planned introduction of SPEAR CAP 3 in 2028, will be compounded by the small number of F-35s) and the need for the hardening of air bases or the ability to disperse aircraft to a wider range of air bases and airports to avoid their destruction by enemy attack.
The Chief of the Defence Staff said that whilst there may be a tension between training and operational sorties, by Spring 2023 the RAF had delivered twice as many operational sorties as in the previous 12 months while also managing to deploy to the US Red Flag series of training events. The Red Flag series had seen the RAF being tested “against some of the most difficult air threats in the world, [and the RAF] did incredibly well. Some of our missile systems are far superior to even the Americans’.”
The Chief of the Air Staff also argued that the RAF had benefitted significantly from investment in the past 15 years which had resulted in the bringing into service the F-35 fleet; A400M fleet; the Voyager fleet and the P-8 Maritime Patrol Aircraft fleet. This had made the RAF “more capable” and therefore “better able to meet the threats of the high-end fight”. However, he acknowledged the concerns about dispersal. He told the Committee the current level of “agility and operational flexibility” was hampering the RAF’s warfighting ability leading to a need to increase flexibility in the airfields the RAF utilised.
This would require “investment in spares and some further investment in infrastructure and in people”.
Good article with the facts laid bare.
On the subject of good and bad articles please indulge me with this comment from the Mail Online and see why UKDJ is to be cherished and recommended for the REAL facts.
‘Meanwhile we have aircraft carriers with no plane’s(sic), frigates that won’t work in warm water(!) destroyers with no missiles just a big gun🙄tanks(?) that make the drivers sick and dizzy and guns that jam, 4 attack submarines but only ever one on duty and 1 civil service employees(I thought he said only 1?) to every 3 armed forces personnel. “
The mainstream newspapers are generally piss-poor at reporting on anything defence related, the Daily Express recently ran a story about how HMS Vanguard (the submarine) is going to test fire an ICBM and somehow ended up using a photo of the battleship HMS Vanguard.
Afternoon Geoff, GB News were just as bad yesterday, mentioning half truth nonsense that “T45 has gym equipment were the bombs should be” etc , etc…. close, but no cigar.
It’s what happens when folks speed read without really understanding the subject matter
Poorly researched. I suggested the researchers check UKDJ to brief themselves next time before giving the presenter a bum steer….
What an excellent comment.That is the reality of todays forces.I was Army for 24 years and had nothing but cut backs.One year was so bad we had to go on our feet for all the track mileage had been used .
Àll governments should be laid out to answer the Question .Why have you allowed our hard fought freedom to Die.
This is nowhere near good enough from the government. Genuflecting to some artificially constructed, reality detached % of GDP whilst our Defence capability rots is dereliction of duty. If the job of resourcing and managing defence is too tough for the current government they should just apologise and get out of the way and let someone else in who can do it.
The % GDP arguments only works if you don’t include CASD.
The reality is that with CASD included it is well below 2%
Source
https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-8166/
“Annual in-service costs, which also include the costs of the Atomic Weapons Establishment and the Nuclear Warhead Sustainment Capability Programme, basing, decommissioning and disposals, are currently estimated at 6% of the defence budget (£3 billion for 2023/24 based on current planned expenditure).”
“The estimated cost of the design and manufacture of a new Dreadnought- class of four SSBN is £31 billion, including inflation over the life of the programme. A £10 billion contingency has also been set aside, making a potential total for the programme of £41 billion. 20% of that contingency has been accessed to date.”
Assuming that UK Defence budget is £58Bn (for arguments sake).
We are spending £3Bn per year operating CASD (excluding people) and £3-4bn on the new submarines. I would suggest that the real cost on top of that is another £2Bn in terms of staff/wages and other things that have been left out of this.
So that is £8Bn out of £58Bn which is 13% of the overall budget……it could well be more after Abbey Wood etc are added in.
Said it before David, they are purley going through the motions as a dead administration.
Nothing they say, promise or do matters, as within 9 months they will be gone, swept aside, it’s all utterly irrelevant.
I would like to see Labour really pushed on their defense posture right now, that’s the direction of travel, like it or not.
