The United States has now moved at least seven B-2A Spirit stealth bombers to Diego Garcia, significantly expanding its military presence at the remote British-controlled island in the Indian Ocean.
This marks a further escalation in the ongoing preparations for large-scale military action, potentially targeting Houthi forces in Yemen and, as some analysts suggest, Iranian military infrastructure.
This continued buildup follows last week’s airstrikes on Houthi targets in Yemen—described as the largest U.S. military operation in the Middle East since President Donald Trump took office in January 2025. The Houthis claim at least 53 people were killed in the latest round of strikes, while the U.S. has reiterated its intent to continue operations until Houthi attacks on commercial shipping in the Red Sea cease.
The activity was first reported by open-source intelligence (OSINT) specialist “IntelFrog” on X (formerly Twitter), who has been using publicly available aircraft tracking data to monitor movements of military assets. IntelFrog initially reported that 18 U.S. Air Force KC-135 tankers were staged at key locations across the Pacific—including Travis AFB in California, Daniel K. Inouye International Airport in Hawaii, and Andersen AFB in Guam.
These tankers, operating under sequential RCH0## call signs, were followed by flights to Diego Garcia, where multiple C-17A Globemaster III aircraft have also been tracked arriving in recent days. The arrival of these cargo planes indicates a substantial logistics effort—likely involving the delivery of personnel, munitions, and support equipment required for long-range bomber operations.
IntelFrog’s verified flight data now shows at least seven B-2 stealth bombers on or en route to the island, a highly unusual concentration of the platform in one location. These aircraft, which are capable of penetrating sophisticated air defences, are typically reserved for high-value strategic missions and are rarely deployed in such numbers.
The increased military presence comes amid warnings from U.S. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, who has made clear that airstrikes will continue for as long as Houthi aggression disrupts global shipping lanes. A U.S. official speaking to Reuters stated the operation may continue “for weeks,” suggesting the buildup is part of a sustained campaign rather than a short-term show of force.
Houthi attacks on vessels in the Red Sea have caused serious disruption to global trade, prompting multiple shipping companies to divert vessels around the Cape of Good Hope. The U.S. sees freedom of navigation in the Red Sea as a strategic imperative, and recent movements suggest an effort to neutralise Houthi launch capabilities and, potentially, to deter Iranian interference in the wider region.
The arrival of the seventh B-2A bomber raises the stakes considerably.
Diego Garcia has long played a crucial role in U.S. strategic bomber operations, having hosted B-52 and B-1 missions during the Gulf War, Iraq, and Afghanistan. Its remote location and long runway make it a key forward operating base for long-range operations, especially when regional basing options are constrained by diplomatic or security concerns.
The deployment of at least seven B-2s, combined with a logistics tail of tankers and transports, represents a highly flexible and potent strike capability. It also signals a return to Diego Garcia’s historic role as a launchpad for power projection across the Middle East and South Asia.
As of now, the U.S. Department of Defense has not formally confirmed the purpose of the deployment. However, the scale, timing, and composition of forces all suggest a significant new phase in the campaign against the Houthis, and possibly beyond.
Getting ready to obliterate Yemen? or Iran? i thought this new adminstration was all about stopping wars…wonder when the orange dildo will start caring about his own country
A conflict with Iran almost happened during Trumpy’s first term.
The Best opportunities To Earn $22,000/Month. We all spend a lot of time on social media every day – Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Twitter, and the list goes on. If you’re used to getting a lot of likes or comments, or if you’re great at motivating others through your posts, you might want to consider turning this into a profession. It appears unbelievable but you won’t forgive yourself if you do not check it…
HERE →→→→ 𝐖𝐰𝐰.𝐇𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐭𝟏.𝐂𝐨𝐦
I make up to $24 an hour working from my home. My story is that I quit working at Walmart to work online and with a little effort I easily bring in around $45h to $89h… Someone was good to me by sharing this link with me, so now I am hoping I could help someone else out there by sharing this link.Try it, you won’t regret it!.
