A Facebook page, part of many but the one we’ll look at in this example, is presenting itself as a British news outlet has published dozens of viral posts praising Nigel Farage, while platform transparency data shows the page is managed from Vietnam, has run undeclared political advertising, and systematically redirects readers to a network of click-driven websites hosting fabricated celebrity and political stories.
There is absolutely no suggestion this activity is directed by Farage or Reform UK.
The Facebook page, titled BritNews Uncut, describes itself as a “News & media website” focused on British political affairs. Since its creation in late November, it has posted a high volume of emotionally charged content, much of it favourable to Nigel Farage, often achieving substantial engagement. A review of the page’s activity, management details, advertising history, and outbound links suggests it operates as part of a broader content farming ecosystem rather than as a UK-based news organisation.
Almost all of BritNews Uncut’s viral posts include links that redirect users away from Facebook to an external website, most commonly the domain wealth.feji.io. The links are typically introduced with prompts such as “READ NOW”, a common tactic used to convert social media engagement into web traffic. Technical records show the site is hosted behind Cloudflare infrastructure, with IP addresses linked to servers in the United States.
While the hosting location appears US-based, this does not indicate ownership or editorial control. Cloudflare’s anycast architecture obscures the underlying origin server and is widely used by content farms to distribute traffic efficiently and reduce takedown risk. The content hosted on the site follows a consistent pattern. Headlines are sensationalist and often demonstrably false, frequently involving high-profile figures such as Elon Musk, Taylor Swift, Beyoncé, Oprah Winfrey, and leading sports personalities. Examples include claims that awards have been stripped, careers “destroyed overnight”, or secret scandals exposed “minutes ago”.
Many headlines are duplicated line for line, sometimes appearing twice in succession with only minor typographical variation. Articles are rarely dated accurately and often recycle identical story structures with different celebrity names inserted.
Fabricated narratives and unusual typography
The Farage-related dog kennel story exemplifies this pattern. One version posted by BritNews Uncut states: “Nigel Farage & Laure Ferrari did something no one saw coming — with just 72 hours left. The dog kennel was about to shut down. Bills unpaid. Final notice issued. Forty-seven dogs faced removal.” The article provides no verifiable details. No kennel is named, no location is provided, and no supporting sources are cited. No UK or French media organisations have reported such an event.
The text also uses unusual characters and fonts, replacing standard Latin letters with visually similar Unicode alternatives, such as “υ” for “u” or “п” for “n”. Media researchers say this technique is commonly used to evade automated moderation systems and keyword-based detection tools. By altering characters while preserving visual readability for humans, content can bypass filters designed to flag repeated misinformation, spam networks, or policy-violating text. It also allows near-identical articles to appear unique to algorithms that rely on exact string matching. The same typographical manipulation appears extensively across the wealth.feji.io site, suggesting automated generation and distribution at scale.
Facebook’s Page Transparency data shows BritNews Uncut was created on 27 November 2025. The platform lists Vietnam as the primary country location for the people managing the page, with two administrators identified there. The page lists a US address in Secaucus, New Jersey, along with a US phone number. It does not provide a UK address, company registration, editorial masthead, or named journalists. No corrections policy or editorial standards are published. While there is nothing inherently improper about offshore page management, the absence of any identifiable UK editorial presence contrasts with established British media outlets, which are subject to regulatory, legal, and professional accountability.
Paid political advertising
Facebook’s Ad Library shows that BritNews Uncut ran several advertisements between 1 and 6 December 2025. The ads were categorised under social issues, elections, or politics and targeted at large audiences, with estimated reach listed as greater than one million users. Individual ads spent less than $100, according to Facebook’s estimates. Several ads were active for only short periods before being marked “Inactive”. Multiple entries in the Ad Library carry the notice: “This ad ran without a required disclaimer.”
At least one of the ads promoted content related to Nigel Farage. Under Facebook’s rules, political advertising must include disclosures identifying who paid for the ad. Ads lacking such disclaimers may be removed or withdrawn. Facebook does not publicly state whether the ads were removed by the platform or deactivated by the page administrators.
