Duties will range from supporting FOST to transporting personnel and freight to the Queen Elizabeth Class aircraft carriers.

According to a pre-procurement notice published by the Ministry of Defence on the 16th of May, 2022.

“Indicative Requirement – Fleet Helicopter Support Unit (FHSU) – The user requires a contracted crewed capability that can provide a medium-lift maritime Support Helicopter (SH) capability to support tasking by day and night and in all weather conditions within the Flag Officer Sea Training (FOST) South Coast Exercise Areas (SCXAs) and wider UK Flight Information Region (FIR).

In addition to the principal task of transporting personnel and/or freight to, from and between ships at sea in the SCXAs for FOST, a further two requirements are under consideration for inclusion within the future FHSU contract:

  • Provision of land-based maritime airborne Search and Rescue (SAR) service for Maritime Counter Terrorism (MCT) Force Generation training. This would encompass supporting up to six (6) UK based exercises per year, each of up to one (1) week duration in two calendar blocks occurring in Spring and Autumn each year and requiring up to 24hrs flying per exercise.
  • This requires an assured ability to search for and recover individual persons from the sea at night, with an additional emphasis on being able to deliver them rapidly to specialist medical care in a timely manner.
  • A further emerging requirement may be to transport personnel and/or freight to the Queen Elizabeth Class (QEC) carrier and other UK based RN shipping based around an initial utilisation of circa 100hrs/yr.”

The anticipated contract length is approximately 5 years with a potential option to extend.

George Allison
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison

38 COMMENTS

  1. Why not just roll this into Puma replacement and buy a good number of Blackhawks to cover all our service roles.

    60 to 80 to cover all our medium support and transport needs . Most importantly, stop pissing money away on outsourcing….

    • The forces must be finding an issue with having enough helicopters to undertake these roles or they think it will free up helicopters to take on other roles.
      The FOST delivery I’m guessing is delivering high up ranks to and from shore bases and ships. I would of thought landing on ships is something only military would be cleared to do? The other role surely helicopter crews also have to practice the recovery at sea roles and other roles mentioned? I don’t know so maybe someone who does can shed some light on this.

    • I will be very surprised if the purchase ends up being Blackhawks/seahawks.
      I think they would be ok and see the forces through until the next generation helicopters come online.
      Any of the helicopters in the competition would be a good choice really.

      • I’m sure they would, in my opinion the latest Blackhawk is as good as anything else out there, cheaper than the competition, thoroughly tested and utterly reliable.

        Seahawks not needed, Blackhawk can happily carry out the full range of general tasking required by the MOD, from dropping troops into a hot LZ, to taking Rear Admiral Blowhard out to admire his new Aircraft Carrier….

        Not VIP enough for him or General Melchett, tough luck, they will have to rough it….

        • Blackhawk capacity/small is small but lets not exaggerate.
          I don’t understand some here that just want one helicopter type for everything…
          Even companies have various types.

          • Because one affordable and reliable medium sized type will complement Chinook and do the job…

            I personally don’t understand the wish to shovel money into the furnace re-inventing the wheel on totally unproven designs that will cost billions to modify and build…

            It’s a relatively simple support Helicopter that’s required, not cutting edge technologies.

            I guess it comes down to the KISS philosophy, keep it simple stupid…

          • Polictics. You have people on this blog complaining when British companies are not chosen and they have a vague interest in doing defense right. Policticans only care about being reelected and so would rather spend huge amounts of money on a white elephant if it was a british white elephant and the bad news stories won’t hit until after the election.

          • Blackhawk is not afordable…

            Even USAF choose AW 139 for their Nuke sites instead of Blackhawk

          • Evening Alex,

            The Blackhawk comes in at $5.9 million per standard spec, off the shelf, according to Google…

            Let’s say we use the sensible solution and purchase a single type to cover all medium lift and general support (big leap of faith I know), the hot favourite to win, the AW149 comes in at $18 -20 million ( according to Google) , that’s obviously before UK specific modifications and a UK line … So anyone care to hazard a guess at a unit price after the Mod has eventually finished pissing about ??