HERE→ 𝗪𝘄𝘄.𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘀𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝘁𝟳.𝗖𝗼𝗺
Its president Trump dim wit
president trumpy orange glow bone spurs
You mean Trumpty Dumpty and his clown show.
I am making a good salary from home $4580-$5240/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now its my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
Here is I started_______ 𝐖𝐖𝐖.𝐖𝐎𝐑𝐊𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐑𝟏.𝐂𝐎𝐌
Probably should start with the democrats
I have earned and received $19,683 by working online from home. In previous month i have this income just by doing work for 2 hours maximum a day using my laptop. This job is just awesome and regular earning from this just great. Now everybody can now get this job and start making real money online just by follow instructions on this website…——–>> 𝐖𝐰𝐰.𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧𝟓𝟒.𝐜𝐨𝐦
Well some on here declared that the US wasn’t interested in keeping this base🤔
Well they were wrong weren’t they.
The Russian trolls, Chinese little pinks and the MAGA morons all seemed to think it was worthless.
Everyone else thinks it’s the most valuable island in the world
Where else would they put the Transformers for a start 😀
The Iranian problem.
If the US attacks Iran with just bombers, it will be the whole worlds problem. The impact to global trade will be significant. All it will do is act as a justification for attacks on western cities and shipping for the next multiple decades.
Trump has issued an ultimatum to Iran over its nuclear programme. The first goal of this build-up is intimidation, if that fails then strike.
USS Harry S Truman carrier group is having its deployment in the region extended, and is going to be joined by USS Carl Vinson carrier group.
USAF is busy ferrying F35As across the Atlantic and to the region.
And what will the strike achieve other than global chaos?
Air strikes alone have never achieved anything, they have to be backed up by ground forces.
Yeah those damn cheese eating, surrender monkey Europeans probably aren’t as blind or stupid about potential consequences as a former Fox Class B presenter and drunk as US Defence Secretary and his hangers on thinks perhaps. Mind you as the Russians and Chinese will likely know the plans by now via Signal chats I do wonder how much they will tell the Iranians, or indeed offer them their support.
All seems to have gone quiet on the BIOT question now that I think about it. I won’t get my hopes up, but I do wonder if the present global situation has edged the plan more into the long grass – we can only hope
👍
🤞
I was going say lucky the UK isn’t trying to sell it… Ahem pay someone to take it off our hands
Ok so those who said 5 doesn’t represent a force sufficient for all out capability for mass destruction on a Country or whatever level was being discussed can’t remember the exact description, is 7 enough to qualify? If not 7 how many more B2s would it have to be taking into account that would only be one leg of the additional assets we know would be there to assist to fulfil any such actions.
It’s a considerable commitment given what they can carry, and where they can penetrate.
Have a look at Google Maps…. Iran is a rather large country, it’s also a rather rugged terrain, 7 B2’s will do nothing compared to a full on Nuclear strike. Vietnam was a classic example of American Cock sure overestimated capability, Iran is on another level.
Having said that though, I’m sure Trump has the utmost faith.
The B-2’s destroy the air defense network, then it’s a field day for everything else.
The US brought north Vietnam to the negotiating table through air strikes. Look up rolling thunder. It’s amazing at how weak the defense ‘knowledge’ is on a defense blog.
