The Ministry of Defence has confirmed that manufacturing of the Challenger 3 main battle tank will not begin on a fixed timetable, but only once performance trials have been successfully completed.
In written answers to Conservative MP Ben Obese-Jecty, defence minister Luke Pollard said the programme is “currently undergoing demonstration phase trials to prove the performance of the tanks.” He added that manufacturing will begin once performance is validated, “rather than being tied to a specific deadline.”
The demonstration phase involves a limited number of vehicles being used to validate design, integration and performance against requirements. As of late 2025, only eight Challenger 2 hulls have been allocated to Rheinmetall BAE Systems Land for design, build and testing activity, with series conversion yet to begin.
The response clarifies that Challenger 3 remains firmly in this demonstration phase, with the transition to manufacturing dependent on technical outcomes rather than calendar milestones. Pollard said the project team will continue to reassess progress, stating that “the timeline [will be reviewed] regularly to ensure alignment with delivery milestones, operational needs, and emerging technical risks.”
By avoiding a fixed start date for production, the department is signalling a cautious, risk-managed approach intended to reduce the likelihood of downstream delays or capability shortfalls. While earlier planning assumptions pointed to Challenger 3 entering service later in the decade, the latest parliamentary answers underline that progress will be driven by trial results rather than pre-set dates.
Challenger 3
Challenger 3 is a British fourth-generation main battle tank developed for the British Army through the conversion of existing Challenger 2 vehicles. Produced by Rheinmetall BAE Systems Land with 148 tanks planned for delivery by 2030. The programme represents the most substantial upgrade to the UK’s armoured capability in decades, featuring a new turret, improved hull, modular armour, and provision for an active protection system.
The origins of Challenger 3 lie in long-running efforts to extend the service life of Challenger 2. Initial work began in 2005 under the Capability Sustainment Programme, but funding delays and management issues slowed progress. In 2014, the programme was reorganised as the Challenger 2 Life Extension Programme, leading to competing proposals from BAE Systems and Rheinmetall. Following the merger of their UK land operations into RBSL in 2019, Rheinmetall’s more ambitious design effectively became the sole viable option short of replacing the fleet with a foreign tank.
The defining technical change in Challenger 3 is the adoption of the 120 mm Rheinmetall L55A1 smoothbore gun, replacing the rifled gun used on earlier British tanks. This brings ammunition commonality with NATO allies such as Germany, alongside a new kinetic energy round developed jointly for Challenger 3 and Leopard 2. Other upgrades include advanced sights with third-generation thermal imaging, improved fire control systems, enhanced electronic architecture, and mobility improvements such as upgraded hydrogas suspension and transmission components
Would still prefer to see 186 Challenger 3 in the British Army.
148 upgrade units and 148 new builds. Sorted. Amazon.com, press buy.
What will they be supported by after Warrior is retired in 2027? Without armoured infantry we can’t deploy the few tanks we have. It’s a giant mess.
Exactly, 148 will be “too many” with no IFVs, next to no artillery, very few transporters, and various other unglamourous supporting arms down to bare bones. The Army needs to face facts and aim to have 2 fully supported brigades deployable by 2030, there’s no way we’ll be able to deploy a well balanced division, let alone 2 as some deluded people are suggesting we aim for.
Sounds about right. Not buying enough tanks because there’s no Warrior replacement is plain daft. Use Boxers until an IFV solution is found.
So Challenger sometime if it works; Ajax dodgy and no warriors. It’s not only Ajax that makes people sick. Two pretend brigades of nothing in how many years.
Bring on putin!!
Run over him more like, if we can find something to use!
Preparing for announcing the predictable delay…
So being generous based on in-service date of all 148 by 2030, they have 6 years for the whole programme. Hope someone has reviewed the Project Plan and looked at long-lead items etc, as if they started in January, it works out at approx 1 of the production line every two weeks.
When is the new barrel plant in Sheffield due to open? I imagine they will have to start boring barrels for CH3 and 155RCH from day one.
Looking at Forgemaster info on the web, i think its due to start production in 2028
Begn? I thought it had begun ages ago!
SO! what are we actually saying here? Not only GD & LM failing on vehicle contracts. Rheinmetall too? every project placed to foreign companies has failed dismally.
Panther (disaster), Ajax, WCSP, Boxer, C3 how do people in DE&S, Army remain in position? Over £25 Billion spent without fielding a new fleet? Archer excluded?
Panther was only a disaster because they didn’t factor in all the additional kit MOD wanted to install. This effected bslance and CofG. I believe thst once they upgraded the suspension that it became a perfectly acceptable vehicle. Well excluding that fact they had all been abandoned in the Ashchurch hangers, and MOD had gone fulltilt on Foxhound
It seems sensible to me?
Certainly better than (ahem) the other programme, where we started production before finding out if they worked or not.
This is utter cobblers!
For what its worth I believe that given the current problems/inability to project manage any of the home grown AFV’s we would be better off mothballing all current programs and buy from our European Nato partners and by jumping on their orders we would get them a lot cheaper and have a reliable access to spear parts as well as a common logistical support for ammunition and communications. We need to fill the void left in our armoured divisions ASAP and as cheaply as possible and the current MoD procurement system dose not cut it as there are to many mouths to feed.