The acceleration of military support to Ukraine will be the primary focus of a meeting of NATO Defence Ministers in Brussels today.

The Defence Secretary, Ben Wallace, arrived in Brussels today for the first NATO Defence Ministers meeting of 2023.

It is expected that the Ministers will discuss how to sustain and accelerate support for Ukraine, drive NATO’s military transformation and modernisation, and the accession of Sweden and Finland to NATO.

Today, the Defence Secretary had bilateral meetings with his Romanian and French counterparts as well as a meeting with his Ukrainian counterpart, Oleksii Reznikov.

Defence Secretary Ben Wallace said:

“I am very pleased to be back at NATO to continue the vital work to support Ukraine, as well as meeting with my defence counterparts. Our important work is ongoing, the UK and our Allies will stand in solidarity with Ukraine for as long as it takes.”

You can read more here.

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

201 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
1 year ago

Time is of the essence to hold off this latest offensive by Russia. Can we also send picks, shovels and ovens (between 1,400- and 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit) to help them bury/cremate their dead? I’m sure Russia’s generals would be very grateful! 11,536 in total so far and counting. Russia burning bodies in Crimea ‘around the clock’ to hide losses “Dead Russian soldiers are being cremated “around the clock” in the annexed territory of Crimea, according to Ukraine’s military.   A local crematorium in the village of Krazna Zorka is being used, with a “constant line of military vehicles” of up… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by Nigel Collins
Marked
Marked
1 year ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

That’s not a crematorium, just ask Johninmoscow, it’s a special kitchen unit for providing hot meals to the brave red army warriors.

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
1 year ago
Reply to  Marked

“Johninmoscow” 😂 What an absolute shower of 💩Confirmed by Ben Wallace on Sky news. He stated a whole brigade of up to 1000 men was killed or injured. February 13, 2023 Russia suffers substantial losses at Vuhledar “Oleksiy Dmytrashkivskyi, a spokesman for the Armed Forces of Ukraine, told Politico: «A large number of enemy forces, including the command staff, were destroyed near Vuhledar and Mariinka in Donetsk Oblast. In addition, over the past week, the enemy lost about 130 units of equipment, including 36 units of tanks.» According to him, the Russian army is losing 150 – 300 soldiers in… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
1 year ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

War in Ukraine has wiped out half of Russia’s modern battle tanks, say experts
“The International Institute for Strategic Studies believes Moscow has lost up to 2,300 of its more advanced T72s and T80s.”

LINK

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
1 year ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

It is appalling Nigel, appalling. What a monster Putin is! I don’t like to think about how young many of these casualties will be.

Like the Confederate General said of the Battle of Cold Harbour – ‘It wasn’t war. It was murder.’

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
1 year ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

Used as cannon fodder by a butcher, but until he’s removed from power better for them to be killed than the innocent Ukrainians’ lives being lost through no fault of their own.

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker
1 year ago
Reply to  Marked

They aren’t casualties they are actually cardboard Russians and cardboard equipment. They get all this cardboard unpacking individual wagu steaks and all the luxury gifts from the Kremlin that the troops enjoy while Ukrainians fight cardboard.
The crematorium is to burn the cardboard that’s been damaged.

Bob
Bob
1 year ago

Just get on and supply the equipment they need; western tanks and ammunition, longer range strike and improved anti-drone/missile capability.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
1 year ago

Mad Vlad is now fighting to keep himself alive. So I expect more Soviet style troops to the meat grinder. I regret the massive loss of life. But Mad Vlad must be stopped. The difference with this vs WWII is that there is a massive tech and intelligence mismatch that in some cases allows Ukraine to pick off key Russian targets at will. M270 / HIMARS has unquestionably made Russia’s awful logistics even worse by pushing supply dumps back out of range so it turns into a hub and spoke supply chain: with very long spokes. Which is a great… Read more »

James
James
1 year ago

If Vlad is cornered and cant see a way out this is the most worrying point, he clearly doesnt have the capability to threaten anymore of Europe in a conventional sense so whats his option?

Retreat and live out life trapped in Russia all the while any new Russian regime will be under pressure from the West to convict him for war crimes or sanctions wont be lifted.

Since this awful series of events started the exit route for Putin has and will continue to be the most frightening part of the story.

grizzler
grizzler
1 year ago
Reply to  James

Again with the attempt to subliminally mention his nuclear option.
We all know it exists – that is for others to decide if he will either want to ,or be allowed to, use it

James
James
1 year ago
Reply to  grizzler

Lets hope its not an option for him to use it and that he doesnt have enough people bending at his will if he did want to no questions would be asked.

Bob
Bob
1 year ago
Reply to  James

Are you really saying that the senior Russian establishment will allow Russia to be destroyed, along with everyone else, rather than sacrifice a leader?

James
James
1 year ago
Reply to  Bob

Thats assuming they can get him out of power, power which hes clearly crazy (insanely crazy) about, its going to take some brave people to finally force him out.

Bob
Bob
1 year ago
Reply to  James

Even I could be brave if the alternative was a nuclear exchange.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
1 year ago
Reply to  James

If Putin was forced from power he would be the only person to fall out of the 6th floor window of a bungalow. He knows that. A new leadership would want to get Russia out of the deep freeze but wouldn’t want the loss of face of handing Putin over to The Hague (or wherever). The problem is that the colonial powers and the US used to let despots go to a quiet island somewhere the weather was nice with most of their ill gotten gains and live out their days with tacit protection if they left quietly when the… Read more »

Mark B
Mark B
1 year ago

Absolutely. It is for the people to decide their leader.The German people decided upon Hitler at one point and that, in hindsight, was not a good decision. Hopefully in everyone’s interests Russians will make the decision to stop things getting even worse today.

Jon
Jon
1 year ago
Reply to  James

Surely his exit strategy lies in getting his money overseas (which I’m sure he’s already done) and taking a trip abroad, extending indefinitely. Sure, he could try to blow up the world, but a country with nice beaches, hot women and no extradition treaties would sound a lot better to me. Somewhere safe. Like Taiwan.

James
James
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon

Definitely will have most his wealth hidden in various companies in numerous countries and hopefully a life in an isolated environment is the easy way out for everyone!

