The bulk of Putin’s ground forces remain more than 30km to the north of Kyiv their advance having been slowed by Ukrainian forces defending Hostomel airfield, a key Russian objective for day one of the conflict.

The UK’s Ministry of Defence has posted an intelligence update on the situation in Ukraine.

“The bulk of Putin’s ground forces remain more than 30km to the north of Kyiv their advance having been slowed by Ukrainian forces defending Hostomel airfield, a key Russian objective for day one of the conflict. Heavy fighting continues around Chernihiv and Kharkiv however both cities remain under Ukrainian control.

Logistical failures and staunch Ukrainian resistance continue to frustrate the Russian advance. Despite continued attempts to suppress details of the conflict from the Russian population, the Russian Armed Forces have for the first time been forced to acknowledge suffering casualties.”

What happened over the weekend?

26th February

  • Heavy fighting was reported to the south of Kyiv, near the city of Vasylkiv.
  • The Ukrainian General Staff claimed that a Ukrainian Su-27 fighter had shot down a Russian Il-76 transport plane carrying paratroopers near Vasylkiv.
  • A second Russian Ilyushin Il-76 military transport plane was shot down near Bila Tserkva, 85 kilometres (50 miles) south of Kyiv, according to two American officials with direct knowledge of conditions on the ground in Ukraine. However, no evidence verifying either of the events was released.
  • Around 03:00, more than 48 explosions in 30 minutes were reported around Kyiv, as the Ukrainian military was reported to be fighting near the CHP-6 power station in the northern neighbourhood of Troieshchyna.
  • The BBC reported the attack may be an attempt to cut off electricity to the city. Heavy fighting was reported near the Kyiv Zoo and the Shuliavka neighbourhood.
  • Early on 26 February, the Ukrainian military said it had repelled a Russian attack on an army base located on Peremohy Avenue, a main road in Kyiv; it also claimed to have repelled a Russian assault on the city of Mykolaiv on the Black Sea.

27th February

  • Overnight, a gas pipeline outside Kharkiv was reported to have been blown up by a Russian attack, while an oil depot in the village of Kriachky near Vasylkiv ignited after being hit by missiles.
  • Heavy fighting near the Vasylkiv airbase prevented firefighters from tackling the blaze.
  • The Presidential Office claimed that the Zhuliany Airport was also bombed.
  • Β Russian-backed separatists in Luhansk province claimed an oil terminal in the town of Rovenky was hit by a Ukrainian missile.
  • Later, President Putin directed the Russian Defence Minister and Chief of the General Staff to put Russia’s nuclear deterrent forces in a “special regime of combat duty.”
  • Several Russian banks were removed from SWIFT, and Turkey proclaimed that a state of war exists in the Black Sea, allowing it to intercept ships of the Russian Navy.
  • The European Union banned Russian aircraft from its airspace.
Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

176 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dragonwight
Dragonwight
2 years ago

Looks like Putin is preparing for the big push. Ukraine has 15 active nuclear reactors supplying half of their electricity. I hope they don’t hit one of them or a subsidiary system.

Sean
Sean
2 years ago
Reply to  Dragonwight

The Russians did claim today they’d seized the largest power station in Europe – 6 reactors – but the Ukrainians have denied this.
I could see them trying to cut power to Kyiv to make it as uncomfortable as possible for civilians to stay there. The Russians have said there’s a open corridor that civilians can leave along, which suggests they want the city as clear if people as possible before a major onslaught.

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

It seems to far hes been avoiding just out right destruction regarding moving forward, Kiev has a lot of culturally significant buildings for the Russians and I doubt it would go down well destroying these.

From what ive read about the idea he could just roll in, remove Zelensky and the population would roll over to a unified support of Russia and a new government also makes sense that they have avoided widespread destruction of civilian buildings.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  Dragonwight

Maybe. It is going to be a push into a Ukrainian airforce with more ground attack capabilities. And increasing confidence in their tactics. I would *guess* that the gifted aircraft, arriving soon, have laser designation capabilities? The other thing is that the logistics β€˜problems’ have probably been deliberately created. The Ukrainians know where the seizures counts are going due to UK/US eyes. They can then calculate, as they have the same kit, where it will run out of juice. They can then make sure the areas petrol stations and farms are dry of diesel. It is pretty easy to take… Read more Β»

Paul.P
Paul.P
2 years ago
Reply to  Dragonwight

I doubt it. Ironically thanks to Russia Kyiv is generously provided with lots of soviet era deep nuclear era bunkers. The population will be safe from shelling. They will have petrol generators and warm clothing. The warmer weather is coming. The West will continue to funnel military and humanitarian provisions from Poland; bit like the Berlin airlift. Most likely we will see a month or two of attrition and then I expect to see Russian forces get fed up and go home for Easter with the family.

maurice10
maurice10
2 years ago

One fear I have is the possibility of Putin aiding terrorist groups to hit the West as part of his offensive against punitive sanctions and other measures? Note, I said Putin, as to label Russian as a part of this madness is to ignore the agonies they are going through too! As I’ve said before, only the Russian people can stop Putin’s lunacy.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  maurice10

I don’t think that those around him would do that. Part of the reason that this is looking increasingly fraught is that I suspect that those around him as looking at the ‘what if this fails’ outcome. Nobody Russian can have been blind to the St Catherines hall fiasco and the fact that the rest of the senior leadership team and not 100% on board with this? Exist strategies involving staying alive and going the minimum to look credible might well be at play here as well as minimising war crimes. If the Ukrainians hang on for another week then… Read more Β»

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
2 years ago
Reply to  maurice10

I agree. We must not sink into a sort of re-run of ‘the Hun’ or ‘Boshe’. It wouldn’t be justified at all; chiefly a section of Putin’s nationalist nutters are cheering this aggression. I hope also the Ukranians retain strict control of their P.O.W.’s; any ‘social media’ imagery a la Abu Ghraib of ill treatment or worse of Russian soldiers would make support wither somewhat. That said, I venture that the training the Brits have be providing sine 2014 and the Annexation of Crimea, is playing out well. Alas, I can’t see the Ukrainians winning but the price they are… Read more Β»

maurice10
maurice10
2 years ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

Sadly, atrocities happen with nearly all desperate conflicts, but Ukraine must refrain from destructive media pictures of reprisals. I know it’s easily said when the temptation to wreak revenge is laid before you.

