HMS Queen Elizabeth and her Carrier Strike Group have arrived in Scotland ahead of a major multinational exercise.

The Royal Navy say that Exercise Strike Warrior will involve more than 20 warships, three submarines and 150 aircraft from 11 nations and is a final test for the Carrier Strike Group ahead of its first operational deployment to the Mediterranean, Indian Ocean and Asia Pacific.

“The exercise, which will run for two weeks, will see the task group pitted against warships from NATO’s Standing Maritime Group 1 in waters off north-west Scotland to prove it is capable of undertaking high intensity operations against the most demanding adversaries.

The culmination of Strike Warrior will see the Carrier Strike Group certified ready for deployment, at which point operational command will pass from the Royal Navy’s Fleet Commander, Vice Admiral Jerry Kyd, to the Chief of Joint Operations, Vice Admiral Sir Ben Key.”

Commodore Steve Moorhouse, Commander UK Carrier Strike Group, said:

“The new UK Carrier Strike Group is the embodiment of British maritime power, and sits at the heart of a modernised and emboldened Royal Navy. Protected by a ring of advanced destroyers, frigates, helicopters and submarines, and equipped with fifth generation fighters, HMS Queen Elizabeth is able to strike from the sea at a time and place of our choosing; and with our NATO allies at our side, we will be ready to fight and win in the most demanding circumstances. Carrier Strike offers Britain choice and flexibility on the global stage; it reassures our friends and allies and presents a powerful deterrent to would-be adversaries.”

George Allison
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison

36 COMMENTS

  1. There’s a lot of spoofing going on with ship tracker, so don’t believe all those vessels are what they claim to be.

  2. If Nicola gets her way an Independant Scotland she be charging any further carrier goups to enter Scottish waters , that if she lets them in.

      • Hmmm, allies maybe, Can’t see Scotland being admitted to NATO without access to bases for US strategic assets.

    • If the SNP had attracted two-thirds of the vote in Scotland then I could see Labour and Conservative preparing the ground work in their manifestos for the next election.

      I think the improvement in the SNP position has been down to the fact that the SNP are focused more on Scottish affairs now – not just independence. Does that mean a shift in interest in independence? I’m not sure and I’m not sure anyone else does either. Indeed I would expect the SNP are a little worried they will get another “No” if they did engineer another referendum.

      The SNP needed to do better than that!

      • Hi Mark. Two things-if this election could be seen as a Referendum then the Unionists won it 51 to 49%. Why doesn’t she save a lot of money and a lot of bile by regarding it as such and GIVE OVER thereafter!!!(NI expression)
        Second- I will do the excercise but up front I think, if there had been a Unionist front then they would have comfortably won a majority in this election. Check how many seats were gifted to the Nats with their one horse agenda by the split in the Unionist vote.

        Regards

        • Unfortunately I think we are going have to have a further independence ref in Scotland. I think that leaving the EU and the fact there was a majority vote in Scotland to stay has provided a legitimate argument for a second independent referendum. I think it needs to be in a few years hence as we need to both settle down from leaving the EU and the pandemic. 3 to 4 years would seem to be a sensible compromise. Refusing to consider a referendum will just fall into the hands of the the independent argument.

          • Unfortunately a vote is a certainty, what the uk government needs to do is take control of the when. The SNP are not in a rush for a vote because they know they are currently unlikely or at last not guaranteed to win it, so want to wait until that swings further their way.

          • Jonathan
            Here is some perspective from bonnie Scotland.

            It’s very unlikely there will be an independence referendum in the next five years. Reason: The SNP don’t want one! The leadership just wants to talk about one a lot to keep its bravehearts happy!

            Brexit blew the SNP model for independence out-the-water!
            As a result, the party has no ideas on borders, currency – or spending. Instead – the current policy is bluff and bluster!

            Scotland has never been in the European Union – neither was England. EU membership was held by the United Kingdom. We went in as the UK in 1973, and we left as the UK in 2020. Despite Ms Sturgeon’s comments, Scotland cannot be taken out of something it was never a member!

            Last Thursday, we voted in an election to decide which party in Scotland should exercise the powers devolved to it by the UK parliament. We voted on mundane things like school-class sizes, NHS waiting lists – and pot-holes in the road. (Of which there seem to be an explosion in an SNP run Scotia!). We did not vote on the constitution – that is a reserved matter for our UK government.

            Rest assured, should Ms Sturgeon attempt to illegally legislate for another independence referendum, it will not be the UK government taking her to court – but a host of private citizens north of the border.

            Just to sum-up: I feel it’s best not to accept separatist propaganda so uncritically. It is not Boris Johnson preventing another referendum – it is the Scottish electorate.

          • I won’t underestimate the SNP will for a vote. Going into the last one without a solid plan around the currency cost them dearly but they still forced the vote. They will do it again, but probably I’m a year or two time.

