In his Lord Trenchard Memorial Lecture delivered at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) on Remembrance Day, Air Chief Marshal (ACM) Sir Rich Knighton, Chief of the Air Staff, highlighted the Royal Air Force’s evolving strategy to counter emerging threats.

His speech focused on the need for advanced capabilities, including the Global Combat Air Programme (GCAP) and Autonomous Collaborative Platforms (ACPs), as essential components for the RAF’s future air dominance.

“As the RAF continues to evolve, we must build an air force that can fly, fight, and win today, tomorrow, and together,” said ACM Knighton. He outlined the importance of GCAP and ACPs in ensuring the RAF’s ability to respond to increasingly complex global threats, particularly from adversaries such as Russia and China.

BAE provide update on new fighter jet demonstrator aircraft

GCAP, Knighton explained, is designed to complement existing assets like the F-35 and Typhoon, while ACPs—also known as Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCAs)—will play a crucial role in enhancing the lethality and survivability of crewed platforms.

“GCAP is very deliberately being designed to complement and enhance the capabilities of F-35, not replace it,” he stated, underscoring the programme’s importance in modernising the UK’s combat air capabilities.

ACMs also emphasised the need for speed in adapting to new technological advancements in the air domain, stating that the RAF must not only keep up with but also lead in developing new air combat systems. “We need to be able to adapt and innovate at pace. The ACPs will be a critical part of an effective combat air system,” he said, acknowledging that nations like the US, Australia, and France are already making significant investments in these capabilities.

The introduction of ACPs marks a significant shift towards unmanned systems designed to work in collaboration with manned aircraft. These systems are expected to deliver the combat mass necessary for effective air combat in an era of highly capable, long-range threats. “Our ability to integrate ACPs with manned aircraft will provide the most cost-effective way of delivering the combat mass we will need to win against an ever-improving enemy,” ACM Knighton added.

RAF squadron to finally get autonomous combat drones

In his address, Knighton also reiterated the RAF’s commitment to maintaining air superiority, which he described as “vital” to NATO’s operational strategy. This focus on air dominance is critical to countering adversary advances, as recent developments in stealth technologies and long-range air-to-air missiles have made controlling the skies more challenging.

“Air superiority…has been a vital aspect of conflict since 1945. With it, anything is possible; without it, everything is dangerous,” Knighton quoted General David Petraeus, reinforcing the centrality of air control to modern warfare.

In closing, ACM Knighton made it clear that the RAF’s strategy for the coming decades hinges on timely adaptation, strategic investments in both GCAP and ACPs, and the continued development of air and missile defence systems. As global security dynamics continue to evolve, the RAF’s ability to innovate and stay ahead of emerging threats will be key to ensuring the UK’s defence capabilities remain robust and agile.

“Deterrence matters now more than ever. The RAF will remain at the forefront of ensuring our nation’s security through decisive air power,” Knighton concluded.


At the UK Defence Journal, we aim to deliver accurate and timely news on defence matters. We rely on the support of readers like you to maintain our independence and high-quality journalism. Please consider making a one-off donation to help us continue our work. Click here to donate. Thank you for your support!

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
39 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Steve
Steve
1 day ago

You know when a SDSR is coming when all these types of speeches come out, which are along the lines of my service needs the money not the others.

Joe Mitchell
Joe Mitchell
23 hours ago
Reply to  Steve

Agreed. The problem is every service needs the money due to the chronic under investment over the past decades.

Steve
Steve
23 hours ago
Reply to  Joe Mitchell

They do but with a limited budget and for sure continual budget constraints, it’s frustrating that we still consider procurement from an individual services perspective rather than a whole of what would be needed for a war.

Patrick
Patrick
23 hours ago

Stalmer and Reeves have no choice now but to get to 2.5% ASAP. 17 Billion is less than 9% of the NHS budget.

