A major new storage facility capable of housing over 900 Army vehicles has been completed at MOD Ashchurch as part of the Vehicle Storage and Support Programme (VSSP), according to a press release from the Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO) and Defence Equipment and Support (DE&S).
The facility, which includes advanced Controlled Humidity Environment (CHE) storage, is the largest of its kind on-site, spanning approximately 25,300m²—equivalent to around five football pitches. The new building was officially opened on 3 March, marking a significant milestone in the Army’s largest ongoing infrastructure programme.
According to the Ministry of Defence, VSSP is designed to enhance the Army’s operational readiness by providing modern, sustainable storage and maintenance solutions. The CHE storage system aims to reduce vehicle maintenance costs by preventing unnecessary wear and tear caused by fluctuating temperatures.
Belinda Lunn, Senior Responsible Owner of VSSP, described the handover of the facility as a major achievement for the programme. She said in a news release:
“The handover of this new CHE storage building is a fantastic milestone in our programme to deliver this exceptional facility for the Field Army. This is the fifth building to be completed under VSSP in the past year and represents a step change in the capability of the site. We look forward to further progress over coming months as we continue our collaboration with DIO and industry partners, to improve working infrastructure for personnel at MOD Ashchurch.”
The VSSP project is being delivered by DIO, with Skanska handling construction and Mace overseeing project management. In total, the programme will see the construction of 13 new buildings while 58 older structures are demolished, alongside a renewal of site-wide infrastructure. The new facilities have been built to the latest sustainability standards, with provisions for solar energy generation in line with the Army’s contribution to government net-zero targets.
Warren Webster, DIO MPP Programme Director – Army, highlighted the collaborative effort behind the project’s success, stating:
“It is always gratifying to celebrate a significant milestone for a complex construction project. The excellent progress we’ve made at VSSP has been achieved thanks to the collaborative effort of DIO, Army, Skanska and Mace project teams, and their supply chain. We are proud to be delivering modern, sustainable infrastructure that will meet the enduring requirements of the Army’s fleet and benefit military personnel.”
Skanska’s Executive Vice President, Terry Muckian, noted the challenges of working within an active military site but emphasised the project’s success in maintaining operational continuity. He said:
“Working within a live military environment presents unique challenges, but through close collaboration with site personnel, we were able to maintain their operations while continuing to deliver this significant infrastructure project on schedule. Our partnership with DIO, Mace, and our supply chain was instrumental in achieving these results. Additionally, through meticulous design and construction efforts, we have ensured that the vehicle storage building not only meets but surpasses the required air tightness specifications, enhancing its durability and operational efficiency.”
According to Graham Seage, Director of Defence and National Security at Mace, the project reflects best practices from across the defence estate. He commented:
“The completion of this state-of-the-art storage facility is a significant step forward in ensuring the long-term resilience of the British Army’s estate and assets. The level of collaboration across all partners to reach this milestone has been first rate and, importantly, has extended to teams working across the wider defence estate, drawing on lessons and experience from around the DIO portfolio to drive efficiencies and innovations.”
MOD Ashchurch is owned by Defence Equipment & Support, with the VSSP programme set to be fully completed by 2027.
At the UK Defence Journal, we aim to deliver accurate and timely news on defence matters. We rely on the support of readers like you to maintain our independence and high-quality journalism. Please consider making a one-off donation to help us continue our work. Click here to donate. Thank you for your support!
Great that we have this facility, but Ashchurch has always struck me as an odd place to put it (proximity to the M5 aside). Surely in the Salisbury Plain area or at Marchwood would make more sense from a logistical point of view.
Make extra profit every week… This is a great part-time job for everyone… ed Best part about it is that you can work from your home and earn from 100-2000 Dollars each week .….. Start today and have your first payment at the
end of the week… 𝐖𝐰𝐰.𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐬𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐭𝟏.𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞/
Not so much when you consider the roads. I live in Wiltshire, about 45 minutes’ drive from Salisbury. The A303 is a nightmare at the best of times, easily choked up for miles. All it takes is one accident and it can cause queues for miles back. I’ve been caught up in it a few times and wished I’d taken another route.
