Leonardo has introduced its latest electronic warfare (EW) system, BriteStorm, aimed at enhancing air defence suppression capabilities.

The system was unveiled on October 14, 2024, and is designed to provide armed forces with a new tool for stand-in jamming, offering greater protection for both crewed and uncrewed platforms during military operations.

BriteStorm is an evolution of Leonardo’s BriteCloud technology, an Expendable Active Decoy (EAD) used to disrupt radio frequency (RF) missiles.

Unlike BriteCloud, which acts as a last-resort defence mechanism, BriteStorm is designed to operate earlier in a mission, disrupting adversary radar and air defence systems before they can engage with friendly forces. According to Mark Randall, Campaign Manager for Electronic Warfare at Leonardo, “Platforms installed with a BriteStorm payload can deploy ahead to create confusion, so that enemy Integrated Air Defence Systems (IADS) are unable to detect, track, and attempt to engage friendly assets.”

The system utilises Leonardo’s Miniature Techniques Generator (MTG), paired with various antennas and Transmit Receive Modules (TRMs), allowing it to be integrated onto a wide range of platforms, including uncrewed systems.

This provides flexibility and reduces the need for larger, more powerful systems traditionally used for stand-off jamming operations. Andrew Ingram, Head of Capability for Electronic Warfare at Leonardo, explained that the stand-in jamming approach reduces the need for high-power systems, making it more suitable for closer operations.

BriteStorm’s digital radio frequency memory (DRFM) technology enables it to employ a variety of electronic warfare techniques, such as creating “ghost” signatures of aircraft or jamming enemy systems with electronic noise. This aims to reduce the effectiveness of enemy IADS by creating confusion and disrupting their ability to track and engage with real threats.

Developed at Leonardo’s electronic warfare facility in Luton, UK, BriteStorm has already undergone live trials as part of its development. Its ability to be integrated onto multiple platforms is expected to offer flexibility for armed forces, providing options for both current and future missions.

The system’s design allows it to be deployed using lower-cost uncrewed platforms, reducing the risks associated with using larger, strategic assets.

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

32 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_862908)
12 hours ago

So will this be aboard whatever low cost Drone 216 are fielding next year?

SailorBoy
SailorBoy (@guest_862911)
12 hours ago

Or is it Spear-EW?
Doesn’t that use a Leonardo jammer?

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_862913)
12 hours ago
Reply to  SailorBoy

Dunno mate.

Jim
Jim (@guest_862930)
11 hours ago
Reply to  SailorBoy

Yes but this jammer is bigger certainly than Brite cloud and probably bigger than SPEAR EW.

Robert Blay
Robert Blay (@guest_862942)
10 hours ago
Reply to  SailorBoy

SPEAR EW does use Leonardo tech.

AlexS
AlexS (@guest_862916)
12 hours ago

If it is high tech i hope is not employed in expendable devices. Otherwise a couple months after employment the enemy will have a copy.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke (@guest_862926)
11 hours ago
Reply to  AlexS

Probably only have the software flashed to it for the job in hand.

This used to be the preserve of EW specialists. Clearly about to become a lot more generalised.

Jim
Jim (@guest_862932)
11 hours ago

Yes that was mentioned in Warzone Today that this would be a contender for ACP from BAE or the CCA designs for USAF.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_862931)
11 hours ago

Totally OT, but newsworthy.
The RAMS is formed today, merging the RAMC,RADC,QARANC.
The RAVC becomes a part of the RE.
George, will there be an article?

Cymbeline
Cymbeline (@guest_862934)
11 hours ago

👍

SailorBoy
SailorBoy (@guest_862941)
10 hours ago

Yes, I agree, absolutely.
Those acronyms tell me all I need to know… 😏

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_862946)
10 hours ago
Reply to  SailorBoy

Oh come on…….
I thought we’d trained you up properly…
Young man…More homework, less fantasy Boxer modules!

Royal Army Medical Service.
Royal Army Dental Corps.
Queen Alexandrias Royal Army Nursing Corps.
Royal Army Veterinary Corps.
Royal Engineers.
😆

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_862947)
10 hours ago

Oh, and first, Royal Army Medical Corps.