Agreed. It was simultaneously refreshing to see that people in positions of power are very clear on the issues the RAF face and frustrating to see the minister that they were highlighting these issues to essentially refuse to take them on board (bar the dispersal of assets during war time). I feel the above exchange is a microcosm of conversations that generally are going on at the higher levels. How on earth do we get the imbeciles in charge to listen to the facts and what we need to do to prepare to adequately fight against a peer opponent?
But not without the engine upgrades now scheduled for 2029-31
FOC???
23 January 2024 @ Janes Defence
F-35 to get Meteor, SPEAR 3 ‘by end of decade’
“The Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning should receive additional UK-specific weapons “by the end of the decade”, the government said on 16 January.
Answering questions in the House of Commons, Minister of State at the Ministry of Defence (MoD) James Cartlidge said that, with the MBDA AIM-132 Advanced Short-Range Air-to-Air Missile (ASRAAM) and the RTX Paveway 4 precision-guided bomb already carried by the Lightning, the MBDA Meteor beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile (BVRAAM) and the Selected Precision Effects At Range (SPEAR) 3 air-to-surface munition will be available by 2030.
These outstanding weapons are due to be integrated under the Block 4 capability drop earmarked for the wider international F-35 programme.
As the prime partner for the UK programme, BAE Systems announced in March 2019 that it had begun work to integrate both the Meteor and the SPEAR 3 onto the F-35B. At that time, work was scheduled to be completed by 2025, so this latest announcement by the government represents a delay of approximately five years.
While no reasons were provided for the delay, it is likely in part attributable to the ongoing problems with the Technology Refresh 3 (TR-3) that enable the Block 4 upgrade. Aircraft deliveries are now being withheld until the TR-3 issue is resolved.
All of this has been subject to many many comments on places such as this for decades…. yet all of a sudden, we seem to be waking up to the utter carnage caused by years of governmental mis management and dare I say woeful lack of “duty of care” regarding the defence of the realm…. the vast majority of posters here and many other sites have been saying this for so many years now…. has there ever been a more dangerous World than that of now ?
Agreed. Anyone who is interested in defence need only check in here. This list has been done to death on countless occasions.
Who was it here who actually thought cutting the Hercs to be a good idea?! Where were a few.
Mate….. If I were not banned and blocked on here quite so often…. (All actually deserved for my terrible mindset/passion/inability to keep my gob shut !!!!) I’d be well up there on the list of complainers…… !😁
I miss your epic battles with H.
Indeed the hercs were a terrible idea…complete hole in tactical airlift around short runways…we needed a replacement for that capacity…Before getting rid off..the same with the tranche 1 typhoons…..sunseting capability and having a gap is fine in a peaceful world where war is clearly a decade away or more..not in a world that is full of enemies that are actually preparing for war….
For me, the worst of the cuts. Absolutely idiotic. They’re not even “wary” fighty assets. Vital enablers enabling their own forward presence strategy and supporting one of our aces, DSF.
Or usable in a range of other taskings.
Now all dropped into the Atlas and C17 fleets taskings.
Both of which….in time, will be completely shagged as ever decreasing assets take on the same load and people wonder why they’re clapped out.
😟
The disaster began when Lyneham was closed. Essentially we are now in a position where the closure of one runway will trap the entire air transport and AAR fleet on the ground. A similar massive loss of capability can be achieved at Waddington. Hit Lossiemouth and the RAF ceases to be a force in being. 3 weapons, total air supremacy over the UK. Even if the Typhoons had dispersed, they will have low fuel state, will be effectively blind and with patchy rearming chances if the dispersal sites survive the next strikes. 3 weapons and the next Battle of Britain is lost before it started. Hell, you could drive a cement truck full of ANFO through the crash gate and destroy the runways. Serco might yell “oi!” as you go past but if you hold your nerve you will be ok.
To be fair, some of that scenario could have happened in the Cold War had it turned hot, when we were far far bigger. Still limited RAF Stations AT ARR wise, but yes, with at least 8 Fast Jet Stations.
The other difference was the SAM screen we had on the east coast, and the RAFR Rapier Sqns.
But I agree, the “super base” obsession has serious vulnerabilities and a home based GBAD system of sorts is needed. What goes to pay for it if there is no extra dosh?
The Typhoon fleet will be impaired/blind if parts of the ASCS system are negated, but again, that is not a new situation.