Sean
Sean
2 years ago

My biggest fear is that, in frustration at their lack of progress, Putin ramps up the onslaught and Kyiv becomes another Grozny. The civilian death toll in Chechnya was terrible.

JamesD
JamesD
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

Just been an indiscriminate mlrs attack in kharkiv so it may have just begun

Farouk
Farouk
2 years ago
Reply to  JamesD
maurice10
maurice10
2 years ago
Reply to  Farouk

Just watched it…..horrible, and a Ukrainian drone attack on a Putin rocket launcher!

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  Farouk

Thats very sad to see and worrying evidence of the use of such weapons.

JamesD
JamesD
2 years ago
Reply to  Farouk

There’s more videos from different strikes I fear kharkiv is about to be utterly destroyed

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

Agreed. A real possibility.

Watcherzero
Watcherzero
2 years ago

EU will be buying Soviet era fighter jets from its members and donating them to the Ukranians. First time EU has ever provided military assistance to a foreign country.

OldSchool
OldSchool
2 years ago
Reply to  Watcherzero

EU like Germany, France playing catch up after being shamed into action. Aircraft are not toys you can pick up and just throw to your friends – they are bound to be different to standard Ukraine types.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  OldSchool

There were plenty of Ukrainian pilots who flew the MiGs. Given they have not had many planes from early on they might have been sent abroad? Maybe the Ukrainian pilots who don’t have aircraft have actually been training with say the Poles. And maybe the Poles have added a few extras to their MiGs such as precision strike? Maybe not? I suspect we will see very soon as they take out the MRLS and Hyperbaric weapons to save the civilian casualties. Has the inbound armoured column got anywhere near Kyiv? Or has it run out of diesel? The one thing… Read more Β»

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  Watcherzero

Has it been revealed who is selling what to the EU?

Surely it can only be the most eastern ex soviet members which would then leave them hugely under equipped?

Watcherzero
Watcherzero
2 years ago
Reply to  James

MiG-29’s from Slovakia, Bulgaria and Poland, the Slovakian ones have been modernized to NATO standards while the Bulgarian and Polish ones are more stock. Possibly some SU-25 as well. The countries are all due to receive new F-16/F-35 aircraft over the next 2-3 years.

Rob N
Rob N
2 years ago
Reply to  Watcherzero

They might be getting planes but do they have pilots? I think the West should send in our little Blue men to give them a hand.

After all how can you tell who is flying the jet….

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  Watcherzero

Slovakia and Poland on the border with the Ukraine, an agreement must exist in the background to move Nato forces in to cover the aircraft they would be releasing and for those forces to stay at least until they have newer/replacement equipment in place.

Sid morley
Sid morley
2 years ago

The Ukrainians certainly are putting up stiff resistance, but why isn’t artillery or the airforce hitting the columns of equipment been slowed down, Russia doesn’t appear to have air superiority?

Nicholas
Nicholas
2 years ago
Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
2 years ago
Reply to  Nicholas

Yet to put yellow armbands on showing them as Ukrainian?

Nicholas
Nicholas
2 years ago

Trigger finger

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
2 years ago
Reply to  Nicholas

As a gentle soul who has never handled a firearm you’ll have to expand.

Nicholas
Nicholas
2 years ago

That chaps finger is curled round the trigger, a situation only appropriate if you’re intending to fire. Its a little pedantic given the situation out there but no one wants a negligent discharge with potential casualties. Imagine if a mortar lands nearby and thet chap isn’t used to that kind of thing. Finger tightens on the trigger and someone falls over.
There are relatively few accidental firing incidents in the UK because of exhaustive drills and training. The Ukrainians won’t have had time for all that

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
2 years ago
Reply to  Nicholas

Ah, ND. Yes I see.

Jonathan
Jonathan
2 years ago
Reply to  Nicholas

I see what you mean, I have only had training with pistols but that’s an accident waiting to happen.

But I guess when your nations at threat of being removed from history, the risks you take are different.

DJ
DJ
2 years ago
Reply to  Jonathan

He appears to be trying to fit the magazine. If he has just picked it up, it’s likely not capable of firing at this point. He may not have even been given any ammo yet (would you hand out already loaded weapons to a bunch of civilians). Looking at the bright side, he has at least found the trigger & the magazine & appears to know which is the dangerous end. Plenty of civilians in Western Europe would be lucky to get that far.

Ron
Ron
2 years ago

Question: with many of the worlds nations banning Russian overflight is it or would it be possible to ban all Russian flagged or ships going to Russian ports from EU, UK, NATO, and Commonwealth waters? When I say waters I mean out to the 200 mile zone not just the 3-12 mile zone. I would like to see all sanctions overflight bans, resriction of sea lanes etc kept in place until the borders of Ukraine are fully restored, that Russian gold reserves that are siezed be used to rebuild the damage that they have done to the Ukraine and that… Read more Β»

John Clark
John Clark
2 years ago
Reply to  Ron

I can certainly see the old Cold War ‘proxy wars’ rearing their heads again as a way of both side undermining each other. That said, Russia might just find itself going into direct conflict with China if it tries to undermine areas the Chinese are active in. They won’t take kindly to having their sphere of influence interrupted by Russian meddling. It does make me wonder if China will move to distance themselves from Russia, as I am sure they are watching the crippling international action against Russia with great interest. Certainly a pause for thought is called for on… Read more Β»

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  John Clark

The Chinese issue is a curious one as to how it will play out.

