BAE Systems has secured a follow-on contract from the U.S. Army to further develop its Multi-Class Soft Kill System (MCSKS), an advanced countermeasure designed to protect ground combat vehicles from guided missiles and adjacent threats.
This initiative aims to enhance vehicle survivability and mission effectiveness by leveraging cutting-edge electronic warfare (EW) technologies.
The MCSKS contract includes the development of BAE Systems’ laser-based Stormcrow and TERRA RAVEN countermeasure systems. These systems, say BAE, are integral to the Army’s electronic warfare-based Active Protection System (APS) and are designed to counter threats while conserving kinetic countermeasures.
“Today’s combat vehicles need active protection systems that quickly and efficiently counter modern threats,” said Jared Belinsky, director of Integrated Survivability Solutions at BAE Systems.
“Missile countermeasures are part of our full-spectrum approach to electromagnetic warfare. We’re creating an Intrepid Shield™ around our customers’ platforms – improving their effectiveness on the battlefield.”
BAE Systems’ active protection solutions integrate advanced electro-optic/infrared (EO/IR) and radio-frequency (RF) spectrum technologies to deliver a layered defense. These systems are designed to provide enhanced situational awareness and threat response across various operational environments, including challenging terrain and adverse weather conditions.
Key features of these systems include their small, modular, and lightweight designs, as well as their ability to operate cost-efficiently. By using multi-function sensors, intelligent processing, and electromagnetic emitters, BAE Systems aims to equip combat vehicles with next-generation capabilities that bolster their defense against evolving threats.
The development and manufacturing of these protection systems take place at BAE Systems’ facility in Austin, Texas, with additional research and development support from the company’s FAST Labs in Merrimack, New Hampshire.
At the UK Defence Journal, we aim to deliver accurate and timely news on defence matters. We rely on the support of readers like you to maintain our independence and high-quality journalism. Please consider making a one-off donation to help us continue our work. Click here to donate. Thank you for your support!
Off thread. Watched a really interesting youtube on the Panther tank. Is she the grandmother of the Leopard 1? Or I need to stop mainlining bleach?
They actually seem quite similar, with silhouette, task, armour. Just asking.
None whatsoever.
I’m confused are you talking about the WW2 Panther? It’s just that the new Panther is derived from the Leopard so just wondered if it was mis written must admit without directly referring to either Panther and a Leopard 1 noticed any resemblance . Either way mind might be an interesting watch can you give some guide as to how to locate it on YouTube. Certainly ‘over engineered’ has been aimed at both the WW2 Panther and the Leopard generally so a similarity there.