Babcock has signed an agreement with ACUA Ocean Technologies and Frankenburg Technologies to explore arming uncrewed vessels with low-cost missiles to counter drone attacks in the maritime domain, with the memorandum of understanding signed at the Farnborough International Airshow, the company stated.

The memorandum of understanding brings together three distinct elements: Babcock’s multi-domain launcher system, Frankenburg’s low-cost precision guided missiles, and the uncrewed surface vessels built by Plymouth-based marine technology firm ACUA, with the partners aiming to create integrated counter-drone solutions for the marine domain as the threat from cheap uncrewed aircraft continues to evolve.

The agreement builds on the partnership Babcock signed with Frankenburg in January to explore air defence systems able to withstand the rapid rise in one-way attack drones, with ACUA now adding the platform to carry the result to sea.

“We’re excited to partner with innovative companies to develop an integrated approach that directly addresses some of the biggest challenges our customers face in today’s defence landscape,” Babcock said in a statement attributed to Sir Nick Hine, its Chief Growth Officer,  “As a trusted systems integrator, collaborations like this will help protect critical national assets and infrastructure from attritable one-way attack drones.”

The seakeeping of the host vessel is central to the pitch. “To counter mass drone attacks, maritime air defence must be uninterrupted, yet rough weather often forces traditional systems out of limits. The unique stability of ACUA’s Pioneer-class, which we’ll be using for this collaboration, ensures these counter UAS and interchangeable payloads remain online and fully operational in high seas where other platforms fail,” said Neil Tinmouth, ACUA’s Chief Executive, as quoted in the release. The company’s PIONEER vessel recently operated 16 to 20 nautical miles offshore for more than 100 hours at sea without hands-on intervention, according to the release, and Babcock says its launcher can be fitted to crewed and uncrewed vessels alike, built at pace and scaled quickly.

Frankenburg, the Estonian-founded firm whose UK arm is led by Daniel Hallett, develops small, mass-manufacturable interceptor missiles aimed at bringing the cost of engaging drones down towards the cost of the drones themselves. “Affordable missile defence is heading farther out to sea. By equipping ACUA’s uncrewed vessels with Frankenburg’s mass-manufacturable missiles and Babcock’s launcher technology, we aim to create a persistent and low-cost way to protect the UK’s ships, ports and critical maritime infrastructure against mass drone attacks,” he said, as quoted in the release.

The concept the three companies describe, persistent armed pickets holding station offshore in weather that would defeat conventional platforms, speaks directly to the Royal Navy’s hybrid fleet ambitions, which Babcock says the agreement supports as it develops technologies to underpin next-generation autonomous capability.

Lisa West
Lisa holds a degree in Media and Communication from Glasgow Caledonian University. With a background in media, she plays a key role in the editorial team, managing industry news and maintaining the standards of the publication's online community.

29 COMMENTS

    • Not really more capable with a flat out speed of 7 knots and an efficient speed of 4.
      Much better range, seakeeping and endurance though. This combination could be handy patrolling Faslane or with a little warning North Sea infrastructure.

      • I think the key word here is explore.

        If it just needs to stay on station it’s not a problem.

        Yet if something else is needed they have funding to explore it. It’s a bit soon to suggest it’s useless with only a couple of exceptions.

    • I was thinking the same thing. He’s shown himself to be a man of principle so I don’t believe he would have accepted the post unless it was with the authority to fund the SDR in full.

    • Huzzah! I do think he will map out a (hopefully credible) plan to get to 3% gdp defence spending by 2030. Some sort of war bonds are coming, I suspect….

  1. This launcher is almost exactly the sort of thing we should be looking to proliferate across the fleet; particularly the OPVs.

    Granted, I was basing that suggestion on Martlet; this seems too small (2kg vs 13kg for Martlet) and too limited in performance to have much longevity. Which begs the question of why we’re bothering in the first place? Martlet is proven, in service, and (based on estimates available online) only costs about 25% more while offering far higher performance.

  2. John Healey is the new Chancellor!
    No excuse now, Defence has an ally in No 11.
    Lets see if he follows on from his resignation.

    • He won’t have any credibility if he doesn’t. I’m sure he will though. He seems like a man of principle. It may not come quickly, but he must have received assurances over the defence budget.

      • I’m thrilled.
        Carns for DS I wonder?
        Just keep that Milliband away, though now he’s FS he might gain greater appreciation for SIS and GCHQ.

        • Great news…Rumours Rachel Reeves was offered F.S. but turns it down..???
          New F.S Ed Miliband will do a lot more travelling now to dangerous places..
          Healey will be very intrested in the Defence budget

        • War bonds I think will be the way he gets to 3% within next few years….good news tho, the man has shown he has integrity, now…🤞🤞

        • Ed.. will find that a strong Military is the friend of the F.O now Soft power in the Form of Foreign Aid Budget no longer Pulls those Chains…Still think his brother would have been a better bet…
          Wish I’d put some money on Healey as Chancellor…Did mention and push for him as possible Chancellor several times in the last few month…!. Damn..! 40/1..!!

      • Personally I thought he would be back from the moment he resigned.

        Wise decision for Defence Secretary would be Ben Wallace. Would show he was serious about all this cross party stuff.

        I think that Burnham will be spending much time herding cats unless he is bold and decisive (unlike Kier).

    • I suspect that the defence bank with Canada and Norway will now be on as will some form of UK public war bonds..

      We sometimes forget that japan has a debt to GDP of around 200% and that’s all based on essentially granny bonds not the markets.

      I would say we will get the granny war bonds and the bank with a 3% ( or close) defence GDP by 2030…

      Also Burnham is wants re-industrialisation, it looks like he’s twigged defence is the only real way for massive re industrialisation..

      • Industrialisation needs a few thinks…!
        A skilled industrial Workforce ,
        Viable Companies..and markets.to supply the goods too…
        Do you Spot the Problems yet..
        Large number of countries on this planet have the same basic idea…
        And most Are less Regulated, Cheaper workforce, and less taxed companies that have cheaper Energy than us to boot…!
        With industries far more developed.and Motivated for the modern world..

      • War bonds are just bonds, ie borrowing. The markets won’t really support that, so they’ll end up costing way more than they generate.

        I think it would be some form of joint investment, and maybe paying up to enter the EU defence fund.

  3. This is a core part of the drone picture if you want any ability to operate in the littoral.. essentially any littoral group will need a ton of these to dump down the threat axis as it moves into the littoral.

  4. Everything hinges on Healey being an honest man. If he is he will be gone by Xmas but if as I suspect he is the same as the rest of them it will delay delay delay on the DIP. Burnham’s priority is clear, the homeless, a”costed” oh really okay “not quite costed” few quid off peoples bills, all just the usual crowd pleasing nonsense and wasting billions on devolution. Unless Burnham gets a briefing from CDS that scares his little mad for it Manc pants off I see nothing that will benefit defence from this government. Streeting knows nothing about defence and I doubt he will care to learn.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here