They didn’t Veto the UN vote which was very surprising, however they will see a huge profit opportunity in assisting the Russian economy under sanctions.

However if them helping then starts causing restrictions for China itself we could see them distancing themselves hugely.

India also is on the fence and could go either way.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  Ron

I hope he is not stupid enough to go himself.

The Russians would simply poison him.

RobW
RobW
2 years ago

He hasn’t, a defence minister has.

he may be a comedian but he isn’t joking around. Also happens to be the voice of Paddington Bear in the Ukraine dubbed versions of the recent films. Weird but true.

Frank62
Frank62
2 years ago
Reply to  RobW

Always thought Paddington Bear was a sleeper agent!

Quentin D63
Quentin D63
2 years ago

Where do you reckon Putin is hiding now? Surely he’s a target for someone also?
Hope the Ukrainian airforce and ground forces can take out all those Russian columns before they get too close to Kiev or anywhere else with large populations.
The West also needs to keep its eyes on Kaliningrad sitting quietly behind their backs.

John Hartley
John Hartley
2 years ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

In cold war times, the Soviets had a cyanide spray into the face of the target person. Killed them in a way that suggested heart attack. If the invasion of Ukraine causes disaster in Russia, expect the dear leader Putin to have a convenient heart attack.

Tams
Tams
2 years ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

Yeah, I don’t think we’re going to see much of Putin outside. Just in grandiose rooms that could be anywhere in Russia.

As for the columns: as long as the front is stalled and the supplies to the back are regularly harassed; I don’t think they are going to be problem and even become an issue for the Russians.

Let’s hope it rains heavily too. That should get the Russians literally stuck in the mud.

Quentin D63
Quentin D63
2 years ago

Maybeva crazy thought, but if Ukraine is getting the upper hand then why does he even need to go to these talks. There might be a chance historically to get rid of two bad old birds with one stone. Keep on πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦, strength to you, the West is right behind you.

Jonathan
Jonathan
2 years ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

I would imagine because they know what comes next ( which is Russia using mass indiscriminate fires on towns and cities ( they did it in Chechnya). If they can negotiate something that saves Ukraine as an independent sovereign nation, while they have stalled Russian forces and may have Putin a bit rattled they should do. After all Ukraine is not fighting a geopolitical battle against Russia ( that’s NATO’s job). The Ukrainian President only has to think of preserving Ukraine as an independent sovereign nation and reducing Ukrainian casualties. Nato needs to be thinking about how it removes Putin… Read more Β»

DRS
DRS
2 years ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

It is always better to talk and save lives that way than by paying in blood. What good is winning militarily if your country is flattened and needs years to rebuild shattered lives and infrastructure.

No shame in talking even if it is posturing. If you can find a saving face way out of a situation then go for it.

Martin
Martin
2 years ago
Reply to  Ron

No country can ban lawful passage in the EEZ at 200 miles only inside 12 mile limit.

ChariotRider
ChariotRider
2 years ago
Reply to  Ron

Hi Ron,

The legal position of the 200miles zones is that they are not national waters. They are areas were the boardering country has control over natural resources only. National Waters are limited to 12miles. Of course China inparticular is trying to rewrite the law by force in the SCS…

Russian aircraft are still flying into Kaliningrad via St Petersburg and the Baltic Sea. A considerable detour.

Cheers CR

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  Ron

Interesting point to bring up earlier as the UK has now banned any Russian ships from entering UK ports.

Frank62
Frank62
2 years ago
Reply to  Ron

He sent a delegation, so didn’t go in person(Very wise).

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  Frank62

Definitely, it had echoes of the start of WW1 if he had gone himself!

Putin was never going to turn up in person so why should he.

Farouk
Farouk
2 years ago

Interesting by Calibre Obscura ( He reports on weapons use around the world)

Quentin D63
Quentin D63
2 years ago
Reply to  Farouk

Hope they can take out some low flying helicopters with these NLAWs too.

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
2 years ago
Reply to  Farouk

Great. Glad the NALWs are proving as useful as we suspected/ knew they would be against Russian quality armoured vehicles.
Manufactured in Belfast. Hopefully we have ordered thousands more so UK can donate more batches to the Ukraine.

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
2 years ago
Reply to  Farouk

Imagery I have seen of knocked out Russian convoys suggest ambush tactics with man portable anti-materiel weapons. Of course, some of these targets might have run out of fuel and easy to hit. Much more of this very effective tactic I suspect the Russians will turn to large area bombing of cities and have done with it.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
2 years ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

Although that will cause great civilian casualties I don’t think that will defeat Ukraine on its own. The Germans tried that at Stalingrad in August 42 and in flattening the place created a perfect defensive position their armour could not get into.

Martin
Martin
2 years ago

The Germans did not have thermobaric weapons though.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

Or as I posted above been run out of fuel elaborately by removing steerable fuel from their corridor and radius and then attacking the tankers which are not armoured.

No fuel = mission kill.

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
2 years ago

Yes Bloke. I am very surprised the Russians have walked into this. Are these their best troops?

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

No one really knows but I think it could be argued he’s sent in the newest recruits with the oldest kit to soften things up and use up arms then may mobilise the more experienced forces with newer kit.

Probably didn’t anticipate the west re-arming Ukraine at the rate it has though!

David Steeper
David Steeper
2 years ago
Reply to  James

Those Paras and Spetnaz that got slaughtered in Holomel were by Russian standards top of the line. Or rather were !

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

It is more to do with crap tactics and logistics.

Tams
Tams
2 years ago
Reply to  Farouk

Shoutout to the Swedes for developing it!

OldSchool
OldSchool
2 years ago

A quick question. What has France done to help Ukraine? I’m thinking here of weapons etc.