Stc
Stc
1 year ago
Reply to  James

So right, but the big concern for me was a Russian guy who said we have a terrible history of replacing an evil leader with some one more evil. He’s right. As much as I hate myself for saying it an accomodation has to be made as far as Putins position is concerned. P10 and novicok is not forgotten, and I would like to see hung by the baubles, but if some way can be found to kick Russia out of Ukraine yet keep Putin in place I think that would be the best solution until his ” natural ”… Read more »

John Stott
John Stott
1 year ago

One of the saddest things about this? A complete lack of diplomacy. Biden and The Greased Piglet threw weaponry into a proxy war. Now? It seems the UK particularly, and others are short of everything. We see lots of jaw, jaw and sheer hatred of Russia, we see very little effort from any country to bring both sides to the table. Remind yourself constantly that war affects ordinary people, like you and me. War is not pretty, it is brutal. Along with Greased Piglet we have seen more posturing by Macron and others than a Punch and Judy show. If… Read more »

Jim
Jim
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

The Trolls are really on the offensive today, welcome comrade, what pearls of wisdom has your glorious leader to share with us today about your “special military operation”

Are you “soldiers” tired of being massacred yet?

Jim
Jim
1 year ago
Reply to  Jim

Yes comrade just keep pushing your propaganda. How is the weather in Troll Farm, have the put the heating back on 😂

John Stott
John Stott
1 year ago
Reply to  Jim

Hard being a jerk like you eh? Nothing else to do all day? Bloody tories cut your daycare to zilch?

Bob
Bob
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

How exactly is this a “proxy war” when one of the supposed authors began it by invading their neighbour?

John Stott
John Stott
1 year ago
Reply to  Bob

It funny how people ignore the Crimea annexation in 2014 and a western backed regime change in Ukraine eh?

grizzler
grizzler
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

Correct – They shouldn’t have accepted the annexation of Crimea. They made the basic error of thinking appeasment was the correct response- -History always repeats itself.

FieldLander
FieldLander
1 year ago
Reply to  grizzler

Appeasement can work if you use the time effectively. Chamberlin did at least win a year. I hope we have not squandered the last year, nor the years before that. I am still concerned that the West has not recognised the need to move to a war footing. The Russians are moving towards a Total War (emptying prisons, certainly, cremating their dead, probably etc…).. Instead we are talking about replacing ATGWs in 2024 and later. The Ukrainians need equipment and ammunition now.

Graham Moore
Graham Moore
1 year ago
Reply to  FieldLander

Chamberlain was also key in rearming when he was Chancellor of the Exchequer. We formed a Rearmament Committteee in 1934, and their work was very effective and we were ready for WW2 (just) some 5 years later.

Steve R
Steve R
1 year ago
Reply to  FieldLander

The problem with that comparison was that Chamberlain bought us a year in 1938 and we used that year to rearm.

Since 2014 we have reduced our armament, if anything. The army and RAF have both shrunk.

Fieldlander
Fieldlander
1 year ago
Reply to  Steve R

Snipped from CNN today. The Americans are ramping up.
How many similar shells a month does the UK produce?

Graham
Graham
1 year ago
Reply to  Fieldlander

I don’t think we produce any ammunition larger than SAA.

John Stott
John Stott
1 year ago
Reply to  grizzler

I agree, we never learn from history. Just repeat the same.

Wasp snorter
Wasp snorter
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

Western backed regime? It’s not Afghanistan. You mean a sovereign European country with allies and ties to Europe, if they want to align with democracies rather than Russia then that’s their right, it’s not a puppet state or a replay of the ‘great game’ with Russia. John I also disagree with the ‘sheer hatred’ for Russia, that’s not true. There criminal autocratic regime is loathed but Russia as a country and its history is generally admired and respected and is a fascinating place. if it was a true democracy it would be one hell of an amazing country with massive… Read more »

John Stott
John Stott
1 year ago
Reply to  Wasp snorter

Russia will never be a democracy. And check Ukraine for corruption, think it is just above Nigeria and the UK in the league table. As for the hatred, reading the posters on here with “Orc” as their favorite word? Yup, that is hatred.

Wasp snorter
Wasp snorter
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

I bet the tsars thought they would never lose power but they did, strange things can happen. Ukraine is corrupt and in many areas and that was part of the backlash that ended up with Zelensky being elected. Ranking UK as corrupt like Nigeria is ridiculous, that must be referring to money laundering in the city of London, which is true in reality in all financial hubs. But aside that the UK is not corrupt, try bribing a police officer or any official and it will simply not work. There are criminals in the UK like everywhere but the place… Read more »

John Stott
John Stott
1 year ago
Reply to  Wasp snorter

Not corrupt? Bud, look at the Covid episode and Tory sleaze. UK actually dropped down the league table last year. Remember one T.B.Liar stopping an SFO investigation into Saudi/BaE bungs? Sorry, beg to disagree.

Matt
Matt
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

I think we dropped down the table to about 18 out of 160.

Still above, for example, La France.

Wasp snorter
Wasp snorter
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

You miss the point, most humans are prone to corruption (favours for friends, personal gain etc) and of course there are many examples here but the point is that western societies build structures to stop corruption from flourishing with laws and scrutiny etc. your examples is where the system has highlighted it, for example Boris had to resign over Covid rules being broken, would putin resign over something like that? Count all the resignations from bad behaviour over the last year, there are many because the system stops corruption from flourishing. The key word here is flourishing, not the fact… Read more »

Wasp snorter
Wasp snorter
1 year ago
Reply to  Wasp snorter

That’s driving examiner, not instructor. Of course an instructor would be paid to pass…duh

John Stott
John Stott
1 year ago
Reply to  Wasp snorter

No I disagree. Corruption is rife, it is not just measured in monetary or fiscal favour. It runs through the fabric of society at all levels. Especially the parasitic aristocracy and political classes. I am no socialist either, a diehard republican. What I see in Britain makes me sick. As for the Greased Piglet? He epitomizes a system based on outdated “rules” where favours are bought. Then Eton and Harrow excel at turning out greased piglets by the hundreds.

Matt
Matt
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

TBH I think you exaggerate – the UK system has shown itself to be comparatively good on checks and balances, and able to evolve time and again. If you want a blunt comparison, consider that two of the last four Presidents of France (Chirac, Sarkozy) have received jail sentences (suspended) for corruption. That is a position which combines the powers of Prime Minister and Monarch. And even then they could not be prosecuted until they stood down, as the President of France has immunity. I might argue that Chirac went for President partly to avoid prosecution, as he knew he… Read more »

Wasp snorter
Wasp snorter
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

To be fair John I’m not a fan of the constant ‘orc’ references either, as many killed will just be young lads who mainly will not want to be there, but it’s understandable given the appalling actions and abuses seen by the Russians at every level incl the horrendous Wagner group. Please don’t start going off about the Azov battalion when it’s Russia that has invaded.

