The Ministry of Defence (MOD) has announced the award of a £60 million contract to BAE Systems Bofors AB for the in-service support of the Archer Artillery System, as detailed in a transparency notice.
This contract ensures the continued operational readiness of the Archer system by providing crucial maintenance, repair, training, and configuration management over the next five years.
This support contract falls under the MOD’s Interim 155 Capability Project, a key programme aimed at enhancing the UK’s artillery capabilities.
The Archer Artillery System, designed and developed by BAE Systems Bofors AB, is one of the most advanced artillery systems in the British Army’s arsenal, offering long-range firepower and rapid deployment.
The MOD opted for a negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice due to the specific technical expertise required to maintain and support the Archer system.
The decision was made in accordance with the Defence and Security Public Contracts Regulations 2011, as amended by post-Brexit legislation. The MOD cited BAE Systems Bofors AB’s unique position as the system’s original designer and manufacturer as the primary reason for awarding the contract without competition.
According to the MOD, “BAE Systems Bofors AB is the only company with the necessary technological skills, knowledge of the underlying design, and expertise required to provide support services for the Archer Artillery System.”
The contract covers a wide range of services, including technical design adjustments, repair and maintenance activities, obsolescence management, and training. BAE Systems Bofors AB will also provide configuration management, ensuring that the Archer system remains up-to-date with the latest technological advancements and meets the MOD’s operational requirements.
As the Design Authority (DA) of the Archer system, BAE Systems Bofors AB holds proprietary rights to essential technical drawings, designs, and components. The MOD does not have sufficient rights to share this data with any third party, meaning that only BAE Systems Bofors AB has access to the specialist tooling and testing equipment needed to maintain and upgrade the system. This proprietary control ensures that BAE Systems Bofors AB is the sole provider capable of delivering the necessary safety standards and performance enhancements required by the MOD.
The MOD further emphasised that no other party has the capability to combine the technical re-design with maintenance and repair activities for the Archer system, making BAE Systems Bofors AB the only logical choice for this contract. The MOD explained, “No other company possesses the technical expertise or access to the proprietary design information needed to safely support and maintain the Archer system.”
Archer
The Archer artillery system, officially known as the Archer – FH77BW L52 or Artillerisystem 08, is a highly advanced Swedish self-propelled howitzer designed to deliver precision fire support on the battlefield. It features a fully automated 155mm L52 gun-howitzer mounted on a modified 6×6 Volvo A30D all-terrain hauler, and comes equipped with a remote-controlled M151 Protector weapon station. Its crew compartment is armoured, with bullet and fragmentation-resistant windows, ensuring protection in combat scenarios.
The system includes an ammunition resupply vehicle, support vehicle, and is capable of firing Bonus submunitions and M982 Excalibur precision-guided projectiles.
One of the key capabilities of the Archer system is its ability to perform counter-battery strikes. Its long-range capability, combined with the ability to fire three rounds and relocate before the first shell even lands, allows for low-risk operations in hostile environments. The system can fire a variety of munitions, including standard NATO shells and advanced precision-guided munitions, extending its effective range to over 50 kilometres with Excalibur rounds. The fully automated loading system carries 21 projectiles, and reloading takes just 10 minutes using its dedicated munitions carrier.
The Archer artillery system is also highly mobile, with the ability to reach speeds of up to 90 km/h on roads and traverse rough terrain, including snow and mud. It can be deployed quickly, with a firing setup time of under 30 seconds, and features a high rate of fire, capable of delivering 20 rounds in 2.5 minutes. The system supports 24-hour operations with sustained fire rates and can be operated by a crew as small as one, though typically it is manned by three or four personnel. Its mobility and speed, combined with its advanced fire control system, make it highly adaptable for a range of missions.
Currently, the system is in service with the Swedish Army, which ordered 48 units, with 26 active as of March 2023. The British Army recently acquired 14 units as an interim replacement for the AS-90, and Ukraine has received eight systems as part of Sweden’s military support.
