Over the past few years, the realities of modern conflict have shifted in a way that few of us could have imagined a decade ago. The pace of change on today’s battlefield is relentless.

The conflict in Ukraine has shown how quickly new technologies can be adapted, how rapidly tactics evolve, and how decisive data and speed of decision making have become.

For those of us who have spent our careers in high performance environments, this acceleration feels familiar. For those in defence, who are sometimes more used to longer procurement cycles, the pace of change remains a challenge.

I’ve spent nearly thirty years in Formula 1™ and related businesses, working for teams including McLaren and Mercedes in a world where speed, precision and constant improvement are the difference between success and failure. Every race is planned and executed using millions of data points, endless simulations and small, continual refinements. In that environment, an organisation either learns faster than its competitors or it falls behind. There is no comfortable middle ground.

During the Covid pandemic, I was asked to draw on this experience to lead the Ventilator Challenge UK, a UK Government-led project to scale ventilator production to meet the huge demands of the Covid-19 pandemic. It was the first time I had seen government and industry come together on what could only be described as a wartime footing in peacetime. Decisions were taken quickly and informed by expertise. Supply chains were redesigned in days and, by using high performance engineering techniques, we delivered a step change in production at a speed that would previously have been thought impossible. What had effectively been 23 years of production was achieved in just 12 weeks, with 65 percent of the ventilator re-engineered for volume manufacture. Peak daily production prior to Covid was 15 machines per week. The UK Ventilator Challenge peaked at 402 units in one day.

To achieve this, approximately 3,000 volunteer operatives, including AA roadside support technicians, airline pilots and Formula 1™ engineers, were trained remotely using digital tools created within three weeks. Although the final ventilator carried all the investment costs of the 40 pilot projects that led to the one successful programme I led, the unit cost was still lower than that of the original device.

The UK was among the few nations able to upscale ventilator manufacturing at speed. That outcome reflected a combination of policy choices, industrial capacity, and the availability of high performance engineering expertise, including from motorsport.

For me, the experience highlighted how Formula 1™ principles, culture and technologies can translate beyond the racetrack when applied with clear authority and shared purpose. It also prompted a more structured effort to apply those lessons outside motorsport, including through work at PurpleSector, where we have sought to codify elements of high performance engineering for use in environments under pressure to deliver critical capability faster and more efficiently.

Defence is one of the areas where this approach is most relevant, and also where adoption is hardest. Recent strategic reviews and ministerial statements emphasise the need for forces and industry to operate at wartime pace in peacetime. While this ambition is well founded, many defence organisations remain shaped by governance, assurance, and decision processes designed for a different risk environment. Closing the gap between stated intent and operational reality will require deliberate changes in how decisions are informed, authorised and executed.

I believe Industrial Racecraft™ offers a practical route forward. By creating a digital twin with an appropriate level of fidelity to represent a complex system, such as an operational facility or a supply chain, and merging this with validation data alongside data science, machine learning and artificial intelligence tools, it becomes possible to model numerous scenarios offline and without risk. This allows better decisions to be made faster in the real world. The same approach underpins Formula 1™ race strategy, where highly developed tools support real time critical decision making by allowing hundreds of scenarios to be explored and rapidly narrowed in preparation for an optimised intervention at exactly the right moment.

Beyond smart tools, there is also a powerful cultural dimension to this approach. In the best race teams, decisions are made at the point of greatest knowledge. This typically means the expert with the clearest data and understanding at that moment is trusted to act, regardless of seniority. When applied appropriately, this principle can significantly increase the speed and quality of decision making in complex organisations. It encourages responsibility, accountability and collaboration, all of which are essential in modern defence environments.

PurpleSector’s Industrial Racecraft™ approach is agnostic to the application. The same principles that help optimise a race weekend can be applied to an RAF base, a munitions facility, a logistics network or a maintenance programme for complex platforms. During the Ventilator Challenge, we demonstrated that agile manufacturing, resilient supply chains and rapid engineering response can be achieved at national scale under extraordinary pressure. Those same capabilities can now be channelled into strengthening sovereign defence capability, de-risking complex programmes or operations, and accelerating the delivery of critical equipment.

The Government’s commitment to increasing defence and security spending in the years ahead brings with it an important responsibility. That investment must translate into tangible capability growth, improved readiness and long-term resilience. To achieve that, innovation must be embedded in the way defence operates every day. Initiatives such as UK Defence Innovation and its Rapid Innovation Team reflect a growing understanding that solutions may come from unconventional places and that dual-use technologies can be harnessed more effectively.

High performance engineering is one of the United Kingdom’s most distinctive and successful sectors. It has delivered impressive results in motorsport, aerospace and advanced manufacturing for decades.

