Bell Textron Inc has announced a new rotorcraft, the Bell 360 Invictus.

The aircraft serves as the company’s entrant for the U.S. Army’s Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft (FARA) Competitive Prototype programme.

“The Bell 360 will deliver advanced battlefield situational awareness, as well as lethal options, in support of the maneuver force at an affordable cost” said Vince Tobin, executive vice president of Military Business at Bell in a news release.

“The multi-domain fight will be complex, and our team is delivering a highly capable, low-risk solution to confidently meet operational requirements with a sustainable fleet.”

The Bell 360 Invictus’ design, say the firm, emphasises  proven technologies to fulfill the Army’s FARA requirements at an affordable cost and on schedule.

“One example is the Invictus’ rotor system. This design is based on Bell’s 525 Relentless rotor system which has been tested and proven at speeds in excess of 200 Knots True Air Speed (KTAS). By incorporating proven designs and the best available technologies from commercial and military programs, Bell delivers a low-risk path to a FARA program of record.”

Some of the key 360 Invictus features include:

  • Speed: Greater than 185 KTAS
  • Combat radius: 135 nm with more than 90 minutes of time on station
  • Achieves 4k/95F Hover Out of Ground Effect (HOGE)
  • Armed with a 20 mm cannon, integrated munitions launcher with ability to integrate air-launched effects, and future weapons, as well as current inventory of munitions
2019-10-01 Bell 360 Invictus 2.jpg

“Bell is committed to providing the U.S. Army with the most affordable, most sustainable, least complex, and lowest risk solution among the potential FARA configurations, while meeting all requirements,” said Keith Flail, vice president of Advanced Vertical Lift Systems at Bell.

“360 Invictus is an exciting opportunity for us to continue our support of Army modernization. This is the next solution to ensure soldiers have the best equipment available for the multi-domain fight.”

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
26 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cam
Cam
11 months ago

Looks nice and it’s faster than Apache, but I’ve always loved the Apache, oh and Air wolf obviously, who doesn’t that gun ship can take out nations.

DaveyB
DaveyB
11 months ago
Reply to  Cam

Don’t forget whisper mode and engage the burners to go supersonic….

Cam
Cam
11 months ago
Reply to  DaveyB

Lol

dan
dan
11 months ago
Reply to  DaveyB

One of my favorite shows as a kid.

Andy P
Andy P
11 months ago
Reply to  Cam

Based on a true story too…..

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
11 months ago
Reply to  Andy P

Airwolf was based on?

Pipkin45
Pipkin45
11 months ago

Looks like the Boeing- Sikorsky RAH-66 Comanche

spyintheskyuk
spyintheskyuk
11 months ago
Reply to  Pipkin45

Yes I was going to say it looks very familiar and that was the bird I had in mind. Seems like Boeing didn’t burn the blueprints then when it was cancelled all those years ago and perhaps passed them on or is it just coincidence? Trouble is (assuming it has the same heritage) it might make it cheaper but generally the more you try to bring an older design up to date it often loses most, or all of that advantage as you wrestle with inbuilt limitations to adapting to a new world, while rarely matching newer concepts designed from… Read more »

Steve Salt
Steve Salt
11 months ago
Reply to  spyintheskyuk

Definately from the RAH 66 bloodline.

DaveyB
DaveyB
11 months ago

Bell have been very clever with their proposal. Rather than going down the risky tilt-rotor, co-axial or convertiplane route, they’ve opted for the traditional route. This is to keep costs down but also for its simplicity. One of the US Army’s Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft (FARA) requirements is that the aircraft must be able to sustain a speed of 200kts. The aircraft that the Invictus is based on is the Bell 525, which has managed 229, but that wasn’t a sustained speed. Bell are being a bit coy on how the aircraft will be able to do these speeds. Traditionally,… Read more »

James Harrington
James Harrington
11 months ago
Reply to  DaveyB

That was very helpful, excellent even. Did you write that from personal knowledge or research, either way good read, thanks.

