NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has called for a significant boost in defence industrial production and improved standardisation across the alliance to meet the growing security challenges posed by Russia and other global threats.

Speaking at a pre-ministerial press conference ahead of the NATO Defence Ministers meeting in Brussels, Rutte spoke to reporters of the urgency of increasing NATO’s defence capabilities and cutting costs to ensure the alliance remains prepared for future challenges.

Rutte highlighted that although progress has been made in defence production over the past two years, it is still not enough to meet NATO’s ambitious goals. “We are still not producing enough, and the costs remain too high,” Rutte told reporters. He explained that NATO needs “more forces, capabilities, and investment” to meet its defence targets and called on Allies to scale up their production capabilities while reducing costs.

Boosting Defence Industrial Capacity

Rutte stressed that boosting defence production is essential to equipping NATO with the necessary military assets, such as munitions, ships, combat vehicles, and jets. To achieve this, he urged NATO Allies to increase their defence spending and commit to long-term, firm orders that will encourage defence companies to expand production.

“There cannot be strong defence without strong defence industry,” he stated. Rutte has been actively engaging with both Allies and major defence industry players to find the best ways to ramp up production and reduce procurement costs, which remain a significant challenge for the alliance.

The Secretary General also underscored the importance of improving the interoperability of NATO forces through a new standardisation initiative. He explained that NATO would be introducing measures to improve the implementation of defence standards across the alliance, which could help reduce costs and improve cooperation between member states.

“Standards underpin our ability to fight together,” Rutte said, adding that “better implementation of standards can help reduce the costs of defence procurement.”

He acknowledged that this is not an easy task, but stressed that Allies increasingly understand the urgency of the matter.

Concerns about Russian influence in the Western Balkans

Rutte’s comments also touched on NATO’s ongoing efforts to counter Russian influence in the Western Balkans. He expressed concern over Russia’s attempts to destabilise the region through cyber and hybrid threats, particularly in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo. The Secretary General noted that Russia is exploiting internal divisions to undermine democracies in the region and create instability.

“Russia is seeking to undermine democracies in the region with cyber and hybrid threats, including disinformation, using internal vulnerabilities to sow divisions,” he warned.

Rutte reaffirmed NATO’s commitment to maintaining stability in the Balkans, particularly through the KFOR mission in Kosovo, which has helped maintain a safe environment and freedom of movement for over two decades. He also welcomed efforts by the European Union, particularly Germany, to support the Western Balkans and bring the region closer to the EU and NATO.

Strengthening NATO’s global capabilities

With the growing alignment of authoritarian actors like Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran, Rutte spoke of the need for NATO to tackle shared security challenges alongside global partners, such as the European Union and Indo-Pacific countries.

The upcoming ministerial discussions will focus on how NATO can increase cooperation on innovation, defence production, and cyber defence with its global partners to better address these interconnected threats.

Rutte’s message to Allies was clear: NATO needs to move faster and more decisively in scaling up defence production and ensuring that the alliance is ready to defend its one billion citizens against emerging threats from Russia and beyond.

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

7 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

BeaconLights2
BeaconLights2 (@guest_863518)
4 hours ago

Well it would be a good start if defence contractors invested all their new found funds in building out production lines instead of stock buyback..

Mark B
Mark B (@guest_863528)
4 hours ago
Reply to  BeaconLights2

The only reason for building production lines is there is reason to believe orders will be forthcoming. NATO seems to be suggesting “let’s order a load of kit”. Good news all round I would have said especially as Russia seems obsessed with wasting all it’s kit in Ukraine to no advantage.

Last edited 4 hours ago by Mark B
Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_863592)
10 seconds ago
Reply to  Mark B

Yes. Cautionary tale….Vickers Defence Systems built two state of the art ‘tank factories’ in Leeds and Newcastle in the 80s – and the orders for new vehicles and upgrades did not justify the expenditure. The BAES factories closed in 2004 and 2015 respectively.

Graham Moore
Graham Moore (@guest_863586)
9 minutes ago
Reply to  BeaconLights2

What ‘new found funds’?

Jim
Jim (@guest_863524)
4 hours ago

Question is what to invest in building, the entire gulf war used about 3 days worth of supply of artillery shells in Ukraine. We will end up with vast production and surpluses of basic weapons like 155mm artillery shells that will never get used.

Ex-RoyalMarine
Ex-RoyalMarine (@guest_863566)
1 hour ago
Reply to  Jim

Maybe Jim, but look at how often a reasonable-sized conflict occurs. It’s only because of nuclear weapons there hasn’t been another major global war. Once nations resign themselves that the nuclear option is forever off the table, they will end up at war more often. History tells us that.

I am not saying I am in favour of war. Only those who never fought in one will be its most ardent advocate. It is they naturally come about more than most of us would like to admit. Until humans evolve past that point, we must forever be ready.

Jim
Jim (@guest_863582)
17 minutes ago
Reply to  Ex-RoyalMarine

Yes I agree, but if we are going to invest large amounts of money it should probably be in things like cruise missiles that we will actually use rather than vast supplies of dumb ammunition that a proxy force can use.

NATO doesn’t have vast supplies of 155mm shells because that’s not how we fight wars.

If you look at production of smart munitions NATO outnumbers everyone else by several orders of magnitude.