SailorBoy
SailorBoy (@guest_862950)
10 hours ago

As of today I am starting a notebook of acronyms so I can look them up.
I doubt it will help me though. As far as I can tell you have never repeated the same one twice.
I like fantasy boxer modules. Also fantasy missiles. Also fantasy ships.
I was actually doing homework this evening. Chemistry 😔

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_862952)
10 hours ago
Reply to  SailorBoy

As far as I can tell you have never repeated the same one twice.”😂 !!

I know you do, my young apprentice.

Chemistry? Must be useful somewhere in BAES. Or you might end up as a boffin in DSTLs CBRD or, more apt for your tastes, PSD….😉

SailorBoy
SailorBoy (@guest_863010)
32 minutes ago

What’s PSD?
Not Personal Security Details, surely?
It isn’t in the pdf, you got me.
BAE is the long term hope, working in government sounds boring.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_863015)
15 minutes ago
Reply to  SailorBoy

It’s a Division in DSTL, working on platforms so developing kit for land, sea, air.
Located, primarily, at Portsdown West I believe.
The CBR Division is of course at Porton Down.

SailorBoy
SailorBoy (@guest_863020)
5 seconds ago

Sounds good.
CBR just sounds scary.
Watched a documentary on it a few days ago, I’d be scared witless of dropping something the whole time.
Besides, I’m not the greatest at chemistry practicals.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_862953)
10 hours ago
Reply to  SailorBoy

Do you do Fantasy Premier League by any chance?

SailorBoy
SailorBoy (@guest_863009)
36 minutes ago

No, but I have friends who do.
More of a strategy turn-based guy myself, with a little bit of tank combat and sailing simulators.
Btw, just found the Gov.uk PDF file on “MOD acronyms and abbreviations”.
I win, you will never catch me out again!

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_863014)
18 minutes ago
Reply to  SailorBoy

Ha! I’ve seen it.
I was most disappointed when I looked for certain little-known organisations I’m aware of and found them missing! 😉
Useful, but not the bible.

Dern
Dern (@guest_862973)
8 hours ago
Reply to  SailorBoy

Good luck with that.

What is RTR short for?

SailorBoy
SailorBoy (@guest_863008)
40 minutes ago
Reply to  Dern

Royal… Territorial… Rangers?
Royal Tank Regiment? Aha!

Dern
Dern (@guest_862980)
7 hours ago
Reply to  SailorBoy

RAMC does mostly PHC, PHEC and R1 Support.
QARANC specialist in PFC, and PCCC
RADC do teeth
RAMS do all of the above.

Dern
Dern (@guest_862972)
8 hours ago

Decent Cap badge.

Awful motto.

Horrendous rank slides.

TRF is okay.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_863017)
6 minutes ago
Reply to  Dern

Yes, I read feedback on x was much of the same opinion.
Some are for it, some against, some seem indifferent.
As an outsider, I have no position, other than is having a Corps of Dentists really necessary?
Yet I do see the value, and tradition, in having the RAPTC, and the SASC, which are also small organisations.

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF (@guest_863001)
3 hours ago

Daniele,

Pardon? 🤔

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_863018)
5 minutes ago
Reply to  FormerUSAF

Morning mate.
See above for translations.

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF (@guest_863002)
3 hours ago

Please explain the wiring diagram that places RAVC under the RE, if possible. Is the MoD anticipating that horse cavalry, on a significant scale, will come back into vogue and require engineering support? When was the last time that the British Army utilized significant horse transport? Crimea? Boer War? WWI? Possibly WWII?

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_863012)
21 minutes ago
Reply to  FormerUSAF

RAVC operationally is about MWD. Military Working Dogs.
In the army, 1 MWD Regiment, think in the counter IED side especially.
RAF police and MDP also have MWD and UKSF their own, and a smaller number with MGS.
Horses are of course used by KTRHA and HCMR for state and other ceremonial occasions.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_863013)
20 minutes ago
Reply to  FormerUSAF

Sorry, wiring diagram.
1 MWD already sits under 8 Engineer Brigade.
I’d have kept RAVC separate myself, just reading in the report it’s going to the RE.

Jim
Jim (@guest_862933)
11 hours ago

Really hope we get SPEAR EW in service soon.