I’ve looked on the net and to be honest have found zilch. Even Germany has had to fess up but France seems to be almost completely silent (except for complete waffle by their foreign minister about how they will respond without weakness).

Disgraceful IMHO.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
2 years ago
Reply to  OldSchool

Looking online there is reference to military and civilian aid, I just think it is coming late like the rest of the EU where UK/USA ( as usual ) get on with things early.

OldSchool
OldSchool
2 years ago

You have more faith DM in the French than I do!

I suspect they are trying to get the EU to pay for it. Recall the Greece bank bailout – the most exposed banks by far were French (with Germany coming a distant second). By getting an EU bailout based on EU contribution size France paid a lot less for the bailout and countries like Spain and Italy (which had little debt exposure) a lot more.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
2 years ago
Reply to  OldSchool

I don’t have faith in their politics, I’m a Brexiteer after all we have seen enough of that crap.

Do I have faith in the French as a people once the political crap is done? Absolutely! They are fellow Europeans and in war will step up to fight like we do.

ChariotRider
ChariotRider
2 years ago

I agree Daniele, Even though the UK and France have had some serious differences of late our armed forces continue to work together very effectively in Mali, although I believe that UK assistance is non-combat. Having said that I believe we have a small number of troops in a peacekeeping (combat?) role with the UN in Mali. All very complicated… Anyway, typical of Western allies our leaders are quick to squabble while the people who do the real work carry on talking and keep the national friendship going until the so called grown ups remember they are indeed supposed to… Read more Β»

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
2 years ago
Reply to  OldSchool

It is disgraceful. Macron went over to Moscow, acting like the voice of Europe and NATO. Believed Putins promises and now has custard all over his face. French inactivity is classic. The French armed forces are high quality and powerful just their political leaders who are spineless.

Klonkie
Klonkie
2 years ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

by custard, I’m sure you meant “creme anglaise” .Your point is well made though – French leadership-shades of 39 /40 all over again

Tams
Tams
2 years ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

He wanted to be the hero that prevented a war.

But Putin had already decided to invade by then.

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
2 years ago
Reply to  OldSchool
James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  OldSchool

What Macron appears to have managed is to wind Putin up no end.

After the initial 6 hour meeting between them Macron is bragging about how he’s made huge progress and assurances have been given. Press conference a few hours later Putin is saying how he’s had 6 hours of his life wasted and followed up with the first threat of nuclear war.

Macron, outplayed in every single way.

OldSchool
OldSchool
2 years ago
Reply to  James

Macron has made Neville Chamberlain look like a superstar. I actually have sympathy for Chamberlain – and he bought the UK an extra 18 months or so to rearm. Macron in comparison got what – a day or two??

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  OldSchool

Macron probably lost time, Putin may well have been playing the bargaining chip and Macron just pushed him over the edge, who knows!

Tams
Tams
2 years ago
Reply to  OldSchool

He’s been very quiet recently.

john melling
john melling
2 years ago

If its true, I believe the Belorussians now have a military convoy on their border waiting!

Jonathan
Jonathan
2 years ago

Now if belarus gets involved I wonder how the west will react to that. NATO nations have made it clear they will not go to War with Russia, but Belarus, will NATO Push against the CSTO and test it. I would think not to be honest.

ChariotRider
ChariotRider
2 years ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Hi Jonathan,

Bloody hope not! I think Putin would treat any incursion into Belarus as an attack on Russia. Not good.

Frankly, whlist I have little time for our politicians even I don’t think they are that stupid! I do, however, fear that Putin might fire is nukes first. Some of the comments he has made over the years and is actions suggest he would. I believe he sees Russia as being incomplete and is determined to rebuild the old Tzarist / Soviet empire. No wonder the Baltic States have been calling the West to action…

CR

Jonathan
Jonathan
2 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

I don’t think NATO will push against the CSTO and take military action against Belarus as I agree it would escalate. Yes I worry to about where and how are Putin will go even if the west actively avoids conflict. I think he’s gone beyond a point of no return for him. He has to win or he will be torn down and I suspect that with the politics of a totalitarian state that would mean a trial and execution at best a quit removal at worst. Like many of this type of leader before him I would suspect he… Read more Β»

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Trouble is what is a win for him now?

He can only have 1 aim in mind, remove the current government and take over Kiev but it will split the Ukraine, would taking part of the country be a win?

Its been incredibly costly for him just to get this far hes never going to be able to take the entire country as that would never be a win just based on the losses he will sustain.

Jonathan
Jonathan
2 years ago
Reply to  James

I suspect he has a different view to us, I don’t think he sees Ukraine as a nation at all. It’s just a bit of Russia that needs to be bright back into the fold. I do think he’s made a massive miscalculation around Ukrainian national identity. All in all I think even if he destroys the Ukrainian armed forces and takes the present government down he’s heading for a bloody set of constant civil uprisings combined with an ongoing civil war between ethnic groups. So at best he’s getting a version of Northern Ireland During the troubles ( only… Read more Β»

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  Jonathan

The Northern Ireland comparison is not a way I had looked at it but yes you are right, on a drastically larger scale both in numbers to control and area of land to police. Russia really doesnt have the capability to do it without sacrificing security over a much larger area.

John Hartley
John Hartley
2 years ago
Reply to  Jonathan

The tragedy is that many Russians/Ukrainians have cousins in either/both nation/s. It would be like England fighting Scotland. We may irritate each other, but no sensible person wants to pull the trigger on their cousins.