Cutting edge and available, British designed ( as far as anything is nowadays) but not ordered…or at least, 14 is hardly much of an order.
It might be a stopgap (only 14??) if boxer 155 was coming in soon but we have no ordinary Boxers yet let alone anything else. Buy another 40? and let Boxer come along as and when, or never.
AA
These are about all there is left, aside from a few AS90s in Ukraine.
14? What’s that?? 2 gun batteries and 2 for training??? It doesn’t make sense.
Yes, I read 2 Batteries of 19RA are equipped with Archer.
I don’t know what the other Battery or 1 RHA will be doing in the next few years. 1 RHA I understand still has some AS90 left but they will be going on to UKR in due course.
Mmmmmm!
Oh dear
1 rha has no guns there are some As90 at the school of artillery
Already. Great. As a RA man, what will those gunners be doing?
Some are in Estonia and one battery have L118
Great. The spread of the LG continues.
We’ve already had two Regiments of AS90 converted to it after the 2010 review.
It’s better than nothing but, boy, what have they done to the Royal Artillery.
I was in the Ra for 24 years and now a civil servant at the rsa it’s gut wrenching to see the state of the gunners
What is 1RHA doing if it has no guns? Lots of phys and course?
Estonia and a battery of L118
14. I understand that is all that can be offered up to us at present.
These 14 were in storage in Sweden. They were for a cancelled Norwegian order.
If we’d wanted new build we’d have been waiting years…
Ah, only 14 makes sense now..
AA
The 14 secondhand Archers sourced from the Swedish MoD has always been declared as an interim capability.
The long term replacement for AS-90 is Boxer RCH-155. I suspect that will take a very long time to come into service for multiple reasons.
Well they can’t leave active gun batteries without any guns, what would be the options in the interim? There must be something knocking about that could fill in short term? 105 light guns out if cold store??
Daniele says that 1RHA still has its complement of AS-90s and there are those 14 Archers. Not sure how many AS-90s are left in storage after all those UKR donations, and what shape they are in.
Not sure about 105mm LG numbers in storage either.
So, good question.
Hope someone has the answers on this.
“1RHA still has its complement of AS-90s”
I don’t think it is a full 24 in 3 Fire Batteries though. I might be wrong, I understood it too well down on establishment.
I’m not sure where you got your info but 1rha has no guns at all
As I said, I knew it was down and not full, but not that bad! Thanks.
I assume RSA, 14RA will give their compliment to UKR too? What’s the point of 14 RA still having examples if no front line regiments have it?
I look after the rsa guns we’ve already sent two As90 and have six left for training they are naturally all fully fit
What are they doing in Estonia with no guns?
There’s a battery of As90 out there until they go out of service its a bit like batus the kit is permanently there just a change of manpower
Army Equipment Report 2023
AS-90 – 57
Light Gun – 126
MLRS – 29
Yes. I have seen that spreadsheet from June 2023. Much has changed since then. Be good to see this year’s document if HMG dare to put it in the public domain!
Yes, one of the sources I based my guesstimate on. And some Tweets.
But David L works at the RSA, no better source than him.
1rha has no As90 there are some at the school of artillery
12 of the AS-90’s handed over to Ukraine were “non-functional spares” If that was guns missing or something else?
Those 12 were non-functioning AS-90s, that UKR could strip for spares. In that shipment was also 20 functioning AS-90s. We have sent more since. Not sure what the total now sent is. Could be 60 or more?
According to Wiki ” 36 operational ones and 12 non-functional spares received from UK. I was interested in the non -functioning one, did they become non -functional as we striped them for spares ? or were they sat in storage
Yes they were cannibalised for parts to keep batus rsa and two regiments running
I read one suggestion that with the Army increasing its M270 Batteries from 6 to 9, those extra regular Batteries may be found from Regs like 1 RHA with few or no guns, as another “interim” until new SPGs arrive.
