Two Typhoons were launched from RAF Coningsby to intercept a Qatar Airways Boeing 777 inbound to Manchester.
The interception was pieced together from open-source flight tracking and appears to have been a Quick Reaction Alert launch rather than routine training.
The two aircraft were Eurofighter Typhoon FGR4s flying under the callsigns RIGID 11 and RIGID 12, which took off from RAF Coningsby in Lincolnshire, the home of QRA (South).
The airliner was a Qatar Airways Boeing 777-300 flying from Doha, using the callsign QTR52N and bound for Manchester Airport. Open-source tracking indicated the 777 was not responding to air traffic control and did not begin its descent into Manchester where expected.
The UK Defence Journal understands the intercept related to an incident in which a threat was made. The nature of that threat, and whether it was assessed as credible, has not been established.
An RAF spokesperson told the UK Defence Journal:
“We can confirm that an RAF Quick Reaction Alert was launched for a Qatar Airways flight which was causing concern to civil authorities. The incident was resolved and landed safely at Manchester Airport.”
The intercepting Typhoons squawked a transponder code in the block allocated to NATO Air Policing, used for air defence priority flights. Tracking data placed the escort over the Midlands and Yorkshire, with the Typhoons following the airliner past Manchester. One of the fighters was later seen holding in orbits over Lincolnshire on its return to base.
Qatar Airways told me:
“Qatar Airways confirms that, as a precautionary measure and in line with standard procedure, flight QR23 from Doha to Manchester was provided with an escort for part of its journey prior to landing following a security notification from UK authorities. At no point was the aircraft in any danger, and normal operations continued on board throughout.
The flight landed safely, and all passengers and crew disembarked without incident. The safety and security of our passengers and crew remain our highest priority. We thank our passengers for their understanding.”
QRA is the standing task under which armed RAF Typhoons are held at high readiness around the clock to respond to aircraft of concern in or near UK airspace. Launches are ordered for a range of reasons, most commonly the approach of unidentified aircraft or the loss of contact with a civil flight, and a communications failure by an airliner is among the more routine triggers.
Coningsby covers the southern QRA area, with RAF Lossiemouth in Scotland also holding aircraft at readiness for the northern QRA area.
CORRECTION: Article was published with QRA North and QRA South in the wrong places, that has been corrected.












I’m confused. Given that Lossiemouth (Scotland) is well north of Coningsby (Lincolnshire), why is Coningsby “QRA (North)”? Surely it has nothing to do with Watford Gap?
I hope this doesn’t turn out to be one of those errors George quietly alters without acknowledgement, making the commentor who pointed it out look barking. You said it was North in this article, George – twice.
Do you have examples of that? Because I spent around twenty minutes every couple of mornings logging and updating corrections on our end and on the article itself and I would have to think I’ve missed one.
Well, sometimes I’ve noted errors and I just email the team direct, rather than pointing it out on here.
Quieter, and no real meed to highlight errors publicly, they happen.
I’ll speak to the others doing the editing, we’re supposed to mark clearly what’s changed and where as part of our NewsGuard and IPSO commitments.
It’s an error. QRA (S) is indeed Coningsby.
It was indeed, appreciate you and others pointing this out, one of those days.
Hope you and Lisa are coping with the kid ok. 👍
Ups and downs, it means that stuff like this gets done at night. The usual comment moderation person is on holiday for two weeks, so just me doing them for now. The automod tool puts everything into the queue lately.
Cheers mate.
You’re not confused/barking – the article has it backwards.
Let’s not blame George though; Jim was supposed to ‘hold the fort’ tonight… 🍷🍷🍷👀
“Glug glug” yup, sounds like him 😁
What?
Looks like someone else is on the ‘pop’ tonight… 👇🤣
I’m sorry?
Don’t be sorry, just put the bottle (and keyboard) down 👍
I’ve been looking after my unwell baby this evening. We’re not familiar like this ‘Greg/JJ’, could you perhaps try and be a bit less, that?