In response to a written question from James Cartlidge, Conservative MP for South Suffolk, the Ministry of Defence (MOD) has provided details on the recent operational deployments of several platforms slated for retirement as part of the UK’s ongoing transition to modernised capabilities.

Luke Pollard, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Defence, outlined the operational timelines for vessels and aircraft, shedding light on the service history of key platforms.

Operational Histories

  • Watchkeeper Mk 1: The unmanned system was last deployed in Estonia during Exercise ATHENA SHIELD in August 2024.
  • Puma HC2: This platform remains operational and is currently deployed in Cyprus and Brunei, providing critical operational support. The Pumas will continue their role until their planned retirement on 31 March 2025.
  • Chinook Helicopters: The 14 Chinooks scheduled for retirement remain part of the forward fleet and will remain operational until their flying hours necessitate deep maintenance.

The MOD also provided updates on naval platforms:

  • HMS Bulwark: Last operational in 2017.
  • HMS Northumberland: Last operational in 2022.
  • HMS Albion: Last operational in 2023.
  • RFA Wave Ruler: Last operational in 2017.
  • RFA Wave Knight: Last operational in 2022.

The MOD has emphasised that these retirements are part of a broader strategy to transition to next-generation capabilities. This includes platforms such as the Type 26 and Type 31 frigates and the Extended Range Chinook helicopter.

Pollard noted:

“Defence has taken the decision to retire some ageing equipment, as we transition to new capabilities and make our Armed Forces fit for the future.”

Further updates on replacement timelines and capability enhancements are expected as the MOD continues its transition to modern systems.

George Allison
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
20 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Quentin D63
Quentin D63
2 months ago

Could the two Waves be converted to be more solid stores in the interim? Give them so thing to do, the ships themselves that is!? They seem still relatively young ships.

Hugo
Hugo
2 months ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

No, they couldn’t.
And we don’t have crews anyway

JB
JB
2 months ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

Converting the oil tanks to be cargo holds of any meaningful value to securely transport the solid stores required would be such a significant structural change that it would probably constitute a massive bill subtracting from other projects and a long conversion period by which time the FSS would be ready anyway. Otherwise it’s just the limited deck space for ISOs – not enough for a CSG. Sadly there’s no quick fix.

Andy reeves
Andy reeves
2 months ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

what numbers of ship types would be the best food the royal navy 6 destroyers 12 frigates, a carrier, 7 SSN,4 S.S.N ? 1£Billion for one frigate. the same for a single Submarine? I don’t think even the navy Sterling castle?, Proteus? do we really need them? I don’t think so. but a rethink of that structure of the u.k forces and it’s equipment needs should be done and shortfalls addressed.

Exroyal.
Exroyal.
2 months ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

A better use would be to crew them and offer them as is to support the US Navy. They have on ongoing issue with oilers as they call them.

Hugo
Hugo
2 months ago
Reply to  Exroyal.

We can’t crew them, that’s the point

Quentin D63
Quentin D63
2 months ago

*something

Ron
Ron
2 months ago

The Waves could supply solid stores but in limited ammounts. Its the same with the Albions, they could be converted to command and control ships with advanced radar suites and intel gathering capability, and or motherships with workshops and hospital capabilities. The ships themselves seem to be in fairly good condition.

Angus
Angus
2 months ago
Reply to  Ron

The Albions are too manpower intensive and where already Command and Control rolled for their main task with required systems. The Waves are needed as the 4 Tide will never be able to generate the required numbers not only to support the small RN but provide service to NATO. 4 means 1 or 2 at best available with the Tides but the with Waves we could generate another one + when needed. They can proved limited stores which can support a couple units keeping them at sea longer. Seldom would the Stores ship supply a Frigate/Destoryer on its own. Manpower… Read more »

Andy reeves
Andy reeves
2 months ago
Reply to  Angus

what numbers of ship types would be the best food the royal navy 6 destroyers 12 frigates, a carrier, 7 SSN,4 S.S.N ? 1£Billion for one frigate. the same for a single Submarine? I don’t think even the navy Sterling castle?, Proteus? do we really need them? I don’t think so. but a rethink of that structure of the u.k forces and it’s equipment needs should be done and shortfalls addressed.the crew sizes for are enough to manage the whole type 31 fleet needs. I’d sooner see a HLP built from a ship taken up from trade as was considered… Read more »

Graham Moore
Graham Moore
2 months ago

I wonder when ‘Defence’ will retire 60-year old FV430 vehicles from the army!

Jonathan
Jonathan
2 months ago
Reply to  Graham Moore

Very very good point, unfortunately they only seem interested in buying very expensive wheeled APCs in numbers that are no way adequate over about a Decade, to replace 600 warrior variants and 750 FV430s and 600 is mastiff/wolfhound variants . 600 boxer for 2032…so if they order a second batch and third Bach of another 600 overs for each batch the army should get a full set of replacements for 2050…… In reality the army needs: 1) 200- 300 cannon armoured ( preferably tracked) IFVs with tracked support variants. ( personally I think they should just do a cheap lifex… Read more »

David Lee
David Lee
2 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Should have gone with cv90 years ago and k9

Andy reeves
Andy reeves
2 months ago
Reply to  Graham Moore

when the navy retires it’s one remaining warship

John Hartley
John Hartley
2 months ago

The Americans are short of tankers, so perhaps we could do a swap? we give them RFA Wave Knight & Ruler, & in return we get enough US Army recently retired UH-60L Blackhawks to replace RAF Pumas.

Andrew D
Andrew D
2 months ago
Reply to  John Hartley

I like it 🤗 don’t ask don’t get .

Jonathan
Jonathan
2 months ago
Reply to  John Hartley

In sure the waves will be flogged for some good money… china is massively expanding and I’m sure would snap them up.

DJ
DJ
2 months ago
Reply to  John Hartley

RAN also has both of its AOR’s out of action at the moment (so only the single NZ AOR to cover both navies). They are also about to order 11 additional frigates, but have not indicated any additional support ships. Brazil is another possibility.

Mr Maurice McPhillimey
Mr Maurice McPhillimey
2 months ago

It has come to mind, why the MoD are keeping these ships in service for now. Also converting them for solid cargo, just wonder if anyone else has thought of this… Our farmers have threatened to go on strike if Starmer does overturn the Inheritance Tax. Starmer has confirmed he will not overturn it on the last PMQs. Therefore if the farmers do go on strike, he will use these older shops to get food from abroad instead of changing his mind… He will rather be a ‘Scab’, and watch our farmers go out of business, than come to an… Read more »

getdownshep
getdownshep
2 months ago

Farmers won’t go out of business, paying half what other people pay in inheritance tax will ensure that!!!