John Stott
John Stott
1 year ago
Reply to  Wasp snorter

No, the street is a two-way one imo. Azov just gave Putin an excuse. I just get sick of the glorification of war on here. If half of the commentators had actual experience of it they would not say a dickey bird. Funny that Youtube will allow films of young lads being killed by drone-dropped grenades, then is still all over any Covid criticism like a rash. Guess it is a sign of the times, I am glad to be of an age when politicians, journalists, and others showed some honour and respect in their dealings. Best wishes.

Sean
Sean
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

Ah so you’re a vivid conspiracy nutter too, that figures. Most of them on social media are pro-Putin too.

Sean
Sean
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

Would you prefer the technically more accurate description of “murdering, pillaging, rapists” to Orcs?
It’s just a bit of a mouthful.

Interesting you seem to think that hatred of war criminals is a bad thing…

Esteban
Esteban
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

Yes if we want to talk about racist hatred… We can’t really get around the fact that that is not really a great term. One would think the enlightened Western European posters would realize that.

Gunbuster
Gunbuster
1 year ago
Reply to  Esteban

Orc…A racist term? How so? Its definitely a metaphor and a borderline simile. Orc’s are according to JRR Tolkien ” Brutish, aggressive, ugly, and malevolent monsters” His use of the term Orc is derived from the old English epic poem Beowulf which was written in 975-1025 AD. Its a striking coincidence that those dates are also around the same time that the Kievan Rus Empire was established centred on Kiev (russia and its now capital moscow did not exist at that time and wouldn’t for many hundreds of years) Of course the term could be taken from the Orcs found in… Read more »

Matt
Matt
1 year ago
Reply to  Gunbuster

I’d say the contemporaneous association is clearer than that at a gross level.

Observe the stereotypes in the Lord of the Rings. The goodies are lilly-white blonde Scandinavian-types with slightly scruffy Viking type men, whilst the baddies are dark and swarthy.

I’d say that reads quite directly from the books, which are from the fag-end of the Imperial time period, and deserves to be discussed.

Airborne
Airborne
1 year ago
Reply to  Esteban

Yaaaaaaawn 👜

OldSchool
OldSchool
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

Transparency International 2022 rankings. UK 18….Nigeria 150.

Please explain……..

Steve R
Steve R
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

If Russian troops stop acting like orcs, we’ll stop calling them orcs.

Matt
Matt
1 year ago
Reply to  Steve R

I think that potentially misses the need for thinking about the future (which is happening), including whatever Russia will become (we hope).

The foundations of the post-WW2 system, which has endured until now, were being laid down amongst UK, USA and others in 1941-2, in the middle of the fight.

dave12
dave12
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

Western backed regime? Zelensky was elected by its people, the people went to the streets to protest the Russian backed leader in 2014 because he stopped the country from joining the EU, he then ordered police to shoot at the protesters killing hundreds ,so deaths of the Ukraine people was not by the western leaders but by Russian influence and guess what? he fled to Russian controlled territory, you Stottsky are just another individual easily manipulated by misinformation.

John Stott
John Stott
1 year ago
Reply to  dave12

Yawn. Do one bud, you talk out of your back end.

dave12
dave12
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

I think you are couple of sails short of wind buddy, you seem to struggle with facts and reality🙄

John Stott
John Stott
1 year ago
Reply to  dave12

Says another “expert”.

Sean
Sean
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

Impressively reasoned logical debate, not. But what we expect from a Putin supporter.

James
James
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

The current Ukrainian government came about due to the population uprising against the Russian imposed regime in Ukraine, remember the months and months of non stop protests?

Sean
Sean
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

There was no “western backed regime change” 🤷🏻‍♂️

There were mass protests as a result of Yanukovych ignoring Parliamentary votes. The situation was inflamed when Yanukovych ordered the murder of protestors through the use of snipers and he fled the city. Parliament then voted to remove him from office.
Since then Ukraine has functioned as a democracy, something which Russia stopped doing decades ago.

And the only foreign intervention during this period was from Moscow.

Klonkie
Klonkie
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

An astute observation John . Thanks for dong nothing, Barrack Obama.

Graham Moore
Graham Moore
1 year ago
Reply to  Bob

Russia is not fighting a proxy war, but we in the West are – thank goodness.

Marked
Marked
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

Diplomacy only works if both sides are willing. One side is hell bent on throwing bodies into the meat grinder regardless of the cost as admitting failure is not an option. Who do you suggest anyone from the west engages with?

John Stott
John Stott
1 year ago
Reply to  Marked

There are individuals/countries who would undertake the role. Funny how the “UN” has not played any significant role eh?

Jacko
Jacko
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

Not really surprising though is it as the country that initiated this madness holds a veto!

Marked
Marked
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

The UN would be vetoed by Russia. Funny that ain’t it.

And what exactly would be achieved by diplomacy with anyone other than those calling the shots in Russia? Exactly nothing is the answer! You can’t have diplomacy when only one party is involved.

John Stott
John Stott
1 year ago
Reply to  Marked

Well, we can agree to disagree.

JohninMK
JohninMK
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

Not round here you can’t.

dave12
dave12
1 year ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Here’s another one struggling with facts and reality 😅

John Stott
John Stott
1 year ago
Reply to  JohninMK

I say what I believe to be the truth. Anywhere I damn well please.

Bob
Bob
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

Then complain when others disagree with you.

Sean
Sean
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

And then get upset when everyone points out how deranged you are 🤷🏻‍♂️

Steve R
Steve R
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

As long as what you say aligns with Grand Fuhrer Putin, of course!

In Putin’s Russia, anyone can say what they like. Once.

Sean
Sean
1 year ago
Reply to  JohninMK

Ah John in MK has a buddy at last, brothers in treachery.

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
1 year ago
Reply to  Sean

👍

Marius
Marius
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

Diplomacy is ongoing, all the time, non-stop, through the sights and laser designators of the West’s superior weapons. It’s the only diplomacy Comrade Vlad understands!