Could some strap on NAMO solid rockets on Meteor create a Bloodhound Mk3? Just spitballing a cheap and fast option…
I have no idea. That is DBs department.
Super bases will be much more effective in wartime for the UK than alternatives.
You need a certain size to make dispersal actually effective. The difference between 5 and 10 airbases makes defending them worse. An enemy that can destroy 5 airbases can destroy 10. It just means each of those 10 are much easier to destroy so is actually worse overall.
It’s the same with industry. Lots on here don’t like the fact that there is only 1 or 2 factories for each piece of equipment, but at the end of the day, an enemy that can destroy 2 factories can destroy 6 factories.
Dispersal only becomes effective at much larger numbers when the enemy don’t know where you are. In wartime this means aircraft operating out of non RAF bases.
Good alternative take on it, Louis. On the dispersal side, we’ve only seem them use St Mawgan and Boscombe Down. Both with HAS available. I don’t think the RAF yet has the assets in place for operating from civilian airfields.
RAF definitely doesn’t have the assets to effectively disperse. They are hugely increasing it though, whether enough is a different matter.
The UK will never have enough Air bases/factories/storage depots/ naval bases in peacetime to ever make dispersal effective.
RAF could also use Leuchars and there are probably others as well.
Myself and others have made lists of places before, there are plenty. Not all as well furnished as Leuchars as an ex fighter station, but there are many on the MoD estate.
I think that’s the wrong way to look at it. An airbase needs a minimum of two frontline squadrons/OCU. Currently the RAF has 10 of those meaning a maximum of 5 airbases could realistically be operated.
On the assumption that Russia can destroy 3 airbases, they can also destroy 5.
The answer is not more bases, it is more infrastructure, mobile logistics and maintenance such that Typhoon flights can disperse all over the country. Russia will hit all 3 or 5 bases, if the aircraft disperse over the country they will have no idea where they are as they could be at any airport in the country.
The RAF has not had enough airbases to make dispersal effective without using civilian airports since the V bomber force wound down in the 70s.
Edit: Just a final point to add onto that, in the case RAF reg regains the air defence role this will become relevant.
Let’s say the choice is between 6 or 3 combat air bases. The former with 4 CAMM launchers and the latter with 8, the latter airbase is likely better defended overall than two of the former airbases.
I still feel the ability to move highly valuable force multipliers like AAR to Western bases like Brawdy, St Mawgan or Kemble, back behind the GBAD and fighter bases makes sense.
It’s the people Daniele, that is the worst thing. Many, don’t care. Health and Social care has been prioritised over defence. Now, no matter how many vehicles (land, sea or air) procured, you will find you can’t man them. The people just do not care.
who has not heard, “we can’t be invaded as they have to come through Europe”. This comment is arguably true, so justification of spend is correct.
we have a people problem, that should be our priority. We need to get the message of true cost of neglect in a manner that can be understood by all.
Yes, I agree. The general public are pretty clueless or interested in other things. I’d say in peace that is a plus that we live in a safe country.
“Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.”
Spot on, the A400 is far from a good SF platform, but that aside, where is the 8 aircraft top up order to replace the 14 retired C130’s??
Never happened, I doubt they ever intended to order them either…
Both parties have caused huge damage to defence over the last 25 years, but the Conservatives must take the brunt of the blame, they have been in power for 14 years and have directly precided over the demise of our armed forces capability and capacity.
It’s absolutely disgraceful….
I’m of the firm opinion that select committees, media outlets, informed sites (such as UKDJ, NL etc), serving senior officers, valued Allies (USA) et all are completely wasting all their time.
Someone has to ask the PM or Grant (I don’t take defence questions, because I don’t know anything about anything) Scrapps, one Simple direct question at PMQs. And not accept anything other than a straight bloody answer 😡
“Can you tell the country what level of direct foreign threat, warning from Allies or embarrassment will it take for you to actually wake up and boost Defence spending right now and across the board ?”.
Without that…………..
“And not accept anything other than a straight bloody answer”
You do realize that you’re talking about a politician 😂
Not a chance. Most MPs are as clueless about defence than the majority of the public. And as for the party shortly coming in, I think they are more concerned with social issues and public spending than defence. A number of them actually supported Jeremy Corbyn for Gods sake and are still sitting there in their seats.
Does not fill me with much hope sadly.