Remind us how that all worked out again…
Remind me who lost the Vietnam war and who won. Said strikes appeared to have achieved nothing
Don’t get me wrong the area needs a solution but dropping a few bombs isn’t going to achieve anything other than newspaper stories
Can you name a single battle the US lost in Vietnam? There wasn’t one. The US didn’t bomb the cities or population centers of north Vietnam until the very end of 1972. It was the most restrictive ROE in history, even more so than Iraq in 2003. On December 13th 1972 the north Vietnamese government broke off negotiations for peace talks, as a result Nixon initiated linebacker II, the first and only maximum pressure, unrestricted bombing campaign against North Vietnam, Dropping 15,000 bombs in the first 3 hours. North Vietnam was out of soviet supplied surface to air missiles in less than 96 hours. On December 29th 1972, 62 B-52’s launched an air raid against Hanoi, before they landed back at base the North Vietnamese delegation contacted the United States and requested a return to ceasefire negotiations. The Paris Peace accords were signed on January 27, 1973. North Vietnam agreed to cease hostilities against South Vietnam in return for US withdrawal. The US began withdrawal and North Vietnam violated the agreement in June of 1973. Secretary of Defense James Schlesinger recommended a return to combat, however Nixon was embattled with the Watergate scandal and the American attention was captured elsewhere. The North Vietnamese began their last offensive in 1975, and Saigon fell on April 30, 1975.
Steve..it’s utterly and completely irrelevant how many battles you win, that’s something the U.S. has really struggled to grasp. It only matters who wins the war, that’s it, you can loss every single battle you fight but if at the end of the war the other side gives up and you hold the field and gain everything you wanted then you win.
So to be clear winning battles is utterly and completely meaningless only winning the war matters and the U.S. had pretty much lost every single war it’s fought for the last 70 years.
The big problem is the US fixation with the big centre piece battle and obsession with the failed idea of the short war. You cannot just wander in kick the shit out of something say I’ve won the war and wander off…because the other side simple picks itself up and goes no you have not.
China and others have a very very different view of war to the US. A war is something that happens in stages
1) political, you try and isolate your enemies or reduce their will to fight..if you can get someone to just walk away and not fight even better.
2) intial kinetic contact or the sub war elements, these will be deniable attacks and subversion…keeping up the political warface
3) full kinetic war.. now you can keep on loosing this and still win because you keep up the political warfare and you keep hurting your enemies even as you loss
4) long war..drag it out keep up giving pain, keep attacking politically
5) resolution..you win because all the political warfare attacks and pain means essentially your enemy gives in..
The U.S. always losses to this it has every single time. It wins so many battles but losses in the end..
The US lost that war. Surprised you didn’t know that given your defence knowledge.
101 reasons why we actually just need to sell DG to the US for an exorbitant amount of money or something even more useful.. then give the rest of the chago islands to the Maldives as our clear commitment to decolonisation…sticking 2 fingers up to the Neo imperialists ( that’s Mauritius). And shrugging our shoulders to the UN and going “see not out problem”.
Why would you give the rest of the Chagos to the Maldives ? I’d resettle the Chagosians on them, sell the entire lot to the US (shared ownership of any future fishing / tourism / mineral rights). If they treat them the same as their Pacific islands it’s a really good deal.
You will hear Mauritius and their UN chums go nuts until the US sticks 2 fingers up at them 🤔
But we have a government who is doing nothing but winge about the previous governments spending who want to give them away with a payment for the privilege! Makes no sense. Why oh why are we paying another country to take charge of the islands, what are we getting back for it? Nothing makes sense.
Agreed. Maybe its the Year of Stupid, with everyone a prize winner.
This is a great bit of geopolitical play to honest and shows you why sometimes you need a capability that is blindly obvious.. SSNs are powerful but as a deterrent they are not very good at the all 3 Cs.. you cannot communicate intention with an SSN..for that you need things people can see… like moving strategic bombers into place or moving an aircraft carrier within strike range.. it’s why we need our aircraft carriers..it allows the UK to signal powerful intent..
Ermm, Iran is bleddy hooje, I can’t see how 7 B2’s could decimate the entire country short of launching Nukes….. Truth be known, that time has come and gone now.
Not the entire country, Freddie, no.
But key targets, with 2 USN CBG and F35As helping, is a lot of damage.
They won’t want to decimate the whole country anyway. Not in one go, it gives them a chance to step back.
There must always be an offramp.
Hi M8, I’m convinced that the US has given up with negotiations and has decided to end the ME problem for the foreseeable future by dealing with the last remaining real opponent to peace. Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthi’s all backed by Iran and all causing a shit load of problems, the rest of the ME countries are just not interested anymore and happily throw Palestine under a bus in a second.