Easy access to the M5 means easier time getting to the M4 towards London, then eastbound on the M25 to the M20 towards Folkstone, which I assume would be main intent to deploy forces across the Channel to head towards Eastern Europe.
It’s a great location. West of England, inland plus the proximity to M5 means transportation of vehicles in and out of the site is easy enough. (There are also a few good A roads nearby in case M5 isn’t an option)
We can’t have all our defence sites clustered into a few large bases as this just makes Russia’s job easier. Distribution and dispersal are highly effective means of increasing defence infrastructure resilience
Blue, the Aschurch depot was probably built in WW2, another contributor saying it was for US forces so the location decision was made a long time ago. Years back the British Army had 10 to 15 vehicle depots. During my service there were only 2 left, B vehicles at Ashchurch and A vehicles at Ludgershall. The merger of those in the 90s made little sense as Ashchurch is a tiny site.
Not sure why you think a better location would be Salisbury Plain area. The army is based all over the country, so no one location would be close to the customer.
A subject we have discussed here several times.
Others have seen the photos and film of Challenger tanks and other kit rusting away in sheds with leaking rooves, so the site was long, long overdue for investment, and had been slated for closure.
Over 7,000 vehicles, boats, and plant were once stored here.
Two points:
Has the railway branch line which once run directly into the site been reinstated? I was told the tracks had been lifted, and on GE it is inconclusive.
Utter stupidity and lack of strategic thinking if so.
Also, what are the chances if it did kick off with Russia this is one of the first places to get hit? No GBAD whatsoever, and several billions of army kit up in smoke concentrated on one, quite small site.
WFM/ JAMES seems to me just another bean counters excuse to cut numbers, with assets stored centrally with assets issued to units deploying and only a skeleton allocation to other units. I assume that remains the case?
3 RSME at Gibraltar Barracks – the Army’s Combat Engineering School – has huge bunkers full of anti-tank mines, demolition charges, small arms ammunition “5.56 x 45 Ball” etc. It’s less than two miles from the M3. No GBAD whatsoever.
BOOM!!!
Yes, at Minley, Camberley.
I could list hundreds of such locations mate. It is impossible financially to defend them all, and even in the Cold War such GBAD for each such site was not available.
But around a dozen could be seen as being critical. They fall, so does UK defence, if all eggs are placed in their baskets.
That is why the umbrella provided by CAMM-MR would be more useful as it isn’t hyperlocal RAPIER was.
Is it confirmed we are actually getting it? It was reported years back, then like everything else army no news?
We *know* it is being developed with Poland. Which is a great start!
So it comes off the fantasy weapons list and on to the real buyable weapons list.
Whether army will buy it or Gucci or buy a few then turn their noses up in favour of Gucci + is another question. In army world the grass is always greener on the next gen weapons system.
The states of the railway line is going to be tricky to find out. the branch of the main line looks like it is still there. Without going in there it is tricky
Very much so Simon.
Daniele, you and the other contributors may be interested in a book I bought about Ashchurch, entitled, ‘Keep’em Rollin,’ Keep’ em Shootin,’ and Keep’em Supplied.’ It basically covers the US General Supply Depot G-25 Ashchurch during WW2 and is an interesting insight to the working of the site.
Thank you, Maurice.
I have always assumed its use by the US determined its location.
As in, western D Day beaches being US allocated, so the US forces for Overlord were, I stand to be corrected, predominantly garrisoned in the west of England, as is the location of the site.
Pity not built years ago to house the now ruined C2 hulls, better late than never. hopefully its used so stop such expensive waste with no one ever being held to account.
