Ferguson Marine has said it is already looking at how to expand beyond the limits of its current Port Glasgow site as it prepares for future vessel work and a broader revival of commercial shipbuilding on the Clyde.
Appearing before Holyrood’s Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee, chief executive Graeme Thomson said the yard’s present footprint would become a constraint if the business secures the work now being discussed with the Scottish Government.
“You are absolutely correct that the yard will run out of space at some point,” he told MSPs.
Thomson said the company is reviewing how to make better use of the site it already has, particularly as investment in new equipment and future vessel programmes begin to reshape the yard’s production model.
“We are certainly looking at what we are doing with the investment that we have talked about and how we can optimise the space that we have,” he said.
That work is tied to a broader push to modernise production flow, rather than simply add more activity into the same layout.
“In the journey that we are starting on, we will look at how to optimise space so that there is a proper production flow that makes best use of it,” Thomson said.
The issue arose during questioning about the Scottish Government’s proposed direct award of contracts for four further vessels, and whether Ferguson Marine has the capacity to handle that workload within the current yard. Thomson said the company estimates that programme could take around five years, although much depends on when contracts are actually signed.
“We estimate that it will take about five years, although that is partly about when the contracts are let,” he said.
For Ferguson Marine, however, the space question is not limited to fitting in the next batch of ships. Thomson suggested the company is already thinking about a larger industrial future for Inverclyde if current plans are realised.
“I have been clear since I have been in the job that I hope that Port Glasgow will not be big enough in five years,” he said.
He added that the ambition is to grow beyond the current site and rebuild a more substantial shipbuilding base in the area.
“I hope that Port Glasgow will not be big enough in five years and that we can expand and spread out more, perhaps at Inchgreen or other annexed areas, so that we can get to the point at which we are creating a good solid commercial shipbuilding industry in Inverclyde again,” Thomson told the committee.
That is one of the clearest indications yet that Ferguson Marine is thinking not only about recovering from the Glen Sannox and Glen Rosa saga, but about re-establishing a broader industrial footprint on the lower Clyde. Thomson said discussions had already taken place locally about potential options.
“I have been speaking with Inverclyde Council about how, if we were looking to expand our footprint, there are areas around the yard, although it might not look like it, that we could go into, subject to the council being amenable to that,” he said.
He also pointed to the Inchgreen facility, around a mile away, as a possible part of that longer-term picture.
“There is also the Inchgreen facility a mile down the road from us,” he said.
At the current site itself, Thomson suggested there may still be scope for targeted expansion, although not without practical limitations. One of those is unusual even by shipyard standards.
“Part of the issue is that we have a fire station in the middle of our yard that serves the whole community,” he said. “We cannot move that, because it is critically important.”
Even so, he said there is land near the existing site that could potentially be used for additional industrial capacity.
“There is space in front of the yard that we could use,” Thomson told MSPs. “It does not look like much, but it could be sufficient for us to put in another panel line or other automated equipment.”
That matters because the yard’s modernisation plans are already tied to new manufacturing infrastructure, including a semi-automated panel line intended to improve steel processing and productivity. Any future expansion would likely be shaped around that kind of equipment and a more streamlined build flow.
For now, the space issue remains partly theoretical, as the details of future vessel contracts are still being worked through. But Ferguson Marine’s evidence made clear that management is already thinking beyond the current yard boundary.












Perhaps unpopular what I am about to say, but surely Fergusons should be closed and investment put into Babcock & BAES, who could use that investment to supercharge their operations which are far more sustainable.
There would be nothing stopping Babcock and BAES working on commercial ships if that’s what they wanted to do, but given the disastrous situation with the ferries I do not think Ferguson should be given money to expand when it can’t prove it has a viable future.
You have successful viable yards that have received no support from the Scottish government that are crying out for workers and a failing yard that has already been bailed out, doesn’t have a great order book or track record of delivery that wants to expand…. Bizarre
The whole thing was loopy.
Giving Ferguson’s a type of ferry to build that they had no experience of on a Design & Build basis…..the mind boggles and still does at the though of it.
I’m more sanguine about this as it is more what they have traditionally built. Still ferries are very competitive to build with countries that subsidise them heavily.
I don’t really understand how this makes and economic sense….wait it is SNP economics so it doesn’t actually make sense….silly me.
BAES risk being left behind by Babcock and H&W. H&W have the opportunity to construct a totally optimised layout in the yard. Babcock have the space to do that and potentially to fit out under cover as well. Whilst it would be a project to cover over part of the H&W dry dock it is quite possible to do that.
I’m not in favour of bailing out the commercial shipyards but I’m also equally not in favour of the Scottish government giving subsidies to defence yards either.
I don’t know why anyone woukd think regional governments should be subsidising UK defence infrastructure. Does anyone think that Cumbria county council should be paying to rebuild the Devonshire Dockyard or the Liverpool combined authority should be paying for equipment to service RFA vessels at Cammel laird.
Defence is and always should be a 100% reserved matter in the UK.
Think this is excellent news. Military infrastructure and production is vital for defence and the economy.
A couple of weeks ago Ferguson was choked for resources and running out of work. Four small ship orders and now they want to take over half the lower Clyde.
I wish this was true however anything linked to the SNP is just so hard to believe. We have seen these over optimistic reports numerous times in Scotland and every time we have seen significant sums of Scottish tax payers money gone.