John Stott
John Stott
1 year ago
Reply to  Marius

Sadly that’s the kind of comment that is normal for this site. Yup, war freaks.

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

Well it’s a defence site and most people on here are interested in that topic. Hardly anyone on here has been shouting support of the murder, rape and general destruction of Ukraine. They support trying to stop this. Currently the only way to do that is providing weapons. If Ukraine said we won’t fight from tomorrow and want peace talks Russia would go along with that? No it would charge across the country. Had roles been reversed and it was Ukraine that invaded Russia or somewhere else and the invaded country was asking for help I would support providing help… Read more »

dave12
dave12
1 year ago
Reply to  Monkey spanker

Well said.

russ
russ
1 year ago
Reply to  dave12

seconded!

Airborne
Airborne
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

The only one on here who will not condemn this war is JohninMK! As for war freaks, been there, done that and it hasn’t warped my morals to believe that this war is not immoral and illegal and needs to be challenged by all democratic nations! It would seem, with all due respect that your dislike for the current Government and other UK establishments has coloured your view.

Simon
Simon
1 year ago
Reply to  Airborne

As you said, 99.99% of the posters on this do not want to see the Ukraine overrun by it invading neighbour and the only way to do that is to supply them weapons.

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
1 year ago
Reply to  Airborne

👍

Steve R
Steve R
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

What part of your damaged little brain doesn’t understand that Putin started this war? He can stop it anytime he likes.

And you call us war freaks. Pathetic!

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
1 year ago
Reply to  Marius

Sadly so.

The casualties are sad but the Ukrainians have the perfect right to fight invaders.

James
James
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

How is the UK particularly short of everything being supplied to Ukraine compared to France or Germany for example?

Regarding bring the leaders to a table to discuss and move forward how would you propose that goes forward? I cant see giving Putin a call and inviting him to dinner in Istanbul with Zelensky is really going to be an option. The UN cant do a thing as Russia used an immediate veto on the 26th of Feb last year to remove any power the UN had.

Graham Moore
Graham Moore
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

The only leader in the world right now who impresses me is Zelensky.

Steve R
Steve R
1 year ago
Reply to  John Stott

Oh, shut up!

Diplomacy?! Zelensky tried, tried and tried again to speak to Putin at the beginning of the war. Putin refused to speak to him. Sent troops to personally murder Zelensky.

How do you use diplomacy when the other side won’t listen? When they’re intent on seizing your country and annexing it into their own? Hitler never listened to diplomacy; countries had two choices: capitulate or fight back. The same is true now.

It was Churchill that said “You cannot reason with a tiger when your head is in its mouth.” Truer words have seldom been spoken.

Quentin D63
Quentin D63
1 year ago

Not really related to this… but just seen on the news Nicola Sturgeon has just quit. A new beginning for 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿!?

Larry
Larry
1 year ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

I would reply to Nicola Sturgeon resignation in depth but am to busy celebrating. And I am a Scotsman. 😂

Jacko
Jacko
1 year ago
Reply to  Larry

Well we can only hope she is not replaced by another rabid loon🤞

Nick C
Nick C
1 year ago
Reply to  Jacko

Agreed, but be careful what you wish for!

Crabfat
Crabfat
1 year ago
Reply to  Nick C

Also agreed – they might get that awful Blackford fellow!

Nick C
Nick C
1 year ago
Reply to  Crabfat

You mean the slim one who has just been hoofed out by his party in Westminster? I think he would be good, he whinges even louder than she does. Should do their cause no end of good.

James
James
1 year ago
Reply to  Nick C

He made Starmer look like a beacon of agreement and positivity, no mean feat!

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
1 year ago
Reply to  Jacko

She will be. The whole of the SNP is run by raving lunatics who lobby on one policy. That of a Scotland that is an entirely independent country whilst conveniently ignoring the fact they have maximum devolution already and have for many years. As long as HMG just keep saying no to another referendum then the SNP will eventually run out of steam and hopefully Scotland will return to a more moderate form of government. Least that’s my hope. I don’t think independence would be anything but a disaster both for Scotland and the rest of the United Kingdom. Together… Read more »

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
1 year ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

Scotland never lost its sovereignty. It retained its crown, national emblems, church and laws. It pooled its powers with those of England Wales and (formerly) Ireland and entered on a rapid rise to significance on the world stage; Scots were at the forefront of Empire. Look at the numbers of Scots in the highest offices of state since 1707 and iterated in 1801 with the creation of the United Kingdom.

Frank62
Frank62
1 year ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

Excellent point. And Scots remain at the forefront of the UK in most fields. United we stand, divided we fall I think. A lot of SNP rage is down to the Scots themselves refusing to become totally independant when asked.
All of us could do with a far better Westminster than recent years.

Glad to hear Ben Wallace speaking for a stronger military. I hope it leads to more than just the soundbite. We need to up our game before we end up extinct or under someone else’s jackboot.

Jim
Jim
1 year ago
Reply to  Frank62

I’m a Scot who believes in the UK if it’s a strong military player. If it’s not I’m happy enough for Scotland to leave. The UK has always been a military and foreign policy alliance to me first and foremost. SDSR 2010 moved me towards independence. Having both carriers in operation moved me back to the union.

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
1 year ago
Reply to  Jim

The Cameron, Clegg, Osborne Coalition government was by far the worst government in modern times. The legacy remains, most significantly in terms of deep cuts to national defence.

Jim
Jim
1 year ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

Well said, the Uk remains a union of nations and Scotland voted twice, once to join and one to stay in.that’s as democratic as things get.

farouk
farouk
1 year ago
Reply to  Larry

.

Matt
Matt
1 year ago
Reply to  farouk

The resignation statement was 40 minutes, which seems to be the longest list of excuses in history.

I don’t think I have the stomach to listen to that.

By comparison, Theresa May was 7 minutes. BoJo and Liz Truss even less.

Expect a series of Great Collapsing Scottish Government events imminently.

And some news about the missing £600k from SNP funds, for which the report was handed over to the Prosecution Authorities last week.

grizzler
grizzler
1 year ago
Reply to  Matt

I wouldn’t have thought Truss would have a lot to say – she could have read every page in her diary during her tenure and still have had to wait for an egg to boil….

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
1 year ago
Reply to  farouk

😅😂

russ
russ
1 year ago
Reply to  farouk

Ha!!

