According to the Annual Assurance Report released by the Defence Safety Authority, the majority of overseas helicopter training exercises have been cut.

The report identifies “significant resource pressures across the Department, which are likely to lead to further changes to organisations and potentially outputs, owing to activity reductions.”

This “resource driven reduction” has seen overseas exercises for most pilots cancelled by the military’s Joint Helicopter Command (JHC):

“For example, the JHC has had the majority of overseas exercises cancelled for its non-specialist forces and those not committed to operations in Afghanistan in FY17/18.

This resource driven reduction in activity already builds on reductions on the Commando Helicopter Force in 16/17 and will effectively prevent helicopter air and ground crews from growing and in some cases establishing proficiency in operating in hot, high and desert environments.

These skills are essential to the safe operation of aircraft in these environments and take years to develop fully. If not maintained, these skills cannot be re-gained in extended Readiness timelines without a significant increase in risk (the risk is of Controlled Flight into Terrain caused by flight in a Degraded Visual Environment).”

The purpose of the report, which can be found here, is to review the effectiveness of safety management across UK defence, assessing the degree of assurance it can have of safety management and the confidence in that assessment.

The report also summarises the most significant safety risks defence currently faces, with a detailed assessment of the risks involved and discussion of the importance of assurance in understanding and managing safety risks.

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
50 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Baz
Baz
6 years ago

What a state we are in
Forget the deficit for one year and reinvigorate all our services NHS especially
Cut the aid budget as i never voted for that
How come the USA can do it even though there debt is probably more than the rest of the world combined
Im not a Corbyn lover but he seems to have the people and services (except the MOD ) and the country at heart even with his magic money tree

joe
joe
6 years ago
Reply to  Baz

Baz, the deficit IS forgotten about!

The UK government is still spending way more than it takes in & the amount it spends increases each and every year.

If the UK actually experienced “austerity”, it would be quite a novelty.

Steve
Steve
6 years ago
Reply to  joe

not to forget that the US debt as a percentage of GDP is not a lot higher than the uk and depending if you take into account public pensions lower. The public debt is much bigger problem than most people in the UK seem to realise.

BB85
BB85
6 years ago
Reply to  Steve

I’d love to know how much of the public sector deficit would be wiped out if public sector pensions where just scrapped and replaced with the same terms and conditions the rest of the country is on. Its the equivalent to 500k per public sector employee.

David Steeper
David Steeper
6 years ago
Reply to  BB85

Baz. Jeremy Corbyn has publicly stated that he does not think any military action this country has undertaken since 1945 was justified. God love him but he’s a pacifist. I would seriously doubt he would view hiking defence spend with much favour.

Nathan
Nathan
6 years ago
Reply to  Baz

The US operates the world reserve currency. This means that people holding dollars outside the US actually supports the US economy. So that money which is effectively “sold” by the US to overseas currency holders, which is hoarded for years – effectively acts like a loan to the US. But over the years those dollars are worth less and less. So when they are exchanged for goods and services they do not buy as much. These dollars eventually find their way back to the US which pays less for them than they originally received. A profit! So the US effectively… Read more »

FrankLT
FrankLT
6 years ago

This puts servicemen’s lives at risk. It is essential to train aircrews properly. I think the “Paradise papers” are only the tip of the iceberg. The money needed to fund necessary government spending has been put offshore to avoid paying the taxes that would see society(including the armed forces) funded properly. Financial crashes & austerity are just the smokescreen to cover up everything being run into the ground as the real wealth is taken out of public circulation. MPs have not only ripped us off in the expenses scandal, but failed to set the example of wage restraint whilst condemning… Read more »

Nathan
Nathan
6 years ago
Reply to  FrankLT

Absolutely, there will be hell to pay if we get tanked in an armed engagement. Unfortunately by then it will be too later and people will have lost their lives.

Bill Edmead
Bill Edmead
6 years ago

Corbyn will cut Trident etc in a heartbeat. Our nuclear capability will go under labour make no mistake. He can then build ivory towers and places of homage to marxism, stalinism and continue to look like a smug twat the whole time. Wake up people! The slippery slope? We’re on it!

joe
joe
6 years ago
Reply to  Bill Edmead

That argument will fail in time Bill.

