BAE Systems and Embraer say they will explore potential defence variants for the Eve eVTOL aircraft.

In a news release received by the UK Defence Journal this morning, BAE Systems and Embraer Defense & Security have announced plans to embark on a joint study to explore the development of Eve’s electric Vertical Take Off and Landing (eVTOL) vehicle for the defence and security market.

“The joint study builds on Eve’s development for the urban air mobility market and will look at how the aircraft could provide cost-effective, sustainable and adaptable capability as a defence variant. Engineers from BAE Systems’ Air sector in Lancashire, UK, will work together with the Embraer Defense & Security team based in São José dos Campos, Brazil to explore how a defence variant could be used for a range of applications such as personnel transportation, surveillance and reconnaissance, disaster relief and humanitarian response.

Eve’s eVTOL could help to transform defence operations, whilst reducing their environmental impact – at a much lower operating cost than today’s platforms.”

Jackson Schneider, president and CEO, Embraer Defense & Security, was quoted as saying:

“This collaboration with one of the leading defence companies in the world on this exciting and game-changing technology is in line with our goal to establish strategic partnerships. We look forward to exploring more ways our two organisations can work together and benefit from those rich experiences and reputations. The collaboration allows us to tap into talent from across the globe in our shared interest to develop innovative and sustainable solutions for the skies.”

Ian Muldowney, Chief Operating Officer, BAE Systems Air sector, said:

“Bringing together Embraer’s innovative technology in the commercial sector with our extensive defence engineering and systems integration experience will help us to accelerate the pace of new innovations. This joint study is a great example of how we’re delivering against our commitment to collaborate to explore new and sustainable technologies for our customers.”

The all-electric aircraft is part of Embraer’s commitment towards more sustainable aviation and has come out of Eve, an independent company dedicated to accelerating the global Urban Air Mobility (UAM) ecosystem.

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

46 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

David Barry
David Barry (@guest_602690)
2 years ago

I’m fascinated. As we move from fossil fuels to renewables – can we really generate enough electricity without nuclear?

Mike
Mike (@guest_602704)
2 years ago
Reply to  David Barry

No. Not currently. Need new nuclear and small nuclear online ASAP until fusion comes along.

Renewable energy is not currently mature nor consistent to provide all our needs. That is not excusing the lack of 3nergy efficiency we have in the UK. How much balance of trade payments / emissions, could we reduce if insulated all the hard to heat homes rather than just on benefits? How much could we improve if suv’s weren’t fashionable etc

David Barry
David Barry (@guest_602725)
2 years ago
Reply to  Mike

Politics – I’d like Defence to have an inflation adjusted budget of 3% GDP wirh a vote of 95% to change it; equally, future energy needs a similar deal.

Now, how to keep the NHS truly public but strip costs to pay for everything else.

Do you have a good envelope?

simon alexander
simon alexander (@guest_602738)
2 years ago
Reply to  Mike

Mike, how about insulating low income homes, save fuel & improve lives. think the germans committed an eco crime by turning off their nuclear power stations and now need Putin’s gas line.

Mike
Mike (@guest_602740)
2 years ago

I would insulate ALL homes. Those on benefits can normally get assistance whilst thise with slightly different circumstances, even on lower household income, might be living in the same style hone but as not receiving any benefit they don’t qualify for assistance. Cost of insulating all homes will be offset by reduction in importing energy.

Agree re Germany commuting eco disaster by turning off nuclear as they moved to Putins gas or local brown (really nasty( coal

geoff
geoff (@guest_602850)
2 years ago

Agree about the German Nuclear shutdown. Complete overreaction to the Japanese disaster. The lesson from that should have been-don’t build these plants in highly unstable environments such as Japan where big Earthquakes are a certainty

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_602897)
2 years ago
Reply to  geoff

Hi Geoff the problem is that there are not that many nuclear piles in the world ( compared to other power stations) and they have had a low but steady rate of catastrophic failures for a number of reasons. Now A big part of my job is to look at safety within complex and chaotic systems and I know one thing. Even the best constructed systems fail and you must aways ask yourself are you willing to take the consequences of that failure. One thing that is always a challenge in my line of work ( to get people to… Read more »

geoff
geoff (@guest_602930)
2 years ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Hi Jonathan. Wow-if you are involved in looking at the possibilities that follow Nuclear plant failures then no wonder you are pessimistic! Also agree there is no proper long term solution to Nuclear waste-in real terms it is ‘Forever’. Perhaps a half way station as with the small RR nuclear systems-hedging benefit against risk must be easier there? Also ,even how advanced artificial intelligence becomes and how near perfect are robots, they will never have that extraordinary flexibility that the human mind posseses but as you say, humans fail and that will always be an inalienable truth.

