Typhoon jets were operating around Russian warship Vice-Admiral Kulakov off the west coast of the UK this week.

HMS Tyne, HMS Richmond and HMS Kent – combined to escort a group of Russian ships as they operated in the Celtic Sea and approaches to the South West coast of the UK.

HMS Northumberland also watched the movements of Udaloy-class destroyer, the Vice-Admiral Kulakov, as she sailed North West of the Outer Hebrides, off the west coast of Scotland.

undefined

This task group were joined by RAF Typhoon and F-35s jets, plus tankers RFA Tideforce and RFA Tiderace, which kept the allied ships replenished throughout the operations and contributed to monitoring duties while in the Irish Sea.

First Sea Lord, Admiral Tony Radakin, said:

“This is why the Royal Navy is at sea every day, protecting the UK and our interests. Even with the pressures of Covid, we remain at short notice to respond to threats both in home waters and around the world. Despite the increase in Russian activity, both on the surface and underwater, we are always ready to respond.”

Commander Philip Harper, Commanding Officer of HMS Severn, said:

“In very challenging conditions with rough weather, Severn and several other British and allied ships, have spent 20 days ensuring that Russian transiting warships remain under our watchful eyes.”

George Allison
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison

29 COMMENTS

    • There will be method in the madness.

      The Bear may be underfunded and using old kit but idiots they are not.

      It might be that they have to get close and crazy because of the limitations of the kit?

      • Yes and no I would say, cutting through some of the busiest civilian flight routes in the world with transponders turned off is extremely irresponsible (and childish) at best and a potential disaster in the skies at worst….. Crazy Ivan…..

        I’m sure their old elint kit means they do have to get considerably closer to the sources though to acquire any useful intelligence.

    • DM Paveway and Brimstone Rob, against a modern well equipped warship with layered defences though, it would be absolutely suicidal…..

    • Interesting. In a crowded maritime zone against single target latest Brimstone may be up to the task. However, if the Kulakov cares to wait around for Spear 3 on an F35B, or at least come back in a couple of years, we could no doubt entertain her satisfactorily then.

    • The Typhoon could potentially carry 24 Brimstones, depending on the range to the target the aircraft needs to travel unrefueled. It would never use a Paveway unless the target was subdued, as the glide distance at height is about 7 miles. Even a toss attack would be bonkers as the aircraft would need to pop over the horizon at near supersonic speeds to transfer enough kinetic energy into the Paveway to lob it some distance. Brimstone is currently the only weapon that can be used “safely” against a moving target. If it was anchored they could use Storm Shadow.

      To attack a ship the Typhoon would approach low level, pop over the horizon ripple fire the missiles, then turn away quickly on full reheat, whilst ducking back below the horizon. Unlike Spear 3, I’m not sure if the Brimstone’s targeting programming allows it to identify specific areas on a ship to attack, like it can against a tank. However, when faced by a swarm of small supersonic missiles, a good proportion of them should reach the target through the ship’s air defences. Whether the Brimstone will do sufficient damage in the right areas to mission kill the ship is debatable. With Brimstone 2 the missile has a much larger range and has a programmable attack profile, so can be set for sea skimming low profile. It will need to use its radar to guide it to the target, as the Typhoon won’t be sticking around illuminating the ship with a laser. This means if the ship has decent electronic surveillance equipment it should detect the Brimstone’s radar, so could affect how many get through the air defences..

        • Surely the lesson learnt in the Falklands was the need for more advanced ship-launched air defences? Something we have definitely improved upon.

        • I don’t disagree with the sentiment, and I really think we should have a common ASM that can be air launched and surface launched.
          But I would be surprised if there wasn’t an SSN also hanging around in the general vicinity of a Rusian Navy surface combattant sailing the Irish Sea and probably within weapons range of BAE’s submarine construction facility at Barrow. I don’t know, but it’s also possible that HMS Richmond and/or HMS Kent were carrying Harpoon cannisters. In this situation, I doubt a Typhoon would have been needed.
          Doesn’t mean we shouldn’t have one for the times when they are, though! I remain to be convinced that Brimstone/Spear 3 are sufficient in the ASM role; I understand that modern precision weapons can potentially provide a mission kill against large surface combattants, but systems can be repaired and ships can come back to mission-ready without necessarily returning to port. Sometimes, really killing them is the best option, and I don’t think we’ll have an air-launched way to do that until F/CASW…

      • Not sure about that, the Kulakovs SAMs have a maximum altitude of 20,000 feet. Could someone let me know how high a paveway can be dropped from? If it’s above that then a Typhoon could sink her with impunity.

          • Hopefully Daveyb, my understanding is that’s it’s basically the same missile as land based SAMs the performance of which is known. Ta for the info on Paveway.

      • Interesting I’d never really thought about Storm Shadow.

        Storm shadow can be updated in flight.

        So if the ship was painted by another asset the re-targetting data can be updated dynamically.

        I agree with Captain P below that it is a bit of a worry that we still don’t have our own full suite of sea skimmers to hand.

      • 50km would be well in range of any vaguely modern missiles that the ship carries, the typhoon would be taken out well before it could launch its missiles.

        • Sorry… Typo. . Brimstone Ii is officially 60km+ from fixed wing. I assume the faster the fixed wing the greater the ‘+”‘… But your comment is well taken… And does put CAMM at 25km+ into perspective…. CAMM-ER for type 32 please

      • It makes me wonder if there are any Crated Sea Eagle Missiles Stashed Away somewhere just in case – and id bet that not all the Retired Tornados have been turned into Coke Cans yet.

        • The only Tornados that had the circuits and software to release sea eagle was the GR1b’s. You could maybe ballistic launch one, but it would have to lock-after-launch. Can’t remember if it could do that. Nice idea though. Always thought the MOD were seriously negligent in gapping the ASM capability. Strong words I know, but we are an island.

  1. Do we still have any sea eagle missiles lying around? Just wondering if we had to air strike a hostile warship anytime soon what would we use?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here