There has been humidity storage at Aschurch for some time, but I believe one or two of these sheds have gone to be replaced by brand new facilities. If you go to Google Earth and use the ‘timeline,’ you can see the extent of the remodelling in recent years. Considering Ashchurch was doomed to be ‘thousands of bloody houses,’ the turn around in fortune is nothing short of a miracle. The throw away, scrap, sell, period appears to be over regarding UK military policy and daft arguments for scrapping the MBT fleet may be consigned to the bin? If anything good comes from Trump’s White House, it will be the realisation that the UK must spend more on defence in all its forms.
Maurice, yes but the CHE provided many years ago was very limited.
Hello Graham, the makeover at Ashchurch could not have happened at a more needed time in our recent history. The new facilities are world-class and should offer long-term storage without too much degradation.
Thanks Maurice, the upgrade has been a long time coming. I was shocked when I visited in 2001/2. My CR1s were in terrible storage conditions and I had to get them into top shape for Jordan.
Seems good
It is a very nice shed for sure. How many Iskanders would it take to be a tumbled down shed? Asking for a friend.
How many Islanders do you need to fire to get one on target?
Answer nobody knows as none of them have ever hit the intended target. Unless, of course, schools and hospitals are primary targets….
Islanders? The Britten-Norman kind?! 😝
Namaste 🙏,
My partner and Disabled Veteran, remembers Ashchurch Logistic Stores Depot and others, well consisting of lines of old or very old storage tin metal roof and wall sheds, some made out of concrete walls with still tin roofs too.
Either with little wooden personnel doors, plus giant sliding on rails manual open vehicle doors, or roller shuttle doors manual operated too, all with leaking roofs at the best of times, with puddles of water on the floor everywhere too.
Along with these old or very old Logistical Storage Sheds, some more than likely built in WW2 or late 1940’s, or 1950’s and the youngest in the 1960’s plus the odd one in the early 1970’s if you were lucky.
Thet were freezing cold in wither, accept for a military fuel fuel heater in a corner of these sheds, where soldiers would try and warm up, with the vehicle door wide open and the cold wind blowing in too.
Because no one wanted to open and close, these large manually opening and closing shed doors every time a military vehicle or forklift went in or out.
Then in summer these Logistic Storage Sheds, became ovens or hot houses, then you wanted the large manually opening and closing shed doors left open.
Also every time it rain, someone having to go round looking for more leaks in the roofs, with then when you found one, having to move very Valuable Military Ammunition, Components Devices, Equipment, Spare-parts, Trailers, Vehicles and even Weapon systems.
Worth tens of Thousands or Hundreds of Thousands even Millions of Taxpayers money, to somewhere dryer, if possible before they were water damaged or destroyed and written off too.
That what the MoD called Environmental Logistic Storage Sheds, in the late 1970’s, throughout the 1980’s and 1990′, even into the 21st Century, for the British Army, RAF, Royal Navy and Royal,
Ask anyone who served in the Quartermaster or in the old Rotal Ordnance Corps and Royal Transport Corps or now Royal Logistical Corps, or any Servicemen and Servicewomen who visited one of the MoD Logistic Storage Depots too.
My partner tell me he can remember, going to pickup brand new 1/2, 3/4 and 1 Ton Land Rovers, a few new Bedford 4 or 5 Tonners plus couple of new Leyland and couple of new Foden “DROP’s” wagons, plus a new Foden Recovery Wrecker too.
Only to find a shed full of WW2 or post war, or late 1940’s Leyland Mk.2A Hippos 6×4 Military 10-tons heavy trucks, in brand new appearance with very low mileage on them too, with tons of spare parts stored on heavy duty shelving, even unused engines, gearbox and whole axles too, with a few equally old AEC Matador 4×4 or 6×4 medium 5 tons trucks, again looking like new too.
These were army trucks, my partners Grandfather, Great Uncle, plus Uncle and other relatives (both male and female), who served in WW2 and in the 1950’s to the 1960’s had driven.