            I am going to say $30/35 million a pop, based on the usual Mod programme mismanagement history.

            You will probably be able to buy 4 perfectly capable Blackhawks for the price of a single 149 when the dust has settled.

            Wildcat was the last gasp, the dying embers in fire if you will, let the patient go and unplug the life support, we excell at high technology defence aviation products, of which (hopefully) the Tempest Programme will be a fine example of.

            Helicopters however, we once did well, Scout/ Wasp and the excellent world beating Lynx, but we let the capability whither on the vine decades ago and now it’s long gone.

            The argument to retain ‘the vital helicopter capability’ is simply a smoke and mirrors political construct.

  2. Can it not be included in the medium helicopter replacement for Puma? Do small and separate purchases for niche fleets not cost more than larger fleets providing commonality of training and maintenance?

    Know lots of people want Blackhawks but supporting UK industry with the AW149 or Airbus option will be hard to resist, especially with plenty of rhetoric from the government over the last couple of years around supporting British tech/jobs and diversifying the economy by on-shoring key capabilities.

    • Rhetoric yes, but actually doing anything about it no, we recently sold off the national grid to a foreign company, at the same time as we were having the energy crisis. However I would guess going with Leonardo would be a vote winner and so will happen.

  3. Actually re-reading this it sounds like a contract to supply these roles not aircraft. So similar to Bairstows SAR contact.

    Just me?

    • Looks like that. A contract to a company that already an helicopter fleet.
      Probably Bristows will also be going for it.

    • Yeah the post is for outsourcing. Unclear if short term gap filling or another fudge to cover for lack of funds.

      • It has been outsourced for sometime. It’s a contract that’s up for renewal. Try reading the whole thread and comments before trying to start another of your predictable rants

        • Try reading the thread yourself. I was just confirming what the post I replied to that it is a outsourcing and not a buy.

          There are two options here, it’s either a gap filler until the new helicopters are selected to fill the gap, as most people are discussing here, or its as with any similar contract it’s a way for the MOD to avoid the upfront cost of buying the helicopters. Outsourcing only saves money if it is a non core capability, such as the air tankers that are only required in a surge situation but outside that would just be collecting dust if owned (hard to know if that has saved money or not but in theory would).

          No idea which it is in this case, but guessing cost avoidance focus. The fact it’s already outsourced doesn’t change what it is.

  4. Seem that most still have little idea about what the RN actually does. It’s all real at sea fellows not playing around. The Helo’s that have supported FOST do a first class job and within the Fleet acknowledged as always to be relied on. No they are NOT VIP shuttles but used to take out the trainers to Ships working up and being made ready for WAR and much much more. Those trainers work dam long hours and at the end get the crews up to a level few others come close too. All those in that team get a lot of respect from the crews they train and those are not only RN but many NATO units too.
    The small unit of 2 Helo’s deliver way above their weight which few can match so leave alone.

  5. This is an existing requirement with an incumbent provider (BIH). It is a services contract and not a contract where
    MOD are looking to procure an aircraft. The provider needs to have the aircraft to deliver the service and as you can see, it is not a full time role.

    • Yeah, which means they probably have already choosen the provider, as I can’t imagine there is a huge amount of competition.

  6. I hate MOD jargon, so is this a contract to for extra support helos for the RN or is it another contract for a private company to supply crews and airframes? To me sounds like another bristow helicopters situation aka another sell off but maintain capacity part time

    • It’s the latter: a contract for the provision of aircrews and airframes to support the RN when it comes to things like FOST. Using a contract for it is nothing new and it has happened for a number of years now, with two airframes operating in the role currently. Devonport recently had a new helipad installed to support the support choppers in their support work. It looks like the scope of the contract has been expanded slightly as well.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here