TypewriterMonkey
TypewriterMonkey
2 years ago

This war is all about Putin. There’s an interesting theory in psychology that destructive leaders like Adolf Hitler and Saddam Hussain are basically on an extended, self-destructive, slow suicide, destroying both themselves and their own nations in the process. They refuse to see, or to accept, their own mistakes. They end up blaming their own population for their failures. When Putin says words to the effect that ‘if there is no Russia there will be no world left’, he’s really talking about himself. If he’s a gonner he’s threatening to take the whole world with him. This is pretty alarming… Read more Β»

ChariotRider
ChariotRider
2 years ago

Hi TypewriterMonkey,

I agree that there is a real parallel between Hitler and Putin. They were both involved in a ‘war’ that their countries lost. They both felt betrayed by history and they both became dictators and they both went to war gradually raising the stakes until the West reacted.

I find the parallels rather unnerving and the idea that someone as potentially as unstable as Putin has his finger on the Nuclear Option. I think he might just be angry enough to launch…

This brief analysis from the BBC gives plenty of food for thought.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-60551140

CR

TypewriterMonkey
TypewriterMonkey
2 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

It is a worry. You can negotiate with someone who’s twisted and rational, but nutjobs are scary because they’re unpredictable. Let’s hope he switches over to decaffeinated… Or something :/

Paul.P
Paul.P
2 years ago

Good cartoon along these Hitler vs Putin comparison lines circulating in Ukraine.
The punchline says β€˜ can we just skip to the end where they shoot themselves’. πŸ™‚

TypewriterMonkey
TypewriterMonkey
2 years ago
Reply to  Paul.P

Thanks for that – made me chuckle, on this otherwise pretty dreary Monday afternoon πŸ™‚

James
James
2 years ago

Once again Turkey taking the risk by blocking Russian black sea access despite good economic links with Russia. Turkish TB2 drones hit Russian invasion convoys hard and slowed down the invasion force, Yet we get countries like Germany that blocked military aid to Ukraine initially get praised lol Turkey risked Russian relation when Putin openly complained about Turkish drones sent to Ukraine while many NATO member states were afraid to send any serious weapons. Putin understands strength only

dave12
dave12
2 years ago
Reply to  James

Well Putin is not understanding that he is getting whipped at the moment.

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  James

So Turkish made drones which o believe Ukraine had purchased a number of these before the conflict?

Western made anti tank weapons and anti air equipment.

So what’s the point? Turkey hasn’t gone in and started destroying Russian forces as you are wording it.

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  James

Don’t even try to twist my words ! Turkish made TB2 drones operated by Ukraine have destroyed Russian convoys the Ukrainian defence forces released the videos. Turkey licensed the drones to Ukraine also. It’s building for Ukraine Corvettes also. No country has greater defence links with Ukraine than Turkey! You just can’t stand the idea Erdogan has more balls than Johnson. He confronted the Russians In Syria Libya Azerbaijan and now TB2 which many of you claimed stand no chance against the Russians, they are destroying Russian convoys and troops claimed by Ukraine itself . The entire eastern Europe wants… Read more Β»

farouk
farouk
2 years ago
Reply to  James

James wrote:

 Turkish TB2 drones hit Russian invasion convoys hard and slowed down the invasion force, Yet we get countries like Germany that blocked military aid to Ukraine initially get praised lol Turkey risked Russian relation when Putin openly complained about Turkish drones sent to Ukraine while many NATO member states were afraid to send any serious weapons. 

Those Turkish made Drones were purchased by the Ukraine for Cash. The Weapons sent to the Ukraine by:
US
UK
Estonia
Lativa
Poland
Lithunia
Sweden
Finland
Luxemburg (sent 100 MBTLAWs)

were handed over for free.

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  farouk

Turkey gave Ukraine over 35 million in military aid which it used to purchase weapons from Turkey . Besides Turkey sold Ukraine most priced weapons the TB2 drones ! What valuable weapons have the UK sold to Ukraine other some stinger etc weapons to defend now? No heavy weapons at all! Plus all of them just barking while Erdogan has flown in drones under Russian noses past months . Ukraine itself says Turkey has done more for our defence than any other country. Ukraine leader is more on the phone with Erdogan than any other leader !

Last edited 2 years ago by James
James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  James

Dont twist your words now you are saying ‘Turkey has FLOWN IN’ as in Turkey themselves are doing it all on behalf of Ukraine. Word things correctly to start with then dont start denying what you are saying. Also I believe the UK has ‘given’ the Ukraine the weapons that have been supplied, along with no doubt invaluable training over the past 8 years as opposed to making a business like Turkey profiteering from the situation. Lets be realistic Turkey isnt in Libya on the proviso of opposing Russia its trying to secure natural resources nothing more. Like its trying… Read more Β»

Steve
Steve
2 years ago

I read it took the US/allies three weeks to take baghdad, as supply lines take time to build, limiting the speed of an advance. So 4 days in is seriously early days.

Martin
Martin
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve

Baghdad is a long way from Kuwait, Kiev is right next to the Belarus boarder.

Steve
Steve
2 years ago
Reply to  Martin

Over two hundred miles though, so not directly next door and the main forces are not coming from Belarus.

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve

They might start getting reinforcements from Belarus soon and not just Russian ones worryingly.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  James

Will they be any better equipped?

Will they be any better lead?

Will they fight smarter?

Those are the real questions.

Yet more T72&T80 won’t make any difference as the Ukrainians have the tactics and munitions to take those out.

James
James
2 years ago

Honestly I have zero idea what the forces of Belarus are capable of.

Do they have any real world experience of recent conflicts?

If they just roll in under Russian command to add to the forces they will no doubt end up in the same scenario of being stalled and taken out in big numbers.

Concern it’s another country joining in so will a other country decide that’s a green light to join Ukraine?

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  James

Neither have I TBH.

But I’d be amazed if their kit was better.

They will come under Russian leadership and their tactics will be the same WWII tactics.

Without air superiority it is unwinable for Russia.

Next 5-7 days are critical if Russia continues to get hammered at this rate Vlad will have an accident / stroke / retire….

James
James
2 years ago

Let’s hope for one of the last 3!!! Radioactive Vodka sounds a fitting way to go.