The people won’t keep voting for a completely incompetent Tory party simply because of the threat of Corbyn.

Eventually the people just want change from incompetence and will take their chances with Jihad Jezz

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
6 years ago

I take it that “home” training is unaffected then? Which is most of the armed forces flying and continuation training.

Mike Saul
Mike Saul
6 years ago

if people think corbyn is the answer to our problems then we are indeed in a very poor state of affairs.

Richard Davies
Richard Davies
6 years ago
Reply to  Mike Saul

Corbyn and his Red Brigade will make things worse than they are now. It will be borrow,spend,borrow etc etc. They will hand the Falklands to Argentina ignoring the Islanders wishes,Gibraltar will be handed over to Spain and then Northern Ireland will be handed over to the Rep.of Ireland even though there is no support for such a deal. Then it will be back to borrow spend,borrow,spend.

David
David
6 years ago

The state of our Armed Forces makes for very depressing reading…….

andy
andy
6 years ago

the country is a mess all caused by past and present idiots in power,because they want the rich to get richer play the big i am on the world stage and increase spending money that we don,t have on foreign aid,something i detest especially when our nhs,defence,social care is in a shambolic state,if a country is hit by natural disaster then yes help out by all means but idiots are giving money away to countries in aid that have a better economy than our own..and it,s always our defence that suffers,so much for all these billions we have for new… Read more »

Geoffrey Roach
Geoffrey Roach
6 years ago
Reply to  andy

What?

Steven
Steven
6 years ago

So are we using Argentina’s armed forces as the model nowadays ?

Tim
Tim
6 years ago

Yet just last week it was announced that £90m would be spent on a new helicopter training centre supporting 70 jobs in RAF Benson.

Lets also remember that the Joint Force Command employs 30,000 people and doesn’t replace any of the three service commands that it was supposed to. I think the JHC is part of that and all they’ve done is reduce numbers and kept 8 Chinooks in storage that cost us including all the cock ups nearly £500m as “one of the most incompetent procurements of all time”.

Rover10
Rover10
6 years ago
Reply to  Tim

I believe most of the £90m is for simulators, which no doubt will substitute for actual flying, or is that me being a cynical observer?

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
6 years ago
Reply to  Tim

As I have already noted much earlier the Medium Support Helicopter facility is not “New”

Do any of you people actually know the process for training British military Pilots??

The JHC combined all helicopters bar the RN’s ASW assets and the then RAF SAR force.

The well known story of the Chinook HC3’s has nothing whatsoever to do with the current situation, or the current government. Also they are no longer in storage and have long been upgraded or “repaired” like the rest of the Chinook force.

As for incompetent procurement’s I agree.

Pacman27
Pacman27
6 years ago

Sadly the only thing I can say now is that I will stop supporting the conservatives unless they transfer the foreign aid budget to other depts. If you take in the Foreign aid budget plus the Tax incentives given to charitable donations then the Government is funding charitable work to an extreme. I think the only option now is for all tax incentives provided to charities has to come under the foreign aid budget as often it is the same charities receives tax incentives and government money. If UK charities wish to operate abroad and have government tax pay for… Read more »

Ian
Ian
6 years ago
Reply to  Pacman27

Not £10bn…

Fifteen
15
£15,000,000,000
Five aircraft carriers a year we give away in Aid

£10bn is the difference between the Aid budget pre-crash (2007) being treated to austerity the same as defence, police etc and the current Aid budget. Few people in 2007 thought we were mean re Aid.

2% & 0.7% are the two most stupid figures in modern political discourse. Neither bear any relation to need, capability or strategic importance to UK.

What pisses me off even more is the 2% isn’t real – it’s frigged but the 0.7% is internationally audited to ensure compliance.

FUBAR

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
6 years ago
Reply to  Pacman27

Agree Pacman. It is crazy.

I understand some of the benefit of “soft power” but when the finances are in their current state it is nuts.

You are all in for a surprise though if you think under Corbyn it will get better!

BB45
BB45
6 years ago

I see the Guardian did an article on Priti Patel trying to fund the Israeli some kind of aid work in the West bank. How can we divert foreign aid money to foreign militarise but not our own?

