HMS Daring has taken on fuel for the first time in years, in the clearest sign yet that the destroyer is close to going back to sea after nearly a decade tied up alongside, according to the ship.

The ship’s own account posted the moment on Tuesday evening, noting she “hasn’t heard this over main broadcast for quite some time” before giving the pipe: “Do you hear there. No smoking, no naked lights, fuelling Ship.” A photograph with it shows a bunkering tanker secured alongside, hoses run across to the destroyer, and a rating on the upper deck watching it happen.

The pipe warns the ship’s company that fuel is going aboard and that ignition sources are banned while it does. Warships take on fuel because they are going somewhere.

Daring has been out of service since April 2017, and we reported last year when she passed 3,000 days alongside. She is now at roughly 3,470 days, or nine years and six months.

The vessel underwent the Power Improvement Project, the replacement of the diesel generators that had left the Type 45 class at risk of losing all power at sea, along with a wider package of refit work. She came back to Portsmouth in early 2023 and has not moved since.

Crewing began ahead of trials, with shakedown expected from around the turn of this year. That would be her first time off the wall since 2017.

The Power Improvement Project has worked through the class ship by ship, with Dauntless completing the same work before her. The intention is to hold the destroyers in service into the 2030s, and a study is now running on whether their out of service dates can be pushed further right.

George Allison
George Allison is the founder and editor of the UK Defence Journal. He holds a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and specialises in naval and cyber security topics. George has appeared on national radio and television to provide commentary on defence and security issues. Twitter: @geoallison

13 COMMENTS

  1. This should be subject to an enquiry but that would cost a lot of money and all that must go on the fleet, instead of lawyers’ pockets.

  2. Incredible maintenance work can take almost 10 years. No point holding an inquiry I think we can guess what most of the findings would be and yes it would cost money but no where near as much as having this asset along side since April 2017. The RN MOD etc really needs to do a lot better than this utter shambles.
    On a positive it’s good news she is going to return to service. Does that mean we will have 3 type 45’s available?

  3. No senior leader in uniform has taken responsibility for this utter shambles. Surely with so little sea time they can remain in service until at least 2050.

  4. As much as I like to see her back on operations I do wonder if it would have been better to keep her a bit longer in refit for the SAMPSON upgrades and installation of Sea Ceptor.

  5. Good to see her return to the fleet. The lack of money is preventing the refit these ship badly need to be a 21st century goal keeper of the fleet.

    They need the utterly useless and totally obsolete 4.5 ” landed and replaced with a Bofors gun fit, the 57mm and twin 40mm guns, plus dragon fire to provide robust defence against mass drone attacks.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here