Darryl2164
Darryl2164
23 hours ago

I do wonder wether we should concentrate on building up naval power and keeping the army and raf for home defence . Just a thought

Math
Math
22 hours ago
Reply to  Darryl2164

In France, we are in the same spot. Nuclear deterrence is priority number one. Combat drone and collaborative tactics with them is priority number two. That’s why we invest a lot on Rafale F5 and the combat drones. Then will come the SCAF. But UK has an interesting partnership approach. We cannot fully go this way since national deterrence is at stake with air vector being part of it. Though you will ultimately have a more diverse fleet of plateforme with complementing performances. It is interesting as well. Note that we will, with the common missile and A321 XLR regain… Read more »

Spyinthesky
Spyinthesky
19 hours ago
Reply to  Math

Can you expand on the A321 XLR in military role it’s not something I am familiar with.

julian
julian
17 hours ago
Reply to  Spyinthesky

had a look its the airbus MPA option. Presumably could be re-purposed as a stormshadow truck too

Math
Math
1 minute ago
Reply to  Spyinthesky

The first objective is to replace the Atlantic 2 fleet. So maritime patrol, sono boy, torpedoes and Dam are to be integrated. The introduction of FMAN/FMC is also part of it. So naval shipping strikes are also scheduled. The 3rd role is bombing with guided precision bombs, since Atlantic did carry such missions in Africa in uncontested airspace. Given the capabilities (range, speed) of FMAN / FMC and the volume one can put aboard a A321, I can easily imagine large fleet attacks being carried out by this mean, since anyway Rafale will be too few, with limited range and… Read more »

Spyinthesky
Spyinthesky
19 hours ago
Reply to  Math

Can you expand on the A321 XLR in military role it’s not something I am familiar with. Is it a missile truck?

Levi Goldsteinberg
Levi Goldsteinberg
17 hours ago
Reply to  Math

Then will come the SCAF”

Oh I doubt it

Jon
Jon
13 hours ago

I think it will.

Can you imagine the level of public pressure in France by the late 2040s, when Germany has 5th gen fighters and Britain and Italy have both 5th and 6th gen if France was still trying to stick yet another marketing plus sign after the 60 year old 4th gen (+++) Rafales? Dassault will absolutely produce something and France will absolutely buy them. Time will tell about Germany and Spain.

Last edited 13 hours ago by Jon
AlexS
AlexS
9 hours ago

There is no way that France will let Dassault die. If the drones get much better than crewed aircraft i think it is possible to bypass SCAF but Dassault will be the drone builder.

Spyinthesky
Spyinthesky
19 hours ago
Reply to  Darryl2164

A navy without air cover, what could possibly go wrong. Certainly not a scenario that has worked well since mid war. I wouldn’t want to test the theory that philosophy has fundamentally changed anytime soon.

rmj
rmj
19 hours ago
Reply to  Spyinthesky

Agree – control the air control the battlefield

Darryl2164
Darryl2164
18 hours ago
Reply to  Spyinthesky

The navy would have air cover , we have 2 carriers and as part of an expanded navy they should have full airwings on board both carriers , along with a proper escort fleet providing air defence .

Mark Franks
Mark Franks
22 hours ago

Don’t expect anything Gucci, it’ll be off the shelf from radio shack at an inflated price.

maurice10
maurice10
22 hours ago

There is also another reason for the service brass making these speeches: one is the Defence Review and the other a post-US NATO. If as feared Trump does reduce the US-NATO footprint in Europe in preference to concentrating on InoChina then the Treasury is going to have to spend considerably more on UK defence. The current fiscal measures introduced by the Labour Government will need to be revisited with even more unpopular tax measures piled on top of the last budget.

AlexS
AlexS
21 hours ago
Reply to  maurice10

Haha, UK was destroying the economy already under the conservatives that conserve nothing with huge tax levels, Labour as expected just kicked it even more to the precipice.

Michael Hannah
Michael Hannah
20 hours ago
Reply to  AlexS

Utter rubbish!!!

Spyinthesky
Spyinthesky
19 hours ago
Reply to  AlexS

Was that a manic laugh. 😱

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF
16 hours ago
Reply to  maurice10

Believe you have read the real leaves correctly. 🎂

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF
16 hours ago
Reply to  FormerUSAF

Sorry, wrong emoji. 👍

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF
16 hours ago
Reply to  FormerUSAF

Son of a bitch, autocorrect changed tea to real, even after designation.

Yousef
Yousef
22 hours ago

If the government is willing ( quite frankly they have no choice) to funded it like every other service then things might go well

Yousef
Yousef
22 hours ago
Reply to  Yousef

And also we spend the money well

john
john
20 hours ago

I get the feeling the government need a nasty shock. An act of serious aggression towards the UK/Nato. It really is all “jaw jaw”.

