As the war in Ukraine continues into its second year, a shared resilience emerges from those impacted by the conflict.

Whether speaking with refugees displaced by the destruction of their homes or sailors aboard a Ukrainian warship in Glasgow, the same unbreakable determination shines through.

For many Ukrainians, the war is not just a battle for territory but a fight for their identity and freedom. Despite the devastation—whether in the bombed-out streets of Mariupol or on the decks of a naval vessel—this spirit of defiance remains.

The Refugees of Glasgow

In Glasgow, I met Ukrainian refugees who had fled the destruction of their homes. Their stories were marked by loss and displacement—homes destroyed, families scattered, and lives uprooted.

One family from Kharkiv described spending weeks in a basement, waiting out the bombings. “We left when we realised there was nothing left to save,” the mother explained. Her words, though laden with sadness, carried a quiet determination.

But for many refugees, their focus remains on more than just survival. “We will go back. We will rebuild our lives,” said one refugee, speaking with a quiet but firm conviction. The belief in Ukraine’s eventual victory runs deep, even for those who have lost everything.

Aboard the Chernihiv

Earlier this year, I met with Ukrainian sailors aboard the warship Chernihiv—formerly HMS Grimsby—in Glasgow’s King George V Dock. There was something rather poignant about boarding a Ukrainian warship at the same dock that previously held the cruise ship hosting Ukrainian refugees, the cruise ship was apply named Ambition, I’ll put a photo below.

This ship, which now serves in the Ukrainian Navy, symbolises both the country’s resilience and its reliance on international partnerships.

The crew, many of whom had trained with the Royal Navy, embodied this sense of preparedness. As I toured the ship, one sailor explained how their training had prepared them for the upcoming NATO Exercise Sea Breeze. “We’ve trained hard for this,” he said. There was no mistaking the readiness in his voice.

Their mission, eventually, will be to become part of a broader effort to reclaim control of the Black Sea, which has become a strategic focal point in the conflict. “When the war is over, we’ll make sure the Black Sea is safe again,” another sailor added, referring to plans for de-mining efforts in the future.

Refugees and Sailors

What struck me most during my conversations with both the refugees and the sailors was how closely aligned their goals were. Though their circumstances differ, both groups remain committed to the same cause: ensuring a free and sovereign Ukraine. For the refugees, this means surviving and rebuilding. For the sailors, it means preparing for the day they can clear the seas of Russian mines.

M/S Ambition arriving in Glasgow.

Their unyielding spirit, reflected in both groups, underscores a larger truth: this is a nation united, regardless of where its citizens are based or what roles they play.

A Nation Unbroken

As I left the Chernihiv, I was struck by the determination that defined both the sailors and the refugees. Despite their challenges—be it losing homes or training for war—none of the people I spoke to had lost hope.

This resilience has come to define Ukraine’s fight. While the war may continue, the Ukrainian people—whether displaced families in Glasgow or sailors preparing for NATO exercises—remain unyielding. Their belief in a free, secure Ukraine will not be shaken.

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

13 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

JJ Smallpiece
JJ Smallpiece (@guest_854400)
4 days ago

Sadly if Trump gets elected in the US, the Ukrainians will be disregarded and left to their fate. if so, an utter diplomatic failure for the west and NATO. No county will ever trust us again. ‘As long as it takes’…. a rather hollow comment, looking at the way it is going. Who could blame the Ukrainians for then hating us.

Jacko
Jacko (@guest_854421)
3 days ago
Reply to  JJ Smallpiece

why would Europe abandoned Ukraine? The Baltics and Poland certainly won’t! I hope our govt and the likes of France wouldn’t either.

Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_854430)
3 days ago
Reply to  Jacko

I agree. Even if a Trumpian US abandons Ukraine, I am sure that we would not.

Jacko
Jacko (@guest_854435)
3 days ago
Reply to  Graham Moore

They would still get stuff from the cousins they will just do what they always do in time of need. SELL it to the Ukrainians!

Wasp snorter
Wasp snorter (@guest_854456)
3 days ago
Reply to  Jacko

Yes the US made a packet out of us in WW2.

Wasp snorter
Wasp snorter (@guest_854455)
3 days ago
Reply to  Jacko

Yes and even the Russians cite Britain as the bogeyman behind all the support, US or not it’s our continent and for us to help. I notice France is way down on the list of contributing nations, what’s the issue there I wonder?

Frank62
Frank62 (@guest_854467)
3 days ago
Reply to  Jacko

Indeed, if the USA pulled out of supporting UKR it would be up to the rest of NATO to up their support & I think we should. It hopefully would allow us too to allow UKR to use weapons as they deem fit & necessary to strike legit targets in Russia. Western timidity in the face of Putins aggresion & threats plays perfectly into his hands. It probably virtually guarantees a far longer & more costly war later down the line than facing him down far earlier in the war.

FieldLander
FieldLander (@guest_854618)
2 days ago
Reply to  JJ Smallpiece

We must recognise that Europe will not be able to pick up the load if Trump is elected. Ukraine will have to accept a humiliating loss of territory, and Europe accept that one day the whole of Ukraine will go down and the Russians will be on the NATO borders. A little like the old days, only Europe does not have the boots it used to have. interesting times indeed.

Pleiades
Pleiades (@guest_855059)
1 day ago
Reply to  FieldLander

None of that is true.

FieldLander
FieldLander (@guest_855064)
1 day ago
Reply to  Pleiades

According to you. We’ll see in January.
The first two sentences are speculative and my opinion, The third sentence is historical fact. The final one another opinion.

Paul.P
Paul.P (@guest_854474)
3 days ago

Interesting Sky interview with Blinken today. I got the impression that the US idea of victory isn’t that the Ukraine regains all lost territory but rather that it becomes a self sufficient economy, stable European democracy, a member of the EU and militarily strong and member of NATO.

Finney
Finney (@guest_854613)
2 days ago
Reply to  Paul.P

It makes a lot of sense although it hasn’t been said much publicly yet. Russia, with significant manpower and material advantages, is slowly gaining ground, but paying a high price for it. It’s hard to imagine a situation where the Ukrainians manage to achieve sufficient quantitative and qualitative advantage that they are able to retake all of their territory without suffering horrendous losses. It’s really not worth recovering every kilometre of ground if it’s going to cost them hundreds of thousands of casualties. Hopefully they can retake all of Zaporizhia oblast and a decent buffer zone around Kharkiv, but all… Read more »

Paul.P
Paul.P (@guest_854721)
2 days ago
Reply to  Finney

Blinken offered that perspective in answer to the interviewers question, will the US give Ukraine permission to use long range missiles against targets in Russia. Sky reporter has said subsequently that he has heard that in fact the US is ok with the UK’s idea but not all European nations are; specifically Italy. I note that’s where Keir Starmer is today, supposedly learning about how Georgia Meloni is tackling immigration and UK- Italy joint projects of various sorts.
The focus of the.US long game must be about dethroning Putin.