The rising tide of abuse against journalists

In recent years, the journalism industry has witnessed an alarming increase in harassment against its members, an issue that has manifested both online and offline and reflects deeper societal issues and a disturbing shift in how the public interacts with news media.

The well-documented incident involving Sarah Smith in Scotland underscores a broader, global issue that threatens the integrity of journalism and democracy itself.

Sarah Smith, former BBC Scotland editor, recently shared her experiences of dealing with “criticism, bile, and hatred” while covering politics in Scotland. Her ordeal included insults, misogyny, and public demonisation, painting a grim picture of the hostility that journalists can face from the public and political figures.

This article is the opinion of the author and not necessarily that of the UK Defence Journal. If you would like to submit your own article on this topic or any other, please see our submission guidelines.

This abuse was so severe that it prompted calls for a “reckoning” over online harassment, highlighting the need for systemic changes to protect journalists.

Politics is personal

A significant factor contributing to the increase in journalist abuse is the intense intertwining of personal and political identities, you’ll have seen this recently with a young reporter on Sky News getting death-wishes for reporting on the new CalMac ferries. That incident is actually what made me want to write this.

Many individuals perceive criticism of their political beliefs or affiliated parties as personal attacks, which triggers defensive and aggressive responses.

This dynamic is particularly evident in politically charged environments, where journalists become targets for merely performing their roles.

In response to these concerning trends, various organisations and government bodies have stepped up efforts to protect journalists. Initiatives like the National Committee for the Safety of Journalists in the UK, which recently expanded its action plan, aim to provide more robust protections. These measures include improved support from employers, cooperation from online platforms, and enhanced police action against crimes targeting journalists.

NUJ general secretary, Michelle Stanistreet, said:

“Attacks on journalists are designed to silence and intimidate those who work to uphold the public’s right to know. NUJ members have shared horrific experiences of being attacked, abused and threatened – on and offline – simply for doing their job. It’s clear that reported incidents are the tip of the iceberg and that harassment and abuse has become normalised. This action plan, with its range of practical measures and protections, is an important step towards changing that and ensuring journalists can get on with their vital work free from harassment or intimidation.”

Furore over frigates

I have personally been a victim of this troubling trend, with individuals threatening to come to my house to confront me simply because I published information about where ships were being built—a clear demonstration of how charged and dangerous the climate has become for those in our profession.

The ongoing abuse of journalists, exemplified by the experiences of Sarah Smith and threats against many others, including myself, is a stark reminder of the challenges facing the press today.

As the cornerstone of democracy, a free and independent press is crucial for informing the public and holding the powerful accountable. However, the increasing hostility towards journalists threatens this fundamental pillar of democratic societies.

Addressing the “but” in conversations about abuse

Even when discussing measures to combat the abuse of journalists, the response from some—especially those deeply invested in their political ideologies—often reveals a troubling train of thought. Many acknowledge that abuse is unacceptable, but they then qualify their condemnation with exceptions, particularly against journalists whose reporting might not align with their views. This “Abuse is terrible, but” rhetoric is problematic as it attempts to justify targeted harassment under the guise of faulting the journalist’s perspective or work, ultimately missing the fundamental issue.

This selective condemnation not only undermines efforts to protect journalists but also perpetuates a cycle where abuse is tacitly accepted as part of the journalistic landscape. Breaking this cycle requires a commitment to unequivocally support the safety and freedom of all journalists, regardless of the content of their reporting or the reactions it may provoke. While it’s legitimate to critique journalism on its merits, it is never acceptable to cross into personal abuse or threats.

How do we stop it?

Enhanced legal protections and stricter enforcement could deter harassment, but these need to be carefully balanced with the rights to free speech. Media companies also play a crucial role and could offer more comprehensive support systems for journalists facing threats.

Public education on the vital role of journalists in a democracy might help shift cultural attitudes, reducing hostility. Additionally, collaborating with social media platforms to improve safety protocols could mitigate online abuse, though finding the right balance between protection and censorship is complex. Ultimately, these efforts might contribute to a safer environment for journalists, but there’s no one-size-fits-all solution, and progress will likely be gradual and uneven.