Airborne
Airborne
1 year ago
Reply to  farouk

😂😂😂

Malcolm Rich
Malcolm Rich
1 year ago
Reply to  farouk

🤣😅🤣😂

Sean
Sean
1 year ago
Reply to  farouk

😂

Gunbuster
Gunbuster
1 year ago
Reply to  farouk

Now that is top trolling!

Cj
Cj
1 year ago
Reply to  farouk

😂😂 that is hilarious 👍

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
1 year ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

I think I can go one better than that!

Wednesday 15 February 2023

Jeremy Corbyn will not stand as Labour candidate in next general election, Sir Keir Starmer says
Another loss for Russia!

Marius
Marius
1 year ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

Brilliant!😂

Paul.P
Paul.P
1 year ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

And Nicola Sturgeon has resigned. There is a god!

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
1 year ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

👍😂

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
1 year ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

Yeah. That is good news, except no doubt we will see another deluded individual from the same looney party appointed to the FM position only to then fail Scotland and it’s people. Scotland is already run by the Scots for the Scots, if things aren’t going well they only have the SNP to blame. Just like we the rest of the UK only have the Tory party to blame for our current situation.

Matt
Matt
1 year ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

There don’t seem to be many heirs apparent, which suggests ructions incoming.

If they don’t find someone so divisive for Scotland to keep the perma-stooshie going, expect an exflux of voters from SNP to Labour.

I’d say that George Robertson is most likely to emerge, as he’s the only heavyweight.

Humza would be good for popcorn sales.

Gunbuster
Gunbuster
1 year ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

Ohh the irony of the comments I can see coming when they decide who takes over…
Lots of ” Scotlands Unelected First Minister ” and “No mandate leader” jibes

Delicious!

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker
1 year ago
Reply to  Gunbuster

It’s a bit strange of her to leave at this time. I hope she’s not running from something.
Going to all the effort to get elected then ducking out half way through.

Last edited 1 year ago by Monkey spanker
David
David
1 year ago

There was an article in the Telegraph yesterday where the RN is contemplating mothballing HMS Prince of Wales in order to free up cash for other equipment items and munitions.

If true, the state of our Armed Forces is even worse than thought! I doubt Uncle Sam would be too impressed either and it would lend credence to the rumblings in private from the US military. Even France has publicly stated they are concerned about the state of the British Armed Forces – yes, France!

Ian
Ian
1 year ago
Reply to  David

Usually these stories are put about in the run up to a defence review in a bid to pressure for more money. The fact that the people tasked with the defence of the nation feel the need to resort to that sort of chicanery is more an indictment of the Treasury than the MOD in my judgement.

Matt
Matt
1 year ago
Reply to  Ian

Indeed.

There were similar “private statements” to the US General “Second Tier Army” thing before each of the last two Defence Reviews.

Frank62
Frank62
1 year ago
Reply to  Ian

Treasury & Tory dogma: Always plenty of money to be given away in dodgy deals to their filthy rich mates, but none for nurses, police, teachers or our military to keep us safe & secure.

Matt
Matt
1 year ago
Reply to  Frank62

Hmmm. Not picking a fight, however we have 10% more nurses than we did in 2019.

And I think the Tories have met the recommendations of the independent salary review body nearly all years since it was set up and they have been in power.

Jacko
Jacko
1 year ago
Reply to  David

The ‘defence’ correspondent on that paper is a nob! The other day he managed to mix up CR1 CR2 & CR 3 in one article very clever bloke ain’t he? Just hasn’t a clue how to do his job though🙄

Graham Moore
Graham Moore
1 year ago
Reply to  Jacko

True. The defence correspondent calls Ajax ‘a tank’ and still thinks Wittering is an RAF base.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
1 year ago
Reply to  Graham Moore

Graham mate, Wittering still is! But yes I agree on the thrust re that Journalist.

Graham Moore
Graham Moore
1 year ago

Blast! I meant Wattisham!!

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
1 year ago
Reply to  Graham Moore

Hi mate. Gotcha, that makes sense. Didn’t think a man of your knowledge genuinely thought Wittering.
Blimey when did Wattisham close as an RAF Station, 91 or 92? Journo is well out of date. RAF had a SAR flight there in the army era.

Graham Moore
Graham Moore
1 year ago

RAF Wattisham closed in Oct 1992 – it was a F-4 Phantom base – No 56(F) Sqn. Handed over to the AAC in Sep 93 and now known as Wattisham Flying Station, although Wiki call it Wattisham Airfield, so don’t know if they are wrong or if it is yet another name change.

You are right – a Flight of RAF SAR Sea King operated there until 2015 when the service was prvatised.

The DT article related to Prince Harry’s time there.

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
1 year ago
Reply to  David

It’s due to set sail in the spring after repairs have been completed, so I’m guessing sometime in April. Interestingly, I posted this the other day and could be used by the government as an excuse to do exactly that but I doubt it will happen in the short term. Published 25 Feb 2021 RFI008 AIRCRAFT LAUNCH AND RECOVERY EQUIPMENT “The Ministry of Defence (The “Authority”) is currently seeking information in order to qualify requirements and develop our understanding of the potential for the market to provide assisted launch and arrested recovery for a range of air vehicles, which would be suitable to… Read more »

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
1 year ago
Reply to  David

It’s due to set sail in the spring after repairs have been completed, so I’m guessing sometime in April. Interestingly, I posted this the other day and could be used by the government as an excuse to do exactly that but I doubt it will happen in the short term. Published 25 Feb 2021 RFI008 AIRCRAFT LAUNCH AND RECOVERY EQUIPMENT “The Ministry of Defence (The “Authority”) is currently seeking information in order to qualify requirements and develop our understanding of the potential for the market to provide assisted launch and arrested recovery for a range of air vehicles, which would be suitable to… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
1 year ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

Boeing signed a $4 billion contract with the Navy in May 2019 for 78 new-build Block III Super Hornets which should be delivered by spring 2024. Tebo says Boeing will also convert all of the service’s current Block II Super Hornets – more than 550 aeroplanes – to Block III configuration with deliveries scheduled between 2023 and the mid-2030s.”

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
1 year ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

I’d rather an F35C then an F18. The C variant carries a bigger payload in terms of weight, has a larger internal weapons bay and a longer range.