Agree with all your points though mate. I’d pay good money to see the PM or the DS put on the spot like that.
On the E-7 Wedgetail shortfall, I see that Stansted Airport is home to VQ-BOS Boeing 737 800 currently available for sale from Canadian owners. There’s another for sale in California. So a serious effort to procure five not three aircraft is feasible with prompt action and contract extension..
Aiming for 2.5% GDP spend would mean something were action taken!
I’d not be quite so negative on RAf. I am very RN centric in my views but I do think that RAF has modernised even if it has made a total mess of pilot training pipelines.
Yes, F35B is spread very, very thin and is expected to be in 10 places at one. However, there is a decedent level of Typhoon force that is state-of-the-art.
A lot of the kits is very, very new and so is genuinely very good. As every not enough frames or my main bugbear – enough pilots/ground crew to deal with really working the frames super hard in combat situations.
Then there is the issues of medium quality munitions which we don’t have enough of. This is probably the easiest bit to fix and it only required money to deepen stockpiles.
Typhoon is not state of the art even for a gen 4 fighter, it still lacks an AESA radar.
I’d beg to differ and there is a program for sorting that.
Yes but how long to get fitted and operational ? And on present plans to only 40 Aircraft
SB Happy Monday from Derby.
Yes it is excellent equipment and the professionalism of the People is simply superlative.
But other than the 3 Wedgetails and last @12 F35B that are being built / delivered there is zilch on order.
Which probably makes us the only member of NATO (except maybe Luxemburg) that’s hasn’t added anything due to the Ukraine. You worry when Canada and Germany stick their hands in their wallets.
We are fitting AESA Radar to only 40 Tranche 3 Airframes and the Tranche 1’s are going out of service in 2025 rather than 2030. That will inevitably further reduce the number of Squadrons / pilots and ground crew.
That will leave just 107 Typhoons and 45 F35B so by the 1 3rd rule that’s 100 combat aircraft between the RAF and FAA to cover how many taskings ?
Like you I’m RN centric due to being involved in Industry not service. Fact is the quality is fabulous, but the quantity is dire and all the “shell game” antics by the Politicians and the PC brigade can’t hide that.
But my Blood Group is B+ so I’ll finish on a few positives.
We do have an upgraded BM radar on order so can see things about to kill us. Also as unlike the UK half the Western World have now ordered extra F35’s and we build @20% of each one so UK industry is looking up.
Plus the Treasury will raise lots of Tax money on all the extra revenue.
Which is now estimated at being £40 billion + over the length of the programme.
Or enough Tax for about 36 New Typhoons and 30 extra F35B or some “Election Winning” Tax Breaks.🥴
To be perfectly honest if I were 20 years younger and in my former line of work I’d very seriously be off down under.
The problem supportive is as always mass or lack of it…yes we can fight and win for a week for a month….but actual peer on peer conflicts run over years…this is our problem the UK and the west as a whole is suffering from a lack of depth…our enemies freely admit that the west will walk all over them…but China especially thinks it can simply out attrition and exhaust the west…Russia is in that camp as well….we have militaries designed to fight a very high intensity conflict over a very short timeframe…..counties like china cannot be reduced in those timeframes….and will aim for exhaustion…how long can our few pilots actually maintain high intensity conflict before becoming to fatigued to fight…how long can our few T23s keep up very high intensity warfare…how long will our complex munitions last….how long will our 2 MBT regiments be able to fight before becoming combat ineffective…..
This is the Key question for the western powers..can we fight a long war..can we fight for years ? Because if china goes to war it’s entire plan and strategic outlook is a long drawn out war over years.
Takes a professor until now to point out what us “warmongers” have been saying for years.
And the government still won’t listen 🙄
A really good article. We’re a boutique force, nothing more. We’re totally
Ill-suited to a peer conflict lacking depth in airframes and pilots. We have too many centres of gravity not helped by getting rid of our force multiplier E3A. Brize and Lossie are out single points of failure! More specifically the 2x Officers mess are! Takes years to train a pilot, that should be the first priority whilst creating a reserve cadre of ex pilots who can hone their skills on fast jets and drones. Our approach to reserves is good for intelligence less so for the sharp end (pilots and airframes). How about RoE? Yes RoE is important but does this give us the hitting edge to hit first hit hard? so many aspects to consider and get a move on with..and that’s the question are we?