The Israelis are buying $6 billion worth of Aerial munitions from the US, it only makes sense if they know their existing stocks will need tell replenishing.
I suspect a joint operation between the US and Israel is in the offing and to do so directly against Iran the US needs a pretext. Trump has warned Hamas that unless they release the Israeli hostages he will unleash Hell and he has a nasty habit of doing what he says. That could be his pretext and if it is then no one will get in the way. The US has been getting ready to take out Iranian underground facilities for decades and the B2 is the beastie to do it. Some have said 7 bombers isn’t enough to do it well, Israel caused a lot of damage with just few well aimed bombs from F35i’s.
The funny thing about underground storage facilities full of things that go bang is that when you hit them or there is an accident they really go bang (see RAF Fauld for details).
The Iranians are a funny lot, a huge population of young, unemployed, well educated and fed up people all controlled by the Mullahs and IRGC. They have come close to revolting before, and I reckon the obliteration of Irans Nuclear programme and missile facilities would be massive blow to the regime.
The off-ramp is watching what happens when the ordinary Iranians decide enough is enough, the US and Israelis are dropping bombs only on the regime and overthrow the Mullahs.
Evening mate.
I agree. And I’d support it.
Though on the earlier article on this B2 build up I had a “Claude” telling me that the Iranian nuclear facilities are quite safe as nothing can get down that far.
I was not convinced, and I begged to differ, and it did not end well.
The Persians are a handsome, beautiful looking race too. I hope they get their wish.
Iran is clearly Trump’s next issue to resolve. Palestine and Ukraine are both well and truly done deals, next big one is Iran. The build up will be to get them to the negotiating table, will be interesting to see how much defensive equipment is moved to protect Saudi, when that build up begins then a possible strike is imminent.
Personally I have always thought the way to deal with Iran is through political warfare not kinetic interventions by the west.. as you say the Iranian government is politically weak and very open to political attack..if you undertake first strike kinetic attacks against a nation you risk actually providing “political” support to a government as its population may harden behind its government.. its far better to do deniability attacks, make the population more miserable and hate their leaders even more..then flood weapons into the hands of potential insurgents..destabilising the country, then when you have got the insurgency up and running really openly throw in behind it…
Let’s hope that the BIOT / Chagos “deal”
does die a death as per comments above. Starmer has the perfect political cover for this due to “changed geopolitical situation and UK strategic priorities” .
Given that the current US administration seems to think in a uniquely transactional way we could consider charging the US a bed and breakfast rate per bomber per night at Diego Garcia? They obviously wouldn’t want us to think that they are freeloaders ( now who said that recently?) – so how about £10 million per plane per night with bulk discount for long stays?
Just a thought…. 😊
I would just sell it to them lock stock and barrel for a serious wad of cash and us it to help pay down the national debt.
Another war crime against the Yemen on the way then
I can’t think of a reason to care really. Stop lobbing missiles at ships
The US has now banned the publication of today’s Sentinel-2 satellite imagery of the Diego Garcia area, so we are unlikely to see what’s now there.
Also the UK seems to be taking part in the events in Yemen, RAF KC2 Voyager (ZZ332) & accompanying Typhoons (ZK342) have been tracked today returning home to Akrotiri from the southern Red Sea.
How long before they decide they quite like this base, and that perhaps we already owe it to them for things they’ve done previous?
Base, read territory.
We only occupied it for them and we are now about to start paying rent for it for them. We barley ever use it and the only thing we do in the base is guard it and deal with the refugee problem.
So why would they want to take it from us. If they asked for it we would give it to them and let them deal with Mauritius, the UN and the refugees now showing up to claim asylum.
You realise that Faiford is actually closer to Terhan than DG!!! ok Strait of H is closer to DG but only by 6-700miles
yes, but you’d need overflight permission from at least a few countries to make that work. Flying from DG means they can just fly over Ocean / international air space.