DaveyB
DaveyB
11 months ago

Personal knowledge as I’m in the trade. The Airbus X3 is going in the right direction for simplicity and speed. It’ll be interesting to see what they do after the X3.

James Harrington
James Harrington
11 months ago
Reply to  DaveyB

Thanks. In Somerset?

DaveyB
DaveyB
11 months ago

Hampshire, at present.

BV Buster
BV Buster
11 months ago

+1, great info, well written. What got the RAH-66 Comanche cancelled was the cost mixed with complexity and use of emerging bleeding edge technologies. You can learn so much about a product from what lines the sales bod has been told to regurgitate. “Bell is committed to providing the U.S. Army with the most affordable, most sustainable, least complex, and lowest risk solution among the potential FARA configurations, while meeting all requirements,” Translation: (key capabilities in priority order), Cheap to buy, cheap to run, not complex and mature. Its almost like they used the Comanche project as a blueprint on… Read more »

spyintheskyuk
spyintheskyuk
11 months ago
Reply to  BV Buster

My memory seems to have fragments of thoughts that the Comanche was not the only advanced helicopter that totally got out of control back in the day they really got burnt fingers with trying to push the envelope beyond the possible at an affordable price even for them. The Cheyenne comes to mind I did love that copter I must say that I had forgotten it had a pusher propellor till just looking it up, so seems the Comanche isn’t the only one to die but have an influence on design some years later.

Willful Murder
Willful Murder
11 months ago
Reply to  DaveyB

Wow! Very informative! thanks for sharing

Mogs
Mogs
11 months ago

Have Bell been to any DOD surplus sales recently?….. It looks very much like the Boeing/Sikorsky RAH-66 Comanche. I’m surprised the future Apache concept that was came out a few months back doesn’t resemble it more.

I assume this offering from Bell is to replace the OH58 Kiowa’s. nice looking aircraft but I have to say the graphic representations make it look very James Cameron’s Avatar-esqe. I wonder how long before we see some contractors concepts of the Aerospatiale SA-2 “Samson” & AT-99 “Scorpion” Gunships that featured in the film.

Herodotus
11 months ago

Why only a 20mm canon?

Elliott
Elliott
11 months ago
Reply to  Herodotus

Gun is likely gun a carry over from the Cobra which Bell still makes and could install with the least risk.

John Walker
John Walker
11 months ago
Reply to  Elliott

A better write up of the Bell proposal is at: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/30136/no-bells-invictus-armed-scout-helicopter-isnt-stealth-but-it-aims-to-be-fast-and-cheap – also touches on the cannon selection. In short this is the same canon that was proposed for the RAH-66 Comanche and is being provided GFE to each of the FARA candidates.

Dave G
Dave G
11 months ago
Reply to  Herodotus

FARA is to be an armed recce helicopter with a light attack capability not a full on attack helo to replace apache. It probably doesn’t need a heavier gun.

I would also assume a larger caliber will also be bigger and heavier (including ammo) which will have significant performance and integration issues, particularly if you have to recess it for aerodynamic and stealth considerations….

Russjm
Russjm
11 months ago

Why am I thinking Comanche the sequel – the plot will go something like:
•We want it, we want it, we want it, we want i and now!
How much ?
We don’t need it – stand back from the door sir. Slam!!!

Lordtemplar
Lordtemplar
11 months ago

Love the looks, however at an estimated $30m per unit, compared to a Kiowa at $5m really makes me question the usefuleness of this concept. For that price may as well buy new Apaches which have more armor and firepower. Furthermore, they have just bougth Lakota that can be fitted with optics, guns etc.. for a fraction of the price. Seems like another wasteful US Army project which really brings nothing new except an arbitrary speed requirement of 200kts. I guess some bureaucrats at the Pentagon must justify their job titles.

Elliott
Elliott
11 months ago
Reply to  Lordtemplar

The Kiowa only cost that much because it was a existing system being upgraded not a new development program. In addition $5m in 1990 is worth approximately $9.6m today.

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
11 months ago

looks like a good replacement for the cobra, a traditional design though- I think the Raider-X might win it for superior high altitude and cruise/ top speed performance.