I am not suggesting that defence should behave like a racing team in every respect. However, I am convinced that the principles that underpin success in Formula 1™, clarity of purpose, disciplined execution, intelligent use of data and technology, and a culture of constant improvement, have direct relevance to the challenges defence faces today.

The need to act is driven by rising global instability and increasing threat levels, creating a shrinking window in which to implement meaningful change. By bringing proven methods from one of the most demanding engineering environments in the world into defence, there is a genuine opportunity to move faster, think more clearly and prepare more effectively for what lies ahead.

Mark Mathieson MBE
With a background in motorsport and automotive engineering, he has held senior roles at McLaren, Mercedes-Benz F1 and Ricardo, including Director of Innovation at McLaren Applied Technologies and Chief Engineer for Powertrain at McLaren Automotive. In 2019 he founded digital technology consultancy PurpleSector, now employing more than 60 people across multiple sectors. He led the UK Ventilator Challenge and supported the national Covid testing programme through automation, work recognised with the award of an MBE.

7 COMMENTS

  1. Good article. And highlights exactly what we as a nation can achieve when the urgent need arrises. Many in the comments section dismiss everything we do as useless, to slow, and all civil servants and everyone at the MOD are useless and a national embarrassment. Now that isn’t an excuse for the current gaps in our Armed Force’s as a result of 20+ years of not enough investment. But people also forget in a time of true conflict, the treasury coffers are well and truly opened. And vast amounts of money and kit are suddenly available. Industry works at record speed, and equipment and upgrades suddenly appear overnight. I have see this first hand in and during Op Telic.

    • Merry Christmas Robert.
      Not really seen anyone actually say much of what you say but I sort of guess the deep concerns of many could be Interpreted In that way.
      F1 lost all It’s appeal to me when the Money Men turned it into a circus decades ago but I guess having sooooo much money does open up huge potential for R&D when Wars come calling. Good to see 3000 Volunteers stepped up when needed.

      • Merry Christmas Halfwit. Have a great time. I generally try to stay with my own experience and common sense rather than just play the MOD blame game. I’m less interested in being popular these days. I enjoy your posts. Hope you stick with it during 2026. Have a good one pal. Ps. I get what you mean about modern day F1. But I still love it. My son also loves it. I love our Sunday afternoons with a Grand Prix and a bacon sarnie 👌

        • Cheers Robert, It’s been fun on here this past 6 months or so, I’m glad I’m not too much of a pain being a bit of a Halfwit all the time !!!!

          I used to watch F1 religiously with my dad, back in the days of Mansell and Prost and Senna but It all went too commercial and dare I say Processional, so far removed from my type of racing and Bikes sort of took over as they are way more “Edge of the seat”.
          Maybe an Invite at yours would get me interested again (Brown sauce on mine please) 😁

  2. This is a really interesting article and something we as a country should take more notice of.

    I do feel we let some of the Covid efforts just slip as fast as they were realised. The NHS is massive and could easily keep going its own pharmaceutical / vaccine (under licence) and PPE factories going and add some much needed resilience. PPE in particular could be highly automated making it cost effective.

    For Defence you can see we are heading in the direction of digital twins in shipbuilding and Tempest in particular, but we also need to leverage the amazing engineering we have in this country.

    I read somewhere recently that Singapore gov hired a load of engineers in past (500 I think) to take a look at all public services and reengineer. for the UK this would probably need 2-5k to pull off a similar task, I think this would be money well spent, put everything on the table and see what they come up with. We can do some excellent stuff when we are allowed to get on with it.

  3. Agree with this completely.

    There’s something else we can take note of. Minimal legal specifications don’t win races, nor do they win wars. When GD said that Ajax conforms to all legal requirements, that should have been a major red flag. It was arse protection of the worst kind. We should be looking to build a capability that’s the best we can afford to achieve the objective of defending the country. We need to win wars not just get a pat on the back from NATO for participation. Imagine if an F1 constructor put a car on the track that merely conformed to all the F1 rules, and when it was completely outclassed defended their action by pointing out the car met the legal standard. They would be a laughing stock.

  4. It is an interesting article.

    Now *if* you wanted to do this for a missile you would need to get
    1 – everyone security cleared – can we do that quickly?
    2 – find more people who *know * about things that go bang – do point me in the direction of the UK explosives industry
    3 – find people who *know* the various limitations of the systems it has to integrate with.

    There is a very small pool of people who understand the full environment. To a certain extent you don’t want to widen that too much either. That has to be done carefully.

    Whilst I accept that a can-do attitude and an ocean of cash can solve most problems and I do believe the engineers are here in the UK. If you told JCB you are now doing military vehicles remarkable things could happen.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here