The Pentagon has released new test footage of the highly anticipated B-21 Raider stealth bomber in flight, offering a glimpse of the U.S. Air Force’s next-generation aircraft.

The footage was revealed during the Air and Space Force Association’s Air, Space and Cyber Conference, where military leaders and industry experts shared updates on the bomber’s progress.


According to a press release from the U.S. Air Force, the B-21 is set to replace the ageing B-1 Lancer and B-2 Spirit bombers, becoming the backbone of the Air Force’s strategic bomber fleet. The B-21 will play a critical role as the “air leg” of the nuclear triad, capable of delivering both conventional and nuclear munitions.

The programme is advancing steadily, with William Bailey, Director of the Air Force Rapid Capabilities Office, and Thomas Jones, President of Northrop Grumman Aeronautics Systems, discussing key milestones. Bailey highlighted the recent completion of a static test on a ground-based asset, which confirmed the aircraft’s structural integrity. The B-21 is now undergoing fatigue testing to assess its durability further.

Jones noted the increased pace of testing, with two flight tests being conducted each week. He stressed that the goal is to make the B-21 a reliable, “daily flyer” to meet the Air Force’s global strike requirements.

The aircraft’s adaptability and flexibility were key points of discussion, with Bailey emphasising that the B-21 has been designed to remain versatile in response to evolving global threats.

Ellsworth Air Force Base in South Dakota will be the first operational base for the B-21 Raider, followed by Whiteman AFB in Missouri and Dyess AFB in Texas. The U.S. Air Force aims to produce at least 100 B-21 bombers in the coming years as it transitions from its legacy aircraft to this new stealth platform.

General Thomas Bussiere, Commander of Air Force Global Strike Command, spoke about the bomber’s significance in maintaining the U.S. strategic advantage: “Nobody on the planet can do what we’re doing right now. Nobody on the planet can build an exquisite, technologically advanced platform like the B-21.”

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

21 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke (@guest_855510)
10 hours ago

“ right now. Nobody on the planet can build an exquisite, technologically advanced platform like the B-21.”

Isn’t that an arrogant statement?

I’m not sure that Tempest would be that far behind – it could even be in front – technologically. Why NIH mindset.

American MIC does groupthink on a grand scale with inevitable circular reinforcement of ideas.

With a small scale collaboration of equals Tempest benefits from the cross fertilisation of ideas. As well as a more recent start. As well as no attempts to recycle B1 or B2 tech into the B21.

BobA
BobA (@guest_855518)
10 hours ago

I think there is a fine line between supreme confidence and culture and arrogance. If you stay on the right side of it, it can be incredibly powerful. I’ll give you an example. My experience of the Parachute Regiment on career courses. All of them, to a man, believed that the Paras are the best conventional infantry on the planet. But what it meant, was that they felt that every day they had to live up to that. They strove to be better, in fitness, weapons drills, everything. And it showed on the courses. There were excellent soldiers in every… Read more »

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_855653)
4 hours ago
Reply to  BobA

Although I’m not sure it works so well with their surface warship fleet…I have a nasty suspicion they may have slipped over the arrogance line and right into hubris..which is not good considering that last three surface warships they designed and built have been abject failures..that they are dependent on knocking out a 40 year old destroyer design that’s been updated 3 times and trying to work up a European frigate buy but butchering a very well designed frigate.

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF (@guest_855730)
7 minutes ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Careful, do not denigrate the USN excessively, they may become a customer of UK PLC in the foreseeable future. Everyone in the US knows (or believes) the customer is always right. 😉😁

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF (@guest_855729)
12 minutes ago
Reply to  BobA

🤔🤞🤞😊

Louis G
Louis G (@guest_855533)
8 hours ago

Tempest might end up being technologically superior to the B-21, but their point was that the B-21 is unmatched right now. The B-21 is due to enter service the same year the Tempest technology demonstrator (not the Tempest itself) takes its first flight. I’d call that being ahead.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke (@guest_855536)
8 hours ago
Reply to  Louis G

Being ahead in the one horse race to have an intercontinental heavy bomber?

Solving the problems is so much easier with more space and weight carrying ability as a % of all up weight.

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF (@guest_855728)
13 minutes ago

Hopefully, USAF has a lessons learned file derived from F-35, KC-46 program(me) experience. Agree, perhaps an unguarded statement by the general. Much better to indulge in humble bragging after the program(me) is an a acknowledged success. 🤔😳😊

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_855512)
10 hours ago

Before anyone asks…no, we cannot have any!

SailorBoy
SailorBoy (@guest_855514)
10 hours ago

Flying wing Tempest variant?
Pleeeeaaassse?

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_855519)
9 hours ago
Reply to  SailorBoy

😳
As a UAV I’d have thought?
There were I believe other US flying wings flying about late 80s on that are still black and were never acknowledged.
Look up the TR3A. It was filmed in New Mexico albiet at dusk and just a glimpse.
If your interested in UK “Black” stuff, which is of course extremely limited compared to the US, Warton is said to have flown some interesting things from their SPTS, which if your interested looking on GE is at the south eastern side of the airfield.
Black world aviation is another of my interests.

DB
DB (@guest_855556)
8 hours ago

Although Farnborough was our skunk works back in 90s.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_855563)
8 hours ago
Reply to  DB

Yes. The RAE in the 80s. Then DRA, then DERA. Though the interesting stuff I understand did not take place at Farnborough, but at Boscombe and possibly Bedford.

SailorBoy
SailorBoy (@guest_855572)
7 hours ago

UAVs are so boooring
Just going in a straight line, dropping a bomb and leaving, no glamour at all.
What we need is a tempest with massive blended wings, about twice as wide, for stupidly improved range.

Quentin D63
Quentin D63 (@guest_855576)
7 hours ago
Reply to  SailorBoy

Evening SB, something like a Vulcan of old? I’d like to see a twin engined F35B – 2E….or a beefed up F35B-C maybe with the wing of the F35C…..lol 😁

SailorBoy
SailorBoy (@guest_855635)
4 hours ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

How about Tempest with the Rolls Royce liftfan shenanigans from F35?
V/STOL 6th gen… à la Hawker P.1154

Last edited 4 hours ago by SailorBoy
Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_855579)
7 hours ago
Reply to  SailorBoy

🤪 😆
If it happens in a decades time we’ll know you went far with BAES.

SailorBoy
SailorBoy (@guest_855642)
4 hours ago

I’ll be only a few years out of Uni then, so very far, very fast.
I like Quentin’s comparison with Vulcan, it isn’t too far off in role.
Add in DaveyB’s comment about nuclear FC/ASW and we complete the set.

Ron
Ron (@guest_855549)
8 hours ago

Awww, but please sir.

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF (@guest_855726)
26 minutes ago

Ah, somewhat difficult to predict the geopolitical/threat environment too far into the future. Who knows, there may be a future “Strategic Bomber Command” in the RAF’s future. A squadron or a wing of B-21(B,C or D) may seem very reassuring to a future PM. 😁

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF (@guest_855732)
32 seconds ago
Reply to  FormerUSAF

Hmmm…probably at least one too many “future” references in that post…🙄