Spyinthesky
Spyinthesky
19 hours ago
Reply to  john

Well once Trump has sorted out Ukraine so Musk can load them up with Starlink for a nice profit I’m sure Russia will provide your wish or maybe they will just pay one of their lackeys todo it for them and dare us to respond. It’s pretty much a light version of what they had planned had they really taken UK and Moldova in a few days. Probably less capable now but angrier and potentially a US conveniently looking the other way will be a hopeful bonus for them when they do… as long as they leave Trump’s golf courses… Read more »

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF
20 hours ago

Hmmm…NGAD paused for a requirements review. UK slated for a SDR in CY25, and GCAP will develop a demonstrator by CY27. Wonder whether there will be language in SDR text re additional future partners w/in GCAP? 🤔😉

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
19 hours ago
Reply to  FormerUSAF

I’m not sure we’d want Uncle Sugar involved.

USA would simply take over, by berating everyone into submission with their cheque book, and as it isn’t AUKUS: ITAR would apply so killing exports and everything else!

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF
9 hours ago

Ahh, perhaps ye have not yet comprehendedith the role of the sovereign, doling out alms to whomsoever chosen, even obstreperous colonists. Or mayhaps a review of the colloquially stated version of the Golden Rule would be in order: Those who holdith the gold, makeith the rules (aka, one functioning demonstrator trumps any number of ongoing requirements reviews). 🤔😉

ITAR revisions/exemptions for both UK and OZ are either in process or already completed. If iTAR exemptions are confined to the AUKUS domain, rhe Son of GCAP/NGAD programme magically transforms into an AUKUS Pillar Ii initiative.

Sailorboy
Sailorboy
7 hours ago
Reply to  FormerUSAF

Australian GCAP might well be a thing given that the Ozzies are buying our submarines and also potentially Japanese frigates already.
I doubt that is in the near future, however, they have already gone in for F35.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
20 hours ago

I’m also reading today of a suggestion Trump might “veto” the deal to hand Diego Garcia over to Mauritius.
Good. I thought it to be a bad idea to start with.

Pete ( the original from years ago)
Pete ( the original from years ago)
10 hours ago

ICJ ruled UK occupation illegal. Presumably UK are champions of international rule of law. Mauritius is politically a good option. Closest land to the chain is actually Somalia. …not sure we want them staking a claim. Trump, the great negotiator, can negotiate his own 500 year lease to kick in at the end of the 99 years

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
7 hours ago

I don’t agree regards Mauritius, with their links to China. No thank you.
I also have in mind the marine protected zone that will no doubt be stripped the moment Mauritius take over.
International rule of law? Like when we attacked Iraq? When it suits, when it suits.
Lets see.

Pete ( the original from years ago)
Pete ( the original from years ago)
6 hours ago

There is no legitimate reason to be there. Blair and Bush should have been prosecuted for GW2….or at least sued for damages for lives lost. Regarding Mauritius..strong democracy..up to them who they elect and who they form alliances with. Better to work with them than against them and loose the international debate. Less likely to drive them to PRC.

BSKS
BSKS
12 hours ago

What advantages do manned fighters provide that are not met by long range missiles and unmanned drones? Shouldn’t we be focusing scarce development funds on the latter?

SailorBoy
SailorBoy
7 hours ago
Reply to  BSKS

The main advantage manned fighters have is that they can be useful short of a full war, for example in the air intercept and escort role. Trying to do that using a missile would ruffle some feathers, I imagine!
Fighters are also generally more flexible than drones. They can operate in a comms jamming environment without the legal and ethical issues associated with autonomous killing machines. A drone cannot “check” imagery or data with a human without revealing its position to a certain extent, whereas human pilots are trained to differentiate between civilians and targets.

ChariotRider
ChariotRider
2 hours ago
Reply to  BSKS

To replace manned fighters with drones would require high end AI equipped drones. The question is just how intelligent is artificial intelligence? It is a subject surrounded by much hype and even more smoke and mirrors, especially defence related AI. I am no expert but I have picked up a few little bits a pieces that suggest that AI is more about the artificial than the intelligence at the moment at least that is how I read it. If we think about intelligence as have two main facets to simplify things, the ability to make decisions and the ability to… Read more »