Good you brought it up, how and why has Russia not got easy/defining air superiority in this conflict?

Ukraine has very few higher level anti air systems and the Russian Air Force is massive in comparison. I don’t get how they are controlling Ukrainian airspace especially in the east and south.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  James

A few hundred Stingers may have been all it took

A few planes lost in the early hours and it is not Russian airforce friendly.

They don’t really have massive inventories of LGB so they are forced to use low level dumb bomb and rocket attacks.

Talking to some Russian friends they speculate that a lot of the issue was corruption. Advanced weapons were ordered money was paid but only a few were ever delivered. The kleptocrats had the rest.

James
James
2 years ago

The lack of capability for high level bombing would then make sense. Crazy so much corruption exists!

JamesD
JamesD
2 years ago

I read that there is no real Belarusian command structure above brigade level they do what russian military tells them to do.

Paul.P
Paul.P
2 years ago
Reply to  James

Or start a drive toward Lviv – unlikely. Belorus is a conscript army. Recruits serve for 18 months. Old Soviet era equipment and emphasis on defence. Large home guard. They would probably get lost after a day in combat.

Last edited 2 years ago by Paul.P
James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  Paul.P

Lets hope they dont enter the theatre at all and if they do as you say they wont be of much use.

Paul.P
Paul.P
2 years ago
Reply to  James

Russian troops are now massed in large numbers north of Kiev. I believe Putin when he says he does not want to harm civilians. I believe the handful of artillery strikes on flats and one hospital have been gunner errors. What Putin is trying to do is re-instate what happened on 1686 when the Moscow Patriarch of the Orthodox church annexed the Kyiv Patriarch. He does not want to level Kyiv. In his mind he really believes that he is protecting, caring for and re-unifying the Russian people. I think Putins original plan was for Kyiv to be taken by… Read more Β»

Last edited 2 years ago by Paul.P
James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  Paul.P

Totally agree, the number of forces outside and on the way down to Kiev now is realistically unfortunately something the Ukrainians are probably not going to be able to hold out against.

Some more destruction of buildings is happening today, Kharkiv just had a large government building completely destroyed in what looked like a targeted strike. A colleague used to work in the building it was a tax and admin office not a military target.

Jacko
Jacko
2 years ago
Reply to  James

They can’t supply forces in country properly now! So any extra strain on the system is not going to go down well hopefully.

Tams
Tams
2 years ago
Reply to  James

At the current rate, it just looks like most of them would get stuck in a massive traffic jam.

Then, if they’re lucky, the traffic jam might extend long enough to overlap with their supply lines and be able to defend them. But in that case, how would the supplies be moved down the line? From soldier to soldier?

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  Tams

It is quite a puzzling situation!

Louis
Louis
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve

It was reported that it is less than 70 miles from Belarus border to Kyiv. Whereas according to google maps Baghdad is 550km direct from Kuwait border.

Last edited 2 years ago by Louis
Paul.P
Paul.P
2 years ago

Talks are underway in Belarus. I hope Zelensky is watching out for the umbrellas.

Tams
Tams
2 years ago
Reply to  Paul.P

Zelenskyy isn’t there. Any why would he given the risk and that Putin isn’t going to bother turning up.

It wouldn’t have been hard for you to find that out.

John Hartley
John Hartley
2 years ago

Given the way Germany & others, have done a 180 U turn over Swift & supplying weapons, I think it is time to look at offering Ukraine a NATO guaranteed safe haven around Lviv/Lvov in the West of the country. That would show those around Putin, how he has misjudged the whole situation. I would not lift a single Western sanction until Russia gives up its veto on the UN security council. They have lost all moral right to it. Likewise, they should cut their nuclear arsenal to 350 warheads. They can no longer be trusted with thousands of warheads.… Read more Β»

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  John Hartley

As much as that would be ideal in an ideal world none of it will happen.

John Hartley
John Hartley
2 years ago
Reply to  James

Wait a week.

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  John Hartley

Fifa definitely agree with you, the rest wont happen at all or certainly anytime soon.

Threatening to remove Russia’s veto would in itself potential trigger a nuclear conflict.

John Hartley
John Hartley
2 years ago
Reply to  James

Putin would bluster. We need to man up & face down that bluster.

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  John Hartley

That is one heck of a gamble and with his current state of mind clearly being clouded not a gamble many would or should even attempt to take!

John Hartley
John Hartley
2 years ago
Reply to  James

No, he needs to be stared down.

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  John Hartley

With his finger over the worlds largest nuclear red button, I think not.

John Hartley
John Hartley
2 years ago
Reply to  James

If we back down now, then we will be backing down forever on. Putin needs to meet cold hard unflinching resolve. To (mis) quote President Reagan “If not us who? If not now when?”.

ChariotRider
ChariotRider
2 years ago
Reply to  John Hartley

Hi John.

I share your anger, but I would caution pushing Putin too far. If he does use nukes I don’t think it will be a battlefield nuke, I think he would go all in. He is just mad enough to do it…

CR

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

Maybe.

He has lost the plot on this one: badly.

John Hartley
John Hartley
2 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

Putin thought the West would be divided & feeble. However, the footage from the weekend has given even the Germans, a new resolve. Putin will huff & puff, but if he is stood up to, then like all bullies, he will slink away.

Alan Reid
Alan Reid
2 years ago
Reply to  John Hartley

Hi John, Yes – Putin seems to have united NATO, brought Ukraine closer to the West (now inconceivable that it won’t soon be offered EU membership) – and increased German defence spending.
What a genius he truly is!! ο»ΏπŸ˜€ο»Ώ

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  Alan Reid

I think Ukraine was just used by NATO and when the going got tough was abandoned to the Russian Bear! I think it is being used to destabilise Russia, it may pay off or may not and Putin could gain a victory , it’s too early . If were Ukraine I would be neutral . Let’s not forget a coup happened in Ukraine when there was a pro Russian government that was elected . The Russians never got over that . Russia will never accept Ukrainian NATO membership. Russian has more advanced nuke missiles than the west let’s not forget… Read more Β»

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  James

I wouldnt say its financially backed by China, it will certainly be financially abused by China over the sanctions when they start buying all the resources at hugely knocked down prices.