          • Honestly man your wasting your time trying to educate the London boys ( not to be confused with the London boys who’s 1989 hit “Requiem” was a top 10), it’s astounding how unaware of reality they are on the crack up here. They watch sky news etc and believe the propaganda and spin then come on here spouting off shite.

            tired of tellin them stop watching the MSM

            🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇬🇧

          • Hello TAFKALPC! 🙂 Hope you are well. Indeed, they need to talk some local lads to get the news on the ground. Sky pisses me off no end but then you get Michael Gove(whose Scots accent revives slightly when he talks from Glasgow) refusing to give a straight answer to a straight question from Sophy Ridge about whether Boris would block another referendum. My answer would have been-I doubt if the Prime minister would ever block another referendum if it was reasonably clear the Scottish people want one. The SNP got 49% of the vote with Unionists on 51%. in addition even Nicola admits that there are many who support the SNP for the Scots Parliament but don’t support Independence, so at present there is no firm mandate. btw I could not decide who i disliked most in that interview-Gove was a squirmer and Ridge is a henpecking pain in the butt-aggresive, interupting and unpleasant as with many of the interviewers (dare i say especially the ladies)on that channel!

          • Geoff my man , I’m well , Despite Utd getting knocked out of the Scottish cup by Hibs and that wee Mexican rascal Canelo Alvarez beating BJS after me staying up to 0400 to watch it i canny really complain 😫 but I digress Yes you are correct many vote nationalist party who aren’t separatist it’s just the weird politicking up here.

            Gove is a peterheid fish man 👍🏻🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Good oratory skills enjoy it when they stick it to the Comcast stooges on sky .

            keep it fresh bro👍🏻

            🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

          • Aye yes D man indeed I shouldn’t generalise as much ,apologies your not in that category of soft Pop that the London boys represent 👍🏻😃

            🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

          • It’s not about not knowing the views mate ( I have a few Scottish friends and some of my close family are crofters). It’s more about tactics to put the SNP to bed. It’s better to give them the rope and agree another ref in say 3 to 4 years ( the SNP would look stupid if they refused after asking ) at this time Brexit will be all bedded in and we should have repaired the economy after the pandemic….given 3-4 years the SNP are not going to win ( I’d lay money). But they now Have a working majority so can push through a request to ask U.K. parliament for a referendum ( which I think they will do, because the party faithful will not accept not doing it). It would play to the SNP to refuse ( as you point out the SNP best outcome is playing at being bullied by London), so I’m betting Boris will agree in the timeframe that suits him…thrash them and effectively break the SNP.

          • What I don’t understand is why no one appears to get the SNP to quote actuals, lets take something defence related. Why can they not answer ‘how many ships will you build?’ If they have a idea of how much money they can raise, they will have outline of a defence budget and therefore how many ships they can build. Same goes for currency, tax rates etc.

          • So we should call Sturgeons bluff and agree to an independence referendum with immediate effect. Eg get one done in 3-4 months?
            that would be dangerous as all people can see is Brexit and the pandemic currently.
            We should wait 3-4 years surely to allow these massively disruptive events to be fully explored, understood and ideally resolved before a referendum is given the green light.
            The pandemic has led to as much governmental debt as WW2 and more civilian deaths in the UK in 1 year than 5 years of warfare in WW2.

          • So in that logic if I voted pro Brexit. But in last few years labour became my MP and they did things locally I don’t like the look of, can I demand a rerun on Brexit cos circumstances are different? Do you rerun every democratic vote cos things change?

          • It’s not so much what is right or wrong, personally I think the a break up of the U.K. is bonkers on so many levels. But the reality is the SNP keep winning the most seats in both the Scottish Parliament and Westminster sets. This is what keeps another independent referendum in play. There is no escape from the politics of a majority of seats being held by parties who had a second referendum on their manifesto. Voters may have voted for many reasons but that’s all unfortunately not relevant, if you voted for the SNP you voted for the whole manifesto ( hint: don’t just pick the bits of a manifesto an MP stands on you like as your voting on the whole thing, I did not vote lab last time for this very reason).

            The problem is the SNP have the votes to request a referendum of Westminster, if the Westminster executive and Legislative refuse ( as is their legal right) the SNP will play it for all its worth and just maybe use it to build support. So politically I think executive will negotiate and try and push for a referendum at a time of most advantage, so give the SNP their head ( and call for a second referendum will irritate a lot of voters) then be the reasonable voice, agree a time, using the need to get over covid and repair the economy as a way to push it back to around 25….( if the SNP push sooner they will piss of voters) then Westminster has 3 years to really prove Brexit works for Scotland as well as show what Westminster does for Scotland….this will probably end up being a win win for the Union and will put independent and the SNP to bed.

          • Hi Jonathan, Interesting comments – but I would argue you’re falling into the same trap that many others have done during the last 25 years. With respect, I feel you’re trying to construct too clever a strategy.

            Referendums have become the bane of British political life. They should be confirmatory in nature, sealing something already agreed by the majority. They should not be used to achieve outcomes in knife-edge propositions like Scottish independence – or Brexit.

            The 2014 referendum need never have been conceded by David Cameron – who thought himself rather too clever by half, and that he could manage Scottish separatists like the wily Alex Salmond. Instead Cameron almost lost Great Britain – but in the process supercharged separatism. Before 2014, the SNP consistently polled only about 30% – today it is fixed on 45%.

