The aircraft, a modified Boeing 747, is a flying control centre in the event of nuclear war or major crisis. The aircraft is supporting the U.S. President as he visits the UK.

The E-4B ‘Nightwatch’ is equipped with everything US officials would need to continue running the country, potentially from the skies, amidst a catastrophic world event. A fleet of four E-4Bs makes up the National Airborne Operations Center.

One of them is on alert 24/7 and always follows the President on overseas visits, that’s what’s happening now as Joe Biden is in the UK.

The aircraft has three decks and can hold a crew of up to 112 people.

“Designed during the Cold War, the Nightwatch has three decks. It can hold a crew of 112 people and can fly for 12 hours without landing, – while aerial refuelling means it can stay in the air for days. Its windows are reported to have wire mesh to keep them intact, while equipment and wiring on board are hardened and there is thermal and nuclear shielding in the event of a blast.”

The front of the plane contains living quarters for senior military officials, where 18 bunks are available for Air Force crew, Business Insider reports.

 

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

16 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Frost002
Frost002 (@guest_737342)
9 months ago

There are 4 Boeing E-4B Nightwatch aircraft & 2 VC-25 “Air Force One” aircraft. Another military operator of the 747 is Iran, which has a tanker variant and I believe it is still in service? Are there any other military 747s?

DMJ
DMJ (@guest_737347)
9 months ago
Reply to  Frost002

Asking for a friend again?

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker (@guest_737358)
9 months ago
Reply to  Frost002

Don’t think there are anymore in service. Wikipedia is ur friend for those kind of questions.

Frost002
Frost002 (@guest_737386)
9 months ago
Reply to  Monkey spanker

Never heard of Wikipedia thanks

Mr Bell
Mr Bell (@guest_737346)
9 months ago

Sheezus the yanks are paranoid. Fact is in event of a wide scale nuclear war whether the US president lives long enough to coordinate a counter attack is irrelevant. It will be the end of the world as we know it. Potentially even the end of human civilization.

Netking
Netking (@guest_737354)
9 months ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

These aircraft are an important but ultimately only a small portion of what the US has built up over the years in order to ensure the survival of the government. They have invested countless billions in systems and facilities scattered all over the country to try to ensure it’s survival in case of a civilization ending event. Whether it works or not, lets hope we never find out because it will be a bad day for the rest of us.

Old Tony
Old Tony (@guest_737402)
9 months ago
Reply to  Netking

One of the things that they did to ensure survival in the event of nuclear war was to invent the internet. This was before the folk at CERN upgraded it into the WWW.

Mark B
Mark B (@guest_737375)
9 months ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

Putin has form for thinking that he can attack without consequence. Peace for the last seventy year has been built on a deterent where everyone dies & conseqently use of nuclear weapons is a bad idea. Can’t do any harm to reinforce the message to everyone there is no way of decapitating the decision makers giving the Russians a miniscule chance..

Last edited 9 months ago by Mark B
Roy
Roy (@guest_737458)
9 months ago
Reply to  Mark B

You think the US will use nuclear weapons against Russia in response to Russian tactical nuclear use in Ukraine? i.e. that they will effectively put American cities and millions of American civilians at risk for the sake of the Donbas?

I do fear that under certain circumstances, Russian tactical nuclear use in Ukraine is possible but I don’t think Putin believes that it is credible that the US would then “blow its brains out all over Russia’s shirt”.

Mark B
Mark B (@guest_737585)
9 months ago
Reply to  Roy

I have no idea exactly what the americans might do should Russia use a tactical nuke in Ukraine however it is highly unlikely, in my opinion, that they would let it go unanswered. I suspect they have a whole array of conventional options which would be highly effective. I doubt Putin wants to add the Americans to his troubles.

Last edited 9 months ago by Mark B
Dr Who
Dr Who (@guest_737418)
9 months ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

Coming to all major world cities soon!

andy a
andy a (@guest_737711)
9 months ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

they are paranoid because they are hated by a chunk of the population of the world just like Britain was during empire. They have the guts right or wrong to make a stand

andy a
andy a (@guest_737713)
9 months ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

Its important to make sure the enemy knows a decapitation strike wont work and there will be a swift nuclear response. The promise of pay back is what stops people like Putin trying it

Charles Verrier
Charles Verrier (@guest_738177)
9 months ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

The US military is a great believer in “Better to have it and not need it, than need it and not have it” – and they have the budget…

The Big Man
The Big Man (@guest_737352)
9 months ago

One of these was at RIAT last year. Tail number 31676 for anyone who likes specifics.
Hopefully see the B52 this year after the unfortunate cancellation in 2022.

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker (@guest_737360)
9 months ago

Better sticking with the U.K. method.
Is radio 4 working. If not launch away 😂😂😂😂