“It Doesn’t Get Tougher Than That” – Combat-Hardened Drones and the RAF’s StormShroud.
When the RAF’s StormShroud drone programme was formally unveiled, questions quickly followed — particularly around the platform’s survivability in contested airspace.
At a media briefing this afternoon, I asked whether the AR3 airframe, used as the basis for StormShroud, had been significantly modified to enhance survivability as part of its adaptation into the RAF’s electronic warfare concept.
The response from Tekever CEO Ricardo Mendes was emphatic and wide-ranging. “So in terms of survivability, it’s one of the core aspects of the AR3,” he said. “Every day, we’re working towards changing the AR3 and adapting it to make it more survivable. Obviously, there’s been a lot of work in integrating with the RAF and with Leonardo to integrate the [BriteStorm] payload, and that changes the aircraft.”
Mendes went on to highlight the direct influence of operational experience on the platform’s robustness. “It’s building upon 10,000 hours in combat in Ukraine,” he said. “It doesn’t get tougher than that. The level of survivability is extremely high today to do deep missions where you’re hundreds of kilometres away and operating under very extreme, high-risk conditions.”
Mark, Tekever business development lead on the programme, reinforced that this wasn’t just rhetoric. He explained that lessons from Ukraine and other operational deployments had been absorbed into the base AR3 platform and carried into the StormShroud configuration. “All of the work we have been doing to enable AR3 to operate on a daily basis within integrated air defence systems has been brought into this programme,” he noted. “That will continue to develop over time.”
The StormShroud system, built around the Tekever AR3, is a product of extensive collaboration between the Royal Air Force’s Rapid Capabilities Office, DE&S’s Catalyst team, and industry partners including Leonardo. The platform entered service with 216 Squadron and is being operated by a mix of regular and reserve personnel. While the AR3 is traditionally a rail-launched drone, its modular design means it can be fitted with a VTOL kit or other swappable components as needed.
For now, the RAF appears to be using the rail-launch, parachute-recovery configuration, favouring endurance and simplicity in deployment.
StormShroud carries the BriteStorm payload, Leonardo’s latest electronic warfare system. Developed at the company’s Luton facility — a key UK hub for electronic warfare R&D — BriteStorm is a stand-in jammer designed to fly ahead of high-value assets and suppress enemy integrated air defence systems.
The payload combines a Miniature Techniques Generator with advanced Transmit Receive Modules, enabling high-powered digital jamming and deception across a wide range of threat profiles. Its software-defined architecture allows rapid reprogramming after missions and ensures operators can adapt it to evolving threats in real time.
The BriteStorm programme began in 2017 and has matured through years of collaboration with UK defence stakeholders, including DSTL and the RAF’s Air and Space Warfare Centre. Designed from the outset to be attritable, BriteStorm offers significant capability at acceptable risk: if lost in the defence of crewed platforms, the system is considered a tolerable loss, not a mission-critical failure.
I also asked about international interest in StormShroud and was told that conversations with allies are ongoing. Mendes also went on to describe interest cautiously but pointed to the broader strategic logic behind developing this type of capability. The importance of autonomous collaborative platforms, he suggested, is not just national but collective.
Shared concepts of employment, procurement, and industrial capacity will be essential to ensuring these types of systems can operate interoperably in joint environments like NATO or AUKUS.
Officials and developers also described the development pathway as deliberately agile. The RAF’s strategy is to field a minimum deployable capability and then evolve it continuously rather than waiting for traditional full operating capability declarations. StormShroud is not a “one stop buy” — it is intended to demonstrate effects today, while the design remains flexible enough to overmatch adversaries through ongoing updates.
Ultimately, this exchange captured a core theme of the StormShroud project: resilience is not an add-on — it’s embedded from the start. In an era of agile warfare and contested electromagnetic space, it’s not enough to build fast or flashy. As Mendes put it, when it comes to survivability, “there is no harder testbed than real war.”
StormShroud itself is not about conventional performance metrics. The platform may be slower than a Typhoon, and its payload modest in size compared to an F-35, but that misses the point entirely. What it offers is persistent, adaptive, autonomous disruption — in other words, a system built to endure where others might not.
Rather than replacing high-end munitions or platforms like SPEAR-EW, StormShroud complements them by providing a flexible and attritable layer in the broader air combat ecosystem.
“Replacing high end munitions like spear-ew”….?
I only wish we HAD spear-ew or even just spear3.
I would like to see a stealthised Banshee jet. Available now, with various payload options and in a 400mph package, not a Sopwith Camel package.
AA
I Get paid 0ver $150 per hour w0rking from h0me. I never thought l’d be able to d0 it but my colleague makes over $ 15415 a m0nth doing this and she convinced me to try. The p0ssibility with this is limitless.
SEE MoRE HERE…..>>> 𝐖𝐰𝐰.𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐬𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐭𝟏.𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞/
I just started 3 weeks ago this web income system that my friend recommended to me and I’ve gotten 2 checks for a total of $9,200…this is the best decision I made in a long time! This extra cash has changed my life in so many ways, thank you!”.