            Believe me, as a home based Scot – in the highly fevered atmosphere of another campaign – it’s very likely Scotland will be lost to the UK. Enough Scots will lose their heads in a highly populist, but divisive 2nd referendum, to push this next one just over the 50% target. In a way, who couldn’t resist the prospect of setting up a new country, even one with such difficult economic prospects.

            Scots already know that the UK works for us – we only have to look at the broad shoulders of the British economy during the financial crash, or its support during COVID. Nicola Sturgeon even knows that the UK works for Scotland! Her economists tell her every year in the GERS report!

            The separatists wish to pick a fight with the UK government – and stir up more bogus grievance and gripe. But the government simply doesn’t play by their rules – and states very calmly and simply. “Thanks – we don’t say never – but now isn’t the right time”.

            After a pandemic, you will be surprised as to how many Scottish voters will support such an approach.

          • Hi Alan

            Thats really interesting, thankyou. I do agree with the whole referendum thing, I personally can’t abide them, the tool of the popularism that can really threaten to destabilise Parliamentary/Representative democracy. Personally I would like to seem them all put to bed and have our nation run by reliable Representative democracy that can be set up to even answer complex questions around constitutional issues (Supported by things like constitution summits ect).

            I sort of hope that Scotland can regain its faith in more traditions parties and stop voting in the Nationalists so they become the fringe group they used to be.

          • But we, as in the rest of the UK, should not have to prove anything to the people of Scotland, the facts are clear.
            I really would not like an even bigger proportion of government spending to go to Scotland then is currently the case. Scotland simply already has its cake and is eating it whilst rest of UK especially in terms of defence expenditure proportionately does not receive such luxuriant funding.
            Free social care, free university places, free prescriptions. Majority of shipbuilding etc etc.

          • Mister Bell, Indeed, the facts are clear ……
            England: Nuclear submarine production, jet fighter production, jet engine production etc Let’s not allow destroyer and frigate work in Scotland to obscure us from recognising that defence investment in England is huge.

            “Free social care, free university places, free prescriptions” may be controversial – but these are spending priorities set by the devolved Scottish administration from the block grant, often at the expense of other social programmes in Scotland.

            It’s also worth pointing out that Scotland is hardly unique in having high levels of public spending – and indeed other parts of the UK receive even more generous funding.

            But let’s end on agreement: Despite separatist claims – the UK model works well for Scotland, and Ms Sturgeon’s economic claims to the contrary do not stack up.

          • Agree Jonathan. I would be inclind to allow another Independence Vote as soon as possible to attempt to put the issue to bd once and for all. Does anyone, apart from all the many other reasons,want a hard borde betweenEngland and Scotland. Insanity!

          • Agree 3-4 years time, once we are through the other side of the pandemic and the full implications of Brexit are known and identified.
            I do find it funny that the SNP state they have no say in running their own country when they have max devolution currently and then want to leave the UK to join the EU.
            How is that going to be maintaining independence and sovereignty?

      • Hi Mark, I agree – after Thursday’s election the improvement in the SNP fortunes is one meagre additional seat at Holyrood! The party remains a minority administration, only able to govern with the support of the Greens – the so-called “gardening wing” of the SNP!

        And in terms of share of the vote, the SNP came last!

        Scots who couldn’t be bothered to vote: 1, 585, 348
        Pro-UK Parties: 1,369, 243 votes
        Separatist supporting parties: 1,326,194 votes

        There is no mandate for independence. Not that the SNP have any ideas palatable to the Scottish public on Currency, Borders, or tax and spend. Hence the party’s tactics of obfuscation and dissembling.

        So expect the next five years to be more of the same: Bogus grievance and gripe, and trying to pick pointless fights with the UK government!

        • Hi Alan ( and Los pollos ) my Scots friends.

          Always enjoy reading the realism and realities you inject into this subject. I’m a “London boy” as Los pollos calls it, but I had a sleepless night Saturday, so upset, worried, pissed off, and quite depressed I was with the situation. The Scottish part of me that runs in my blood is obviously strong!

          ( Gordons/Cormacks/ Lewis Great and Great Great Grandparents! )

          That the elephant in the room being a vote mostly based on FPTP which enables the SNP to win so many seats as the union vote is split mainly 3 ways hamstringing it is IGNORED by the BBC, Sky, and of course the SNP makes by blood boil.

          Long live the union. I pray that awful woman gets put to bed one day, some how.

      • Also after a yes vote the SNP could become less influential, political battle grounds will be draw more around traditional right v left policies. Yes vote could see the SNP disappear within 10 years.

  3. Using ship trackers isn’t the best way to figure out where naval ships are during exercises. But if anyone wants to look at Flight Radar 24 and track the Cobham Falcon 20’s they will find they are very busy flying pretty patterns
    between the inner and outer Hebrides WSW of Skye.

  4. Selecting appropriate choice of words such as the Mediterranean, Indian Ocean and Asia Pacific, HMS Queen Elizabeth and her Carrier Strike Group show an understanding of power in each of those areas. This is the characteristic of the British that I admire, writing English with depth.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here