David
David
6 years ago
Reply to  BB45

Actually to clarify – the discussions she had had with the Israelis wasn’t to help fund Israeli Army military operations but the field hospitals they have put in place to help Syrian refugees who cross the border in the Golan Heights. It amazes me that the media who unfairly criticize our Israeli friends never report this act of humanitarian kindness. Israel doesn’t have to do open her doors to treat the Syrian war wounded but she still does. It’s about time the media reported that! If Israel sealed her border with Syria and flatly refused to let the wounded in,… Read more »

Ian
Ian
6 years ago
Reply to  David

Yes, its a fair observation.

Unfortunately but realistically Israeli actions are generally viewed through the single prism of an occupying power. Until there is peace it will be hard for anything else to be heard.

Steven
Steven
6 years ago
Reply to  David

Syrian refugees ? The only people i have seen get medical help from the Israelis are the Jihadists. Go to youtube if you don’t believe me.

BB85
BB85
6 years ago
Reply to  David

I completely agree, my complaint is how much FA money do we then divert into our own military when providing humanitarian aid. Every penny spent cleaning up after hurricane ………. from fuel to salaries should be pulled from the FA budget.
I also agree the guardian article is ridiculously biased it may as well have blamed Israel for the Syrian refugee crisis.

John Hampson
John Hampson
6 years ago

At some point the borrowing to support the Foreign Aid Budget has got to be seriously questioned. In addition to the £14 billion the UK gives it separately provides the EU with £1 billion for its aid budget. That is £15 billion. In other words equal to 33% of the entire Defence budget. The joke is much of the Foreign Aid budget is wasted. There are dozens of reports elsewhere that illusrate the almost criminal waste. Meanwhile egotistical politicians strut around accepting praise for committing the UK is ever bigger spending. Additionally I do not accept that placing every major… Read more »

Dan01
Dan01
6 years ago

If they stopped foreign aid then there would be no problem.

JohnStevens
JohnStevens
6 years ago

The above comment about Corbyn getting rid of the nuclear deterrent, don’t think that would happen under Labour.. even a left wing led Labour government, because a majority of Labour MP’s wish to keep the nuclear deterrent.. I do have a horrible feeling the conventional forces would suffer under a Labour government though just to add to the cut’s that have happened under the Tories.. My feeling is bad for the future of the UK currently.. I wish i could be more confident and i hope i’m wrong i really do, but what with the weak Tory government plus a… Read more »

JohnStevens
JohnStevens
6 years ago

I do apologise for my gloomy comments above .. For me it’s just reached a time now where im finding it really difficult to find some positives.. Can somebody try and find something to cheer me up !!! plz lol

David
David
6 years ago
Reply to  JohnStevens

You are not alone John; unfortunately there is precious little to be cheerful about when our Armed Forces are squeezed and squeezed relentlessly and we’re lied to by our politicians to the contrary. Yet I fear more needless and irresponsible cuts will be forthcoming making it as bleak a picture as can be… silver lining anyone???

Geoffrey Roach
Geoffrey Roach
6 years ago
Reply to  JohnStevens

Two new carriers, refurbishment for the T 45, the T 26, the T 31, more Astutes, Dreadnought and co, F 35’s, largest air force in Europe, army re equipping across the board……..Yeah, I know but you did ask!

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
6 years ago
Reply to  Geoffrey Roach

Just the tip of the Iceberg actually, as Geoff well knows. Too many are only interested in “how many” and should take a look at other countries to compare.

That in no way excuses cuts which depress me as much as anyone. But I look beyond mere numbers.

I think we are flogging a dead horse though Geoff.

Geoffrey Roach
Geoffrey Roach
6 years ago

Looks that way Daniele but we’ll no doubt take her a few more furlongs yet!!

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
6 years ago
Reply to  JohnStevens

Read my posts! I always try to look for positives.
Agree with so much of your sentiment though John.