Is there any good news in UK Defence 🙄 🇬🇧
Yes……. ermmm there’s the …. ummmm, hang on…. ermmmm….. bugger…. can’t seem to find it now…..
Yes but most of it will be delivered in the 2030s….but we do have 2 very good carriers as well as some of the only 5th generation navel air power…we also have some of the best SSNs on the planet..the issue is mass and our ability to fight a high intensity peer war over a long period of time.
the RAF “can force packet—that is run from CAOC—in a way that is impressive, but is far more ugly with ground combat”.
Anybody know what this means?
Slash the defence budget to help fund tax cuts, no surprise that this is the result.
Slash the Defence Budget ? …… Feck me…. Lets just take a look at the Tax avoidance our Elite are getting away with…. just look at Rich Sunak and his Wife….. Richer than basically 90% of all the Brits who actually were born here and worked their Arses off for decades…..
This isn’t going to surprise anyone on this forum. There is a critical shortage of everything in all areas of the military. Only those with their head in the sand for the last several decades will be surprised.
I did think we needed to increase spending to 3% of GDP but as time goes on I think we need even more in a short amount of time. 4% within 5 years seems more needed now.
Time for 4% GDP me thinks.
For the world we live in..which is a multi polar world in which our enemy has essentially said they will go to war if presented with the possibility of winning..and is on a massive armament programme….5-6% is actually the required amount….that’s what we spend when facing the USSR..and the china Russia axis is a far greater threat than the USSR was.
Look on the bright side, folks !
It’s been obvious to everyone on this site for many years that, although much of our kit is very good, there isn’t anything like enough of everything.
But these woes have now come into the public domain, and into everyone’s consciousness. If Joe Public now realises that more needs to be spent on defence, then politicians who wish to be re-elected will fall into line.
It will all come right. Eventually.
(Puts tin hat on, crawls into bunker)
SK Really knows how to get something from the design phase into Full-Rate Production.
Purely asking a question, would the EJ200 fit this aircraft? MBDA are looking to fit a range of their missiles onboard (KAI) and MBDA, with flight and launch tests already underway.
Friday, Feb 2 2024South Korea to start mass production of KF-21 fighter jets
“MANILA, Philippines — South Korea will build 40 KF-21 Boramae fighter jets this year with the 238.7 billion won (U.S. $178.6 million) allocated for the Defense Ministry, even as the aircraft makes its way through flight and ground tests.
The first mass production of the KF-21 is expected to fill the “power vacuum” left when the South Korean Air Force’s aging fighter fleet retires, the defense minister said in a Dec. 21 statement.
According to Korea Aerospace Industries, which makes the KF-21, the engineering and manufacturing phase will conclude in 2026. The Korea Times repotred in January the Air Force plans to deploy the first KF-21 in the second half of that year.
The KF-21 is set to replace the F-4 and F-5 fleets, and the Air Force plans to have some 120 Boramae jets in total by 2032.
The Boramae will serve as the “backbone” of the Air Force, the ministry said, and will play a pivotal role in expanding the three-axis system — a strategy that informs how the South Korean military should respond to an attack from North Korea.
The fighter has been under development since 2015, but the program didn’t gain much ground until 2020, when assembly for the first prototypes took place. The government hired Korea Aerospace Industries to produce the jet, and the company sought technological support from the American firm Lockheed Martin.
The two businesses previously worked together on the FA-50 light attack aircraft.
The inaugural flight test of six KF-21s took place in 2022. KAI carried out a supersonic test within the first 60 flight tests, and the company unveiled the aircraft at the Seoul ADEX defense conference following at least 300 of the planned 2,000 test flights in October 2023.
Flight, ground and additional tests for the remaining prototypes will continue until 2028 — the same year Air Force squadrons are to begin flying the first batch of KF-21s for air-to-air missions.
The fighter jet boasts cutting-edge avionics, including active electronically scanned array radars, and it can carry a range of advanced precision weapons.”
It’s easy to see how we got here, after all it’s a problem shared outside the defence realm, removing all capabilities not needed in the present, seen in pandemic preparedness, attracting and training the next generation of health care workers, replacement of ageing passenger railway stock.