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
1 year ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

Good morning Mr Bell, I was making the point that the US would be able to launch and recover their Super Hornets/Growler from the QE carriers, but the C variant would be a better option than the current B.

At $67M a pop for the Super Hornet and lower costs in terms of maintenance and fuel compared with the B who knows what the future holds?

Let’s wait and see what comes in the next four years in relation to assisted launch and arrested recovery for a range of air vehicles requested by the MOD.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
1 year ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

Taking off with a light(ish) load isn’t the issue.

How does it land and stop?

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
1 year ago

Good morning Supportive Bloke, As I mentioned above, “both crewed and un-crewed air vehicles” which tend to suggest something like a super Hornet. Ski Jump and Arrestor wires only were used in these tests. “According to a press release shared by Boeing, the pair of U.S. Navy F/A-18E Super Hornets, at least one of which belongs to the U.S. Navy’s Strike Fighter Squadron 25 (VFA-25) based on its markings, completed multiple ski jumps, roll-in and fly-in arrestments, as well as other performance flights in a variety of air-to-air, air-to-ground, and air-to-surface combat configurations.” “GOA, India, July 20, 2022 — Boeing’s [NYSE: BA]… Read more »

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
1 year ago

Good morning Supportive Bloke, As I mentioned above, “both crewed and un-crewed air vehicles” which tend to suggest something like a super Hornet/Growler. Ski Jump and Arrestor wires only were used in these tests. “According to a press release shared by Boeing, the pair of U.S. Navy F/A-18E Super Hornets, at least one of which belongs to the U.S. Navy’s Strike Fighter Squadron 25 (VFA-25) based on its markings, completed multiple ski jumps, roll-in and fly-in arrestments, as well as other performance flights in a variety of air-to-air, air-to-ground, and air-to-surface combat configurations.” “GOA, India, July 20, 2022 — Boeing’s [NYSE: BA] F/A-18… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by Nigel Collins
Watcherzero
Watcherzero
1 year ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

If you looked at the illustrative specification they put out at the time its for aircraft half the weight of fighter jets. We are talking directly piloted and autonomous drones not Super Hornets, with initial candidates being recon drones followed by the Crowsnet airborne radar successor. Stuff in the MQ-25 Stingray and XQ-58 Valkyrie weight class.

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
1 year ago
Reply to  Watcherzero

The link is taken from the original article from this site. It clearly states Manned and unmanned. To my mind, it would be very foolish to go to great expenses not least downtime to fit a system that cannot accommodate both types. But I wouldn’t be in the least bit surprised! Published 25 Feb 2021 RFI008 AIRCRAFT LAUNCH AND RECOVERY EQUIPMENT “The Ministry of Defence (The “Authority”) is currently seeking information in order to qualify requirements and develop our understanding of the potential for the market to provide assisted launch and arrested recovery for a range of air vehicles, which would be suitable… Read more »

Sean
Sean
1 year ago
Reply to  David

There’s you’re mistake, reading The Telegraph 🤷🏻‍♂️
It’s absolutely clueless with regards to defence.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
1 year ago
Reply to  Sean

I agree. Wasn’t much better when Max Hastings was warbler in chief.

Graham Moore
Graham Moore
1 year ago
Reply to  David

I think the Telegraph is unreliable on defence matters. Their articles are littered with factual errors.

Richard Beedall
Richard Beedall
1 year ago

If the rumours are true, Ben Wallace will soon be spending a lot of time in Brussels as the next Secretary General – telling Times Radio it would be a “great job. The only serious hold out against his appointment being France who don’t like him and want a French speaking EU Francophile instead. They will presumably have to be “thrown a bone”, e.g. maybe it’s indeed time that the post of Deputy Supreme Allied Command, Europe (DSACEUR) be opened up to non-British Generals. Lets hope that that Wallace successfully gets the IR update and a big increase in Defence spending over… Read more »

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
1 year ago

There is a reason DSACEUR has been a British general since NATOs inception. It’s because Britain is the linchpin that helps hold NATO together. France historically hasn’t been a reliable military partner. A French DSACEUR won’t act to unify the alliance, it will all just end up about France, for France and what can France get out of it.

Marked
Marked
1 year ago

Ben Wallace quoted on the BBC news page earlier saying we need to take defence seriously and need more investment.

Now the story has gone only minutes later. Rishi no doubt wetting himself at the thought of anybody supporting calls for more spending on his hated defence. Quick call to his BBC propaganda agency and the stories now buried.

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker
1 year ago
Reply to  Marked

There is the link if anyone wants a read.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-64648159

Marked
Marked
1 year ago
Reply to  Monkey spanker

Found it, shuffled quickly off to the politics sub page instead of the main page.

In a government of cretins Wallace seems to be a rare example of someone speaking cold hard truths.

Sean
Sean
1 year ago
Reply to  Marked

Think you should take the tin-foil hat-off if you think that is remotely plausible. Calling the BBC a “propaganda agency” suggests you’ve been wearing that hat too long. I dislike the BBC over its right to a poll-tax style tax, it’s anti-Brexit bias, etc, but to call it a propaganda agency is laughably deranged.

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker
1 year ago
Reply to  Sean

When I see things like how other countries tv services operates with adverts every 5 mins I’m kind of glad for the bbc.
BBC radio is also another staple for millions everyday.
With the developments in streaming etc in the last few years media has changed.
As with any big organisation it has its faults. Most people’s issue seems to be with the news dept.
The fact people moan about it shows it still puts out news people listen to.

Paul.P
Paul.P
1 year ago

Sounds like this meeting was a turning point. Putin’s ordered spring Russian advances will be beaten back with significant losses. Ukraine is in process of receiving ovef 250 Bradleys/Strykers/Marders and about 150 tanks ( CR2/Leo2/PT91). The UK has sent a lot more NLAWs. The US has sent a lot more Javelin. These should be enough to enable Ukraine to defend the ground they hold and punch significant breaches in Russian defences. I read ‘accelerated support’ to mean the decision to supply large numbers of western tanks and F-16’s with the maintenance training and logistics has been taken, and these will… Read more »

Matt
Matt
1 year ago

Interesting little piece on submarines for Australia.

