In a Defence Committee session on 17 December 2024, senior Ministry of Defence (MOD) officials faced scrutiny over the ongoing recruitment crisis and the performance of contractor Capita.

The discussion, chaired by Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi MP, highlighted the Army’s inability to meet recruitment targets, with just 63% achieved this year—the worst performance in five years.

Addressing the issue, Dhesi criticised the figures: “It’s a dire situation. Five years ago, recruitment rates were at 95%, but they have now slumped to 63%. This is less than two-thirds of the target and is simply unacceptable.”

David Williams, MOD Permanent Secretary, acknowledged the shortcomings of the Capita contract, which manages Army recruitment. He detailed plans to replace it with a new Armed Forces recruitment programme, stating: “We are well advanced in the replacement project for that contract, the Armed Forces recruitment project, which will operate on a tri-service basis. We expect to place a contract by the spring of next year, and the new programme will have a phased introduction to allow the supplier two years to step up recruitment requirements fully.”

Williams also outlined lessons learned from Capita’s poor performance, highlighting the need for personal engagement by uniformed personnel during recruitment and the importance of reducing bureaucratic delays. “This Government has set out measures, including reviews of medical standards, to reduce the number of applicant rejections and shorten the timeline from application to training,” he said.

Lieutenant General Sir Robert Magowan, Deputy Chief of the Defence Staff for Military Capability, echoed these concerns. “Recruitment and retention are critical for our military capability. We need to recruit more and retain more across all three services,” he said, admitting that the Army’s missed targets were a serious concern. He assured MPs that new measures outlined by Williams would address the issues.

Lincoln Jopp MP queried whether the MOD’s new targets, including faster recruitment timelines, would impact the tendering process for the replacement programme. Williams clarified: “We don’t need to revisit the commercial arrangements. Many of the measures to speed up the pipeline, such as electronic sharing of medical records with candidates’ GPs, are independent of the contract. These measures will ensure we meet the new timelines without renegotiation.”

Derek Twigg MP pressed Williams on what specific improvements the new system would deliver compared to Capita’s performance. Williams explained: “Expressions of interest are high, but the process for medical checks, background verification, and sequencing of tasks is too slow. The new programme will focus on making conditional offers earlier and reducing unnecessary delays.”

Williams acknowledged the historical fluctuations in recruitment success, noting: “Where we had got to five years ago reflected a focused improvement in the operation of the contract. However, progress stalled, particularly during COVID-19, and we’ve not seen a recovery since.”

George Allison
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison

21 COMMENTS

    • They were a significant conservative donor. Your assuming there was delivery standards in the contract. The good law project has been trying to bring light to all the terrible contracts the last goverment signed.

  1. It seems as if there were neither incentives to achieve targets nor penalties for under-performance, when this was all set up.
    Also, I recall Capita getting a renewal of contract some yers ago even following their poor performance.

    • Well said Graham, HMG seem to be unable to put in place even the most basic contracts – Or, there is real corruption going on. SO Capita has been paid £500M to destroy forces recruitment? with absolutely no comeback?

    • Welcome to the campaign the good law project has been trying to draw light on over terrible contracts the last goverment signed.

      • I suspect there was a very obvious reason the previous goverment kept trying to block the courts seeing the contracts. The fact they did is public record

    • Not to let capita off the hook because clearly they are shit but perhaps the British Army and its requirements are the problem as much as anything. In this day an age how many jobs require someone to submit medical record history. Who is qualified to even read this stuff, how much time and money is wasted doing it and how many people are rejected needlessly because of some child hood complaint.

      If medical examinations are required and I don’t think they are for most jobs in the army then go back to doing them on the spot. Let the individuals volunteering for the army decide if they feel well enough for the job and if they fail in basic training then they can be let go.

      Problem is the army is run by infantry officers who look at everything from an infantry officer perspective and have little grasp of the complexities of organisations. These officers giving a list of criteria to a private company like capita was always going to be a disaster. The same people who came up with 2000 separate specifications for an armoured vehicle.

  2. They were no better recruiting for the Civil Service., 18 months the norm from application to start date. The company and all its shady offspring should be blacklisted by HMG

    • To be fair, the process for joining the civil service has been excessively long, way before it was outsourced. Just old school thinking vs the much more streamlined processes for private sector company recruitment.

  3. My second life after the army was as a Customs Officer. There was a youngish guy on my team who was an A.O. (band 4) He moved down to Dover and whilst there they had some Officer posts come up (band 6) but they were being advertised externally through Capita. They reviewed his application and through feedback told him they thought he wasn’t what Customs & Excise was looking for. He then saw an internal post come up as Team Leader (band 7) at Heathrow and he walked the promotion process. Says it all really. Glad they are getting shot of those imbeciles.

      • Don’t get me wrong I work for company that uses capita with a.sensible contract with sensible delivery targets and penalties and they do a great job.

        • Yes, too easy just to blame the contractor but who is setting the specifications. I bet you didn’t have to submit medical records for your current job.

  4. Why can’t recruitment be brought in house again. The useless MOD are just going to replace one failing supplier with another.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here