Inflammatory language
Alongside positive and fictionalised stories, BritNews Uncut has also published posts using highly confrontational language attributed to Nigel Farage. One post was headlined: “TOTAL WAR DECLARED: FARAGE VOWS TO ‘OBLITERATE’ THE TRAITORS IN WHITEHALL — PRISON CELLS ARE WAITING!”. The text described a “death warrant for the Deep State”, threatened civil servants with prosecution, imprisonment and financial ruin, and framed political disagreement as an existential conflict.
Farage has not used this language in public statements, and it does not correspond to any stated policy position. The framing replaces policy discussion with absolutist and punitive rhetoric designed to provoke emotional reaction rather than debate, encouraging shares.
For regulators and platforms, this creates a persistent problem as rules are designed to track identifiable actors and declared campaigns. Content farms and synthetic media networks do not fit neatly into those categories. They can appear quickly, operate briefly, and disappear or rebrand just as fast. Transparency tools help expose these patterns after the fact, but they rarely prevent them. By the time a page’s origins or methods are understood, its content may already have reached large audiences. The case of BritNews Uncut illustrates how political influence no longer depends on formal organisation or official endorsement, but can emerge from loosely connected networks built to exploit attention itself.
No evidence of coordination
There is no evidence that Farage, Reform UK, or any associated organisation is involved in the operation, funding, or direction of BritNews Uncut or the websites it links to. The page does not claim any official connection, and none has been identified through available records. Reform UK and Meta were contacted for comment on the activity described in this article but did not respond by the time of publication.
















Nigel Farage & Laure Ferrari did something no one saw coming — with just 72 hours left. The dog kennel was about to shut down. Bills unpaid. Final notice issued. Forty-seven dogs faced removal.
They opened a Korean barbeque.
Oh that is so bad it’s hilarious!!!
Scammers exploiting the fact that Reform voters aren’t that bright and will fall for such rubbish.
Scammers exploiting the fact that Farage and Reform are the most popular party in the UK and see an opportunity to jump on a bandwagon which could be a very successful bandwagon in the future. Love your patronising post, do stop it, it demeans you.
I recall at times in the past when the new SDP, LibDems, and UKIP were all touted as “the most popular party in the UK”…
Reform is filled with gullible conspiracy theorists; anti-vax, climate-change deniers, Putin-apologists, etc, etc. Quite frankly I would vote and support any other party that is the strongest as defeating this Poundland copy of Trump’s MAGA movement.
You demean yourself by supporting Reform.
Calm yourself down, so you don’t vote on policies they just dislike and hate! Nice!
Yes I vote on policies.
Supporting Putin and being anti-science are two redline policies.
Seems you’re too lazy to bother researching the beliefs behind Reform and have simply fallen-far for the flag-waving nationalism.
And there you go, more childlike presumption and a tendency to go on a personal verbal attack. Once again you show your weakness and vulnerabilities.
And there you go making ad hominem attacks because you know can’t defend the specific charges I made against Reform.
The classic admission of defeat.
You are a little angry at times, you stated a number of generic charges against people who support Reform, without any evidence or research, as they maybe think differently than you, and attacked me for being “lazy”! You don’t like being challenged and you get angry at many other posters. Take a chill pill and maybe join the reserves for a challenge and something to do?
As your dementia is preventing you from focussing on the issues I raised, let’s just focus on the anti-science.
• “I don’t think what happened with Covid were vaccinations. You have to keep having them every six months.”
Nigel Farage
• Dr Aseem Malhotra, who believes the mRNA vaccine killed millions, personally invited by Farage to speak at Reform conference.
• “Net zero will make zero difference to climate change”
Richard Tice
• “There’s no evidence that man-made CO2 is going to change the climate.”
Richard Tice
Or maybe I should simplify from anti-science to anti-fact…
And there you go again, your initial comment was stating that those who support reform target that bright, you get grumpy when challenged, and I’m interested in seeing the statistics and proof of your initial statement? However your subsequent replies reek of a desperate effort at deviating from that initial comment. And yet again you use a negativity stating that I have dementia, a medical issue which affects many many people, and something not to be bandied around lightly.
Please get a grip. You are like the post police on here and if anyone disagrees with your froth, you get angry and abusive. May I suggest once more, on the reserves hobby, if you have not served you may enjoy it and release your pent up aggression.
Once again ignores the facts because you can’t defend them and instead rages in more ad hominem attacks.