Seems to suggest an evolved Astute with some Usonian stuff inside.

https://www.aumanufacturing.com.au/bae-systems-could-be-in-the-box-seat-to-build-australian-n-subs

Quentin D63
Quentin D63
1 year ago
Reply to  Matt

Good to see the UK potentially expanding its submarine manufacturing base and getting a share of the Australian sub deal. Hope that this can lead into SSNR coming on line sooner for the RN and maybe build up the sub fleet to 8-10.

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
1 year ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

I’d love the RN SSN fleet to get back upto 10+ units. Moving too simultaneous construction of an Aussie Astute alongside Dreadnought programme would be a good start to build capacity.

Quentin D63
Quentin D63
1 year ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

Mr Bell, let’s 🍷🍷to that! Hope you like red!

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
1 year ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

👍Cheers! 🍾

Quentin D63
Quentin D63
1 year ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

Better save the 🍾🍾🍾 for all those extra subs we want!

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
1 year ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

😂

dan
dan
1 year ago

Stupid Western leaders led by senile old Joe isn’t giving Ukraine the weapons it really needs to defeat the orcs. They’re holding back on the weapons that will really turn the tide. Until that happens it will continue to be a stalemate and go on for years. I guess we shouldn’t be surprised since Biden was part of the Obama gang that gave Putin a pass when he first invaded Ukraine in 2014 and then said a month before Putin invaded that he was “Ok with a limited invasion of Ukraine.” lol

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
1 year ago
Reply to  dan

Really difficult balancing act playing out on the battlefields of Ukraine.
The west needs to keep Ukraine alive and in the fight whilst not getting embroiled in a war with Russia directly.
Ukraine’s fight for democracy is our fight for democracy.
Ever Russian tank, APC, helicopter, jet or ship destroyed in the Ukraine war is one NATO units won’t have to fight should Putin be reckless enough to provoke NATO into a direct conflict.

farouk
farouk
1 year ago

So this morning the BBC news questioned Ben Wallace regards Germany asking NATO for them to remain in charge of the NATO Rapid reaction force as the British military isnt fit for purpose.

Here is his reply

Last edited 1 year ago by farouk
Adrian
Adrian
1 year ago
Reply to  farouk

And this is Germany, pot calling the kettle black if they did. German Tornadoes anyone? Least UK equipment works when asked, UK may not have much of it though

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
1 year ago
Reply to  Adrian

Article from RUSNI indicating Germany has the war material and ammunition for only 2-3 days combat.
That’s bad.

Sean
Sean
1 year ago
Reply to  farouk

At last, someone accurately describing the unsubstantiated rumours that journalists love to throw around.

Ben is a non-nonsense guy, and has played a blinder during the Ukraine War. He’d be perfect as NATO Secretary General, hope he gets it.

Jacko
Jacko
1 year ago
Reply to  farouk

😂can a minister actually get away with “bollocks” on tv?😂

Last edited 1 year ago by Jacko
Gunbuster
Gunbuster
1 year ago
Reply to  Jacko

Johnny Mercer gets away with far worse and as for his missus …She is a Twitter legend and takes no prisoners.

Quentin D63
Quentin D63
1 year ago
Reply to  Jacko

Yes he can! Loved it! Well said Mr Wallace. Best of British 🇬🇧 “bollocks”! 😂

Airborne
Airborne
1 year ago
Reply to  farouk

Brilliant! Did he actually say that! 😂👍

Quentin D63
Quentin D63
1 year ago
Reply to  Airborne

He did! 😁

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
1 year ago
Reply to  farouk

Take that! The only man in this pathetic excuse for a government.

David Owen
David Owen
1 year ago

If a certain lady was still alive and in politics, God help you putin you would be up shit creek THE IRON LADY ,she would have given the Ukrainian people the weapons ie planes etc but alas she is gone thank almighty god and Mr angry putin gone to hell soon

ABCRodney
ABCRodney
1 year ago

Blimey reading some of the comments about differences of opinion is hard going. OK so 2 folks do not agree with the majority and get slated for their opinions, I say that is a good thing and we should actually celebrate the fact we can disagree. In Russia a young Lass got 10 years house arrest for arguing against the war online. A woman got anaethetised in public for daring to tell a Russian Admiral that the Bearing sea wasn’t 500m deep so could someone rescue her husband from the Kursk. My local Navy veterans put up a monument to… Read more »

Esteban
Esteban
1 year ago

The UK has nothing more to send. It is horrifically under strength at the moment and there is no ammunition reserve. And no one in the government seems to really be interested in increasing any sort of defense spending so there is that.

Airborne
Airborne
1 year ago
Reply to  Esteban

Ah US fanboy still giving it big licks! Green card and Brit squaddie socks in your laundry, the two issues which make you froth and get soooooo 👜

Esteban
Esteban
1 year ago
Reply to  Airborne

Were you always a complete tool or is that some sort of special British training you get in the army. Any sort of independent thought in your brain at all or just mush?

Airborne
Airborne
1 year ago
Reply to  Esteban

And tonight’s winner of crybaby 👜 goes to US fanboy Esteban! Well done, without fail you are top throbber, congratulations lad!

Airborne
Airborne
1 year ago
Reply to  Esteban

Analysing your use of language, to keep this brief (mainly for you) you try to use a casual American dialect, to give the impression of being from the US (albeit claiming to be from the UK when desperate to justify a chuff post) but you also use UK common slang terminology, which does not match your efforts at location status. Therefore every time you post you make mistakes and confirm your status as a sad troll. Job done, keep trying to troll, my little saddo and if you are lucky, fly over here to the UK, you may get leave… Read more »

Gunbuster
Gunbuster
1 year ago
Reply to  Esteban

You need to expound on that statement. The Army still has a lot of kit it can send but does it need to send all of it? CH2, Warrior, Mastiff, Bulldog, trucks, engineering kit, explosives …Still plenty of those knocking around. You can add to that the training, infantry clothing, body armour and kit being supplied to troops undertaking training at the hands of UK Army mentors. The RN not so much as Maritime is not really a thing yet…But 2 x MCMVs are being trained up and no doubt the RM will have some input to riverene forces and… Read more »

Graham Moore
Graham Moore
1 year ago
Reply to  Esteban

We have sent barely 5% of the CR2s on the active list.

Jacko
Jacko
1 year ago
Reply to  Esteban

And you know that how? Got access to all the lists of stores in your comics have you? Which country are you from again?

