As the U.S. government barrels toward a potential ban on TikTok, citing national security concerns over its Chinese ownership, the effectiveness and rationale of this move are being brought into question.

Ironically, as TikTok faces regulatory pressure, American users are flocking to other Chinese-owned platforms like RedNote (Xiaohongshu), underscoring the limited scope of such a ban and the government’s apparent disconnect with digital realities. This migration highlights the shortcomings of a targeted approach that addresses a single app rather than the broader issues of data privacy and security.

The ban, rooted in fears of data access by the Chinese government, raises more questions than answers. Why single out TikTok when countless platforms—regardless of ownership—engage in extensive data collection?

Why focus on ownership rather than building robust frameworks to safeguard user data across all digital ecosystems? The migration to RedNote demonstrates not only the futility of such measures but also the unintended consequences: far from reducing exposure to Chinese technology, it is simply shifting it elsewhere.

TikTok Bans on Government Devices

TikTok’s challenges in the U.S. are not new and mirror actions taken in other countries. The app has already been banned on government devices in the U.S., Canada, the United Kingdom, and several European Union countries, including France and Belgium. These bans were introduced to mitigate potential security risks associated with sensitive data being accessed through devices used in official capacities.

While these restrictions may seem reasonable for high-security environments, they do not directly address the concerns for the broader population, where the app remains widely accessible and popular. This selective targeting highlights the fragmented nature of the response to TikTok’s perceived risks and raises further questions about its long-term efficacy.

The Broader Context of Data Privacy

The central concern driving the TikTok ban is its parent company, ByteDance, being subject to Chinese laws that could compel it to share user data with the Chinese government. While this concern is valid, it’s hardly unique to TikTok. Most social media platforms harvest vast amounts of user data, and many store or process this data globally.

If the goal is to protect user data from foreign adversaries, banning a single app does little to address the systemic vulnerabilities inherent in the digital age.

Furthermore, users are not abandoning Chinese technology altogether; they’re simply moving to alternatives like RedNote. The platform, which shares many similarities with TikTok, has quickly risen to prominence in the U.S., becoming the most downloaded free app on the Apple App Store. Its Chinese ownership raises the same concerns that led to the scrutiny of TikTok, making the ban appear reactionary and myopic rather than a well-thought-out solution.

A Counterproductive Move?

The TikTok ban could also have broader, unintended consequences. For one, it risks alienating younger users, many of whom see TikTok as more than just an app—it’s a space for creativity, connection, and entertainment. Government action that appears to stifle these freedoms could be perceived as overreach, eroding trust among the very demographic it aims to protect. Additionally, this approach undermines the perception of the U.S. as a champion of open markets and innovation, particularly when targeting a single foreign-owned platform.

The move could even backfire geopolitically. By targeting TikTok, the U.S. might encourage retaliatory action from China, potentially restricting American companies in the Chinese market or doubling down on efforts to create alternative ecosystems that exclude U.S. influence.

The TikTok saga underscores a larger issue: the absence of a cohesive digital policy framework to address privacy and security concerns in the age of big data. Rather than banning individual platforms, governments should focus on implementing robust data protection regulations that apply across the board, regardless of a platform’s country of origin. This would not only enhance security but also create a level playing field for all companies operating in the digital space.

What was the point?

The TikTok ban is emblematic of a reactive approach to a complex issue, one that fails to account for the interconnected nature of the digital age. By focusing narrowly on one platform, the U.S. government risks undermining its own objectives, as users migrate to similar apps owned by the same geopolitical entities it seeks to counter.

Instead of piecemeal bans, what’s needed is a comprehensive strategy that prioritises data security, fosters innovation, and protects user freedoms. Until then, measures like the TikTok ban will remain a cautionary tale of policy that misses the forest for the trees.

Tom Dunlop
Tom has spent the last 13 years working in the defence industry, specifically military and commercial shipbuilding. His work has taken him around Europe and the Far East, he is currently based in Scotland.

3 COMMENTS

  1. 100% agree. data collection is completely out of control, makes the Stasi look like amateurs.
    Just read an article on how countries were using smartphone fitness apps to track the departure of SSBN, etc…

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here