The Protector RG Mk1, a remotely piloted aircraft system, took to the skies from RAF Waddington.
According to a press release:
“The first of 16 remotely piloted Protector aircraft arrived at RAF Waddington in Lincolnshire in September and is undergoing a series of rigorous trials and tests before entering the RAF fleet. Capable of operating across the world with a minimal deployed footprint and remotely piloted from RAF Waddington, it can operate at heights up to 40,000 feet with an endurance of over 30 hours.
Protector, the largest and most advanced remotely piloted aircraft flown in UK airspace, successfully taxied and flew a series of circuits around RAF Waddington airfield, at all times under the control of a pilot through its ground-based advanced cockpit. Equipped with a suite of surveillance equipment, the Protector aircraft will bring a critical global surveillance capability for the UK, all while being remotely piloted from RAF Waddington.”
Mr. Holford, Head of Remotely Piloted Air Systems for Defence Equipment and Support, was quoted as saying:
“At DE&S one of our key drivers is strengthening operations by providing cutting-edge equipment into the hands of our Armed Forces. Seeing the first UK Protector take flight on UK soil is a key moment along that journey to our goal.”
Group Captain Rutledge, RAF Programme Director for Protector, said:
“Achieving the first flight of Protector in UK Airspace is a fitting milestone for this phase of testing, representing an outstanding team effort. We will now build on this success and look forward to the next Test & Evaluation phase as part of our preparations for the In Service Date later next year.”
Really want to see us procure the Seaspray radar for these and start using them for MPA as well. Perfect to beef up the P8 fleet. Also dead handy for stations like the Falklands.
Agreed, I think that is inevitable.
Yes, I think they market the modification package under Sea Guardian- which makes perfect sense for us. Surface search radar and E/O sensors, signal relay equipment, sonobuoy dispensers, and I believe the hardpoints will take Stingray (if we were to integrate it)
They even do a STOL wing kit for it- so we could deploy them on the carriers.
Is it coincidence that this took place at almost the same time as the Navy’s Mojave demonstration? They are similar aircraft that are designed for similar roles.
Yes, I believe they do a similar wing kit for the MQ-9B, so we could theoretically expand our fleet slightly and have a level of commonality between RN and RAF drones as well as jets.
I thintt hat makes more sense than getting the Mojave, which is based on the MQ-1 I believe
Good news, these are essential for the RAF to replace not only the 10 MQ9 Reapers but also18 recon aircraft scrapped in the last 2 years, Sentinel, Defender and Islander.
The RAF wanted 22 Protectors to equip 3 squadrons, they got 16 to equip 2. Overall, +16 -28 = net loss of 12 aircraft. Wearily familiar.
Ref Protectors for the navy, does the RN have the budget to cover it? They are not cheap, something like £40m a pop IIRC. At the last count, 75% of the mega black hole in the service’s equipment budget was down to the RN, which is busily buying loads more kit in the form of frigates, MROS, Sea Ceptor etc.
Just asking before the Public Accounts Committee do…
The Protector project is currently estimated to cost over £1.75bn for 16, so once you get all the bits and bobs to go with them, training, maintenance, spare parts, operational costs, etc, £40m is just a starter. I’d hope that with the RAF already having some the project costs sorted, the navy could piggy back and bring them in for less, but these are definitely not a cheap option.
There’s a bit of debate going on in the US about whether or not they are worth it. They are large, non-stealthy and don’t carry anything in the way of self protection, yet they cost too much to be classed as attritable. With 3 US Reapers being lost to the Russians and the Houthi in the last 18 months, some question the cost effectiveness of these heavy MALE drones.
One of the GA comms bigwigs pointed out that nothing else can do what they do and suggested they needed to carry air to air missiles and early warning radar. GA ASI President said you could complain or do something about it. With limited payload when carrier launched, I wonder if active protection is the right solution for the Royal Navy, if losses should just be taken on the chin, or if they should simply not be committed in highly contested space.