My partner father was Army Pay Corps or assigned to, he drove only a typewriter and army balance sheets for Officers wages, plus checked his Commanding Officer sums (arithmetic) as the CO was known to make mistakes over Officers pay and expenses from time to time!
The joke to these Leyland Hippo’s and AEC Matador army truck, still being in British Army War Reserves, which we in 2025 do not have the even a fraction of size of War Reserves we did in 1980’s Cold War period.
Was the Ordnance storesman, told my partner, if you want a Leyland Hippo or AEC Matador army trucks, in place of the brand new Bedfords, Leyland and Foden army trucks.
We the Ordnance Depot has spares for the old Hippos and Matadors army truck, to keep them going into the 2,000’s, where they did not have enough spares to keep new Bedford or new Leyland’s and new Foden’s going if war broke out tomorrow for a few months let alone a year of fighting.
The MoD has not changed much, my partners relatives and friends still serving in HMF, in fact things may have got worse, because Defence Ministers and MoD Senior Civil Servants, no little about how an army fights and keeps fighting too, it is the good and proper Logistic Chain Capabilitypies and Large Logistical Storage of ready to use and issue stores, replacement vehicles and weapons, plus fuel, ammunition, food, medical supplies, clothing, food and everything else, either the amy, navy, air force and maries all needs to fight, as well as large number of trained soldiers, sailors, airmen or airwomen and Marines (regular and reservists) as war replacements too!
So is this new Vehicle state of the art Logistic Storage Sheds, really enough, or a drop in the pond of what the British Armed Forces needs, will 2.5 percent of UK GDP on Defence Spending by 2027.
Actually be enough or should the the MoD and the Labour Government have made the 2025 to 2026 Defence Budget right now of 2.5 percentage of UK GDP, with this raising by one percent of UK GDP per year, from 2026 to 2027 (upto 3.5 GDP) Defence Budget, then in 2027 to 2028 (upto 4.5 GDP) Defence Budget, followed by 2028 to 2029 (upto 5.5 GDP) Defence Budget, then 2029 to 2030 (upto 6.5 GDP) Defence Budget, plus then stays at this level until 2034 to 2035 tax year.
While the Labour British Government, asking President Donald Trump and his Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, to agree to match UK Defence Spending, not the US Military Budget being cut by Trump and Hegseth by 8 percent (around 70 Billion US Dollars) in tax year 2025 to 2026, with more US Defence Spending Cuts throughout Trump’s Presidency too.
Trump want all Nato Member Countries, to increase their own Defence Spending or by 5 percent of their Countries GDP, or American Presidency will not honour Arctile 5 of Nato Treaty. While Trump himself is cutting US Defence Budget by 8 percent this year and again next tax year too, plus pulling US Forces out of Europe too!
That is not the moves of a Defence Friends and Allies, that the moves of a traitor now and maybe an enemy in the future too!
Trump is already it seems giving intelligence to President Dicator Putin and his Soviet Regime in Moscow, on Ukraine 🇺🇦 Defence Forces, Government and civilian population too,.
Maybe Trump’s Maga Far Right Fascist Republican US Government Administration, are giving intelligence on European Countries and other Nato Member States, plus Western International Democracies and Allies of Ukraine to Russia as well?
While cutting off US Intelligence Assistance to Ukraine 🇺🇦 totally, to get Ukraine 🇺🇦 President Volodymyr Zelenskyy hand over to Trump Ukraine 🇺🇦 Valuable Minerals, Oil and Gas Reserves plus Valuable Ukraine Wheat and Gain production, to so call repay the USA for Humanity Aid and Military Aid supplied to Ukraine, but Europeans are not blackmailing Ukraine like Trump is.
Trump is trying to make money out of the Russian President Vladimir Putin illegal war on Ukraine, while helping Putin to win in the process, plus Trump’s is hoping to get paid by both sides too, that the Art of Deal for President or Dicator Trump! Is to exhort as much as possible from Alies for yourself and while betray your Allies to their enemies too,,
All to make yourself stronger and your Allies weaker, plus helping Enemy Rogue States and their Dicatorship’s, because you want to be the new Dicatorship in the World too!