HERE_____ 𝐖𝐖𝐖.𝐇𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐏𝐑𝐎𝐅𝐈𝐓𝟏.𝐂𝐎𝐌
.
.
.
I just came across this amazing way to earn $6,000-$8,000 a month online! No selling, no struggle—just a simple system that anyone can follow. Kelly Richards did it, and so can you! Don’t miss out on this life-changing opportunity.
Check it out now!….. 𝐖𝐖𝐖.𝐖𝐎𝐑𝐊𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐑𝟏.𝐂𝐎𝐌
My question would be where or who deploys it and coordinates it’s use with a fast jet strike package as it has limited range and speed
I Get paid 0ver $150 per hour w0rking from h0me. I never thought l’d be able to d0 it but my colleague makes over $ 15415 a m0nth doing this and she convinced me to try. sx The p0ssibility with this is limitless.
SEE MoRE HERE…..>>> 𝐰𝐰𝐰.𝐏𝐚𝐲𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐡𝟏.𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐞/
Have a look at Modini…they had a jet powered EW drone exhibiting at the Polish defence expo…
Plus there is the Brakestop effectors…one of which is LO…
Suspect this is the way forward alongside StormShroud and Spear-EW.
These advances in the UK fill me dread as well as glee, it sounds like a very useful tool to have in the arsenal but I always worry this suddenly becomes the go to instead of the conventional tool because it’s cheaper. These need to additional too not instead of.
But, surely if you achieve the same effect at lower cost / lower risk… then it should be the go-to.
Overall, I do agree with the sentiment that new tech should be additive to current capability rather than replace it per se. e.g. I fully believe that FPV drones should not replace other firepower available to the force (such as Mortars, artillery, AT missiles etc) they should add to it.
The UK hasn’t had a dedicated electronic attack aircraft in over half a century so I would not worry about this replacing anything.
hy
I just started 3 weeks ago this web income system that my friend recommended to me and I’ve gotten 2 checks for a total of $9,200…this is the best decision I made in a long time! This extra cash has changed my life in so many ways, thank you!”.
HERE_____ 𝐖𝐖𝐖.𝐇𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐏𝐑𝐎𝐅𝐈𝐓𝟏.𝐂𝐎𝐌
How is the drone, with a lawn-mower engine at the back travelling at 100 mph, going to work along side a Typhoon travelling at 750 mph?
Where does this fit in the forces’ inventory? Is it a replacement for the under-performing Watchkeeper or an addition asset? Is it a MALE uav (medium altitude, long endurance) or what?
The Yanks have lost something like 9 Reapers, at about £60m each, to Houthi air defences, which casts some doubts about the efficacy of MALE drones operating in contested airspace. We can afford to lose a few, as long as they are low cost, expendable weapons. But I wonder if StormShroud is in the low-cost category?
Thanks for the “explanation” of the acronym. I was initially wondering what it was about. I know the Navy always used to refer to ships with female pronouns, so hence the initial confusion 😀😀😀
Hi mate.
No, this does not replace Watchkeeper. It is not a ISTAR asset, but an EW asset that is expendable, like one way attack Drones are.
Watchkeeper is still around until next year. Look up a Project Corvus as to its replacement.
Just watched the BFBS report. It’s really small – like it would fit in my living room kind of size. I do wonder how it’s employed to open up airspace for other assets – logically this fits well where you have a deployed ground force close to where you want to affect.
AR3 is in use in Ukraine abnd reportedly doing very well. But its not the Watchkeeper replacement. It’s a lot smaller. The AR5 is the likely Watchkeeper replacement, apparently thats also getting BriteStorm…but perhaps as a Self Defence system.
) Are you single tonight? A lot of hot girls waiting for you …….. Sexy24.mom
I just started 3 weeks ago this web income system that my friend recommended to me and I’ve gotten 2 checks for a total of $9,200…this is the best decision I made in a long time! This extra cash has changed my life in so many ways, thank you!”../
HERE_____ 𝐖𝐖𝐖.𝐇𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐏𝐑𝐎𝐅𝐈𝐓𝟏.𝐂𝐎𝐌
.
.
.
Even though more information keeps coming out, I’m still having a hard time piecing together just exactly how this drone will be used in practice. Where will it be launched from, from where will it be steered, and where recovered? The Aviationist clearly states it will be ground launched and parachute recovered, so it seems we are expecting the RAF to provide expeditionary forward bases, less than 100km from wherever the Typhoons and F-35s will be flying, in order to support them.
With static front lines as in Ukraine, I could see that, just about, but how will it work in the more normal case? Has anyone got a handle on the practicalities yet and cares to share?
You and me both. This was the core of my thinking further up thread.
It seems unusable in most situations without a FEBA to launch from close to an enemy, or a RN vessel nearby.
We can’t operate in that region, Putin’s pre-booked all the decent hotels. The blighter!
The RAF really have to get over that!
Why am I scrolling through spam?
Why aren’t replies assigned to comments?
Why don’t I get notification of replies?
Why am I bothering to write this?
Because…….it’s a flippin pain in the ?
I know, mate.
Fingers crossed George will sort it out when he has a chance.