Operating expenditure at the Civil Nuclear Police Authority rose by almost £25 million during 2025-26, while reported workplace stress cases increased by 86% during a year of expansion, site closures and organisational change.

Operating expenditure at the Civil Nuclear Police Authority increased to £178.7 million during 2025-26, while reported workplace stress cases rose from 29 to 54, the UK Defence Journal understands.

The figures are contained in the CNPA’s Annual Report and Accounts, covering a year in which the Civil Nuclear Constabulary expanded its armed protection role to four non-nuclear energy sites while also managing the cessation of policing at older nuclear facilities. Total operating expenditure increased from £154.1 million in 2024-25 to £178.7 million, a rise of approximately £24.6 million or 16%. The Authority says £19.7 million of additional pay costs reflected the full-year effect of previous pay awards, higher employer pension and National Insurance contributions, and the transfer of Ministry of Defence Police personnel into the CNC as responsibility for the four additional sites changed hands.

Staff costs reached £131.1 million, compared with £111.3 million a year earlier, including £99.2 million in wages and salaries, £14 million in social security costs and £17.3 million in pension costs. Despite the increase in overall expenditure, the Authority spent less than had originally been approved for the year. Pay costs were below forecast because of vacancies and fewer new officers entering training than expected, while delayed project activity and lower-than-anticipated property maintenance costs also produced underspends. The CNPA said its standard operational activities achieved a breakeven position, although the accounts recorded £6 million more expenditure than income overall, mainly because of technical accounting adjustments and non-operational costs reimbursed by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero.

Fifty-four workplace stress cases were reported during 2025-26, compared with 29 the previous year, an increase of 86%. Stress accounted for 21% of reported health and safety incidents. The CNPA says the increase partly reflects more systematic reporting, with its time-recording system checked daily and managers asked to submit a health and safety report where an employee is recorded as absent because of work-related stress. Twelve of the 54 cases were directly linked to the cessation of policing at Hunterston B and Hinkley Point B, or the relocation of Corporate Learning and Development functions to the firearms training facility at Bisley. The organisation said stress risk assessments and support measures had been introduced in anticipation of some of those changes.

Reported injuries also increased from 97 to 119, a rise of 22.6%. Sixty-three per cent occurred within the Training Division, with the Authority saying a large number were associated with the dynamic and realistic training undertaken by officers. Fifteen incidents were reportable under the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations, compared with ten the previous year. Fourteen involved more than seven days of lost working time and one was recorded as a serious near miss. The CNPA said investigations found no common pattern or trend, with the incidents occurring at different locations and in different circumstances.

The report also records two personal data breaches that were reported to the Information Commissioner’s Office during the year. One concerned the sharing of employee payslips and was closed with no further action, while the second remained under investigation by the ICO when the report was prepared. The Authority said all breaches and incidents were managed through its internal processes and that it continued to record lower-level incidents and near misses for organisational learning.

Other workforce indicators moved in a more favourable direction. Police officer attrition fell from 9% to 7%, while police staff attrition also stood at 7%. Police staff headcount increased from 357 to 382 and the number of staff leaving fell from 39 to 28. The CNC maintained its deployability target of at least 90% throughout the year, while more than 80% of personnel on its Initial Foundation Programme passed to become newly qualified Authorised Firearms Officers.

Chief Constable Simon Chesterman said, as quoted in a news update: “I am immensely proud of what we achieved in the past year. Officers and staff contributed to our successful delivery of the core mission, the protection of our sensitive civil nuclear sites and material.” He added: “We also demonstrated our ability to expand our protective services to new areas of critical national infrastructure, and to continue to support national policing needs.”

The Authority has approved a £194.5 million revenue budget for 2026-27 alongside £14.1 million in capital expenditure. The report identifies inflation, national pay negotiations and supply-chain costs as continuing pressures, while changes across the nuclear estate create a separate workforce challenge because recruiting, vetting and training new firearms officers involves substantial lead times. The CNC says it is developing retention measures as existing sites cease operations and personnel are increasingly required across new nuclear facilities and other areas of critical national infrastructure.

Craig Langford
Trained as a mechanical engineer, Craig took an unconventional route into journalism, bringing with him a rare technical precision and analytical depth that continues to set his reporting apart.

4 COMMENTS

  1. I’d be interested to know what is causing the workplace stress for this force? Article makes it just moving/closure of places?

    Compared to their Home Office colleagues or fellow nationwide force the BTP, they don’t carry or investigate crimes, deal with Mental Health/medical/concern calls outs, constant watches, driving on extended Cat 1 calls (blues and tones) or face the public 24/7 with the threat of one out of context clip/phrase getting them the sack… whilst all the time being regarded as ‘the enemy’ by far left and far right…
    I think I just don’t understand their mission or stress… their contracts clearly didn’t cover moving around, hopefully they can figure it out.

    • Hi Mike Have you actually done the Maths on these figures 54 out of 1500 is 0.34% and that’s an exceptionally low figures for any industry. You also have to take into account these folks are nearly all Fire Arms Trained / Armed and have to maintain a high level of fitness. Also FYI some of them work in counter terrorism / protest intelligence.
      Most Nuclear sites are in fairly remote areas and widely separated for obvious reasons which means those staff are facing either relocation (family stress) to another part of the country or redundancy and both of those are pretty damn stressful in anyone’s life.

      If Jonathon is reading this I’d love to know what the corresponding figures are in your industry for stress absence (I bet the decimal point moves to the right 😉).

  2. For a public body these are pretty impressive figures, Policing is stressful and anyone who has ever worked in a business knows that the possibility of downsizing, relocation or redundancy sparks a surge in stress related absences. When you consider that, the overall increase in responsibilities into protecting Nationally important infrastructure and that they are armed it’s no great surprise really.
    What is a surprise is they managed to operate below their allocated budget for the year, that’s a real bonus these days.
    I do have to wonder if perhaps the time has come for the U.K to have a really big rethink about Policing and Security, we are facing multiple threats from internal and external sources but have a complete mishmash of organisations trying to deal with them.
    I’d really like to hear from others on here what they think can or should be done ?
    For me the answer is to have a 2 tier Policing System comprising of the following.
    1st Tier of larger combined Regional Constabularies to replace the county based ones which reduces admin overheads and cuts down the County line issues.
    The 2nd Tier is IMHO staring us in the face and that’s to set up an enlarged National Police Force by combining the existing ones we already have and pay for. So that’s the Civil Nuclear Constabulary (CNC), British Transport Police (BTP), Ministry of Defence Police (MOD Plod), Royal Military Police (RMP), Regional / Mets Counter Terrorist Units (CTU’s / CTC also known as SO15) and finally Special Branch.

    I might even consider going one stage further and reorganise the other 2 emergency services into mirrors of the Tier 1 Regional Constabularies so they can share infrastructure and Admin functions.

    • I should add how I’d pay for it. We have 2 NATO agreed spending targets 3.5% for Direct Defence spending and another 1.5% of GDP which can include this as it’s about Society resilience, countering hybrid threats and securing National infrastructure.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here