Have slightly more advanced nuclear weapons (assuming they are) is of no significance when both sides possess as many as they do, both will hit targets and decimate the planet.

John Hartley
John Hartley
2 years ago
Reply to  James

If NATO said to Russia, you cannot ally with China, Russia would say it was a sovereign nation & could ally with who it wanted. Same applies to Ukraine. It is down to Ukraine who it wants to ally with. I don’t care if Russia does not want Ukraine to join NATO. It is not Russia’s decision. It is Ukraine’s decision. As for China. Yes it has made a great leap forward, but it has done it on debt. Evergrande $300 billion+ in debt. High Speed rail $950 billion in debt. Local government $ 4 to 8 trillion in debt.… Read more Β»

Tams
Tams
2 years ago
Reply to  James

Some serious Russian cope from you.

Alan Reid
Alan Reid
2 years ago
Reply to  James

James, But this conflict has nothing to do with NATO membership. It’s good to have an open mind, but I fear you’re too influenced by how Putin is framing this invasion. NATO last accepted new members 18 years ago (2004) – and discussions with Ukraine have been going no-where since 2008. Indeed when Putin invaded Crimea and the Donbas in 2014 he kiboshed any realistic possibility of Ukrainian membership. NATO would not accept a new member with conflict within its borders. I wouldn’t characterise the events of 2014 as a coup. The government fell because it couldn’t maintain public support… Read more Β»

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  John Hartley

As much I disagree with Putin we have no right to lecture Putin after what we did in Iraq ! Russian back them wan warned if the US and UK go ahead with this illegal war they should not wonder when others invade a country based on bogus ground .

John Hartley
John Hartley
2 years ago
Reply to  James

Two wrongs don’t make a right.

Tams
Tams
2 years ago
Reply to  John Hartley

This, this, and this again.

Alan Reid
Alan Reid
2 years ago
Reply to  James

I’m sorry, James, but this is classic “what-aboutery”.

Klonkie
Klonkie
2 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

Hi CR, might you know if there is an American shift in their nuclear alert status? It seems there hasn’t- but I could well be wrong.

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  Klonkie

Must admit I did expect to see a big DEFCON alert notice in the news, but then again its not a movie!

Klonkie
Klonkie
2 years ago
Reply to  James

it does seem a little odd though- no US reaction.

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  Klonkie

Maybes very calculated and not reacted to not escalate things.

John Hartley
John Hartley
2 years ago
Reply to  Klonkie

They did not want to wake Biden from his nap.

farouk
farouk
2 years ago

from the Ukraine Gov:

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  farouk

Hope that is accurate.

If so Javelin and NLAWS sales will be through the roof.

Paul.P
Paul.P
2 years ago

The numbers reconcile in a way. 900-1000 armoured vehicles @ 4-5 souls per vehicle….

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  Paul.P

A very, very sad statistic.

They will all have had loved ones.

The Ukrainians had no choice it was forced on them by Vlad The Mad.

What happens when they have lost 10k personnel?

Paul.P
Paul.P
2 years ago

Ukraine suffered the worst of the German atrocities in WW2 followed by a generation of living under the Soviet cosh. Gorbachev is reputed to have said that Chernobyl was perhaps the real reason the USSR collapsed. The Ukrainians know BS when they see it. They are clear eyed and would rather die than live a daily fearful β€˜existence’ under Russian rule. The last few days have also seen Germany and the EU snap out of their post war EU garden of Eden delusion. I would bet Putin expected Germany to be β€˜the weakest link’ as Anne Robinson would say. He… Read more Β»

Tams
Tams
2 years ago
Reply to  Paul.P

It must be starting to really hit some of the Russian soldiers on the ground.

From civilians trying to stop tanks, and women trying to give them sunflower seeds so that their bodies will help them grow, to that Russian Ukrainian telling them that even though he is Russian, that this is Ukraine and his home.

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  farouk

This are fantasy propaganda stats for 3 days war! Putin would have destroyed Ukraine if those figures were true . Even a modern well equipped army can’t bring such results ! Propaganda on both sides is going on! I won’t fall for both sides as this is not independently verified , plus the Ukraine official military was way more modest than those figures

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  James

I dont know, seeing how many videos of Ukrainian scrap metal dealers wheeling away both destroyed and non destroyed Russian armor I think the locals are doing a grand job at contributing to the figures!

mike Haran
mike Haran
2 years ago

Wonder how the Russia-Turkey relationship is holding it In Libya they are enemies, in Syria they are friends. Now it seems that in the Black Sea they are enemies
And then there is Israel which is now more blatant regarding its Russian Israeli cooperation in Syria.

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  mike Haran

Russia has stable relationship with Turkey, Turkey buys 33 percent of lts gas from Russia, and receives many tourist from there, and Turkey exports lots to Russia, and Turkish construction companies are very active in Russia. Russia is building 3 nuclear plants in Turkey due to be finished next year It has purchased S400 from Russia too . It has deep defence relationship with Ukraine , Turkey supplies drones with know how transfer and is building 4 Corvettes for Ukraine with know how transfer .Ukraine provides long range rocket tech and engine tech to Turkey . So Turkey wants no… Read more Β»

Last edited 2 years ago by James
Marked
Marked
2 years ago

Seeing the comparisons made to Hitler, the crazy thing is Mad Vlad has united nations to a degree even Hitler failed to achieve!

Even hard core neutrals Sweden and Switzerland have sided against him now.

