The Scottish Government has published a paper outlining how an independent Scotland would organise its defence and security, describing protection of its people as “the first duty of every independent country’s government.”
The report, part of the A Fresh Start with Independence series released on 8 October, proposes three central pillars for a future defence policy: joining NATO, participating in the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy, and building a “collaborative, mutually beneficial defence and security relationship with the UK as well as other strategic partners.”
Under the first pillar, the paper states that an independent Scotland would “seek discussions with NATO leaders with a view to joining as soon as possible.” The government says Scotland would “align with NATO’s defence principles,” contribute conventional forces to alliance operations, and help defend the strategically important Greenland–Iceland–UK Gap. It also pledges to support global non-proliferation and disarmament within the NATO framework.
Membership of the EU is presented as the second pillar. The paper says Scotland would participate fully in the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy, “joining the family of nations fully committed to the international rules-based system and multilateralism.” It highlights that EU defence initiatives combine military and civilian tools to “tackle challenges they cannot solve alone.”
The third pillar focuses on cooperation with neighbouring countries, particularly the UK and Ireland. The government argues that geography makes defence collaboration essential, saying an independent Scotland’s “most enduring defence and security partnership would be with the UK and Ireland.” It pledges to establish “joint readiness, capability and intelligence-sharing mechanisms” after a vote for independence to ensure security during the transition.
An independent Scotland would form its own armed forces with land, sea and air components overseen by a Joint Forces Headquarters. The structure and capabilities would be determined by a “comprehensive, expert-led Defence and Security Review” to be completed before independence. A new Scottish Security and Intelligence Agency would be created to manage intelligence, cyber security, and counter-terrorism, working closely with Police Scotland and international partners.
On nuclear weapons, the paper is categorical: “Nuclear weapons would have no place in an independent Scotland.” The government says it would make nuclear disarmament a constitutional duty and negotiate for the “safe and expeditious removal” of the UK’s nuclear arsenal from Scottish territory. It argues this position would not hinder NATO membership, noting that “only a minority of NATO members host nuclear weapons” and that Finland’s 2023 accession demonstrates it is not a precondition for joining.
The full report, A Fresh Start with Independence, is available through the Scottish Government’s website under the “Building a New Scotland” series.










How many other NATO nations would actively pursue a policy that seeks to remove the very weapons that gives NATO it’s ultimate security. These people cannot be taken seriously.
No mention on Swinney finding the 3.5% of GDP to meet the NATO target while simultaneously providing milk and honey for everyone in Scotland.
The SNP are just fantasists, they couldn’t organise a piss up in a brewery…
It doesn’t matter how you cut the figures, left to their own devices, Scotland would have very high taxes and and crippling austerity, to make ends meet…
Forget free prescriptions etc, etc…
There would be no money for defence, never mind a NATO minimum of 2.5%…
High taxes and crippling austerity,
Sounds like UK economic policy as well
More posturing, while their schools, hospitals and roads fall apart.
At this point let them go. Would probably be an economic win for the rest of the UK
Sorry don’t think so, the majority of us already voted to stay we don’t want independence.
SNP? Yeah, Chinese troops on Hadrians Wall knowing them. I will be polite, they are nothing but a bunch of lunatics and fantasists.
Better start issuing new licences for oil drilling.
With all the terms and conditions they have for going independent, they might as well stay part of the UK
just out of interest.??
how many countries have split/broken apart./separated. peacefully.
just interested.?