Great first post.
Regards.
Wendy, great post. Your experiences must have been many moons ago. I visited Ashchurch in 2001 or 2002 and there were no antique vehicles being held there then.
There has been humidity storage at Aschurch for some time, but I believe one or two of these sheds have gone to be replaced by brand new facilities. If you go to Google Earth and use the ‘timeline,’ you can see the extent of the remodelling in recent years. Considering Ashchurch was doomed to be ‘thousands of bloody houses,’ the turn around in fortune is nothing short of a miracle. The throw away, scrap, sell, period appears to be over regarding UK military policy and daft arguments for scrapping the MBT fleet may be consigned to the bin? If anything good comes from Trump’s White House, it will be the realisation that the UK must spend more on defence in all its forms.
Sorry for the duplication folks.
Wendy, thank you for a fascinating blog on life at Ashchurch. I love passing that place and looking out for a chance to peep into the sheds. The idea WW2 trucks were stored there in recent years is the stuff of dreams, especially AEC Matadors in pristine order, which may have ended up at the Ruddington auctions? If you have more juicy stories about Aschurch, I love to read them…..All the best.
All of that stuff was cleared ages ago.
There was WW2 stuff around in ‘82 – I saw loads in RN stores.
But all that was cleared down as establishments reduced.
I’d be amazed if any of it was still around in the 90’s.
About 15 years ago, I saw a dusty Commer Long Nose parked behind the fence at Ashchurch! I also remember passing by COD Donnington on a train (the line is now closed) as a child and gazing down at hundreds of 25-pounder guns parked in rows outside sheds, which I’m sure sparked my interest in military vehicles.
All ones eggs in one basket I would have thought , prime target to get a kalibr cruise missile through the roof, just like Brize.
A lot of eggs in one basket methinks, got to be a prime target to get a kalibr cruise missile through the roof.
Apols for double post, this new format doesn’t appear to allow you to edit or delete.
I spent over 5 years working in and out of Ashchurch on the MAN Support Vehicle programme.
Yes when I first went there, their was a Centurion BARV in one of the sheds, along with an old series 2 Landrover configured for the royal family to ride in the back of, whilst reviewing troops. There were also the old Haulamatic dumpers used by the RE. Overtime they all disappeared along with the old CETs.
They also had for a few years a number of towed Rapier units just dumped in there.
Sadly for to long, both Army top brass and the IPT’s from Abbeywood ignored the importance of the site and allowed it to deteriorate to the point that not only was the storage building rotting, but also the equipment stored within.
The saddest thing was the fact that as other have said, most sheds were in an appalling state of repair. It was expanded in WW2 as a major transit store for the US Forces. Ships came into Liverpool and other west coast ports, and then came down the old A38 on the way to the south west (Devon and Cornwall) where the US forces gathered before D-Day. You could tell the difference between the sheds as those “thrown up” during the war had complete “asbestos” sides, whilst pre-war ones had small brick sides below the asbestos.
With the closure of the Lugershall “armoured” storage depot after the end of the Cold War, (itself now a housing estate), all was transferred to Ashchurch, but sadly NO investing the site infrastructure. It was sad to walk around the hangers, seeing vehicles of all times rotting away, covered in seagull poo, and constantly exposed to the weather though leaking roofs and doors that had either fallen of or where stuck open.
I dread to think what the clearance costs for all this asbestos was.
I was the Equipment Support Manager for many A vehs in 2001 to 2002. Cent BARV was of course still in service then.
The term, ‘All eggs in one basket’ comes to mind. Take such a facility out, and what then?
But will it stop us blowing all our money on unsuitable vehicle stocks.
We are good at that, buying a load of container trucks that couldn’t take standard containers.