Tim sinnett
6 years ago

I just don’t get the strength of negativity towards Us getting a Corbyn Government. Everyone seems to agree that the conservatives are weak and responsible for the criminal removal of wealth from the country to the super rich. In Corbyn you have someone who will stand up for us, our living standards and our services. He wants those that can pay to actually bloody pay their bits. That is where the extra money will come from to fund stuff, and I’m hopeful, that while defence might not be the top priority for any government we might get some improvements in… Read more »

Geoffrey Roach
Geoffrey Roach
6 years ago
Reply to  Tim sinnett

….and you won’t get any of the things you desire, Tim, under a Corbyn led government. There is no more money so he can’t spend it. Interestingly, you blame the Tories for sucking the country dry and yet the whole financial collapse happened under Gordon Brown. Before anybody decides I’m a reactionary, right winger I’ll say that I’ve voted Tory and Labour over the years and I was a union branch secretary. I consider myself very middle of the road but I have seen a semi-left Labour government and the worst of the unions in power so I certainly have… Read more »

Tim
6 years ago
Reply to  Geoffrey Roach

The financial collapse was caused by the sub prime issues in America as far as I’m aware and was not caused by Labour. Under labour life was a whole lot better for far more people. Tories answer to our financial issues is to sell off our public assets to…. tory funding businesses, hammer down on those most vulnerable in society under a faux guise of catching a small minority of benefit fraudsters, all whilst massively increasing our national debt despite the billions saved. How’s this? Because of the massive tax avoidance allowed to the wealthy few who, can you guess,… Read more »

Elliott
Elliott
6 years ago
Reply to  Tim sinnett

Unless it was conference at Camp David which even then was pointless there are NO INNOCENT handshakes with the PLO or HAMAS! Likewise South American communists. All while incessantly criticizing the US and it’s other allies particularly Israel and Poland will probably trigger the biggest backlash in America against the UK since the 19th century.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
6 years ago
Reply to  Elliott

Which is exactly what the hard left want, in the form of the inner circle of Corbyn’s henchmen. They hate the “special relationship” and the UK having any world standing whatsoever.
I doubt many hard working traditional Labour voters feel the same but they will vote Labour nonetheless.

Tim
6 years ago
Reply to  Elliott

I think you will find the handshakes with IRA and Hammas were not in agreement with their actions, but that of someone who has the desire to step in and try to mediate, broker peace and get the sides talking. Youve just read the headlines from the tory press and fallen for it. When mediating peace, try doing it by throwing critisism at them. It would be justified and im sure corbyn thought it. But that’s not going to work. You have to tread carefully and bite your tongue to get things moving. Trying to do something has got to… Read more »

KieranC
KieranC
6 years ago
Reply to  Elliott

Elliot you’re full of S**t as always. That’s about 10 times over the last few months you’ve tried to scare us into thinking that if we upset the US or its “allies” there will be a “backlash” and the US will turn on us. Let me try spell it out for you, WE DONT CARE! Just remember you’re on a British defence website, not Poland, not Israel, not the Middle East, not South America, Britain! We don’t care who it upsets if we call you out on your deplorable foreign policy, we don’t care how much money you have, how… Read more »

Elliott
Elliott
6 years ago
Reply to  KieranC

That paycheck you get from being the final Arbiter human decency must be nice. Top tax bracket even. On another note please curtail the use of profanity, it does not do for the Arbiter of human decency to use such indecent language.

Paul T
Paul T
6 years ago

TH have considered that the high employment that the cuts you support will create will mean more people relying on government benefits to survive and therefore costing just as much money. I am already on Universal Credit myself and I am a skilled worker.

trackback

[…] comes not long after we reported that, according to the Annual Assurance Report released by the Defence Safety Authority, the […]

JohnStevens
JohnStevens
6 years ago

Agree with you Daniele…

Elliott
Elliott
6 years ago

Myth. Blowing enemies of the State to atoms in the most efficient, productive, and safe manner possible is what generates arms sales. The Aid budget is used to virtue signal and any excuse is used to make people feel good.

farouk
farouk
6 years ago

The Foreign Aid budget is unsustainable. However, some of it is used to secure overseas arms sales.

Really, want to name one country where that has worked:
Pakistan the biggest recipient of British Aid buys Chinese.
India buys well anybody bar British
Other examples of British Aid:
Nigeria
Sudan
Afghanistan
Syria
China (yes China )
do not purchase British weapons
Those countries which do:
US/France/Estonia/Korea/Gulf States
do not receive British Foreign Aid.