The Ministry of Defence has awarded a single source contract to Rheinmetall BAE Systems Land (RBSL) for the repair of the Challenger 2 Commanders Sighting System.

The contract, valued at £10,412,544, is set for a three-year period and will be administered from Telford and Wrekin.

According to the contract award notice, Babcock Land Defence Limited, acting as Agent to the UK MOD, negotiated the contract with RBSL. The notice states that the procurement was conducted using a negotiated procedure without prior publication under Regulation 16(1)(a)(i) of the Defence and Security Public Contracts Regulations 2011. It explains:

It is considered this requirement can be placed using the negotiated procedure without prior publication pursuant to Article 25(1)(a) of Directive 2009/81/EC (Regulation 16(1)(a)(i) of the Defence and Security Public Contracts Regulations 2011) due to the absence of suitable tenders in response to the previous restricted procedure reference 2017/S 225-469815. The UK Ministry of Defence received a single tender response and that tender was evaluated as being technically compliant.”

The contract falls under CPV code 50630000, which covers repair and maintenance services of military vehicles.

Challenger 2 is a British main battle tank that has been a cornerstone of the United Kingdom’s armoured forces since its introduction. Developed by Vickers Defence Systems and later refined by BAE Systems Land & Armaments, the tank is renowned for its robust composite armour, advanced fire control systems, and a highly effective 120mm rifled gun.

Its design emphasises survivability and battlefield effectiveness, making it one of the most heavily protected and capable tanks in service.

Integral to the tank’s performance is its sophisticated sensor and targeting suite which enables rapid target detection, identification, and engagement, which are critical for maintaining the tank’s combat readiness in complex operational environments.

George Allison
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison

6 COMMENTS

    • I suspect the answer to your question will lay in the question of will this make a significant improvement should the worst come to happen and we have to fight before the C2s are upgraded to C3 configuration. Alternatively, can we really take the risk of not doing it?

      From my perspective I am actually pleasantly surprised that this isn’t just going to be allowed to slide under the carpet and hopefully it will turn into a general trend where we will see other systems getting the fixes and updates that they really need sooner rather than later. I know it is a slim hope, but it’s better than no hope which seemed to be the recent trend.

      • It is a clear sign, combined with the power pack contract, that the fleet is being kept serviceable and not just being allowed to slide into a capability gap pending CH.

        The older logic would have been that it was ‘inefficient’ to fix things close to OoS dates.

  1. As the battlefield landscape changes we keep refusing to accept the evidence in front of us, it was exactly the same in ww1 and ww2, we’re stuck in a comfort zone of defensive blitzkrieg, we appear to be destined once again to repeat the same historical mistakes.
    The good news is we always win the last battle.
    ♾️❤️☮️

  2. There’s more to this than meets the eye. Ten million is small change in the world of defence procurement. Also It’s probably an.upgrade of the current 2 systems to the equivalent of the new system for 3, plus some networking interface to allow 2s and 3s on the same operation to share sighting information on all available targets.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here