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_602944)
2 years ago
Reply to  geoff

Hi Geoff, lucky for me I get to look at failures of healthcare systems and providers. But as all industries share what we call “human factors”, learning, control systems, risk management as well a things like the study of special and common cause variations we tend to share learning and study failures across different complex systems and fields ( so I pay as much attention to what learning I can get from Hinckley, shipping disasters and aviation ect as I do from cases like shipman or the management of covid outbreaks). The thing is as you noted the human factor… Read more »

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_602778)
2 years ago
Reply to  Mike

Hi Mike that’s not entirely true, we are one nation that could under present technology be 100% supplied by green energy. We have 31,000km of coastline which is just one great big energy supply. Wave energy density is around 30kw per meter of wave. It’s more a lack of bravery that has held back wave power as it’s basically pretty basic with around five mechanical ways of waves driving a turbine ( it’s not rocket science like solar or fusion). Tidal barrages are very old tec and a great way to go ( you can have some environmental impact, but… Read more »

Sean
Sean (@guest_602825)
2 years ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Assuming ITER goes as planned without any hitches, it’s 2048 before it’s successor DEMO is scheduled to demonstrate commercial electricity generation. Given the delays experiences so far, 2048 would seem optimistic. Using current technology for generating electricity from wave and tidal sources the cost is 3 times that of offshore wind. Solar is also a more cost-effective form. This is why there there has been little investment in this area. (Not overlooking the huge environmental impact of giant tidal barrages.) SMRs offer the best hope for meeting the energy gap between renewables and the UK’s requirements. The large fission plants… Read more »

geoff
geoff (@guest_602852)
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

Hi Sean. The one major problem with large scale generation of solar power in the crowded UK as Jonathan points out, is the loss to agriculture of the land required. However here in Durban the local MAN plant(the German heavy truck MAN) generates virtually its entire needs from roof top panels fitted to every square metre of their extensive factory footprint. Now there is a solution to the loss of space elsewhere-basically no additional room required. Obviously better suited to new construction where monopitch roofs can be constructed on buildings to face due South(North here😉)

Last edited 2 years ago by geoff
Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_602907)
2 years ago
Reply to  geoff

Hi Geoff, yes that should be the way forward for solar, smaller sub commercial generation using the dead space on roof tops etc.

Clearly some parts of the world have the right environment for commercial solar. Especially if the area is not much use for any other purpose ( desert etc).

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_602903)
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

Hi Sean, interesting on the small nuclear reactor, to be honest I’ve not explored the safety/risk case around them in the same way I have with large commercial reactors, so I can’t comment on that. With tidal, barrage generators tend to come in very cheap per KWh compared to other “clean energy”. But they have a large capital cost, so a nation needs to look at cost over lifetime. Look at the business case and longer term envoromental impact studies around the La Rance barrier, it’s in it 50th decade, produces very cheap clean power ( at around 10p KWh)… Read more »

Grim
Grim (@guest_602980)
2 years ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Hi Jonathan, the UK government rejected tidal barrages in Swansea Bay a couple of years ago because the Levelised Cost of Electricity (LCOE) was nowhere near competitive on the UK grid, and that accounts for it’s whole lifecycle cost. From memory it was around £120/MWh which is well beyond even Hinkley at £92.50. From an environmental point of view I have no issue with the idea of tidal lagoons (if they can be built economically), but a barrage across the entire Severn Estuary impacts a massive ecosystem when compared to the size of La Rance. It is also a rare… Read more »