Where else do the RA get personnel from to expand the Deep Fires area?
The problem there is there isn’t enough Mlrs to do that the mod has procured extra miles from Norway and I believe Japan but they all have to go back to the USA for upgrade to glmrs they’re being fed through rsa remember to have non usa parts removed
Thanks. So not a short term option either.
Do you have any timescale estimate for the completion and expansion to 75?
I’m afraid not they even removed an mlrs gate guard for use from larkhill
Lucky to fine anything in storage mate .
Obviously different times. I can remember having to go up to a storage site in Melton Mowbray around 1978/79 to pick up a new Radar (Cymbeline) the site had a number of very large sheds brimming with kit. Good times.
David Lee says 1RHA has no guns.
Sad state of affairs.
It maybe quicker to buy more Archer platforms ,which I think is the better Artillery platform ,RCH-155 looks more like a make do job .
I don’t think there are anymore secondhand Archers on Volvo chassis to be had.
Anyway Sunak did a PM to PM deal to get Boxer RCH155. That is not going to be unravelled.
A pity the army did not get the chance to evaluate Archer, Caesar, K9 and RCH155 alongside each other as was the plan under the MFP programme.
What did Sunak know about artillery?!
So they had an initial 24 month support contract for £4 million, and now a long term one for £60 million. We have just 14 systems so that’s £4.5 million a pop, anyone know how much we paid for them ? I may be way off the mark but this doesn’t look like a very good deal to me for just an interim solution. I always find it odd that we have stuck with the Volvo Truck chassis when Sweden is moving to the same MAN Truck as we use for everything else. It may explain why Norway backed out… Read more »
Indeed – and people wonder where the MOD Budget goes 🤔
I often wonder just how competent staff at DE&S actually are, if those figures are accurate? Support costs are so high they I think are higher than the equipment budget.
Over a, say, 30 year service life then support costs for any equipment is far, far higher than original acquisition costs.
But I doubt we are keeping Archer, an interim solution, for 30 years and anyway this support contract is for just 5 years!
So you may well have a point!
We clearly quickly bought what was available or others will moan about a long capability gap. There is still one anyway as we have donated more than 14 AS-90s to Ukraine. I agree that this support contract looks poor VfM at first glance. The RA will do Level 1 maintenance, REME will do Level 2 and would do Level 3 if the unit has a Regt Wksp REME rather than just a LAD. Looks like we would send repairable E&MAs to the OEM for specified repair. Not sure how many years this deal runs for but it does not look… Read more »
I struggle to figure out why as an interim we just didn’t buy some M777 ? Yes I know they are towed, not self portable or automatic but it’s an interim solution.
Failing that ask Poland how expensive it is to upgrade the AS90 turret like they have for Krab SPG. They picked the Braveheart turret over the Pzh2000 and fitted a Nextor 52 calibre 155mm.
I suspect we could have bought far more M777 for the budget than Archers.
Most say the M777 is a nice peace of kit .Think because it’s Towed never on the MODs list .
Not a bad idea. Sunak should have stayed out of it and let the army do the MFP to determine the long term solution, centrepiece of which would have been a comparison between Archer, RCH155, Caesar, and K9.
Then when the final selection is made those interim M777s could be issued to support the mech brigades or light brigades in 1 Div.
If 16AA and the Commandoes wanted to keep 105mm, then they still could.
I have spent a long time trying to find out how much we paid for our 14 secondhand ‘Mk1’ Archers. Not found a thing. It smells fishy. I suspect we massively overpaid.
60M to support 14 units??????
i hope that includes a lot of spare gun tubes and ammo, otherwise it seems way overpriced for maintenance for 14 units for just 5 years.
Such is their way. No wonder we have so little kit.
“interim” ?😟
Interim might be 20 years, the speed they are currently building Boxer at.
Exactly. Will Boxer RCH155 be built after all the other Boxers?
As quick as that? 😉