Nice job Vlad, truly some achievement and something that will go down in history!

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  Marked

I wouldn’t be surprised if China turns if Vlad The Mad uses genocidal weapons.

James
James
2 years ago

Agreed that must be a red line for China, they seem very uncomfortable with the situation so far, if it escalates further it will be interesting to see how they calculate the relationship going forward.

Tams
Tams
2 years ago
Reply to  James

Yes. China haven’t shown their usual ‘wolf warrior’ diplomacy. It’s almost been normal diplomacy from them. That suggests that they aren’t confident with backing Russia at all.

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  Tams

I hope that is the case and then that may shine a light on how they will look at a Taiwan situation.

Also if Putin loses such an ally in China then he may start to realise how isolated he actually is.

farouk
farouk
2 years ago

Aid sent to the Ukraine as of yesterday: Canada is sending lethal military weaponry to Ukraine and loaning Kyiv half a billion Canadian dollars ($394 million) to help it defend itself. Berlin has broken a longstanding taboo of not exporting arms to conflict zones in vowing to send Ukraine 1,000 anti-tank weapons, 500 “Stinger” surface-to-air missiles and nine howitzers. It is also donating 14 armoured vehicles and 10,000 tonnes of fuel. Stockholm is also breaking its historic neutral stance to send 5,000 anti-tank rockets to Ukraine as well as field rations and body armour. It is the first time Sweden… Read more Β»

amin
amin
2 years ago
Reply to  farouk

If Ukraine can resist for a day or two, will it get the equipment? Can Ukraine win with this equipment? Can Ukraine survive until this equipment reaches him and not fall?

Jacko
Jacko
2 years ago
Reply to  amin

I wouldn’t be to sure that even if Kiev is taken that the Ukrainians are just going to roll over! Hopefully they will get the president out and carry on from somewhere else.

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  farouk

This idea Germany sends no weapons to conflict zones is blatant lie! They have sent weapons to Syria start of war ! And they armed the Saudis in Yemen . The sheer hypocrisy is beyond anything .

James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  James

Sending arms to conflict zones and the sale of weapons to states are not exactly the same thing.

Germany certainly had arms contracts with Syria that got signed well before the war started and the time lines do appear to cross over that they continued to supply some small arms after the civil war kicked off.

I dont believe Germany has supplied any arms at all to Saudi since 2018, or do you have evidence to suggest otherwise?

Combat_wombat
Combat_wombat
2 years ago

Question for the masses, I see that Ukraine has applied to join the EU, if its approved does that pave the way for European armies to become involved to defend a fellow member, and if one of those members happens to be NATO does that then drag NATO in too?

Last edited 2 years ago by Combat_wombat
James
James
2 years ago
Reply to  Combat_wombat

The EU has no military ! EU won’t bring Ukraine help, they misunderstood what the EU is. The EU said we will sanction Russia block it from EU airspace and territory? It’s interesting because the EU is not a country nor can ban airspace of sovereign member states , it’s up to individual countries under international laws . So they are using this conflict to expand their own federalist agenda acting as if the EU is one superstate which its not

Combat_wombat
Combat_wombat
2 years ago
Reply to  James

I think maybe I didn’t mean my comment clear, I didn’t mean European armies acting on behalf of the EU I meant armies of the European countries as individuals, say the German army, the French army etc. If they decide to come to the aid of ukraine under the guise of defending a fellow European Union member would that then drag NATO into a conflict

Albion
Albion
2 years ago

Does anyone know what the staus of the Ukrainian air force is. Has it/is it in action? Or has it been neutralised on the ground?

Andy
Andy
2 years ago

An interesting site to look at on Twitter is @oryxspionkop it gives an update of equipment losses and lots of videos. Seems Putin has bitten off more than he can chew. Looks like the Ukrainian drones are doing well including hitting a fuel supply train

James
James
2 years ago

NORTH KOREA has already ICBMs plus NATO would do nothing as Russia is a nuclear power! Sanctions only they would do. What is going in Ukraine reminds me of Iraq 2003 when the US destroyed it and nobody could stop them because the US is a nuclear power

Sid Morley
Sid Morley
2 years ago

Why are the Ukrainians not hitting the supply lines 40 km of supplies, If that was the Middle East there would be dozens of roadside IED’s waiting for them. Why not hit it with artillery sitting ducks

Last edited 2 years ago by Sid Morley
Gunbuster
Gunbuster
2 years ago
Reply to  Sid Morley

Bidding their time …to make it a really big target rich environment…

Ohhh how the Ukrainians must we wishing for a flight of A10s going Brrrr and Typhoons with a full brimstone load out….

Steve Salt
Steve Salt
2 years ago
Reply to  Gunbuster

I was thinking that this morning, A10 drivers would be licking their lips at that Russian convoy.

Tams
Tams
2 years ago
Reply to  Sid Morley

Maybe they have intel that the convey isn’t really going anywhere?

And if they know that the supply lines are disrupted/broken, then they know that they convoy can’t go very far. Plus, given the gridlock, it doesn’t look like the convoy can even get supplies to the front…

If so, they might just be able to keep hitting the supplies and wait it out. The vehicles can’t move without fuel, and the soldiers won’t last long without food.

amin
amin
2 years ago

Does Ukraine have a chance with that caravan, which of course is mostly fuel trucks? Of course, this caravan is a moving bomb

Steve
Steve
2 years ago

The Cherkassy Pocket was a brutal battle fought in the Ukraine in early 1944 when a German Army group was surrounded by the Red Army on the West Bank of Dneiper. One of the survivors from the Wallonie Brigade attached to the Viking SS Division wrote the account of the horror of what the Red Army did: running down fleeing soldiers and smashing them under their treads and castrating German prisoners and stringing them up on trees. Of course no war crimes trials were ever held for these atrocities.