Tams
Tams (@guest_602844)
2 years ago
Reply to  Jonathan

We cannot currently be supplied with 100% green energy 100% of the time, and that’s all that matters. We also have no more capacity to store renewable energy using reservoirs, unless you want to fight people over flooding their valleys. Batteries (chemical and hydrogen) are and will be used to store excess generation, but the scale needed to support an entire country wholly is not really viable. And that’s not even taking into account future electricity demands if more things go electric (or hydrogen – also requiring electricity). Fossil fuels are incredibly energy dense, so that’s an awful lot of… Read more »

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_602911)
2 years ago
Reply to  Tams

Hi Tams The point is we cannot produce 100% green power all the time, because we have not created the generating or storage capacity. We can if we wanted to make the capital expenditures. But government does not like making capital expenditures that don’t pay off in term and power companies need a profit now, not in 2 decades. tidal power is completely predictable and reliable( baring catastrophic failure). So we would know exactly what power we could get at anyone time from any barrages and tidal stations we built. local solar ( on roofs) again is reliable in the… Read more »

geoff
geoff (@guest_602851)
2 years ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Great post Jonathan. There is as I am sure you know, a tidal power generator in County Down NI near Donaghadee where my cousin resides(also has one of the oldest ports and pubs in the UK) 😉

David
David (@guest_602705)
2 years ago
Reply to  David Barry

With current technology, I doubt it. Hence the importance of RR’s small modular reactors……

David Barry
David Barry (@guest_602724)
2 years ago
Reply to  David

I don’t but into that – where I reside at the moment is a favoured location for a nuclear waste repository – now if the Mendips and Chilterns would take one each, I’m sure people would acquiesce but somehow, not sure they would.

geoff
geoff (@guest_602853)
2 years ago
Reply to  David Barry

Morning David. Yes the nuclear waste issue is a problem that won’t go away-again especially in the crowded UK. I think the perfect illustration of this is the lines of decommissioned nuclear subs stacking up in Scotland. The Americans have their huge Desert facility and again here in SA we have vast open spaces in the Northern Cape that would do waste and solar panels. What of the logistics of shipping to say Ascension-the island is virtually uninhabited and with a trashed environment with almost all of its indigenous vegetation long gone. Would be ideal

Chris
Chris (@guest_602707)
2 years ago
Reply to  David Barry

This is indeed a fascinating subject. On the subject of your generation question. The short answer is no. I read a report a couple of years ago by an engineering professor and green energy advocate, who set out to take an honest look at the future of energy generation in the UK. I’ll see if I can find a link, it was very interesting. One thing that stuck out for me was that he said we could put one wind turbine on every square mile of the UK mainland and still not meet baseload requirements for the whole country. While… Read more »

David Barry
David Barry (@guest_602723)
2 years ago
Reply to  Chris

The problem is the disposal – requisition the Falkland Islands to take one for the Team?

geoff
geoff (@guest_602854)
2 years ago
Reply to  David Barry

Wrong island David!! Ascension would be perfect.

David Barry
David Barry (@guest_602868)
2 years ago
Reply to  geoff

I wonder what the grown ups think? How long has the nuclear sub decommissioning exercise been going on?

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_602946)
2 years ago
Reply to  geoff

I vote for the Isle of Wight.

geoff
geoff (@guest_603063)
2 years ago
Reply to  Jonathan

😳I am sure you would have overwhelming support from the Wightians Jonathan😂

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_603082)
2 years ago
Reply to  geoff

We would pay them a sort of “ fucked up your island” payment obvs. Keep them in 🍺🍺 so they don’t notice all the ☠️☠️ Signs.

Farouk
Farouk (@guest_602714)
2 years ago
Reply to  David Barry

Iceland gets all its electricity by Geo Thermal, currently there is no such power station in the U.K., but that said one is set to start generating power in Redruth anytime now. interestingly the project started with £1.4 grant from the Government , which was followed by a grant in 2011 by the EU for £6 million, which they took back after the project couldn’t find a originate company to back them. In 2017 they crowdfunded the project to a tune of £4 Million which they achieved after a fortnight. Personally I feel there is a huge potential for the… Read more »

Last edited 2 years ago by Farouk
David Barry
David Barry (@guest_602722)
2 years ago
Reply to  Farouk

Do we actually have any ‘geysers’ ? I spoke with a developer in Latvia and he said heat pumps were great for 5 years but then packed up… I’m not an engineer… and to be dug out and replaced.

