Saab and Babcock have issued fresh details on their joint bid to supply Sweden’s next generation of surface combatants, setting out how their proposed Arrowhead 120 frigate would be configured for the Swedish Navy’s future operational requirements.

In a joint statement, Saab and Babcock said the Arrowhead 120 (AH120) had been developed specifically to meet Sweden’s emerging maritime needs, and described the partnership as combining two “sovereign defence companies” and their supply chains.

The firms said the project would support Sweden’s national defence and reinforce the wider defence relationship between Sweden and the United Kingdom.

“The Arrowhead 120 (AH120) is an advanced multi mission frigate jointly developed by Babcock and Saab to meet the future operational needs of the Swedish Navy,” the spokesperson said, adding that the partnership was intended to contribute to Sweden’s defence and security while supporting the long-standing bilateral relationship.

The companies said the AH120 design integrates what they described as a highly capable combat management suite, with Saab taking the lead on combat system elements. Saab cited its recent international work on Singapore’s Multi Role Combat Vessel programme and Poland’s SIGINT ship as relevant experience, and said it would provide fully equipped composite superstructures as well as weapons including anti-ship missiles and lightweight torpedoes. The spokesperson noted Saab has integrated combat systems for more than 20 navies globally.

Babcock, meanwhile, said it would provide design, build and integration expertise drawn from its Arrowhead 140 programme, which forms the basis of the Royal Navy’s Type 31 frigate and has also been selected for programmes in Poland and Indonesia. The companies described this as evidence the wider Arrowhead family has already proven itself as an export-ready design.

The AH120 is described as a 124-metre frigate with a steel hull and lightweight composite superstructure, with a displacement of around 4,650 tonnes. Saab and Babcock said the vessel would be optimised for Swedish territorial defence in the Baltic Sea and the High North, with a focus on endurance, survivability and manoeuvrability.

“The partnership brings together a proven, export-ready design tailored to Sweden’s needs,” the spokesperson said. “It is adaptable and provides strong potential for international adoption.”

In their statement, the companies also claimed the frigate would be equipped to counter sophisticated air threats, including ballistic missiles, and would offer defensive capability against manned and unmanned surface and underwater threats, reflecting the evolving threat environment faced by Nordic and Baltic states.

Sweden is seeking to acquire four new frigates under a programme expected to be worth tens of billions of kronor, with a number of European shipbuilders understood to be competing. The Saab-Babcock offer is one of several bids, alongside proposals linked to France’s Naval Group and Spain’s Navantia.

George Allison
George Allison is the founder and editor of the UK Defence Journal. He holds a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and specialises in naval and cyber security topics. George has appeared on national radio and television to provide commentary on defence and security issues. Twitter: @geoallison

11 COMMENTS

  1. At less than 5,000 tonnes with a crew of 80 could these be a good fit for an additional UK frigate to back up the T26 in home waters and leave the T31 for deployments further afield.

    With CAPTAS 2 they could be a more affordable ASW capability especially for the North Sea and UK continental shelf operations.

    • There were proposals very similar to this for T31 and they got rejected in favour of AH140, if we get anything more now it will be those. Besides, we need to make sure the vessels we do have are fully equipped first.

      • It would make a good deal more sense to order a T31 Batch 2, rather than faff around with a different but basically equivalent design.

        AH140 has all the space it needs if we want additional systems; far better to upgrade that design and potentially backfit upgrades to the first five ships.

  2. Hi folks hope all is well .
    Jim, you are one the experts on this site I turn to on defence matters – a fascinating subject indeed – this is rather light in weight compared to modern frigates, possibly still heavier than the Royal Navy types of the second world war. Can you please advise why this type is light and small? I was thinking about a comparison to our Type 31 we are building which is larger.
    Cheers
    George

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here