Loser.
More name calling, oh dear you do seem to be very angry. Stop trying to be the post police and calm yourself down.
I notice you appear to have no rebuttal to the claims of Reform being positioned in favour of Trump’s America and in opposition of science?
Where the fuck did you and your nonsense comment come from clown? Stop trolling and using different accounts!
And he responds to your reasonable question with abuse and insults.
Typical response from Reform Party knuckle-draggers when they can’t refute the facts.
Temper, temper – someone seems a bit angry…
Oy pencil, you can’t even reply to the correct post, I noticed your reply when I was dealing with coco! Come on pal make more of an effort.
Still deflecting by resorting to name calling and ignoring the quotes and specific actions that prove Reform is anti-science.
Both of the Reform’s party’s political hero’s – Putin and Hitler – served in the military like yourself. The point? 🤷🏻♂️
Name calling? Are you mad, you are the immature poster police who is being rude and name calling! Damn this is entertaining for sure! I take it you didn’t fancy the reserves then?
Just reread your reply with a modicum of interest when replying to the other troll! So you equate UK service personnel with hitter and Putin then? Oh dear you never served…………it’s ok, never mind.
I see you didn’t deny admiring Putin and Hitler.
Or were you just too busy ranting? Maybe you should check your meds…
You are a very sad and aggressive troll. It would appear I’m living rent free in your head.
I’m sure you’re an expert potato peeler. Than you for your spud service.
So you never served, won’t join the reserves and equate UK military service with Putin and Hitler! Wow, it would appear your troll credentials are become more observable.
Any friend of Putin or Trump is no friend of mine, and should be no friend of anyone who cares about the future of the UK. The anti-UK party under Farage wraps itself up in the Union Flag and sadly it seems that’s all that is required to scam the gullible.
I don’t like the other Parties very much but Reform are much, much worse. They represent the interests of foreign parties – Russian oligarchs and American corporates – which seek to undermine us socially, economically and militarily.
If I could, I’d prosecute Farage for being in the pay of foreign interests.
Unfortunately
• the poor standard of politicians in traditional parties, and
• an irrational belief that governments are omnipotent,
means that a lot of people are blaming every discontent in their lives on politicians, and rationalising voting for Fuhrage, Trump, Le Pen, etc on the basis that they can’t possibly be any worse and might be better.
Of course the answer is, they could be much much worse, as Americans are now discovering.
I’m waiting for the Haters to turn up and post silly comments 🤔🤔🤔🤔
Doh ! 🤦♂️
😅😅😅
Is it just me or have some of the regular Haters gone quiet since the Iran troubles?
I’m not convinced at all, my take is that multiple names are used just to cause arguments in some sort of game they enjoy playing.
I enjoy that game too 😉😁
You might be one too,😱 who knows in this age of VPN anonimity ?
Personally, I just have the one name here, It’s more than enough for any site !
It’s also nice now that Spock, No Poet, Clunker and a couple of “Others” have all said exactly the same, that they will no longer respond to me 😁😁😁😁 Yeah ! happy days.
Just Centurion for me, I had another name quite a while ago, overreacted one day to a comment (in vino veritas) and was too embarassed to use it again. I enjoy learning about modern military issues and the banter.
“In Vino Veritas” “You must be Jonny Ringo, look darlin, It’s jonny Ringo”
Why jonny Ringo, you look like somebody just walked over your grave ”
Tombestone !
Is that you Ike?
Shhhhhhh! I think Doc Holliday and the Earps are here posing as the Nastys!
“I’m your Huckleberry”
I have to watch Tombestone again…that was Doc Holliday before he shot Jonny Ringo?
A bit of criminality and a side order of political warfare please….
It’s a disturbing time when foreign interference can seemingly easily influence (some/many) voters to vote for or not parties that benefit their own aims and interests. And never has the population appeared so easy to persuade.
They are busy reshaping our political landscape and we appear little more than a pawn in game between MAGA and Putin and the PRC.
Cui bono?
Hang on, I know this one,
Lead singer of U2 ?
But if a hypocritical story from UKDJ given that it contains lots of scam advertising – eg ones ‘featuring’ Martin Lewis, the MoneySaving Expert.
You don’t have an Ad Blocker ?
How quaint 😅