He actually spent a shoite load on self contained insulated housing as he believed that was the way forward.

Gareth
Gareth (@guest_602731)
2 years ago
Reply to  David Barry

Nearest we have is probably Bath, but the water there varies from ~70-90 degrees C. Not really hot enough for geothermal power generation, at least at the surface anyway.

Gunbuster
Gunbuster (@guest_602777)
2 years ago
Reply to  Gareth

Geothermal was tried in Southampton some decades ago via a borehole. It was close to the station I think…

Gareth
Gareth (@guest_602728)
2 years ago
Reply to  Farouk

Geothermal power is great if your territory happens to have the required thermal gradient below ground. We have it in a few places such as Redruth, as mentioned above, but Iceland has a much higher geothermal potential owing to it’s fairly unique geology. A lower thermal gradient requires the water circulation systems to be buried much deeper before temperatures greater than boiling point can be reached whereas for many places in Iceland its relatively near the surface.

Lee1
Lee1 (@guest_602741)
2 years ago
Reply to  David Barry

Yes, there is a vast amount of wind solar and hydro energy. Many times the amount that we could ever need. It is estimated that offshore wind power alone has the potential to supply 18 times the current world power usage with current technology

Tams
Tams (@guest_602845)
2 years ago
Reply to  Lee1

Is that taking into account people refusing power generation in their area (and the local MP backing them up to keep their votes), and the drastic increase in demand for electricity that shifting from fossil fuels would cause?

Lee1
Lee1 (@guest_602873)
2 years ago
Reply to  Tams

As far as I am aware that figure is based on global electricity demand. So it includes fossil fuel powered generation. Obviously demand will increase with the move to electric transportation however not by as much as you may think (mainly due to the massive increase in efficiency that electric transport enjoys). National Grid did a study into future generation needs and found that if everyone in the UK swapped to an EV overnight then we would need just a 10% increase in generation capacity… So it is safe to say that there is plenty of wind power potential available… Read more »

David Barry
David Barry (@guest_602720)
2 years ago

People! Thank you so much for replying and an incredibly interesting topic – which you guys have opened up with your replies.

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_603133)
2 years ago
Reply to  David Barry

I do love a good conversation around green energy and nuclear power, I’m so sad really.

David Barry
David Barry (@guest_603135)
2 years ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Enough grown ups have replied bud – engage with them.

Mrmauricemurphy@gmail.com
[email protected] (@guest_602748)
2 years ago

I would like to see any of these aircraft properly tested rather than telling us what they will be able to do. Build a full sized one and let’s see what it can do!

Airborne
Airborne (@guest_602768)
2 years ago

There’s a few 40mm cannons and turrets knocking about we can glue on the bugger!

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_603148)
2 years ago
Reply to  Airborne

BAE are good at glueing stuff together. We should ask them.

JOHNT
JOHNT (@guest_602781)
2 years ago

Just looking at the hypothetical specs. 1000 kilo MTOW. 240 Kph (150mph) 96 km (60 mile) range. Compare that to a Robinson R66 which has a similar passenger capacity. MTOW 1225 kilo, similar speed, 650km (350 mile range). Other than short range air taxi I can’t see much use for it given the range restrictions.

geoff
geoff (@guest_602855)
2 years ago
Reply to  JOHNT

Also the nagging doubt-the image of an electric car being recharged from a station via a Diesel generator!!! But of course here in SA(sorry to keep punting the local) we have a large hydro power complex in the Drakensberg mountain area whereby water gravitated down from the Sterkfontein dam supplies energy and in the off peak period is pumped back up again to continue the cycle. I know it sounds counter intuitive-no such thing as a perpetual motion machine, but it uses surplus electricity that would otherwise be wasted. My description is crude but I am sure Google can give… Read more »

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_603134)
2 years ago
Reply to  geoff

Some electric car actually have petrol engines to recharge the batteries….. always considered that a bit shall we say um odd.

Johan
Johan (@guest_603557)
2 years ago

i have enough Charge worry, driving to the supermarket and back and my feet don’t leave the ground. Man-Made fuels better option