But the solution is much harder to effect. How, exactly, does one win the argument with a treasury that simply wants to progress budget cuts in the name of present day efficiency?
The answer partly may be that efficiency drives need to be placed under far greater scrutiny, where it seems that layers of sub-contracting each with their slices of G&A charges are protected, whilst shrinking numbers of units, people, equipment, aircraft or ships. The other matter, of course, is the poor grip on costs and poor estimating.
Clearly there is something broken when every round of spending results in fewer actual deliveries. It’s this delivery to overhead ratio that lies at the heart of all this issue and leaders need to be held to account over this key metric. But this also needs to include *future* deliveries rather than accepting the argument that force size will be inevitably reduced, particularly when the root cause is high programme overheads or cost overruns, both of which are unacceptable.
Is the F35 both overrated and expensive? The 3 stealth F35s in the picture above are leaving wing tip vortices, whilst the accompanying Typhoons are not
This report only scratches the surface of how far the RAF has fallen in numbers and capability.
We had close to 30 fast jet (aka fighter) squadrons in Cold War times. This has been slashed to just 6 squadrons today, of which the 5 Typhoon ones are well understrength. We have cut so far that we now have far fewer FJCA than France, Germany, Italy and even Spain, (which has a population 20 million less than the UK!).
With the retirement and non-replacement of the Tornado, we have NO interdiction/strike capability at all, just Typhoon and F-35b doing their limited tac air bit.
The RAF will not be down to just a measly 155 FJCA, as the Navy is well ahead in grabbing.the F-35s for their carrier showboat, so count RAF as just 107 Typhoons, of which just 54 frontline.
We can apparently only afford to upgrade 40 of these with the new ECRS2 AESA radar, so 67 will be left as legacy 4th generation aircraft.
RAF is equally short of MR/ASW Poseidons,where we have 9 doing the job that needs 18. Ditto AEW, with 3 Wedgetails to do the job that needs 5 or 6 minimum. Ditto EW, with 3 Airseekers to do the work of 5.
And so on, with the loss of the serviceable Hercules solely to save money and of course no.money to add some more A400s to fill the gap.
Add in the glaring vulnerability of the super bases, the absence of any base air defence, the complete screw-up by the contracted-out UKMFTF to produce sufficient pilots etc, etc, and the RAF has fallen a long way from its former numbers and international standing.
It is not helped by the constant clamour from the RN and its vocal supporters for more of everything, at the expense of the other services. Without air superiority provided by the RAF, the RN and army would be most vulnerable. We need to rebalance our strategic stance, air and land are going to be the priorities in any peer or near-peer conflict, with the RN playing a role primarily in Eastlant, with a rmore realistically limited ambitions East of Suez.
All these articles point to one thing the government has made that many cuts, that the Royal Navy, the Royal Air force, and the Army have gone from the best in the world to a second class military that wouldn’t last long in a fight. At the moment if Russia, China, Iran, North Korea are any other dictatorship escalated a conflict, we would be outgunned and out-matched.
Personally I think many of you are being very negative, I have every confidence that our RAF could-after our huge investment in it in time and money over the past decade- defeat even a sustained pro noun attack from the likes of China, or NK.
Diversity inclusion and equity training and indoctrination is our RAF’s strength 😉
Without which the RAF couldn’t have binned off those few dozen promising future world leading fast jet pilots, and discouraged a great many others to even bother applying to the RAF🙄
All contributors on here grasp both problem and solution.Successive Govts have ignored the problem and underfunded the solution.Never be enough Govt will,never be enough money.The kit we buy is too expensive ,too complex,not enough of everything.So perhaps the whole of UK defence needs a rethink by impartial professionals not politicians.Empire and boxing above our weight are long over.What do we want the defence forces to do,what can we afford?A Trump win in November will see NATO starved of US clout.Demoralised UK personnel leaving left,right and centre.But it will be fine…The latest super missile will be available at the end of the decade!!!
The drum tight decision of the DC Circuit Appeals court that #45 has no presidential immunity will likely not be taken by the Supreme Court meaning that he will be going to Jail not the White House.
Until that plays out the possibility of USA withdrawal from NATO must be exploited to push the reluctant UK & European politicians to deliver a 5% GDP spending commitment.
Detterance must be credible so serious as a heart attack.