A B-2 Stealth Bomber is pictured leaning on one wing in the grass after veering off of the runway at Whiteman Air Force Base in the United States.

The B-2 “experienced an inflight malfunction during a routine training mission” at about 12:30 a.m. local time, an AFGSC spokeswoman said at the time back in September.

It was reported that the aircraft was damaged on the runway “after an emergency landing”.

According to the U.S Air Force magazine at the time:

“AFGSC issued a notice to Airmen (NOTAM) shortly after the accident to keep at least six miles away from the base. The initial notice said the airspace would be restricted through Sept. 17. The reason for the NOTAM was given as “to provide a safe environment for accident investigation.”   

The command declined to answer questions about whether Whiteman’s runway is operational or whether B-2s are continuing to operate while the crash is being investigated and the aircraft recovered. Whiteman is home to all 20 of the Air Force’s B-2 Spirit stealth bombers, although typically a handful are away from the base on deployment or detached to Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., for testing.”

George Allison
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison

31 COMMENTS

  1. The reason for the NOTAM was given as “to provide a safe environment for accident investigation.”

    The real reason of course is “don’t fly over head, take photos, and post them on social media cos’ it’s kind of embarrassing.”

    • Or it could be a tiny bit dangerous if the B2 was carrying live ordnance?

      Maybe they genuinely had to clear up a big dangerous mess?

  2. Now the digital/information ages is a thing to see. A bog standard available free to everyone service gives every human being more intelligent resources about what’s happening anywhere on the planet than could have been dreamed of by the nations fighting in WW2.

    It’s also great for looking at your house as well and comparing how big your garden is to the rest of the street……what a brilliant time to be alive.

    • But actually very interesting indeed, from a defence point of view it should make you think. Just look at how much intelligence and knowledge is available from open source information.

      • Morning Jonathan. I presume the Ruskies or Chinese would be spitting blood if such a photo of a similar incident were to be posted from their territory!! I am really surprised that Google Maps are allowed to post such information in the public domain. Gary Powers was shot down and put in prison for less! The big question is how to pitch the rules somewhere in between what say Sweden allows and at the other end, North Korea where this photo would no doubt bring public dismemberment for the Board of Google Maps if they could get their hands on them! 😁

        • Yes I agree Geoff, it all goes to the debate about tec giants and social Media not having any real appropriate control over content or any form of accountability as to what it allows to go out on its platforms.

      • Well yes! That is where most of mine comes from!

        You can lean much on GE and Street View if you know where to look.

    • Damage to a massive asset like this is relatively newsworthy. More so than a minor twitter feud like another recent article.

    • The satellites that take the photos take everything in shot.

      Most often it is what ops and functions a facility does that is secret, not the facility itself. So a photo will not reveal that much. Things are hidden inside structures or underground. The photo will reveal nothing.

      There are exceptions to this, where the facility itself is covert. In which case, unless you know it is there, a satellite photo from overhead is pointless if the site is secret anyway. As no one will be looking there.

      Sometimes the authorities are said to blur or black out certain areas. That in itself is a red rag to the bull. They also do that on Street View. Again a bad idea, moths to the candle. It highlights something is there.

      Through the Cold War and into modern times many of these places ( Uk ) did not even show on OS maps. A ridiculous situation when a photo shows them.

      • Russia and China are going to have regular satellite overflight of facilities of any note. So this was probably already known before GM published it. War Zone regularly publishes images from commercial satellites of things of interest on US bases as well as China and Russia.

        In this case adversaries will not know if the B2 is a written off or already back in service so it’s actually creating an information black hole in B2 numbers.

  3. Is it worth repairing the aircraft, or just let it become a source of spares for the other b2’s? With the B21 scheduled to have first flight this year and 5 airframes allegedly being built, with another 2 completed, an in service date of 2026/7, to me, it seems a waste of money to repair the aircraft. Just invest the money into a B21!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here