Ian M
Ian M
1 year ago
Reply to  Esteban

Still a dick head

Esteban
Esteban
1 year ago
Reply to  Ian M

So has the UK actually expanded its defense budget since there’s a goddamn European land war going on…? No. The UK is good at press releases. Artillery production been ramped up how about ammunition? Get your head out of your asses and look what’s really going on in the real world. This s*** is so tiresome but we still stick to the fanboy site here and can’t see anything from outside our rose-colored glasses.

Airborne
Airborne
1 year ago
Reply to  Esteban

Ah US fanboy whining again! Take it no green card yet, hence your sad anger! It’s ok, you can still work illegally at the chicken shop! Just don’t ever get home early when the Brit squaddies are on tour. Good lad.

Graham
Graham
1 year ago
Reply to  Esteban

We will send more equipment, of that I am sure. As our forces have downsized there is still a fair bit of kit sitting in the sheds.

Watcherzero
Watcherzero
1 year ago

Australia completed its Defence Review on Tuesday with the completed document being publicly handed over. Its remaining classified until the announcement is made on the submarine strategy which is expected mid to late March in a visit to the US along with Sunak (with the sub review itself completing as soon as next week). After the sub announcement they will then publish a redacted version of the defence review for public consumption. Not much is known about the contents of the Australian defence review but its expected to recommend a switch to an offensive strike posture with more long range… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by Watcherzero
Quentin D63
Quentin D63
1 year ago
Reply to  Watcherzero

Let’s hope the UK gets the Australian gig for 2 while subs and maybe can add to the RN fleet by bringing forward the SSNR or Astute v2.0. God, let’s get greedy, with the 6 ASW Corvette and 3 AAW Destroyers, maybe good for T31 and AAW T26 respectively?

Quentin D63
Quentin D63
1 year ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

*whole

Graham Moore
Graham Moore
1 year ago
Reply to  Watcherzero

Abrams was a strange purchase for Oz – apparently there was a kickback involved.

Jacko
Jacko
1 year ago
Reply to  Watcherzero

Well if an invasion force gets as far as your coastline it’s a tad late to do much about it😳

Watcherzero
Watcherzero
1 year ago
Reply to  Jacko

I love a quote from Australian media. “The earlier defence reviews this century in 2003 and 2016 anticipated that Australia would have 10 years to prepare for an attack by a belligerent nation in the Pacific, the 2020 defence review warned that assumption was unsustainable and Australia may be called on to fight at shorter notice requiring thought now be given to preparing critical supplies such as specialised munitions, logistic capacity and fuel, though it didnt indicate timescales or offer solutions. The current defence review is expected to conclude that 10 year window is now dead and Australia might at… Read more »

Graham
Graham
1 year ago
Reply to  Watcherzero

We had exactly the same 10 year rule operating post WW1, until 1934.

Watcherzero
Watcherzero
1 year ago
Reply to  Graham

Indeed but for Australia this is now 1940.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
1 year ago

Totally OT. Just had a British Gas repairman round. He was obviously Nepalese….And had some thing about him.

So I asked, and he was, ex Gurkhas.

I’m honoured to have had one of those men who have served the British Army for so long in my home.

And I made sure he knew this, and of the esteem so many Brits hold them.

Respect.

Quentin D63
Quentin D63
1 year ago

Hi Daniele, can relate to that. I remember dad, who was a Captain in the 10th Gurkha rifles during the war fur the last five years saying how much admiration he had for them. Not just their fighting prowess, loyalty to officers and fellow soldiers but that they also saved his life coming out of the Burmese Jungles. Simply put he wouldn’t have been around if not for them and I and my brothers wouldn’t exist. Even here in mum’s aged care in Sydney we have a lot of Nepalese as well as Indian, Filipina, Tibetan nurses. They are so… Read more »

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
1 year ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

I know mate.

Airborne
Airborne
1 year ago

Mate the Gurkha lads still think it’s an honour to serve in the British Army! Yes it’s a way out of poverty in Nepal, yes it can be seen as a hard and harsh way of recruiting, but the 200 or so lads required per year are dwindled down from the 4-5000 who show up every year to the Gurkha recruitment team in Nepal. The team in Nepal are so bloody professional and fair, it’s an example to all of us how I operate! The young Gurkha lads in training are so obviously proud to be there it shines through… Read more »

Ron
Ron
1 year ago

Possibly there are a few things NATO and the UN could do to help the Ukraine and cause some real headaches for Russia. Both of the things I am thinking about could be seen as risky but possibly not as risky as sending modern NATO aircraft to the Ukraine. As much as I would like to see NATO aircraft in the hands of the Ukraine its just not possible for some time. I suppose we could form a Flying Tigers Unit call it the self defence acrobatic team. Russia uses rifles for hire, so why not. The first would be… Read more »

Steve R
Steve R
1 year ago

Russia’s invasion makes my blood boil! The impact on poor civilians turns my stomach. I interviewed a Ukrainian woman yesterday for a job where I work and she ended up in tears halfway through.

Makes me angry as well that even though we’ve given a lot to Ukraine, we have little more to give.

If we hadn’t have retired the Tornado GR4s six years early they’d still be operational now and we could donate them to Ukraine, and done so 6-8 months ago. Ukrainian pilots in Tornado GR4s could be lobbing Storm Shadows at the Kerch Bridge right now!

Quentin D63
Quentin D63
1 year ago
Reply to  Steve R

Steve, hopefully soon the Russian leadership and forces will will get their day of reckoning. Mayn’t be a knock out blow, just a push and shove back to their side of the fence after sinking more of their fleet and blowing up that Kerch Bridge!

Graham Moore
Graham Moore
1 year ago
Reply to  Steve R

The GR4s were in service 2003 – 2019, a pretty good innings? Were they really meant to soldier on until 2025?
Treasury doesn’t like the RAF having three types of fast combat jets. Main reason the Harrier was dropped over a decade ago.

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
1 year ago

Possible good news? General Dynamics expects Ajax payments to resume soon17 FEBRUARY 2023 General Dynamics believes it has resolved noise and vibration problems with its Ajax armoured fighting vehicle and that the UK Ministry of Defence (MoD) will resume making payments for the programme by the end of March, according to officials at the US-based defence contractor. “We anticipate, given the maturity of the vehicle and where it is in its test programme, that payments will begin to flow again,” General Dynamics chairman and CEO Phebe Novakovic told the Cowen 44th Annual Aerospace/Defense & Industrials Conference on 15 February near… Read more »