The Ministry of Defence has confirmed that the British Army’s Ajax armoured vehicle programme remains on track to achieve Initial Operating Capability (IOC) by December 2025, with 100 vehicles now formally accepted into service.

In response to a Parliamentary Written Question from James Cartlidge MP (Conservative – South Suffolk) on 28 April, Defence Minister Maria Eagle stated: “The Armoured Cavalry programme continues to remain on track to achieve Initial Operating Capability by December 2025. As at 10 April 2025, 100 Ajax platforms have been accepted by the Ministry of Defence.”

The announcement marks a significant milestone for a project that had been dogged by technical problems, delays and cost overruns since its inception. General Dynamics UK recently completed production of the 100th Ajax vehicle, built to the latest standard, which is expected to enter service with the Household Cavalry Regiment.

Despite years of challenges—including crew safety concerns stemming from noise and vibration issues—the Ministry of Defence remains confident that over 180 operationally deployable Ajax vehicles will be delivered to the Army by the end of 2025.

The Ajax programme, launched in 2010 and valued at £5.5 billion, involves the supply of 589 vehicles across multiple specialist variants. These include 245 Ajax reconnaissance vehicles fitted with turret-mounted 40mm cannons, alongside Apollo repair vehicles, Ares armoured personnel carriers, Athena command vehicles, Atlas recovery vehicles and Argus engineering reconnaissance variants.

While the Army had originally intended to field Ajax vehicles as early as 2017, the project was severely delayed due to technical faults. Nevertheless, the government continues to maintain that Ajax remains vital to the British Army’s Future Soldier modernisation strategy.

With a major batch of deliveries now underway, attention will focus on whether the programme can sustain momentum through the remainder of 2025 and deliver the cutting-edge reconnaissance and armoured capabilities originally envisioned.

26 COMMENTS

  1. A monumental achievement given the initial difficulties experienced in the pursuit of cutting edge battlefield capabilities. Together with CH3, these systems will provide unsurpassed offensive and defensive options the likes of which the World has never known.
    Once more we see the British Army at the forefront of modern warfare.

    # Back on tracks.

  2. This is encouraging news, and I’m interested to see what other variants will appear once the first transch is completed. Surely, additional Ajax beyond the 289 will be a possibility.

    • Maurice, the article said that the order is for 589 vehicles in the Ajax family, with 245 of those being Ajax recce vehicles. Where do you get 289 from?

  3. What happens when the order is complete? Will HMG be willing to fund continuing low rate production or will the manufacturing capability be allowed to close down? One way or another it is as essential to retain the ability to build armoured vehicles as it is to build warships.

      • Oh dear that’s going to raise the discussion that ‘mustn’t be mentioned’ again. But whatever the merits of that somewhat circular argument we need an IFV option, that’s been shown in Ukraine when there had previously been questions about their viability amongst some military experts.

        • Actually – IFVs have been proven to be extremely effective in Ukraine. In particular Bradley and Marder (both with auto-canons) are well utilised in armoured raiding.

          The viability question is more the age old question, can you bring to bear all capabilities to overmatch the enemy at a time and place of your choosing? This now includes FPV drone and counter-drone capability alongside armour, infantry, artillery and logistics.

  4. If as stated, Initial Operating Capability (IOC) is achieved by the end of this year, then why will it take 3.5+ years to achieve Full Operating Capability (FOC)? Yes, bringing in new systems and platforms takes time but in today’s world a further 4 years seems a very long time. Surely this could be reduced to 2 years without compromising operational capability and effectiveness? For those that may read this question as a ‘negative’ slight, please don’t. It’s unfair to compare apples against oranges, but the Ukrainians have managed to ‘up learn’ and fully integrate their western donated tanks in very short order. I’m not suggesting that we have to go to war to bring forward the FOC on Ajax but this does highlight the length of time it takes us to bring equipment into full capability. On another note, anyone know how long it will take us to bring Boxer up to FOC?

    • According to Jane’s: “The British Army plans to achieve a Boxer Initial Operational Capability (IOC) in 2025, and Full Operational Capability (FOC) in 2032”
      I imagine that long period is due to the number and complexity of all the different variants (12 including the RCH-155) being introduced.

    • I think that is a very reasonable question Doug. After all it was common belief in the West (and Russians too clearly) the Ukrainian army, certainly the bulk of it prior to the war was something of a joke. There had been little evidence certainly in the years prior that it could fight effectively a serious foe. How that perception has changed in short time, they are probably the most effective fighting force in Europe these days, which is why we need them on our side. As you say you can’t generate a war to create this experience (though their adaptation challenges were far greater into western weaponry and use culture) but as such experience with your tools is required to fight a war effectively from day one these expressed time periods are concerning. Perhaps the exact meaning is a little deceptive however, so perhaps military experienced posters might be able to elaborate on the exactitude of the terms a little more.

  5. 👌The Ajax production line is hot. It is a tracked vehicle. Boxer production is limited and probably mortgaged on the 155mm. Ares looks favourite chassis for an IFV and SHORAD. Could we use an Ajax with a 120mm?

  6. What do those in the know make of the number of Ajax recce variants? To this civvy it seems like an awful lot when you look at the rest of the army. Are they being lined up for fire support roles as well as recce, or does the army genuinely need that many in the recce role?

    • What did you mean by the rest of the Army Rob?
      Ajax will be going into Brigades in 3 Division, much of the rest of the Army is light on Armour or has none at all.
      245 Ajax Scout I still thought too few, when including those used for training, reserves, maintenance, trials.
      One interesting piece of news here, is that the Army will only field 3 Armoured Cavalry Regiments now, down from 4, which might alter the original Ajax allocations?
      The 4th Regiment was to be the KRH, whose Tanks were to be culled as part of the Carter Strike plan, which will now remain an MBT Regiment, which itself is major news and another conversation re Challenger 3 numbers and Regiment type.
      If each Armoured Cavalry Regiment still has 3 Recc Sqns, is it still 12 Ajax per Sqn? I recall Scimitar Regs fielded that number.
      So assuming, 36, plus RHQ and Sqn HQ Vehicles, 44 per Regiment?
      132 across the 3 Regiments.
      The 3 Armoured Regiments then also each have a Recc Sqn, say another 36, might be others?
      168 total.
      Any RAC types recall exact legacy numbers?
      Dern and Graham might know more.

      • I could have added the future Boxer Battalions. Legacy Warrior AI Battalions had a Recc Platoon on Scimitar, which Ajax Scout replaces. I used to wonder whether any Ajax Scout would end up filling that role too, but assume a Boxer recc variant will appear.

  7. Does any one think more than already ordered number might yet added on, or is the 589 it? i know extra Boxer types could be added such as IVF/Mortar/AAD/Overwatch/RCH 155MM but its just a guess.
    Ajax as good as any one else has if not better, better late than never.

  8. Good level of detail but can someone please tell me what is planned for the recce platoons in Boxer battalions?

  9. This was one of those too big to fail projects. While glad to see it been deployed operationally (crews using the same seem to be pretty positive about it) its bringing into service was a complete omnishambles. Fingers crossed, lessons have been learned.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here