Britain has seen an enormous flight of businesses this year because it has become uncompetitive to manufacture goods here, with larger companies finding the arithmetic works better in France and Germany, according to evidence given to the Defence Committee.
Stephen Phipson, chief executive of MakeUK, raised the point during a session on the implications of the Defence Investment Plan for British industry.
He said: “There is a wider point that I would like to make about manufacturing in this country, which is something that we have been talking to the Chancellor about. In fact, Julian and I were with the Chancellor this morning on this very subject. We are now losing a lot of companies because it is uncompetitive to manufacture goods here. That is because of energy costs in the UK.”
He continued: “This year, we have had an enormous flight of businesses out of the UK. In particular, larger companies are finding it hard to allocate capital to UK capability because the maths works better if you do it in France and Germany than it does in the UK. It is very difficult to isolate that just to the MOD, but there is a wider issue about the competitiveness of manufacturing in this country, which, to be fair, the Chancellor recognised this morning as a key issue for growth.”
Kevin Craven of ADS told MPs that price is not the only problem, saying grid connections are “now running at eight to 10 years versus an average of about four years anywhere else”, and that the same pressures show in skills and the supply of componentry. He said a broader economic focus is needed to secure the defence technology and wider defence sector.
Craven said government can help through enablement in areas such as skills and by considering the general business context, and named the carbon border adjustment mechanism as another measure coming down the track that makes it expensive to do business in Britain.
On firms leaving, Craven told the committee the numbers are low, that companies are nonetheless going, and that the United States and Europe represent more attractive defence markets at present. Julian David of techUK said the number saying they will no longer be in Britain is low, but that firms are shifting emphasis and investment money.
David also told MPs that international members who came to Britain to invest are not seeing a resulting pathway to growth and business, and are asking whether they made the wrong decision to expand here.
Arnab Dutt of the Federation of Small Businesses said British firms are finding opportunities abroad, particularly in the Baltics and northern Europe where countries see the threat as imminent. He said that if their capacity is taken up elsewhere, even though they would rather be working in Britain, the country will lose out, and described the risk to capability over the next few years as potentially very dangerous.
Phipson told the committee that Britain does not lack industrial capacity, pointing to thousands of smaller firms already exporting defence technology to other nations and to the automotive sector, which employs six hundred thousand people and has capacity available. He said those companies would rather be doing the work with their own Ministry of Defence.












I’m sure our PR PM ‘Northern Man’ Burnham , ‘Marxist Man’ Miliband with his sidekick protege Farenheit Fahnbulleh , along with ‘Half Pence’ Healy will soon sort this mess out so DON’T PANIC.
Whilst energy costs might be relatively high at the moment the actual problem is as a country we are not accelerating our moves to new cheaper forms of energy.
Agree but that is because the country is broke and that is successive Governments fault by not being robust and favouring a nanny state. The county needs to produce to increase GDP but this will not happen as long as welfare is more attractive than work!
That’s a rather simplistic and , If I may say , a somewhat disingenuous statement TBH. ‘Green’ energy is not the panacea many – such as Ed Miliband- would have you believe.
A Simple reason to drill in the North Atlantic, North sea, Irish sea and off the Falklands!!! I would go further and dig the 1000 yrs of coal and develop Nuclear and tidal power. This Government needs to wake up quickly!!!
The Government feel it is more important to appear to be doing what their supporters think they want than to do the right thing.
Really. I mean really. So those of us who spoke of this many years ago were not silly (translated), after all.
Ask S Korea to build nuclear plants for us. Much cheaper, even if we flew in and housed the engineers and construction teams
We can’t even get a third runway at Heathrow built.
Self inflicted harm.
No thanks. We can build whatever we need.
I’m sure Rolls Royce would have something to say about that- hopefully their modular reactors will prove a sound model.
Ultimately subsequent governments since (and inc.) Thatcher, have pandered to the anti-nuclear zealots of all shades.
The UK could , nay should, have continued to be a ‘power’ (no pun intended) in the Nuclear market , we have , however, allowed that to slip for decades , leaving us where we are now , beholden to China & France for their technical expertise- with the associated heavy payments.
Reform the Market by decoupling gas from electricity pricing
Introduce zonal or locational pricing. Power is cheaper closer to where it’s generated.
Move green levies off electricity bills and fund them through general taxation, or shift them onto gas bills.
Speeding up the construction of new infrastructure, reduce grid connection times